Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:55:12.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting the Mercator World Map of 1569: an Assessment of Navigational Accuracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2016

Joaquim Alves Gaspar
Joaquim Alves Gaspar*
Affiliation:
(Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia, University of Lisbon, Portugal)
*
(E-mail: alvesgaspar@netcabo.pt)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An assessment of the navigational accuracy of the Mercator world map of 1569 is made, aimed at better understanding how the information was adapted from the contemporary cartography. At the time the map was engraved, navigational charts were constructed on the basis of astronomically-observed latitudes, magnetic courses and estimated distances between places. Before this information could be incorporated into the new world map it should be first transformed in such a way that the longitudinal spacings between places were restored to their correct values, as defined on the surface of the Earth. The question of whether Mercator performed such transformations or just considered that the positions were approximately correct has hitherto never been addressed in the literature. It is demonstrated in this article that Mercator was not fully aware of the complexity of the contemporary charts – which he considered to implicitly comprise a square grid of meridians and parallels – and that all planimetric information was directly imported to the novel world map without correction. It is further shown that the Mercator projection was not compatible with the navigational methods of the time.

Keywords

Mercator projectionHistory of CartographyMercator world map of 1569Cartometric analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 69 , Issue 6 , November 2016 , pp. 1183 - 1196
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Broecke, M. van den (2010). The Significance of Language: The Texts on the Verso of the Maps in Abraham Ortelius, Theatrum orbis terrarium. Imago Mundi, 60, 2, 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, J.A. (2007). The Myth of the Square Chart’. e-Perimetron, 2–2, 66–79.Google Scholar
Gaspar, J.A. (2010). From the Portolan Chart of the Mediterranean to the Latitude Chart of the Atlantic: Cartometric Analysis and Modelling. Lisbon, Unpublished doctoral thesis, 26–34.Google Scholar
Gaspar, J.A. (2012). Blunders, Errors and Entanglements: Scrutinizing the Cantino Planisphere with a Cartometric Eye. Imago Mundi, 64, 2, 184–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, J.A. and Leitão, H. (2013). Squaring the Circle: How Mercator Constructed his Projection in 1569. Imago Mundi, 66, 1, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar, J.A. (2013). From the Portolan Chart to the Latitude Chart: The silent cartographic revolution. Cartes & Géomatique , Revue du Comité Français de Cartographie, 216, 67–77.Google Scholar
Leitão, H. and Gaspar, J.A. (2014). Globes, Rhumb Tables, and the Pre-History of the Mercator Projection. Imago Mundi, 66, 2, 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercator, G. (1932), Text and translations of the legends of the original chart of the world by Gerhard Mercator issued in 1569. Hydrographic Review 9, 2, 7–45.Google Scholar
Nunes, P. (2002). Obras. Vol. I, Tratado da Sphera. Lisboa, Academia das Ciências de Lisboa; Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, [Lisbon, 1537].Google Scholar
Nunes, P. (2008). Obras. Vol. IV, De arte Atque Ratione Navigandi. Lisboa, Academia das Ciências de Lisboa; Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian [Basel, 1566].Google Scholar
Robinson, A.H., Morrison, J.L., Muehrcke, P.C., Kimerling, A.J. and Guptill, S.C. (1995). Elements of Cartography, Sixth Edition. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar