Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:16:42.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stabilizing the Radar Picture and ARPA Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Bernhard Berking  and
Joachim Pfeiffer
Bernhard Berking
Affiliation:
(Fachhochschule Hamburg)
Joachim Pfeiffer
Affiliation:
(Atlas Elektronik)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Radar and ARPA are used both for anti-collision purposes and for navigational purposes. The requirements for ‘ground-stabilization for navigation’ and ‘sea-stabilization for collision-avoidance’ seem to exclude each other. Since the development of True Motion radar (TM), there is the need for an input of Own Ship's velocity. Since then, the mode of velocity input and, consequently, the mode of stabilization have been the subject of controversy. The problem became even more important by the introduction of ARPA, by the use of video map overlays and by the introduction of complex integrated navigation systems including radar.

Keywords

1. Radar.2. Charts.3. Collision avoidance.4. Electronic charts.
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 29 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1IMO Resolution A.42 2 (XI) Performance Standards for Automatic Radar Plotting Aids (ARPA).Google Scholar
2IMO Resolution A.478 (XII) Performance Standards for Devices to indicate Speed and Distance.Google Scholar
3IMO Resolutions A.278 (VIII) und A.477 (XII) Performance Standards for Navigational Radar Equipment.Google Scholar
4Burger, W. (1993). Radar Observer's Handbook for Merchant Navy Officers, 8th Edition. Brown, Son & Ferguson Ltd, Glasgow.Google Scholar
5Hughes, T. (1990). The True Picture. 6th International Radar & Navigation Lecturers Conference, St Malo.Google Scholar
6Bole, A. G. and Jones, K. D. (1988). Automatic Radar Plotting Aids Manual. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
7Lübbers, H. D. (1985). True Motion-Radar, See- oder Bodenstabilisierung? HANSA-Schiffahrt- Schiffbau-Hafen Nr. 23, S.2414–2416.Google Scholar
8Harre, I. (1985). Fahrteinspeisung in TM-Radargerdte und ARPA. HANSA-Schiffahrt-Schiffbau- Hafen Nr. 22, S.2325–2327.Google Scholar
9DGON Maritime Commission (1993). Study Super imposition of ECDIS and Radar/ARPA, Version 2, p. 1–69.Google Scholar
10DGON(1993). Superimposition ofECDIS and Radar/ARPA Displays. This Journal 46, 138.Google Scholar
11 Subcommittee on Safety of Navigation Nav 40/5. Navigational Aids and Related Equipment, Report of the Technical Working Group, Section 3 and Annex 3.Google Scholar
12 DIN/IEC 872 (1987–9). Automatische Radar-Plotthilfen für die Seeschiffahrt (ARPA).Google Scholar
13IMO (1977). International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS).Google Scholar
14RIN Working Party (1967). Guidance on manoeuvres to avoid collisions. This Journal, 20, 106.Google Scholar
15Majohr, J. (1979). Leitfaden der Navigation: volume Technische Systeme der Navigation. VEB Transpress Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
16IMO NAV 39/31 (1993). Report to the Maritime Safety Committee Draft Assembly Resolution (Section 4 and Annex 6) Performance Standards for ECDIS.Google Scholar
17 Det Norske Veritas (1991). Rules for Classification of Steel Ships.Google Scholar