Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T07:16:55.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the EGM2008 model of Earth's gravitational field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

Don Koks Open the ORCID record for Don Koks [Opens in a new window]
Don Koks*
Affiliation:
Defence Science and Technology Group, P.O. Box 1500, Edinburgh, South Australia 5111, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: don.koks@defence.gov.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Earth Gravity Model 2008 (EGM2008) is now some years old, and yet information on how to use it to calculate Earth's gravity remains obscure outside the field of geodesy. We describe the mathematics necessary to implement EGM2008, and use this to discuss several points of the model: its sensitivity to the number of spherical harmonics being summed, nuances and a trap for physicists and mathematicians in the normalisation it uses, and a comparison with other work. We conclude that one must not overestimate the precision shown by a global-fit model such as EGM2008.

Keywords

EGM2008Earth gravityEarth potentialassociated Legendre functionsspherical harmonics

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 75 , Issue 5 , September 2022 , pp. 1017 - 1034
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Navigation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chatfield, A. B. (1997). Fundamentals of High Accuracy Inertial Navigation. Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. See equation (7.35).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. C. W. (1984). Quantum Mechanics. 1st ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. See Appendix 1.Google Scholar
Featherstone, W. and Dentith, M. (1997). A geodetic approach to gravity data reduction for geophysics. Computers & Geosciences, 23, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M. (1994). Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. 5th ed. San Diego, California: Academic Press Inc. For my (2.6), see paragraph 8${\cdot }$910 eqn 2 and paragraph 8${\cdot }$752 eqn 1, and see also paragraph 8${\cdot }$810. For (2.7), see their paragraph 8${\cdot }$914 eqn 1. For (2.11), see their paragraph 7${\cdot }$112 eqn 1.Google Scholar
Hofmann–Wellenhof, B. and Moritz, H. (2006). Physical Geodesy. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. A. and Featherstone, W. E. (2002). A unified approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very high degree and order normalised associated Legendre functions. Journal of Geodesy, 76, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karney. (2020). See https://geographiclib.sourceforge.io/C++/doc/index.html. For my discussion of the geocentric latitude, see https://geographiclib.sourceforge.io/C++/doc/auxlat.html.Google Scholar
Li, X. (2018). Using radial basis functions in airborne gravimetry for local geoid improvement. Journal of Geodesy, 92, 471–485. doi:10.1007/s00190-017-1074-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. and Götze, H.-J. (2001). Ellipsoid, geoid, gravity, geodesy, and geophysics. Geophysics, 66(6), 1660–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moritz, H. (2000). Geodetic Reference System 1980. Journal of Geodesy, 74(1), 128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NASA Report NASA SP-365 Part 1. (1977). Godard Space Flight Center, National Geodetic Satellite Program.Google Scholar
NGA. (2021). These coefficients are held in the file EGM2008_to2190_TideFree in the download link called ‘EGM2008 Spherical Harmonics (104 MB)’ at https://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/update/index.php?action=home. The coefficients that I have labelled $C^{\text {EGM}}_{nm}$, $S^{\text {EGM}}_{nm}$ in (2.1) are the third and fourth elements, respectively, of row number $n(n+1)/2 - 2 + m$ of this file.Google Scholar
NGA Document NGA.STND.0036_1.0.0_WGS84. (2014). National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, US Department of Defense, Version 1.0.0.Google Scholar
Pavlis, N., Holmes, S., Kenyon, S. and Factor, J. (2012). The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, B04406.10.1029/2011JB008916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siouris, G. M. (2009). Gravity modeling in aerospace applications. Aerospace Science and Technology, 13, 301–315. See pages 304 and 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Naval Research Laboratory (2021). Available at: https://github.com/USNavalResearchLaboratory/TrackerComponentLibraryGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. et al. (2016). An online gravity modeling method applied for high-precision free-INS. Sensors, 2016(16), 1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, R. et al. (2016). Gravity compensation using EGM2008 for high-precision long-term inertial navigation systems. Sensors, 2016(16), 2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar