Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:42:36.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Vessel's Mathematical Model and its Real Counterpart: A Comparative Methodology Based on a Real-world Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2016

Krzysztof Czaplewski  and
Piotr Zwolan
Krzysztof Czaplewski*
Affiliation:
(Gdynia Maritime University, Poland)
Piotr Zwolan
Affiliation:
(Polish Naval Academy)
*
(E-mail: krzysztof@czaplewski.pl)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Navigation and manoeuvring simulators are increasingly being used in research centres to conduct complex navigation experiments and analyses. The structure and capabilities of simulation software make it possible to reproduce any conditions, including weather conditions. The complex mathematical models of marine environmental conditions that are being implemented nowadays take into account various sea wave models, which makes simulation tests more realistic. This paper deals with issues related to evaluating and verifying vessel simulation models based on real-world studies. As a result of the present research project, a methodology for comparing vessel simulation models with their real-life counterparts was developed. A measurement platform was created for the purpose of carrying out real-world studies; it is available at the Institute of Marine Navigation and Hydrography of the Polish Naval Academy. One important research step involved developing a procedural algorithm for making real-world measurements. This paper presents the results of using this platform in comparative tests of the manoeuvring elements of real and simulated vessels.

Keywords

SimulationVessel models
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 69 , Issue 6 , November 2016 , pp. 1379 - 1392
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abkowitz, M.A. (1964). Lectures on ship hydrodynamics - Steering and manoeuvrability, Report no. Hy-5. Hydrodynamics Department, Hydro- and Aerodynamics Laboratory, Lyngby, Denmark.Google Scholar
American Bureau of Shipping (ABoS). (2006). Guide for Vessel Maneuverability. Houston, USA.Google Scholar
Czaplewski, K. and Zwolan, P. (2009). Navigational and Maneuvering Simulator Components Used to Design Infrastructure of the Harbor. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, Poland.Google Scholar
Czaplewski, K. and Zwolan, P. (2014). Struktura modelu matematycznego symulatora nawigacyjno-manewrowego. Logistyka, No. 6/2014. ISSN 1231-5478. Poland.Google Scholar
Michel, W.H. (1999). Sea Spectra Revisited. Marine Technology, Vol. 36, No. 4, Winter 1999.Google Scholar
Montewka, J. and Gucma, M. (2006). Podstawy morskiej nawigacji inercyjnej. Maritime University of Szczecin, Poland.Google Scholar
National Marine Electronics Association (NMEA). (2002). NMEA 0183 – Standard for Interfacing Marine Electronic Devices.Google Scholar
Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute (NMTRI). (2013). Harsh – weather tests of lifeboats. Marintek No. 2/2013, Norway.Google Scholar
Specialist Committee on Waves (SCoW). (2002). Final Report and Recommendations to the 23rd ITTC. Proceedings of the 23rd International Towing Tank Conference - Volume II.Google Scholar
Spitzer, S. (2009). NMEA 2000 – Past, Present and Future. RTCM 2009 Annual Conference, St. Petersburg, Florida.Google Scholar
Transas Marine. (2011a). Navi-Trainer Pro 5000 Ship Motion Model. Saint Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
Transas Marine. (2011b). Navi-Trainer Pro 5000 Ship Mathematical Model. Saint Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar