Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:32:48.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Undernutrition and anaemia among Indian adolescents: role of dietary diversity and hygiene practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2023

Mukesh Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
Pratap Chandra Mohanty*
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
*
*Corresponding author: Pratap Chandra Mohanty, email pratap.mohanty@hs.iitr.ac.in

Abstract

In 2021, the Lancet Commission on adolescent nutrition highlighted the need to prioritise the elimination of adolescent malnutrition to tap the human capital potential and break the intergenerational malnutrition trap. The nutritional requirement during adolescence reaches its peak. The present study aims to appraise the prevalence of undernutrition (stunting and thinness) and anaemia among adolescents (10–19 years) in India and the role of socioeconomic, individual-level hygiene behaviour and dietary diversity in nutritional outcomes. We have used the nationally representative Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS-2016–18) that covers children and adolescents (0–19 years) in India. The prevalence of stunting, anaemia and thinness among adolescents was 27⋅2, 28⋅5 and 24⋅1 %, respectively. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were applied to estimate the likelihood of undernutrition. The likelihood of stunting was higher for late adolescence (OR 1⋅21, 95 % CI 1⋅15, 1⋅27), low dietary diversity (OR 1⋅37, 95 % CI 1⋅26, 1⋅49) and low hygiene behaviour compliance (OR 1⋅53, 95 % CI 1⋅42, 1⋅64). Adolescents from the poorest quintile were more likely to be stunted (OR 3⋅20, 95 % CI 2⋅94, 3⋅48), anaemic (OR 1⋅66, 95 % CI 1⋅47, 1⋅87) and thin (OR 1⋅68, 95 % CI 1⋅54, 1⋅82). We found that lower hygienic compliance was significantly associated with undernutrition and anaemia. Therefore, promoting hygienic practices should be emphasised to tackle undernutrition and anaemia. Furthermore, dietary diversity and poverty were strong predictors of stunting and thinness, therefore targeting the poor and focusing on improving dietary diversity should be the priority.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Introduction

In 2021, the Lancet Commission on adolescent nutrition emphasises that ‘to end malnutrition in all its forms, interventions and investments are needed in later childhood and adolescence’. Adolescence (age 10–19 years) is an age of transition from childhood to adulthood. During this transitional phase, crucial biological, cognitive, psychosocial and physical changes take place, and 50 % of the adult weight and 20 % of overall height are acquired in adolescence. These changes are profoundly related to nutritional status, and they also affect nutritional requirements, resulting in highest nutritional requirements during adolescence in the life cycle. The Commission also highlighted that adolescence can be another (possibly last) window of opportunity for linear growth catch-up beyond the first 1000 days since birth(Reference Norris, Frongillo and Black1). Earlier, the 2016 Lancet Commission on adolescent health and wellbeing had raised concerns over the lack of adequate data on adolescent nutrition, particularly in developing countries. Therefore, it is still challenging for policy makers to design policies, strategies and nutritional interventions that can help to eliminate the adolescent malnutrition(Reference Patton, Sawyer and Santelli2).

Malnutrition is a complex phenomenon characterised by a multiplicity of factors ranging from the socioeconomic status to dietary intake, water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) practices, and socio-political factors affecting policymaking(Reference Azupogo, Abizari and Aurino3Reference Zavala, King and Sawadogo-Lewis5). Addressing the adolescent nutrition is fundamental to materialise the potential human capital gains and to break the intergenerational malnutrition trap. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has estimated that around 16 million adolescent girls, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with higher nutritional risks, become mothers every year(Reference Norris, Frongillo and Black1). In India, for socioeconomically vulnerable groups like disadvantaged caste and gender, education and other skills earned during adolescence are very crucial in determining their future socioeconomic status and labour market outcomes(Reference Nandi, Behrman and Kinra6). Furthermore, due to son preference, early-age marriage and negative intra-household biases in food distribution females are more vulnerable in India(Reference Aurino7).

Therefore, to understand the health, nutrition, hygiene practices and dietary intake-related aspects of adolescents in India, the Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS, 2016–18) was implemented. The findings from CNNS (2016–18) data show that 27⋅2 and 28⋅5 % of the adolescents are stunted and anaemic, and only 11 % of adolescents have adequate dietary diversity. Recent studies on adolescent dietary diversity and nutrition have found that only 24 % of adolescents have a high-mix diet(Reference Sharma, Maheshwari and Kuwatada8) and inadequate dietary intake is significantly associated with poor nutritional outcomes among females in India(Reference Radhika, Swetha and Kumar9).

Furthermore, access to improved WASH services have been found to have a significant impact on child nutritional outcomes(Reference Choudhary, Schuster and Brewis1012). Chattopadhyay et al. find a significant positive association between WASH practices (beyond household level availability) and nutritional outcomes of adolescent girls in three states (Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Odisha) of India(Reference Chattopadhyay, Sethi and Nagargoje13). But due to lack of comprehensive and representative data on adolescent nutrition, the scope of earlier studies is a limited to specific region or gender(Reference Sharma, Maheshwari and Kuwatada8,Reference Radhika, Swetha and Kumar9,Reference Chattopadhyay, Sethi and Nagargoje13,Reference Nithya and Bhavani14) . Two recent studies on adolescent malnutrition(Reference Pandurangi, Mummadi and Challa15) and anaemia(Reference Scott, Lahiri and Sethi16) conducted using CNNS (2016–18) data shows substantial socioeconomic and regional disparities in adolescent malnutrition. However, none of these large-scale studies assessed the roles of dietary diversity and individual-level hygiene practices in adolescent malnutrition.

Therefore, the present study aims to bridge this critical gap, first, by analysing nationally representative data on adolescents in India that covers adolescent dietary intake and hygiene practices. Secondly, apart from the socioeconomic covariates (place of residence, wealth status, caste, religion, sex and education), we investigate the role of dietary diversity score (DDS) and two hygiene behaviour practice indexes in nutritional outcomes using the population-weighted CNNS (2016–18) data on adolescents in India. The findings of the study can serve as a basis for further in-depth analysis and evidence for policy formulation and programmes aiming to optimise the interventions which may enhance the nutritional outcomes of adolescents in India.

Methods

Study design

The present study used a cross-section survey, CNNS 2016–18, data of a collaborative project of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), UNICEF and the Population Council of India. The survey was the largest micronutrient survey ever conducted globally. A multistage stratified cluster sampling design with probability proportionate to the size sample was used to attain a nationally representative sample of children as well as adolescents (below the age 19 years) in 29 states and the UT of Delhi(17). To get information on different aspects of health, education, nutrition and demographic characteristics, separate schedules were designed with a common household schedule for children and early and late adolescents. Furthermore, the survey used gold standard cyanmethemoglobin methods to assess anaemia, micronutrient deficiencies and NCD for the first time in India. The unit of analysis in our study are the individuals aged 10–19 years. More details on sample selection and coverage of issues can be found from these sources(17). Two analytical samples of undernutrition (stunting and thinness) and anaemia have been created for the final analysis Ethical standards disclosure (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Flowchart of the sample included in the study.

This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all the procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Population Council (New York Office) and the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Research (PGIMR) Chandigarh, India(17).

Measuring undernutrition and anaemia

Malnutrition

Ideally, the definition of malnutrition involves both undernutrition and overnutrition (overweight/obesity). In developing countries, undernutrition and anaemia are still prevalent forms of malnutrition and they are used interchangeably. We have used the standard WHO's(18) growth reference for adolescents aged 10–19 years to define malnutrition (undernutrition and anaemia).

Stunting and thinness

Stunting (low height-for-age) is defined as height-for-age z-score below −2 standard deviation (sd) from the (WHO 2007) adolescents growth reference. Similarly, a person aged 10–19 years is considered wasted/thin (low BMI-for-age) if his/her age-sex segregated BMI-for-age z-score is below −2sd(Reference de Onis, Onyango and Borghi19). Notably, due to rapid change in physical growth in puberty age, WHO has not defined the underweight for adolescents (aged 10–19 years)(18).

Anaemia

The survey collected a blood sample of 8 ml from children aged 10–19 years to assess anaemia-related micronutrients and haemoglobin variants. For areas of higher than 1000 m altitude, haemoglobin concentrations were adjusted for altitude. Anaemia status is classified as per age-sex-specific criteria according to the WHO guidelines(20). For ages 10–11 years and 12–14 years, a person is referred to as having anaemia if (s)he has a g/dl less than 11⋅5 and 12, respectively. For late adolescence (15–19 years), g/dl requirements are different for males (<13 g/dl) and females (<12 g/dl).

Outcome and predictor variables

Our primary-dependent variables are anthropometric measures (height- and weight-for-age) and anaemia. All three outcome variables are categorical and coded as ‘1’ for having anaemia or undernutrition and ‘0’ otherwise. The measurement and classification of the dependent variables is explained in the previous section. Based on the conceptual framework proposed by the Lancet Commission 2021, an extensive literature review and CNNS data availability, the study uses independent or predictor variables from the individual-, household- and community-level contexts.

Individual-level variables

As adolescence is characterised by age, which is on its own is an indicator of physical growth that determines the micro- and macronutrient requirement for the body. So, age is included as a dummy variable for early- and late adolescence (age 10–14 and 15–19 years). The literature provides evidence of gender biases in nutrition and food distribution within the household in India(Reference Aurino7). Hence, a dummy for the sex (male, female) of the respondent is also included in the determinants. The existing studies show significant positive impacts of hand hygiene on the health and nutritional outcomes of children in the Indian context(Reference Hussam, Rabbani and Reggiani21). Interestingly, the first-time questions on the hygiene behaviour of adolescents are included in the CNNS survey. The questions were asked using a dummy form i.e., when is it important to wash your hand? Based on ten questions, we constructed two hygiene indexes (general and critical) (Supplementary Table S1) based on their possible exposures to the pathogens. Six and four questions are considered for general and critical hygiene behaviour with equal weight. Both range from zero to two, where a score of zero, one and two implies no compliance, at least one, and two or more compliances, respectively. Education is another important contributor to health and nutrition(Reference Shah and Subramanyam22) via awareness and school-based supplementary nutrition programmes, i.e., Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM-POSHAN, erstwhile Mid-Day Meal [MDM]) till early adolescence in India. We have included education as a dichotomous variable which provides us information about whether the child ever attended school or not. The availability of data on dietary intake and its frequency allows us to map dietary diversity and its role in determining nutritional outcomes. Based on the frequency of consumption of various food items: cereals, vegetables and fruits, eggs, meat, fish etc., a DDS is constructed using Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) guidelines for measuring adolescent dietary diversity (Supplementary Table S2)(Reference Kennedy, Ballard and Dop23). Following the literature, a cut-off score ≥4 is assumed as adequate dietary diversity(Reference Kennedy, Ballard and Dop23,Reference Isabirye, Bukenya and Nakafeero24) .

Household-level variables

Besides individual characteristics, the household environment also shapes nutritional outcomes. The household environment affects nutritional outcomes directly and indirectly via shaping individual behaviour and access to resources. A wealth index based on various household assets possession is used to assess the economic status, which divides the total population into five equal quintiles (poorest, poorer, middle, richer and richest). Caste and religion-based social stratification is an intrinsic feature of India's social system, which affects the socioeconomic status of individuals and households. CNNS data includes different categories of castes (Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes, Other backward class and ‘Others’) and religions (Hindu, Muslim and Other religions) to which the household belongs. A dichotomous variable on whether mother attended school (yes, no) is also included in models because studies indicate that mother's education is an important predictor of child nutrition(Reference Alderman and Headey25).

Community-level or meso-environment variables

Though CNNS survey implemented a separate village questionnaire to capture community-level characteristics but partial data from this section is made available. These include the place of residence (rural–urban), states (Supplementary Table S3) and regions of the country based on agroecological and geographic features. There are six regions defined in CNNS (2016–18) survey from 29 states and the UT of Delhi (North, Central, East, North-East, West and South).

Statistical analysis

To perform the statistical analysis, Stata 15⋅1(26) software is used. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables are reported with mean and in the form of frequency distribution for categorical variables. χ 2 test is applied to test the significance of the association. As our dependent variables are binary (stunted v. non-stunted, thin v. others, anaemic v. non-anaemic), logistic regression models have been used. Firstly, separate bivariate regressions have been applied for each category of predictors, and then multivariable models have been fitted to identify independent predictors. The independent variables which are statistically significant at the 5 % level in bivariate regressions are retained in multivariable models.

To take into consideration the CNNS multistage cluster sampling design, appropriate sampling weight has been applied. A more detailed description of the weighting procedure is available in CNNS report. The survey collected a blood sample for a subsample and therefore provided separate sampling weight for analysis of anthropometric (stunting/thinness) measures and biomarker (anaemia) samples. The odds ratios are reported at a 95 % confidence interval [CI] of statistical significance with a P-value <0⋅05 in two-tail.

Results

The adolescent sample characteristics are presented in Table 1. The average age of adolescents in India is 14⋅4 years with a margin of ±2⋅8 sd. The age distribution of our sample is almost equal among early (51⋅8 %) and late adolescents (48⋅2). Half of the respondents are female, 75⋅3 % of the total adolescents reside in rural areas and 24⋅7 % are from urban settings. The groups are diverse in terms of both caste and religious belongingness. Twenty-two percent are from Scheduled Castes (SCs), 10⋅9 % are Scheduled Tribes (STs) and 41⋅7 % are of Other Backward Classes (OBCs). A majority of the respondents are Hindus (80⋅2 %), followed by Muslims (15⋅2 %) and ‘Others’ (4⋅5), including Sikh, Jain, Christian, etc. Among the sampled adolescents, 94⋅2 % reported that they had attended school, and 52⋅9 % of the mothers attended school/higher education. Surprisingly, only 11⋅4 % of adolescents have a DDS of 4 or greater. Based on a score of 0–6, 16 % of adolescents have zero compliance for general hygiene behaviour and only 36⋅9 % considered two or more hygiene practices important. Surprisingly, 16⋅4 % of the respondents think that it is not important to wash hands after; urine/passing stool, clean child faeces, touch pet waste or blow nose, which are taken as critical hygiene behaviour.

Table 1. Sample characteristics of adolescents (10–19 years) in India, CNNS 2016–18

* Value is mean.

Prevalence of undernutrition and anaemia

Table 2 shows the socioeconomic and demographic breakdown of stunting, thinness and anaemia prevalence among adolescents in India. More than a quarter adolescent population of India is either stunted (27⋅2 %) or anaemic (28⋅5 %) or thin (24⋅1 %). Around 29⋅9 % of females are stunted, whereas the prevalence of stunting among male adolescents is 25⋅4 %. The prevalence of anaemia among females is 39⋅6 % compared with 17⋅7 % among males. In rural areas, 28⋅8, 29⋅1 and 25⋅3 % of adolescents are stunted, anaemic and thin, respectively. The rural–urban difference is lowest (2⋅2 %) in the case of anaemia compared with stunting (6⋅8 %) and thinness (4⋅8 %). Late adolescence is more prone to be stunted (29⋅2 %) and anaemic (33 %), whereas contrary to this, thinness is highest (27⋅4 %) in early adolescence. The highest prevalence of stunting (35⋅6 %) and anaemia (37⋅6 %) is among STs, and thinness is among OBCs (26⋅5 %). The prevalence is more pronounced among Muslims, with stunting (29⋅7 %), anaemia (31⋅8 %) and thinness (24⋅7 %).

Table 2. Prevalence of stunting, thinness and anaemia among adolescents (10–19 years) in India, CNNS 2016–18

We find that undernutrition prevalence is significantly lower among the adolescents whose mothers attended school. The prevalence of stunting is 11⋅7 percentage points (pps) higher among the adolescents who do not attend school. In case of thinness, the prevalence does not differ significantly between school attendees (24⋅1 %) and non-attenders (24⋅6 %). Those adolescents who consider maintaining hygiene is important have a significantly lower prevalence of stunting, anaemia and thinness (Table 2). Respondents having a DDS <4 is significantly associated with a higher prevalence of undernutrition and anaemia. The prevalence of stunting (31⋅3 %), anaemia (34⋅3 %) and thinness (23⋅9 %) are highest in the Eastern region, which comprises larger and relatively poorer states (Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha and West Bengal).

Predictors of undernutrition and anaemia

To identify the likelihood of being undernourished or anaemic, results of bivariate logistic regressions are presented in Table 3. Late adolescent age respondents are more likely to be stunted and anaemic but less likely to be thin. Female had higher odds of being stunted and anaemic compared with males and lower likelihood of thinness. Among all other predictors classified under individual correlates, dietary diversity, hygiene behaviour and education were found to have a statistically significant association with stunting and anaemia prevalence. Adolescents of the social group ST have higher odds of stunting and anaemia compared with ‘Others’. The wealth index is another strongly associated factor with undernourishment, and the adolescents in the poorest wealth quintile are more likely to be stunted.

Table 3. Bivariate logistic regression results for unadjusted odds ratios for stunting, anaemia and thinness among adolescents (10–19 years) in India, CNNS 2016–18

Table 4 shows the estimates of multivariable logistic regressions applied to identify the statistical significance of individual variables after mutually adjusting for other confounders. Even after controlling for other correlates, females have a higher likelihood of stunting (OR 1⋅19; 95 % CI 1⋅14, 1⋅26) and anaemia (OR 3⋅13; 95 % CI 2⋅89, 3⋅40). In multivariable models, the odds (OR 0⋅93; 95 % CI 0⋅86, 0⋅99) of stunting become lower in rural areas compared with urban areas. In the case of thinness, rural adolescents are more likely to be thin (OR 1⋅12; 95 % CI 1⋅04, 1⋅21). Though magnitude lowers, the likelihood of stunting (OR 1⋅43; 95 % CI 1⋅30, 1⋅58) and anaemia (OR 1⋅62; 95 % CI 1⋅40, 1⋅87) remains higher among STs. Compared with ‘Others’ religious groups, Muslim adolescents are more likely to be stunted (OR 1⋅37; 95 % CI 1⋅18, 1⋅59), anaemic (OR 1⋅46; 95 % CI 1⋅17, 1⋅83) and thin (OR 1⋅44; 95 % CI 1⋅23, 1⋅70). Economic status remains the strongest predictor of stunting and thinness, even after controlling for social and demographic covariates. Being a member of the poorest wealth quintile households, the likelihood of stunting approximately three times (OR 2⋅83; 95 % CI 2⋅54, 3⋅17), anaemia (OR 1⋅66; 95 % CI 0⋅99, 1⋅35) and thinness (OR 1⋅83; 95 % CI 1⋅63, 2⋅04). Adolescents with a lower score on hygiene practices have higher probabilities of stunting (OR 1⋅20; 95 % CI 1⋅08, 1⋅33) and anaemia (OR 1⋅24; 95 % CI 1⋅03, 1⋅48). A DDS of <4 predicts a higher likelihood of stunting (OR 1⋅14; 95 % CI 1⋅05, 1⋅24) (Table 4). The results of multivariable models reinforce the finding of bivariate models even after controlling for various socioeconomic and household correlates.

Table 4. Multivariable logistic regression results (adjusted odds ratios) for stunting, anaemia and thinness among adolescents (10–19 years) in India, CNNS 2016–18

Discussion

The present study assesses the prevalence and predictors associated with undernutrition and anaemia among adolescents in India. Besides socioeconomic factors, we have also examined the role of perceived hand hygiene behaviour and dietary diversity in nutritional outcomes. The study has found that stunting (29⋅9 %) and anaemia (39⋅6 %) are more prevalent among females(Reference Scott, Lahiri and Sethi16). Females are relatively more disadvantaged (2⋅23 times) in terms of anaemia compared with stunting. A similar degree of relative disadvantage for the female child (age 0–9 years) in case of anaemia has been reported in CNNS 2016–18 report. This indicates persistent gender disadvantage in terms of anaemia prevalence. As the children reach adolescence maturity, the gap in anaemia prevalence between males and females starts rising and reaches its peak at the age of 18–19 years. Furthermore, this gap remains persistent during the life course(2729). At the same time, the prevalence of thinness is significantly lower (10 % points) among females. It may have multiple interpretations as the mean age at menarche in India is 13⋅8 years(Reference Pathak, Tripathi and Subramanian30), and menarche is associated with rapid weight gain in late adolescence(Reference Abraham, Boyd and Lal31). This is also reflected in the age-sex disaggregated analysis of thinness, where the difference in thinness among males and females is 8 % points in early adolescence (10–14 years) which later extends up to13 % points in later adolescence (15–19 years), followed by the start of menarche. Due to these uneven differences in weight changes, it is difficult to determine the underweight criterion for adolescence age(18). Noteworthy, after reaching adulthood and entering childbearing age, the pattern of thinness prevalence is reversed, and women become more vulnerable to being underweight(29).

In terms of nutritional outcomes, there already exists large rural–urban disparities among children and adults in India(Reference Borooah32). Similarly, we also observe a substantially higher prevalence of stunting (6⋅8 pp), thinness (5 pp) and anaemia (2⋅2 pp) among rural adolescents. The potential mechanism can be the unaffordability of nutritious diet (only 24–37 % can afford a nutritious diet) in the rural area(Reference Raghunathan, Headey and Herforth33) and the widespread lack of access to and utilisation of WASH facilities(Reference Coffey and Spears34). The present study finds an upward shift in stunting (4 %-point increase) and anaemia (9 % points increase) after early adolescence. The underlying reasons may be the increased intensity of physical and cognitive activities in late adolescence, which further deepens the vulnerabilities of existing undernourished adolescents.

There are two major supplementary nutrition programmes in India: Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) and PM-POSHAN (erstwhile MDM). ICDS provides supplementary nutrition and health check-up services for children (age 0–6 years), adolescent girls, pregnant women and lactating mothers(35). Through PM-POSHAN hot cooked meal is provided in government and government-aided schools from class (I–VIII) to improve child nutritional and educational outcomes. Impact evaluation studies show that the beneficiaries of MDM have better nutrition and cognitive outcomes(Reference Afridi36,Reference Chakrabarti, Scott and Alderman37) . Our study has also found that the likelihood of being anaemic and stunted is higher among those adolescents who do not attend school.

Low dietary diversity makes adolescents more vulnerable to undernutrition(Reference Nithya and Bhavani14,Reference Belay, Handebo and Derso38) , and we also find that lower DDS is significantly associated with poor nutritional outcomes. Mersha et al. find 2⋅47 times higher likelihood of undernutrition among the adolescents having inadequate DD and food insecurity(Reference Mersha, Tariku and Gonete39). In India, by making more diverse and nutritious, PM-POSHAN can help to improve the nutritional outcomes, at least, in early adolescence as the mean age at class (VIII) is 15 years up to which cooked meal is served in the schools. Furthermore, on experimental basis, PM-POSHAN can be extended to higher classes to assess the benefits of such a scheme in late adolescence.

Wealth-based poverty is another factor that significantly determines nutritional outcomes in India and our findings are also consistent with the existing studies(Reference Mukhopadhyay and Chakraborty40,Reference Sagalova, Vollmer and Ntambi41) . In a long-term, large-scale experimental setting, ‘Targeting the Ultra Poor’ (TUP) in West Bengal(Reference Banerjee, Duflo and Sharma42) has found a positive and durable effect of transfer on food security, consumption, income and health. This kind of policy intervention should be adopted, which simultaneously improves health and nutritional outcomes and economic status.

Among other predictors, we find that better hygiene and sanitation awareness contributes significantly to nutritional outcomes. Earlier studies in the Indian context have found that improved Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) services are positively associated with child nutritional outcomes(Reference Avula, Nguyen and Tran43,Reference Rah, Cronin and Badgaiyan44) . But these studies are limited to access and availability and do not touch on the behavioural aspects. We have analysed the hygiene practices among adolescents using two indexes. The finding is worrisome and reveals that one-sixth of the adolescents do not consider hygiene practices important at all and are more vulnerable to being undernourished. Chattopadhyay et al. in their study on adolescent girls in Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Odisha also found that handwashing without soap after defecation is associated with increased stunting and thinness. Our findings are consistent with the study conducted in Ethiopia that finds that handwashing before eating lowers the odds (0⋅67) of stunting(Reference Belay, Handebo and Derso38). This seems very much relevant in the present context because, based on ownership of toilets, the present government has declared India as open defecation-free (ODF). And now, practising hygienic behaviour is another important area that requires attention(Reference Gupta, Khalid and Deshpande45). In this direction, the Swachh Bharat Mission-Gramin (SBM-G) has adopted sanitation behaviour change communication to nudge and mobilise communities to adopt sustainable hygiene and sanitation practices(46). A recent study on rational habit formation in the context of handwashing in rural India proposes that monitoring and incentivising results in persistent handwashing, which ultimately improves child health and nutrition outcomes(Reference Hussam, Rabbani and Reggiani21).

The existing literature documents the poor health, education and nutrition outcomes among historically marginalised social groups(Reference Borooah47). Our study also has also found that even after controlling for demographic and other covariates, adolescents of disadvantaged sections are more vulnerable to undernutrition and anaemia.

Conclusion

The present study examines the prevalence and predictors of adolescent undernutrition and anaemia in India using CNNS 2016–18 data. Among an array of socioeconomic and demographic factors, we find that the likelihood of stunting and anaemia is significantly higher in late adolescence (age 15–19 years). Females are three times more likely to have anaemia compared with males. We also find that dietary diversity and hygiene behaviour are significant predictors of stunting and anaemia among adolescents in India. After conditioning on socioeconomic characteristics, the magnitude of dietary diversity and hygiene behaviour decreases but remains statistically significant. The likelihood of stunting remains 14 and 20 % higher among adolescents having inadequate dietary diversity and poor hygiene practices compliance. Maternal and adolescent's education are also significant predictors of adolescent nutrition status. The mechanism through which education can affect nutrition is that educated mothers and children may have more aware food choices and a better understanding of the significance of hygiene practices.

During adolescence (age 10–19 years), rapid and crucial physical, mental and psychosocial changes occur. Therefore, adolescent health and nutrition require special attention to break the vicious cycle of the intergenerational malnutrition trap. Apart from socioeconomic predictors, the present study has identified the role of hygiene and sanitation behaviour and dietary diversity in adolescent nutrition and anaemia status in India.

Limitation

Despite several strengths and salient findings, we accept to have some limitations of the study. First, the DDS does not indicate the quantity of food consumed as the questions are asked on the frequency and the type of food items consumed. Dietary intake may be affected by seasons, and some food items can be available in large quantities and at low cost for limited periods. Second, disaggregated data on years of schooling is not made available till now in the CNNS dataset. It is important to have these data to assess the impact/role of school-based feeding programmes PM-POSHAN on adolescents’ dietary diversity, anaemia and nutritional outcomes. Third, puberty results in rapid weight gain among females. Therefore, we suspect that the uneven prevalence of thinness is affected by this factor, but due to the lack of data on age at menarche, we cannot factor out this. Age at menarche was asked in the survey, but the data have not been released yet. Fourth, due to the cross-sectional nature of the data, we cannot claim the findings as a causal relation. The survey was designed to be representative at the state level, therefore, further disaggregated analysis is not possible.

Policy implications

Apart from the policy relevance of targeting socioeconomically vulnerable groups, the present study has two key takeaways. First, after achieving the household toilet ownership-based universal ODF target, our study underlies the indicative importance of the behavioural aspect of hygienic practices on nutritional outcomes(46,48) . More focused behaviour modification approaches highlighting the positive impacts of practising sanitation and hygiene should be emphasised in the Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM)(Reference Hussam, Rabbani and Reggiani21).

Second, the CNNS survey was completed well before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the crisis increased the risk of food-and-nutrition insecurity. Therefore, more targeted and direct nutrition intervention should be implemented. This can be done by expanding PM-POSHAN to higher classes and making it more nutritious and diverse. POSHAN 2⋅0 (renamed and extended provisions of ICDS), which makes provisions for nutritional and health requirements of out-of-school adolescent girls (age 14–18 years), is a very important step in this direction(35). However, despite the disruption in delivery mechanisms of school-based feeding programmes and estimated rise in hunger and undernutrition, the budget allocation for POSHAN 2⋅0 has remained stagnant over the last 2 years (2021–22 and 2022–23)(Reference Kumar and Mohanty49).

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2023.19.

Acknowledgements

First, we would like to thank editor and anonymous referee for their critical insights. Second, we also wish to thank Manoj Godara for the helpful discussion in the problem formulation and conference participants of the Second Biennial Conference on Development (2022) at the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), Mumbai, for their helpful comments and suggestions.

M. K.: Conceptualisation, writing manuscript, data analysis and interpretation. P. M.: Review, supervision and approved the final manuscript.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial entity or not-for-profit organisation.

The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

Norris, SA, Frongillo, EA, Black, MM, et al. (2022) Nutrition in adolescent growth and development. Lancet 399, 172184.10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01590-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patton, GC, Sawyer, SM, Santelli, JS, et al. (2016) Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet 387, 24232478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azupogo, F, Abizari, A-R, Aurino, E, et al. (2021) Trends and factors associated with the nutritional status of adolescent girls in Ghana: a secondary analysis of the 2003–2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey (GDHS) data. Public Health Nutr 25, 116.Google Scholar
Patton, GC, Neufeld, LM, Dogra, S, et al. (2022) Nourishing our future: the Lancet Series on adolescent nutrition. Lancet 399, 123125.10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02140-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zavala, E, King, SE, Sawadogo-Lewis, T, et al. (2021) Leveraging water, sanitation and hygiene for nutrition in low- and middle-income countries: a conceptual framework. Mater Child Nutr 17, e13202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nandi, A, Behrman, JR, Kinra, S, et al. (2018) Early-life nutrition is associated positively with schooling and labor market outcomes and negatively with marriage rates at age 20–25 years: evidence from the Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS) in India. J Nutr 148, 140146.10.1093/jn/nxx012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aurino, E (2017) Do boys eat better than girls in India? Longitudinal evidence on dietary diversity and food consumption disparities among children and adolescents. Econ Hum Biol 25, 99111.10.1016/j.ehb.2016.10.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, S, Maheshwari, S, Kuwatada, J, et al. (2021) Assessing dietary intake patterns through cluster analysis among adolescents in selected districts of Bihar and Assam from India: a cross-sectional survey. Front Nutr 8, 592581.10.3389/fnut.2021.592581CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radhika, MS, Swetha, B, Kumar, BN, et al. (2018) Dietary and nondietary determinants of nutritional status among adolescent girls and adult women in India. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1416, 517.10.1111/nyas.13599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhary, N, Schuster, RC, Brewis, A, et al. (2021) Household water insecurity affects child nutrition through alternative pathways to WASH: evidence from India. Food Nutr Bull 42, 170187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuesta, J & Maratou-Kolias, L (2018) WASH and nutrition synergies: the case of Tunisia. J Dev Studies 54, 122.Google Scholar
UNICEF & NIUA (2022) Health, Nutrition and WASH among Children and Adolescents in Urban India, vol. 4. New Delhi: UNICEF and National Institute of Urban Affairs, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, A, Sethi, V, Nagargoje, VP, et al. (2019) WASH practices and its association with nutritional status of adolescent girls in poverty pockets of eastern India. BMC Women's Health 19, 89.10.1186/s12905-019-0787-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nithya, DJ & Bhavani, RV (2018) Dietary diversity and its relationship with nutritional status among adolescents and adults in rural India. J Biosoc Sci 50, 397413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandurangi, R, Mummadi, MK, Challa, S, et al. (2022) Burden and predictors of malnutrition among Indian adolescents (10–19 years): insights from Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey Data. Front Public Health 10, 877073.10.3389/fpubh.2022.877073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, S, Lahiri, A, Sethi, V, et al. (2022) Anaemia in Indians aged 10–19 years: prevalence, burden and associated factors at national and regional levels. Mater Child Nutr 18, e13391.10.1111/mcn.13391CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MoHFW, UNICEF, and Population Council (2019) Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey 2016–18. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, UNICEF, and Population Council.Google Scholar
WHO (2007) Growth Reference 5–19 Years - Weight-for-age (5–10 Years). World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/tools/growth-reference-data-for-5to19-years/indicators/weight-for-age-5to10-years (accessed February 2022).Google Scholar
de Onis, M, Onyango, AW, Borghi, E, et al. (2007) Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ 85, 660667.10.2471/BLT.07.043497CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2011) Haemoglobin Concentrations for the Diagnosis of Anaemia and Assessment of Severity. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Hussam, R, Rabbani, A, Reggiani, G, et al. (2022) Rational habit formation: experimental evidence from handwashing in India. Am Econ J 14, 141.Google Scholar
Shah, AR & Subramanyam, MA (2021) Community-level women's education and undernutrition among Indian adolescents: a multilevel analysis of a national survey. PLoS ONE 16, e0251427.10.1371/journal.pone.0251427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, G, Ballard, T & Dop, MC (2013) Guidelines for Measuring Household and Individual Dietary Diversity. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Isabirye, N, Bukenya, JN, Nakafeero, M, et al. (2020) Dietary diversity and associated factors among adolescents in eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 20, 534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alderman, H & Headey, DD (2017) How important is parental education for child nutrition? World Dev 94, 448464.10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
StataCorp (2017) Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.Google Scholar
DHS (2022) DHS STATcompiler. Demographic and Health Survey, USAID. https://www.statcompiler.com/en/ (accessed February 2022).Google Scholar
IIPS, NPHCE, MoHFW, et al. (2020) Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) Wave 1, 2017–18, India Report. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences, National Programme for Health Care of Elderly, MoHFW, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health and the University of Southern California.Google Scholar
IIPS & ICF (2017) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16. India: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF.Google Scholar
Pathak, PK, Tripathi, N & Subramanian, SV (2014) Secular trends in menarcheal age in India – evidence from the Indian Human Development Survey. PLoS ONE 9, e111027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abraham, S, Boyd, C, Lal, M, et al. (2009) Time since menarche, weight gain and body image awareness among adolescent girls: onset of eating disorders? J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 30, 8994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borooah, VK (2018) Health and Well-Being in India: A Quantitative Analysis of Inequality in Outcomes and Opportunities. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghunathan, K, Headey, D & Herforth, A (2021) Affordability of nutritious diets in rural India. Food Policy 99, 101982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coffey, D & Spears, D (2017) Where India Goes: Abandoned Toilets, Stunted Development and the Costs of Caste. India: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
MoWCD (2022) Guidelines for Mission Saksham Anganwadi and Poshan 2.0. Ministry of Women & Child Development. https://wcd.nic.in/acts/guidelines-mission-saksham-anganwadi-and-poshan-20 (accessed December 2022).Google Scholar
Afridi, F (2011) The impact of school meals on school participation: evidence from rural India. J Dev Studies 47, 16361656.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, S, Scott, SP, Alderman, H, et al. (2021) Intergenerational nutrition benefits of India's national school feeding program. Nat Commun 12, 4248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belay, E, Handebo, S, Derso, T, et al. (2019) Prevalence and determinants of pre-adolescent (5–14 years) acute and chronic undernutrition in Lay Armachiho District, Ethiopia. Int J Equity Health 18, 137.Google ScholarPubMed
Mersha, J, Tariku, A & Gonete, KA (2021) Undernutrition and associated factors among school adolescent girls attending schools in Mirab-Armachiho District, Northwest Ethiopia. Ecol Food Nutr 60, 473490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukhopadhyay, S & Chakraborty, A (2020) Changing wealth inequalities in child nutrition in Indian states. Econ Pol Weekly 55, 8.Google Scholar
Sagalova, V, Vollmer, S, Ntambi, J, et al. (2021) Socio-economic predictors of undernutrition and anaemia in adolescent mothers in West and Central Africa. J Glob Health 11, 13007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, A, Duflo, E & Sharma, G (2021) Long-term effects of the targeting the ultra poor program. Am Econ Rev 3, 471486.Google Scholar
Avula, R, Nguyen, PH, Tran, LM, et al. (2022) Reducing childhood stunting in India: insights from four subnational success cases. Food Sec 14, 10851097.Google ScholarPubMed
Rah, JH, Cronin, AA, Badgaiyan, B, et al. (2015) Household sanitation and personal hygiene practices are associated with child stunting in rural India: a cross-sectional analysis of surveys. BMJ Open 5, e005180e005180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, A, Khalid, N, Deshpande, D, et al. (2020) Revisiting open defecation evidence from a panel survey in rural north India, 2014–18. Econ Pol Weekly 55, 78.Google Scholar
GoI (2017) Complete-set-guidelines.pdf. Swachh Bharat Mission - Gramin. https://swachhbharatmission.gov.in/sbmcms/writereaddata/images/pdf/Guidelines/Complete-set-guidelines.pdf (accessed February 2022).Google Scholar
Borooah, VK (2018) Caste, religion, and health outcomes in India. Econ Pol Weekly 53, 9.Google Scholar
Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation (MoDWS), GoI (2017) Review of health data in selected ODF and non-ODF districts under the SBM.Google Scholar
Kumar, M & Mohanty, PC (2022) Decoding the three pandemic budgets education, health, and nutrition. Econ Pol Weekly 57, 2730.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Flowchart of the sample included in the study.

Figure 1

Table 1. Sample characteristics of adolescents (10–19 years) in India, CNNS 2016–18

Figure 2

Table 2. Prevalence of stunting, thinness and anaemia among adolescents (10–19 years) in India, CNNS 2016–18

Figure 3

Table 3. Bivariate logistic regression results for unadjusted odds ratios for stunting, anaemia and thinness among adolescents (10–19 years) in India, CNNS 2016–18

Figure 4

Table 4. Multivariable logistic regression results (adjusted odds ratios) for stunting, anaemia and thinness among adolescents (10–19 years) in India, CNNS 2016–18

Supplementary material: File

Kumar and Mohanty supplementary material

Kumar and Mohanty supplementary material

Download Kumar and Mohanty supplementary material(File)
File 19.1 KB