Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:26:46.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An echinoderm Lagerstätte from the Upper Ordovician (Katian), Ontario: taxonomic re-evaluation and description of new dicyclic camerate crinoids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2018

Selina R. Cole ,
William I. Ausich ,
David F. Wright  and
Joseph M. Koniecki
Selina R. Cole
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 121, Washington, DC 20013-7012 〈colesel@si.edu〉; 〈wrightda@si.edu〉
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210USA 〈ausich.1@osu.edu〉
David F. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 121, Washington, DC 20013-7012 〈colesel@si.edu〉; 〈wrightda@si.edu〉
Joseph M. Koniecki
Affiliation:
3529 E. Joy Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 〈paleojk@gmail.com〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Upper Ordovician (lower Katian) Bobcaygeon and Verulam formations from the Lake Simcoe region of Ontario contain a highly diverse echinoderm assemblage that is herein recognized as a Konservat-Lagerstätte. Although fossil crinoids have long been recognized from these formations, the fauna has not received a comprehensive taxonomic evaluation since Springer’s classic 1911 monograph. Recent extensive collection and preparation of new material from the Bobcaygeon and Verulam formations near Brechin, Ontario recovered numerous exceptionally preserved crinoid specimens with arms, stems, and attachment structures intact. The Brechin Lagerstätte is the most taxonomically diverse Katian crinoid fauna, with more than 20 crinoid genera represented in this collection.

Here, all dicyclic crinoids belonging to subclass Camerata from the Brechin Lagerstätte are evaluated. The following four genera and seven species are described from the fauna, including one new genus and four new species: Reteocrinus stellaris, Reteocrinus alveolatus, Archaeocrinus sundayae n. sp., Archaeocrinus maraensis n. sp., Priscillacrinus elegans n. gen. n. sp., Cleiocrinus regius, and Cleiocrinus lepidotus n. sp. The exceptional preservation of this collection provides an opportunity to describe more fully the morphologic and ontogenetic details of known Ordovician crinoid taxa, to conduct a taxonomic re-evaluation of many species, to describe new taxa, and to provide a framework for subsequent studies of crinoid community paleoecology.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/e3e268a7-88e5-43cd-84ea-b40df45e8281

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 92 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 488 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, D.K., 2000, Paleozoic geology of the northern Lake Simcoe area, south-central Ontario: Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6011, 34 p.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D.K., and Carter, T.R., 2010, The subsurface Paleozoic stratigraphy of southern Ontario: Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 7, 201 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Deline, B., 2012, Macroevolutionary transition in crinoids following the Late Ordovician extinction event (Ordovician to early Silurian): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 361–362, p. 38–48.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W., Rhenberg, E.C., and Wright, D.F., 2015, Early phylogeny of crinoids within the pelmatozoan clade: Palaeontology, v. 58, p. 937–952.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1915, Bibliographic index of American Ordovician and Silurian Fossils. Part 2: U.S. National Museum Bulletin, v. 92, pt. 1, p. 1–718, pt. 2. p. 719–1521.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1938, Pelmatozoa Palaeozoica, in Quenstedt, W., ed., Fossilium catalogus, I: Animalia, Part 83. Junk, s’Gravenhage, 194 p.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., and Moodey, M.W., 1943, Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms: Geological Society of America Special Paper, v. 45, 734 p.Google Scholar
Bigsby, J.J., 1868, Thesaurus Siluricus; the flora and fauna of the Silurian period. With addenda (from recent acquisitions): London, J. Van Hoorst, p. 1–214.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1856, Report of progress: Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, v. 1, p. 54.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1857, New species of fossils from Silurian rocks of Canada: Canada Geological Survey, Report of Progress 1853–1856, Report for the Year 1856, p. 247–345.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1858, New genera and species of fossils from the Silurian and Devonian formations of Canada: Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, v. 101, p. 419–444.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1859, On the Crinoideae of the Lower Silurian rocks of Canada: Canadian Geological Survey, Figures and Descriptions of Canadian Organic Remains, Decade, v. 4, p. 7–66.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1874, Paleozoic fossils. Part 1: Geological Survey of Canada, v. 2, 144 p.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., and Baird, G.C., 1986, Comparative taphonomy: a key to paleoenvironmental interpretation based on fossil preservation: Palaios, v. 1, p. 207–227.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., and Brookfield, M.E., 1984, Morphology, faunas and genesis of Ordovician hardgrounds from southern Ontario, Canada: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 46, p. 233–290.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., and Liddell, W.D., 1978, Preservation and paleoecology of a Middle Ordovician hardground community: Paleobiology, v. 4, p. 329–348.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., and Taylor, W.L., 1999, Middle Ordovician of the Lake Simcoe area of Ontario, Canada, in Hess, H., Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Simms, M.H., eds., Fossil Crinoids: New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 63–74.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., Moffat, H.A., and Taylor, W.L., 1997, Echinoderm taphonomy, taphofacies, and Lagerstätten: Paleontological Society Papers, v. 3, p. 147–190.Google Scholar
Brookfield, M.E., and Brett, C.E., 1988, Paleoenvironments of the Mid-Ordovician (Upper Caradocian) Trenton limestones of southern Ontario, Canada: storm sedimentation on a shoal-basin shelf model: Sedimentary Geology, v. 57, p. 75–105.Google Scholar
Brower, J.C., 1994, Camerate crinoids from the Middle Ordovician (Galena Group, Dunleith Formation) of northern Iowa and southern Minnesota: Journal of Paleontology, v. 68, p. 570–599.Google Scholar
Brower, J.C., 2007, The application of filtration theory to food gathering in Ordovician crinoids: Journal of Paleontology, v. 81, p. 1284–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J.C., and Veinus, J., 1974, Middle Ordovician crinoids from southwestern Virginia and eastern Tennessee: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 66, p. 1–125.Google Scholar
Cole, S.R., 2017, Phylogeny and morphologic evolution of the Ordovician Camerata (Class Crinoidea, Phylum Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 815–828.Google Scholar
Cole, S.R., Ausich, W.I., Colmenar, J., and Zamora, S., 2017, Filling the Gondwanan gap: paleobiogeographic implications of new crinoids from the Castillejo and Fombuena formations (Middle and Upper Ordovician, Iberian Chains, Spain): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 715–734.Google Scholar
Deline, B., 2009, The effects of rarity and abundance distributions on measurements of local morphological disparity: Paleobiology, v. 35, p. 175–189.Google Scholar
Deline, B., Ausich, W.I., and Brett, C.E., 2012, Comparing taxonomic and geographic scales in the morphological disparity of Ordovician through early Silurian Laurentian crinoids: Paleobiology, v. 38, p. 538–553.Google Scholar
Foote, M., 1994, Morphological disparity in Ordovician–Devonian crinoids and the early saturation of morphological space: Paleobiology, v. 20, p. 320–344.Google Scholar
Foote, M., 1999, Morphological diversity in the evolutionary radiation of Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic crinoids: Paleobiology, v. 25, p. 1–115.Google Scholar
Gabdeyan, R., 2011, Stratigraphy, sedimentology, and diagenesis of the Lindsay Formation, Upper Ordovician, Ottawa Embayment, eastern Ontario [M.S. thesis]: Ottawa, Carleton University, 123 p.Google Scholar
Grabau, A.W., and Shimer, H.W., 1910, North American Index Fossils, Invertebrates: New York, A.G. Seiler & Co., 909 p.Google Scholar
Guensburg, T.E., 1984, Echinodermata of the Middle Ordovician Lebanon Limestone, central Tennessee: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 86, 100 p.Google Scholar
Guensburg, T.E., and Waisfeld, B.G., 2015, South America’s earliest (Ordovician, Floian) crinoids: Journal of Paleontology, v. 89, p. 622–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, S.M., and Patzkowsky, M.E., 1996, Sequence stratigraphy and long-term paleoceanographic change in the Middle and Upper Ordovician of the eastern United States: Geological Society of America Special Paper 306, p. 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolata, D.R., 1982, Camerates, in Sprinkle, J., ed., Echinoderm faunas from the Bromide Formation (Middle Ordovician) of Oklahoma: The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Monograph 1, p. 170–205.Google Scholar
Liberty, B.A., 1967, Ordovician stratigraphy of southern Ontario: the Ottawa Valley problem: Geological Association of Canada—Mineralogical Association of Canada Joint Annual Meeting, Ottawa, Abstracts of Papers, p. 49–50.Google Scholar
Liberty, B.A., 1969, Palaeozoic geology of the Lake Simcoe area, Ontario: Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir, v. 355, 201 p.Google Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1821, A natural history of the Crinoidea, or lily-shaped animals; with observations on the genera, Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites : Bristol, England, Bryan & Co., 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1889, North American Geology and Paleontology for the Use of Amateurs, Students, and Scientists: Cincinnati, Western Methodist Book Concern, 664 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1890, The structure, classification and arrangement of American Palaeozoic crinoids into families: American Geologist, v. 6, p. 275–286. 340–357.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1897, Second appendix to North American geology and palaeontology: Cincinnati, Western Methodist Book Concern, p. 719–793.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., and Gurley, W.F.E., 1894, New genera and species of Echinodermata: Illinois State Museum, Bulletin, v. 5, p. 1–53.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Laudon, L.R., 1943, Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids: Geological Society of America Special Paper, v. 46, 151 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., 1978, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T Echinodermata 2: Boulder, CO and Lawrence: KS, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, 1027 p.Google Scholar
Peters, S.E., and Ausich, W.I., 2008, A sample-adjusted macroevolutionary history for Ordovician–Silurian crinoids: Paleobiology, v. 34, p. 104–116.Google Scholar
Roemer, C.F., 1854–1855, Erst Periode, Kohlen-Gebirge, in Brown, H.G., ed., Lethaea Geognostica, 3rd edition., Stuttgart, Schweizerbart, v. 2 E, 788 p.Google Scholar
Shumard, B.F., 1868, A catalogue of the Palaeozoic fossils of North America. Part I. Paleozoic Echinodermata: Transactions of the St. Louis Academy of Science (1866), v. 2, p. 334–407.Google Scholar
Simms, M.J., 1999, Systematics Phylogeny and Evolutionary History, in Hess, H., Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Simms, M.J., eds., Fossil Crinoids: New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 30–41.Google Scholar
Smith, A.B., 1985, Echinodermata, Chapter 7, in Murray, J.W., ed.., Atlas of Invertebrate Macrofossils: New York, John Wiley & Sons and the Palaeontological Association, p. 153–181.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1905, Cleiocrinus : Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology Memoir, v. 25, p. 91–114.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1911, On a Trenton echinoderm fauna at Kirkfield, Ontario: Canada Department Mines, Memoir 15-P, p. 1–70.Google Scholar
Sproat, C.D., Jin, J., Zhan, R.B., and Rudkin, D.M., 2015, Morphological variability and paleoecology of the Late Ordovician Parastrophina from eastern Canada and the Tarim Basin, Northwest China: Palaeoworld, v. 24, p. 160–175.Google Scholar
Strimple, H.L., and Watkins, W.T., 1955, New Ordovician echinoderms: Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, v. 45, p. 347–353.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., and Gahn, F.J., 2006, Morphological and systematic reinterpretation of two enigmatic edrioasteroids (Echinodermata) from Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 43, p. 497–507.Google Scholar
Swisher, R.E., Westrop, S.R., and Amati, L., 2015, The Upper Ordovician trilobite Raymondites Sinclair, 1944 in North America: Journal of Paleontology, v. 89, p. 110–134.Google Scholar
Swofford, D.L., 2003, PAUP* Version 4.0.b10 Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and Other Methods: Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1950, Le genre Spyridiocrinus Oehlert: Annales de Paléontologie, v. 36, p. 107–122.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1953, Classe des Crinoides, in Piveteau, J., ed., Traité de Paléontologie: Paris, Maison et Cie, v. 3, p. 658–773.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978a, General morphology, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T Echinodermata 2: Boulder: CO and Lawrence, KS. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. T58–T216.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978b, Camerata, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T Echinodermata 2: Boulder: CO and Lawrence, KS, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. T408–T519.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T.T., 1974, Conodonts of the Hull Formation: Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin, v. 248, 31 p.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1880–1886, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Pt. I. The families Ichthyocrinidae and Cyathocrinidae (1880), p. 226–378 (separately repaginated p. 1–153). Pt. II. Family Sphaeroidocrinidae, with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinitidae, and Actinocrinidae (1881), p. 177–411 (separately repaginated, p. 1–237). Pt. III, Sec. 1. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1885), p. 225–364 (separately repaginated, 1–138). Pt. III, Sec. 2. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1886), p. 64–226 (separately repaginated to continue with section 1, 139–302).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1883, Remarks on Glyptocrinus and Reteocrinus, two genera of Silurian crinoids: American Journal of Science, v. 25, p. 255–268.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1897, The North American Crinoidea Camerata: Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology, Memoir, v. 20, p. 1–359. v. 21. p. 360–897.Google Scholar
Webby, B.D., Paris, F., Droser, M.L., and Percival, I.G., eds., 2004, The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event. New York, Columbia University Press, 484 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1973, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1942–1968: Geological Society of America, Memoir, v. 137, p. 1–341.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1974, Crinoid pluricolumnal noditaxis patterns: Journal of Paleontology, v. 48, p. 1283–1288.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1986, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1974–1980: Geological Society of America, Microform Publication, v. 16, p. 1–405.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1988, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids and coronate echinoderms 1981–1985: Geological Society of America, Microform Publication, v. 18, p. 1–235.Google Scholar
Williams, D.A., 1991, Paleozoic geology of Ottawa-St. Lawrence Lowlands, southern Ontario: Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 5770, 292 p.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.E., 1946, Echinodermata of the Ottawa Formation of the Ottawa-St. Lawrence lowland: Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin, v. 4, p. 1–61.Google Scholar
Wright, D.F., and Toom, U., 2017, New crinoids from the Baltic region (Estonia): fossil tip-dating phylogenetics constrains the origin and Ordovician–Silurian diversification of the Flexibilia (Echinodermata): Palaeontology, v. 60, p. 893–910. DOI: 10.1111/pala.12324.Google Scholar
Wright, D.F., Ausich, W.I., Cole, S.R., Rhenberg, E.C., and Peter, M.E., 2017, Phylogenetic taxonomy and classification of the Crinoidea (Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 829–846.Google Scholar