Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Orth, Charles J.
Attrep, Moses
Quintana, Leonard R.
Elder, William P.
Kauffman, Erle G.
Diner, Richard
and
Villamil, Tomas
1993.
Elemental abundance anomalies in the late Cenomanian extinction interval: a search for the source(s).
Earth and Planetary Science Letters,
Vol. 117,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
189.
Hilbrecht, Heinz
and
Dahmer, Dirk D.
1994.
Sediment dynamics during the Cenomanian-Turonian (cretaceous) oceanic anoxic event in Northwestern Germany.
Facies,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1,
p.
63.
Kauffman, Erle G.
and
Harries, Peter J.
1997.
The importance of crisis progenitors in recovery from mass extinction.
Geological Society, London, Special Publications,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 1,
p.
15.
Jolet, Patrick
Philip, Jean
Thomel, Gérard
Lopez, Gregorio
and
Tronchetti, Guy
1997.
Nouvelles données biostratigraphiques sur la limite Cénomanien-Turonien. La coupe de Cassis (Sud-Est de la France): proposition d'un hypostratotype européen.
Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series IIA - Earth and Planetary Science,
Vol. 325,
Issue. 9,
p.
703.
Jolet, P.
Philip, J.
Cecca, F.
Tronchetti, G.
Babinot, J.-F.
Thomel, G.
and
López, G.
2001.
Integrated platform/basin biostratigraphy of the Upper Cenomanian-Lower Turonian in Provence (SE France).
Geobios,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 2,
p.
225.
Takahashi, Akinori
Hirano, Hiromichi
and
Sato, Takashi
2003.
Stratigraphy and fossil assemblage of the Upper Cretaceous in the Teshionakagawa area, Hokkaido, northern Japan.
The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan,
Vol. 109,
Issue. 2,
p.
77.
Gale, Andrew S.
Kennedy, W. James
Voigt, Silke
and
Walaszczyk, Ireneusz
2005.
Stratigraphy of the Upper Cenomanian–Lower Turonian Chalk succession at Eastbourne, Sussex, UK: ammonites, inoceramid bivalves and stable carbon isotopes.
Cretaceous Research,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
460.
Košťák, Martin
and
Wiese, Frank
2008.
Lower Turonian Record of BelemnitePraeactinocamaxfrom NW Siberia and Its Palaeogeographic Significance.
Acta Palaeontologica Polonica,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 4,
p.
669.
Harries, Peter J.
2008.
High-Resolution Approaches in Stratigraphic Paleontology.
Vol. 21,
Issue. ,
p.
227.
Ifrim, Christina
and
Stinnesbeck, Wolfgang
2008.
Cenomanian-Turonian high-resolution biostratigraphy of north-eastern Mexico and its correlation with the GSSP and Europe.
Cretaceous Research,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 5-6,
p.
943.
Mortimore, Rory
2011.
A chalk revolution: what have we done to the Chalk of England?.
Proceedings of the Geologists' Association,
Vol. 122,
Issue. 2,
p.
232.
Walaszczyk, Ireneusz
Plint, A. Guy
and
Kennedy, William J.
2016.
Biostratigraphy and Inoceramus survival across the Cenomanian–Turonian (Cretaceous) boundary in the Ram River section, Alberta, Canada.
Acta Geologica Polonica,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 4,
p.
715.
Ifrim, Christina
2017.
Larval shell morphology of Inoceramus pictus: all suspicions confirmed.
PalZ,
Vol. 91,
Issue. 3,
p.
327.
Košťák, Martin
Čech, Stanislav
Uličný, David
Sklenář, Jan
Ekrt, Boris
and
Mazuch, Martin
2018.
Ammonites, inoceramids and stable carbon isotopes of the Cenomanian–Turonian OAE2 interval in central Europe: Pecínov quarry, Bohemian Cretaceous Basin (Czech Republic).
Cretaceous Research,
Vol. 87,
Issue. ,
p.
150.
Aly, Mohamed F.
Zidan, Abdallah M.
Tantawy, Abdelaziz
El Soughier, Maher I.
and
Bulot, Luc G.
2023.
Late Cenomanian–early Turonian ammonite successions of north Eastern Desert, Egypt: biostratigraphy and paleobiogeographic implications.
Journal of African Earth Sciences,
Vol. 208,
Issue. ,
p.
105095.