Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:12:13.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On some Paleocene invertebrates from the Potrerillos Formation (Difunta Group), northeastern Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Francisco J. Vega  and
Maria Del Carmen Perrilliat
Francisco J. Vega
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, México D.F. 04510, México
Maria Del Carmen Perrilliat
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, México D.F. 04510, México
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three species of mollusks and one annelid are described from the Paleocene upper mudstone member of the Potrerillos Formation (La Popa Basin), and from the upper part of the Rancho Nuevo Formation (Parras Basin). The species described include a gastropod, a bivalve, a nautiloid and a serpulid worm, which are formally reported for first time as Paleocene fauna of the Difunta Group in northeastern Mexico. The nautiloid species provides the basis for correlation between the two sedimentary basins of the Difunta Group, as it is reported for Paleocene layers of the two formations studied. Shoreface and tidal-flat depositional environments are inferred for the Paleocene rocks of the Difunta Group.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 5 , September 1995 , pp. 862 - 869
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H., and Adams, A. 1853-1858. The Genera of Recent Mollusca; arranged according to their organization. 3 vols. John Van Voorst, London, 1,145 p.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. 1848. Nomenclatoris zoologici index universalis. Soloduri, sumtibus Jent et Gassman, Boston, 1,135 p.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1866. Preliminary report upon the Tertiary fossils of Alabama and Mississippi. Alabama Geological Survey Bulletin, 1:15–60.Google Scholar
Aldrich, T. H. 1931. Description of a few Alabama Eocene species and remarks on varieties. Alabama Geological Survey Museum Paper, 12:1–21.Google Scholar
Archiac, A. D', and Haime, J. 1853-1854. Description des animaux fossiles du Groupe Nummulitique de l'Inde. 373 p. Seconde livraison (1854), 36 Pl. Gide et J. Baudy, Libraires Editeurs, Paris.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. 1909. Paleontology of the Coalinga District Fresno and Kings Counties, California. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 396:1–173.Google Scholar
Ball, H. W. 1960. Upper Cretaceous Decapoda and Serpulidae from James Ross Island, Graham Land. Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, Scientific Reports, 24:1–30.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. D. de. 1825. Manuel de malacologie et de conchyliologie. F. G. Levrault, Paris, 664 p.Google Scholar
Böse, E. 1906a. Excursion dans les environs de Monterrey et Saltillo. México, D. F., Congrés Géologique International 10, Guide des Excursions, 29, 17 p.Google Scholar
Böse, E. 1906b. Excursion dans les environs de Parras. México, D. F., Congrés Géologique International 10, Guide des Excursions, 23, 23 p.Google Scholar
Böse, E. 1913. Algunas faunas del Cretácico Superior de Coahuila y regiones limítrofes. México, D. F. Boletín del Instituto Geológico de México, 30, 56 p.Google Scholar
Böse, E., and Cavins, O. A. 1927. The Cretaceous and Tertiary of southern Texas and northern Mexico. Texas University Bulletin 2748, 142 p.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, C. 1930. Étude synthétique sur le Mésozoïque mexicain. Mémoire de la Société Paléontologique Suisse, 49:1–123; 50:123-180.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1836-1837. Handbuch der naturgeschichte. Zum gebrauch bei vorlesungen entworfen von Herman Burmeister. T. C. F. Enslin, Berlin, 2 Volumes.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, R. V. 1919. The Annelida Polychaeta. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 48:1–514.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1860. Descriptions of new species of Cretaceous and Eocene fossils of Mississippi and Alabama. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Second Series 4:275–297.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1866. Observations on Recent and fossil shells, with proposed new genera and species. American Journal of Conchology, 2:101–103.Google Scholar
Cserna, Z. de. 1956. Tectónica de la Sierra Madre Oriental de México, entre Torreón y Monterrey. México, D.F., Congreso Geológico Internacional 20, Monografía, 87 p.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1797. Tableau élémentaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux. Baudouin, Paris, 710 p.Google Scholar
Defrance, D. F. 1804-1845. Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles. Paris and Strasburg. 61 Volumes.Google Scholar
Fauchald, R. 1977. The Polychaete Worms. Definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Natural History Museum, Los Angeles County, Scientific Series, 28:1–190.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. 1887. Manuel de Conchyliologie et de Paléontologíe conchyliologique. Paris, 1,369 p.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1817-1821. Conchology. D. Brewster's Edinburgh encyclopaedia. Several Volumes.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1828. A history of British animals. 8 Volumes. Bell and Bradfute, Edinburgh, 565 p.Google Scholar
Galeotti, M. H. 1837. Mémoire sur la constitution géognostique de la province de Brabant. Memoires couronnés de l'Academie Royal Science Belles Lettres, Bruxelles, 12:1–192.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A. 1923. New species of Mollusca from the Eocene deposits of southwestern Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 131-D:109–117.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A. 1933. The Midway Group of Texas. The University of Texas Bulletin, 3301, 403 p.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A. 1939. Notes on fossils from the Eocene of the Gulf Province; 1, The Annelid genus Tubulostium; 2, The gastropod families Cassididae, Ficidae, and Buccinidae. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 193-B:17–44.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. A., and Bowles, E. 1939. The Venericardia planicosta group in the Gulf Province. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 189-F:143–215.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1778-1793. Linné's Systema Naturae. Editio 13, 3 Volumes.Google Scholar
Gregorio, A. de. 1890. Monographie de la Faune Eocenique de l'Alabama et surtout de celle de Claiborne de l'Etage Parisien (Horizon a Venericardia planicosta Lamarck). Annales Geologie et Paleontologie, Livre 7 and 8:1–316.Google Scholar
Grube, A. E. 1850. Die Familien der Anneliden. Archiv fuer Naturgeschichte, Berlin, 16:249–364.Google Scholar
Guppy, R. J. L. 1866. On the relations of the Tertiary Formations of the West Indies. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 22:570–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaslip, W.G. 1968. Cenozoic evolution of the alticostate venericards in Gulf and East Coastal North America. Palaeontographica Americana, 6:55–135.Google Scholar
Hill, R. T. 1891. Preliminary notes on the topography and geology of northern Mexico, southeast Texas and New Mexico. American Geologist, 8:133–141.Google Scholar
Hill, R. T. 1893. The Cretaceous formations of Mexico and their relations to North America geographic development. American Journal of Science, 45:307–324.Google Scholar
Hill, R. T. 1923. Further contributions to the knowledge of the Cretaceous of Texas and northern Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 34:95 (abstract).Google Scholar
Humphrey, W. E. 1941. Geology of some mountain ranges east of the Saltillo basin. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 52:1910 (abstract).Google Scholar
Humphrey, W. E. 1956a. Tectonic framework of northeast Mexico. Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, 6:25–35.Google Scholar
Humphrey, W. E. 1956b. Notes on the geology of northeast Mexico. Corpus Christi Geological Society. Supplement to guidebook, Laredo to Monterrey Field Trip, 44 p.Google Scholar
Imlay, R. W. 1937a. Geology of the middle part of the Sierra de Parras, Coahuila, México. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 48:587–630.Google Scholar
Imlay, R. W. 1937b. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Upper Cretaceous beds along the eastern side of Laguna de Mayrán, Coahuila, México. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 48:1785–1872.Google Scholar
Imlay, R. W. 1944a. Cretaceous formations of central America and Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 28:1077–1195.Google Scholar
Imlay, R. W. 1944b. Correlation of the Cretaceous formations of the Greater Antilles, Central America and Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 55:1005–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kummel, B. 1956. Post-Triassic Nautiloid genera. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 114:324–494.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. de. 1801. Systeme des animaux sans vertebres ou tableau general des classes, des ordres, et des genres de ces animaux. Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. de. 1802-1809. Memoires sur les fossiles des environs de Paris. Annales de Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Volumes 1–9, 12, 14. (Variously paged, reprinted 1978 by Palaeontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York.) Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. de. 1818. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans vertebres. Volume 5. Paris.Google Scholar
Laudon, R. C. 1984. Evaporite diapirs in the La Popa basin, Nuevo León, México. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 95:1219–1225.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. von. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, Editio decima reformata, Regnum animale, Volume 1. Holmiae. 824 p.Google Scholar
McBride, E. F., Weidie, A. E. Jr., Wolleben, J. A., and Laudon, R. C. 1974. Stratigraphy and structure of the Parras and La Popa basins, northeastern Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 84:1603–1622.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K. 1947. Tertiary Nautiloids of the Americas. The Geological Society of America, Memoir 23, 234 p.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K., and Thompson, M. L. 1933. The Nautiloid Cephalopods of the Midway Group. Journal of Paleontology, 7:298–324.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. 1848. Note sur la classification naturelle des mollusques gastéropodes. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Zoologiques, Série 3, 9:102–112.Google Scholar
Murray, G. E., Boyd, D. R., Durham, C. O., Forde, R. H. Jr., Lawrence, R. H., Lewis, P. D. Jr., Martin, K. G., Weidie, A. E. Jr., Wilbert, W. P., and Wolleben, J. A. 1960. Stratigraphy of Difunta Group, Parras basin, states of Coahuila and Nuevo León, México. Copenhague, International Geological Congress, 21, part 5, The Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary, 96 p.Google Scholar
Murray, G. E., Weidie, A. E. Jr., Boyd, D. R., Forde, R. H., and Lewis, P. D. Jr. 1962. Formational divisions of Difunta Group, Parras basin, Coahuila and Nuevo León, México. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 46:374–383.Google Scholar
Murray, G. E., E., G., Wolleben, J. A., and Boyd, D. R. 1959. Difunta strata of Tertiary age, Coahuila, Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 43:2493–2495.Google Scholar
Neumayr, M. 1884. Zur Morphologie des Bivalvenschlosses. Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Classe der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 88:385–418.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W., and Brann, D. C. 1965. Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene Mollusca of the Southern and Eastern United States. Part I. Pelecypoda, Amphineura, Pteropoda, Scaphopoda, and Cephalopoda. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 48, 466 p.Google Scholar
Perrilliat, M. C., and Vega, F. J. 1993. Early Eocene ostreids from the Adjuntas Formation, Difunta Group, northeastern México. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 26:15–26.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A., and Rhoads, S. N. 1896. Contributions to the Zoology of Tennessee. Number 4. Mollusks. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 48:487–506.Google Scholar
Regenhardt, V. H. 1961. Serpulidae (Polychaeta sedentaria) aus der Kreide Mitteleuropas, ihre ökologische, taxionomische und stratigraphische Bewertung. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologischen Staatsinstitut in Hamburg, 30:5–115.Google Scholar
Rutsch, R. 1943. Die Paleocaen-Mollusken der Inseln Trinidad und Soldado Rock (Britisch-Westindien). Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 36:139–192.Google Scholar
Rutsch, R., and Schenck, H. F. 1940. Upper Cretaceous Pelecypods of the Venericardia beaumonti Group from Iran. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 51:1, 976 (abstract).Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. C. 1818. Versuch über die beste Einrichtung zur Aufstellung, Behandlung und Aufbewahrung der verschieden Naturkörper und Gegenstande der Kunst. Gotha, 252 p.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1927. Revision of the Jurassic cephalopod fauna of the Kachh (Cutch). Geological Survey India, Memoir, Palaeontographica Indica, New Series, 9:1–84.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1987. Eocene molluscan paleontology of the Whitaker Peak Area, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, California. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum, Contributions in Science, 388, 93 p.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1925. Gastropoda der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. II. Teil: Deutsche Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer “Valdivia” 1898-1899. Wissenchaftliche Ergebnisse, 17:35–382.Google Scholar
Toulmin, L. 1977. Stratigraphic distribution of Paleocene and Eocene Fossils in the eastern Gulf Coast region. Geological Survey of Alabama Monograph, 13, 622 p.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., and Feldmann, R. M. 1991. Fossil crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda) from the Maastrichtian Difunta Group, northeastern Mexico. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 60:163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega, F. J., Mitre-Salazar, L. M., and Martinez-Hernandez, E. 1989. Contribución al conocimiento de la estratigrafía del Grupo Difunta (Cretácico Superior-Terciario) en el noreste de México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma, México, Instituto de Geología Revista, 8:179–187.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1989a. La presencia del Eoceno marino en la cuenca de La Popa (Grupo Difunta), Nuevo León; orogenia post-ypresiana. Universidad Nacional Autónoma, México, Instituto de Geología Revista, 8:67–70.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1989b. Una especie nueva de cangrejo del género Costacopluma (Crustacea: Decapoda: Retroplumidae) del Maastrichtiano de Nuevo León, México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma México, Instituto de Geología Revista, 8:84–87.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1989c. Moluscos del Maastrichtiano de la Sierra El Antrisco, estado de Nuevo León. Universidad Nacional Autónoma, México, Instituto de Geología Paleontología Mexicana, 55, 65 p.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1989d. On a new species of Venericardia from the lower Eocene in northeastern Mexico (Difunta Group). Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 22:101–106.Google Scholar
Vega, F. J., and Perrilliat, M. C. 1992. Freshwater gastropods from early Eocene Difunta Group, northeastern Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 66:603–609.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1881. Descriptions of new invertebrate fossils from the Mesozoic and Cenozoic Rocks of Arkansas, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 3, 157 p.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1882. On certain Cretaceous fossils from Arkansas and Colorado. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 4:136–139.Google Scholar
Wolleben, J. A. 1977. Paleontology of the Difunta Group (Upper Cretaceous–Tertiary) in Northern Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 51:373–398.Google Scholar
Wrigley, A. 1951. Some Eocene serpulids. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, London, 62:177–202.Google Scholar