Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:26:32.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stomatopods (Crustacea: Malacostraca) from the Miocene of California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Cees H. J. Hof  and
Frederick R. Schram
Cees H. J. Hof
Affiliation:
Institute for Systematics and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Post Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Frederick R. Schram
Affiliation:
Institute for Systematics and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Post Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The scarce fossil record of stomatopod crustaceans is extended with three new species and two new genera described from the Miocene of California. Squilla laingae new species and Angelosquilla altamirensis new genus and species show clear affinities to the Recent family Squillidae. Topangasquilla gravesi new genus and species can be accommodated within the Recent family Lysiosquillidae. These new species occur in the Monterey and Topanga Formations in Los Angeles County. In addition, three other specimens are described from the Miocene Topanga Formation. The preservation of these stomatopods is among the best noted for any fossils of this group. These specimens show characteristic stages of decay that clearly correspond with those noticed in taphonomic experiments with Recent stomatopods.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , March 1998 , pp. 317 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, C. T. 1939. A summary of the fossil Crustacea of the order Stomatopoda, and a description of a new species from Angola. The American Midland Naturalist, 21:461–471.Google Scholar
Caldwell, R. L., and Dingle, H. 1975. Ecology and evolution of agonistic behavior in stomatopods. Naturwissenschaften, 62:214–222.Google Scholar
Caldwell, R. L., and Dingle, H. 1976. Stomatopods. Scientific American, 234(1):80–89.Google Scholar
Calman, W. T. 1904. On the classification of the Crustacea Malacostraca. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7(13):144–158.Google Scholar
Dingle, H., and Caldwell, R. L. 1978. Ecology and morphology of feeding and agonistic behavior in mudflat stomatopods (Squillidae). Biological Bulletin, 155:134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1787. Mantissa Insectorum sistens eorum Species nuper detectas adjectis Characteribus Genericis, Differentiis Specificis, Emendationibus, Observationibus. Volume 1, Christ. Gottl. Proft. (Hafniae), 348 p.Google Scholar
Förster, R. 1982. Heuschreckenkrebse (Crustacea, Stomatopoda) aus dem Alttertiär von Helmstedt und Handorf (Niedersachsen) und der Oberkreide von Nigeria. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 6:321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. H., Allmon, W. D., and Reaka-Kudla, M. L. 1991. Stomatopod predation on fossil gastropods from the Plio-Pleistocene of Florida. Journal of Paleontology, 65:355–360.Google Scholar
Giesbrecht, W. 1910. Stomatopoden. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel, Erster Theil, Volume 33. R. Friedländer, Berlin, 239 p.Google Scholar
Hof, C. H. J., and Briggs, D.E.G. 1997. Decay and mineralization of mantis shrimps (Stomatopoda: Crustacea)—a key to their fossil record. Palaios, 12:420–438.Google Scholar
Holthuis, L. B., and Manning, R. B. 1969. Stomatopoda, p. R535–R552. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R, Arthropoda 4. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H. 1996. Shako, a new Miocene stomatopod Crustacea from Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, 182:413–418.Google Scholar
Karasawa, H., and Nakagawa, T. 1992. Miocene crustaceans from Fukui and Ishikawa Prefectures, central Japan. Bulletin of the Japan Sea Research Institute, 24:1–18. (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Kunze, J. 1983. Stomatopoda and the evolution of the Hoplocarida. Crustacean Issues, 1:165–188.Google Scholar
Lienau, H.-W. 1985. Heuschreckenkrebse aus dem Geschiebe. Der Geschiebesammler, Hamburg, 19:1–8.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802–1803. Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière, des Crustacés et des Insectes, Volume 3. F. Dufart, Paris, 468 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1806. Genera Crustaceorum et Insectorum Secundum Ordinem Naturalem in Familias Disposita, Iconibus Exemplisque Plurimis Explicata. Volume 1, Parisiis et Argenorati (Amand Koenig), 302 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1817. Les crustacés, les arachnides et les insectes. In Cuvier, G., La Règne Animal Distribué d'après son Organisation, pour Servir de Base à l'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux et d'Introduction à l'Anatomie Comparée, edition 1, part 3. Déterville, Paris, 653 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1825. Families Naturelles du Règne Animal, Exposées Succinctement et dans un Ordre Analytique, avec l'Indication de leurs Genres. J. B. Baillière, Paris, 570 p.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1969. Stomatopod Crustacea of the Western Atlantic. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida, 380 p.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1970. Nine new American stomatopod crustaceans. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 83:99–114.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1978. Further observations on Oratosquilla, with accounts of two new genera and nine new species (Crustacea: Stomatopoda: Squillidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 272, 44 p.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1980. The superfamilies, families, and genera of Recent stomatopod Crustacea, with diagnoses of six new families. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 93:362–372.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1995. Stomatopod Crustacea of Vietnam: The Legacy of Raoul Serène. Crustacean Research, Special Number 4, The Carcinological Society of Japan, Tokyo, 339 p.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B., and Camp, D. K. 1993. Erythrosquilloidea, a new superfamily, and Tetrasquillidae, a new family of stomatopod crustaceans. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 106:85–91.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B., Kropp, R. K., and Dominguez, J. 1990. Biogeography of the deep-sea stomatopod Crustacea, family Bathysquillidae. Progress in Oceanography, 24:311–316.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B., Schiff, H., and Abbot, B. C. 1984. Cornea shape and surface structure in some stomatopod Crustacea. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 4:502–513.Google Scholar
Müller, H.-G. 1994. World catalogue of the Recent Stomatopoda. Wissenschaftler Verlag, Laboratory for Tropical Ecosystems, Wetzlar, Germany. Floppy disk version.Google Scholar
Münster, G. Graf Zu. 1842. Beschreibung drei neuer Arten Crustaciten. Beitrage Petrefactenkunde, 5:76–77.Google Scholar
Pether, J. 1995. Belichnus new ichnogenus, a ballistic trace on mollusc shells from the Holocene of the Benguela region, South Africa. Journal of Paleontology, 69:171–181.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1926. The fossil stalk-eyed Crustacea of the Pacific slope of North America. Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum, Bulletin 138, 155 p.Google Scholar
Reaka, M. L. 1975. Phylogeny of Malacostracan Crustacea. American Zoologist, 15:816.Google Scholar
Rowell, H. C. 1981. Diatom biostratigraphy of the Monterey Formation, Palos Verdes Hills, California, p. 55–70. In Garrison, R. E., Douglas, R. G., Pisciotto, K. E., Isaacs, C. M., and Ingle, J. C. (eds.), The Monterey Formation and Related Siliceous Rocks of California. Pacific Section of Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1969a. Some Middle Pennsylvanian Hoplocarida and their phylogenetic significance. Fieldiana, Geology, 12:235–289.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1969b. Polyphyly in the Eumalacostraca? Crustaceana, 16:243–250.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1981. On the classification of the Eumalacostraca. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 1:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1982. The fossil record and the evolution of Crustacea, p. 93–147. In Abele, L. G. (ed.), The Biology of Crustacea: Systematics, the Fossil Record, and Biogeography. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1984. Upper Pennsylvanian arthropods from black shales of Iowa and Nebraska. Journal of Paleontology, 58:197–209.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford University Press, New York, 606 p.Google Scholar
Secretan, S. 1975. Les crustacés du Monte Bolca, p. 315–388. In Studi e ricerche sui giacimenti terziari di Bolca II, Miscellanea Paleontologica. Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Verona.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P., Bramlette, M. N., and Kew, W. S. 1946. Geology and paleontology of Palos Verdes Hills, California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 207, 145 p.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P., Bramlette, M. N., and Kleinpell, R. M. 1936. Miocene stratigraphy and paleontology of Palos Verdes Hills, California. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 20:125–149.Google Scholar
Yun, H. 1985. Some fossil Squillidae (Stomatopoda) from the Pohang Tertiary Basin, Korea. Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, 1:19–31.Google Scholar