Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:53:57.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Camerate and disparid crinoids from the late Kinderhookian Meadville Shale, Cuyahoga Formation of Ohio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

William I. Ausich  and
Edgar W. Roeser
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, 155 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA,
Edgar W. Roeser
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0013, USA 2165 Reed Road, Knoxville, MD 21758-7716, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Crinoids were first reported from the Cuyahoga Formation in northeastern Ohio by James Hall in 1863. However, these crinoids have not been re-examined in detail since the late nineteenth century. With the restudy of classical and more recent collections, ten (nine camerate and one disparid) species-level taxa are recognized from the late Kinderhookian Meadville Shale Member, Cuyahoga Formation, including the camerates Amphoracrinus viminalis (Hall, 1863); Aorocrinus helice Hall, 1863; Aorocrinus meyeri n. sp.; Aryballocrinus martini n. sp.; Cusacrinus daphne (Hall, 1863); Platycrinites s.l. contritus (Hall, 1863); Platycrinites s.l. graphicus (Hall, 1863); Platycrinites s.l. lodensis (Hall and Whitfield, 1875); and Platycrinites s.l. burkei n. sp. In addition, Halysiocrinus sp. is the first disparid reported from this fauna. Platycrinites s.l. bedfordensis (Hall and Whitfield, 1875) is designated a nomen dubium. Growth is evaluated for Aorocrinus helice and Cusacrinus daphne, which had contrasting development. The growth of the Aorocrinus helice calyx was largely not allometric but that of the primaxil plate was, suggesting the arms may have grown allometrically. In contrast, much of the calyx of Cusacrinus daphne displayed allometric growth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , May 2012 , pp. 488 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W. I. 1996. Chapter 17 Phylum Echinodermata, p. 242–261. InFeldmann, R. M. and Hackathorn, M.(eds.), Fossils of Ohio. Ohio Division of Geological Survey Bulletin 70.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1998. Phylogeny of Arenig to Caradoc crinoids (Phylum Echinodermata) and suprageneric classification of the Crinoidea. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, new series, 9, 36p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Kammer, T. W. 2006. Stratigraphic and geographic distribution of Lower Carboniferous Crinoidea from England and Wales. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 56:91–109.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Kammer, T. W. 2008. Generic concepts in the Amphoracrinidae Bather, 1899 (Class Crinoidea) and evaluation of generic concepts of North American species. Journal of Paleontology, 82:1139–1149.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Kammer, T. W. 2009. Generic concepts in the Platycrinitidae Austin and Austin (Class Crinoidea). Journal of Paleontology, 83:694–717.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I. and Sevatopulo, G.D. 2001. Lower Carboniferous (Tournaisian) crinoids from Hook Head, County Wexford, Ireland. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, 617, 136p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., Brett, C. E., Hess, H., and Simms, M. J. 1999. Crinoid form and function, p. 3–30. InHess, H., Ausich, W. I., Brett, C. E., and Simms, M. J.(eds.), Fossil Crinoids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W., and Lane, N.G. 1979. Fossil communities of the Borden (Mississippian) delta in Indiana and northern Kentucky. Journal of Paleontology, 53:1181–1196.Google Scholar
Austin, T. 1848. Observations on the Cystidea of M. Von Buch, and the Crinoidea generally. Geological Society of London, Quarterly Journal, 4:291–294.Google Scholar
Austin, T. Sr., and Austin, T. Jr. 1842. XVIII. Proposed arrangement of the Echinodermata, particularly as regards the Crinoidea, and a subdivision of the Class Adelostella (Echinidae). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 1, 10(63):106–113.Google Scholar
Austin, T. Sr., and Austin, T. Sr. 1843–1847. A monograph on recent and fossil Crinoidea, with figures and descriptions of some. Recent and fossil allied genera, 1(2):1–32 (1843); 1(3):33–48 (1844); 1(4):49–64 (1845); 1(5): 65–80 (1846); 1(6–8): 81–128 (1847), London and Bristol.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 45, 734p.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1889. The natural history of the Crinoidea. Proceedings of the London Amateur Scientific Society, 1(1, 2):32–33.Google Scholar
Bowsher, A. L. 1955. New genera of Mississippian camerate crinoids. Echinodermata Article 1, University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 23p.Google Scholar
Breimer, A. 1962. A monograph on Spanish Paleozoic Crinoidea. Overdruk uit Leidse Geologische Mededelingen, Deel, 27, p. 190.Google Scholar
Bronn, H. G. 1848–1849. Index palaeontologicus, unter Mitwirking der Herren Prof. H. R. Göppert und H. von Meyer. Handbuch einer Geschichte der Nature, 5, Abt. 1, (1, 2), pt. 3, A. Nomenclator Palaeontologicus; A–M, p. 1–775; N–Z, p. 776–1381, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 2002. Cupulocrinus angustatus (Meek and Worthen, 1870), a cladid crinoid from the Upper Ordovician Maquoketa Formation of the northern midcontinent of the United States. Journal of Paleontology, 76:109–122.Google Scholar
Gahn, F. J. and Baumiller, T. K. 2004. A bootstrap analysis for comparative taphonomy applied to Early Mississippian (Kinderhookian) crinoids from the Wassonville cycle of Iowa. Palaios, 19:17–38.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1852. Palaeontology of New York, 2, Containing descriptions of the organic remains of the lower middle division of the New-York system. Natural History of New York, New York, D. Appleton & Co. and Wiley & Putnam; Boston, Gould, Kendall, & Lincoln, 6, 362p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1860. Contributions to palaeontology, 1858 &1859: Observations upon a new genus of Crinoidea: Cheircrinus. New York State Cabinet of Natural History Annual Report, 13:121–124.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1861. Descriptions of new species of Crinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Journal of the Boston Society of Natural History, 3:261–328.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1863. Preliminary notice, of some species of Crinoidea from the Waverly Sandstone series of Summit Co., Ohio, supposed to be of the age of the Chemung Group of New York. Preprint of Seventeenth Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the state of New York, on the Condition of the State Cabinet of Natural History, and the Historical and Antiquarian Collection annexed thereto, State of New York in Senate Document 189, Albany, Comstock and Cassiday Printers, 50–60.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1864. Preliminary notice, of some species of Crinoidea from the Waverly Sandstone series of Summit Co., Ohio, supposed to be of the age of the Chemung Group of New York. Seventeenth Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the State of New-York, on the Condition of the State Cabinet of Natural History, and the Historical and Antiquarian Collection annexed thereto, State of New York in Senate Document 189, Albany, Comstock and Cassiday Printers, 50–60.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1867. Some species of Crinoidea from the Waverly Sandstone series of Summit Co., Ohio, supposed to be of the age of the Chemung Group of New York. Preprint of Seventeenth Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the state of New-York, on the Condition of the State Cabinet of Natural History, and the Historical and Antiquarian Collection annexed thereto, State of New York in Senate Document 189, Albany, Comstock and Cassiday Printers, 50–60.Google Scholar
Hall, J. and Whitfield, R. P. 1875. Descriptions of invertebrate fossils, mainly from the Silurian System, Crinoidea of the Waverly Group. Ohio Geological Survey Report, vol. 2, Geology and Palaeontology, pt. 2, Palaeontology, 162–179.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø. and Harper, D. 2006. Paleontological Data Analysis, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom, 351p.Google Scholar
Harvey, E. W. and Ausich, W. I. 1997. Phylogeny of calceocrinid crinoids (Paleozoic: Echinodermata): Biogeography and mosaic evolution. Journal of Paleontology, 71:299–305.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. and Clayton, G. 2005. Official names of the Carboniferous System. Geology Today, 21:213–214.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 1987. Aerosol suspension feeding and current velocities: distributional controls for late Osagean crinoids. Paleobiology, 13:379–395.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Roeser, E. W. 2012. Cladid crinoids from the late Kinderhookian Meadville Shale, Cuyahoga Formation of Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 86:470–487.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 2007. Stratigraphical and geographical distribution of Mississippian Crinoidea from Scotland. Earth and Environmental Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 98:139–150.Google Scholar
Lesley, J. P. 1889–1890. A dictionary of the fossils of Pennsylvania and neighboring states. Pennsylvania Geological Survey 2nd Report, P4, 1–1283 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1869. Descriptions of new Crinoidea and Echinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of the western states, with a note on the genus Onychaster. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 21:67–83.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A natural history of the Crinoidea, or lily-shaped animals; with observations on the genera, Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites, Bryan & Co., Bristol, England, 150p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American geology and paleontology, Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, 664p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1897. Second appendix to North American geology and palaeontology, Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, p. 719–793.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896. New species of crinoids from Illinois and other states. Illinois State Museum Bulletin, 9, 66p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1897. New species of crinoids, cephalopods, and other Palaeozoic fossils. Illinois State Museum Bulletin, 12, 69p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. 1952. Crinoids, p. 604–652. InMoore, R. C., Lalicker, C. G., and Fischer, A. G.(eds.), Invertebrate Fossils. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 46, 151p.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1836. Illustrations of the geology of Yorkshire, or a description of the strata and organic remains, Part. 2, 203–208. The Mountain Limestone districts, 2nd edition, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Roeser, E. W. 1986. A Lower Mississippian (Kinderhookian-Osagean) crinoid fauna from the Cuyahoga Formation of northeastern Ohio. Master's Thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 322p.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 2011. Developmental transformations in Jurassic driftwood crinoids. Swiss Journal of Paleontology, 130:129–141.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1868. A catalogue of the Palaeozoic fossils of North America. Part I. Paleozoic Echinodermata. Transactions of the St. Louis Academy of Science (1866), 2:334–407.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978a. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, p. T58–T216. InMoore, R. C. and Teichert, K.(eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Echinodermata, Pt. T (2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder and Lawrence.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978b. Camerata, p. T408–T518. InMoore, R. C. and Teichert, K.(eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Echinodermata, Pt. T (2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder and Lawrence.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth C. and F. Springer. 1880–1886. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Pt. I. The families Ichthyocrinidae and Cyathocrinidae (1880):226–378, (separate repaged p. 1–153); Pt. II. Family Sphaeroidocrinidae, with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinidae, and Actinocrinidae (1881):177–411 (separate repaged, p. 1–237); Pt. III, Sec. 1. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1885):225–364 (separate repaged, p. 1–138); Pt. III, Sec. 2. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1886):64–226 (separate repaged to continue with section 1, p. 139–302).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology Memoirs, 20 and 21, 897p.Google Scholar
Wanner, J. 1916. Die Permischen echinodermen von Timor, I. Teil. Palaontologie von Timor, 11, 329p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1973. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1942–1968. Geological Society of America Memoir, 137, 341p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 2003. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, coronates, and hemistreptocrinids 1758–1999, Geological Society of America Special Paper, 363, <http://crinoid.gsajournals.org/crinoidmod>..>Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. and Lane, N. G. 1987. Crinoids from the Anchor Limestone (Lower Mississippian) of the Monte Cristo Group Southern Nevada. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Paper, 119, 55p.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1898. A bibliographic index of Carboniferous invertebrates. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 153, 653p.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1874. Preliminary report upon invertebrate fossils collected by the expeditions of 1871, 1872, and 1873, Geographical and Geological Exploration and Surveys west of the 100th Meridian, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, 27p.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1865. Description of new species of fossils from the Devonian and Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Boston Society of Natural History Journal, 9:8–33.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1950–1960. The British Carboniferous Crinoidea: Palaeontographical Society,. Monograph, 1(1):1–24, 1950; 1(2):25–46, 1951a; 1(3):47–102, 1951b; 1(4):103–148, 1952a; 1(5):149–190, 1954a; 2(1):191–254, 1955a; 2(2):255–272, 1955b; 2(3):273–306, 1956b; 2(4):307–328, 1958; 2(5):329–347, 1960.Google Scholar