Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T22:36:48.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clarification of the genus Nematothallus Lang

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Paul K. Strother
Paul K. Strother*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Geophysics, Boston College, Weston Observatory, Weston, Massachusetts 02193
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Upper Silurian and lowermost Devonian fossil plant assemblages are often dominated by fragmentary remains of problematic land plants that are composed of a tubular anatomy. Traditionally, these remains have been divided into two morphotypes: large three-dimensionally preserved axes (the Prototaxites group), and smaller thalloid incrustations referred to the genus Nematothallus Lang. Because of their peculiar anatomy of different combinations of tubular elements, these plants do not appear to be closely related to the Tracheidatae (sensu Bremer et al., 1987). Neither do they fit easily into any extant algal groups (Rossat, 1952; Edwards, 1982; Strother, 1988). For these reasons, when he first described the genus Nematothallus, Lang (1937) constructed an informal class of plants, the nematophytales, to include these fossils. Strother (1988) further emphasized the differences between the nematophytales and both embryophytes and algae by placing them into a new group, the Paraphyta.

Type
Taxonomic Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 6 , November 1993 , pp. 1090 - 1094
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbey, F., and Kœniguer, J.-C. 1979. Les Nématophytes et les algueraies de l'Ordovicien et du Dévonien Saharien. Centre des Recherches et Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine, Bulletin, 3:409–418.Google Scholar
Bremer, K., Humphries, C. J., Mishler, B. D., and Churchill, S. P. 1987. On cladistic relationships in green plants. Taxon, 36:339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, N. D., and Edwards, D. 1988. A new Palaeozoic plant closely allied to Prototaxites Dawson. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 97:189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsin, P. 1945. Les algues de l'Eodévonien de Vimy. Sociétés des Sciences, de l'Agriculture et des Arts de Lille, Mémoires, 9:1–86.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. 1982. Fragmentary non-vascular plant microfossils from the late Silurian of Wales. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 84:223–256.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. 1986. Dispersed cuticles of putative non-vascular plants from the Lower Devonian of Britain. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 93:259–275.Google Scholar
Edwards, D., and Edwards, D. S. 1986. A reconsideration of the Rhyniophytina Banks, p. 199–220. In Spicer, R. A. and Thomas, B. A. (eds.), Systematic and Taxonomic Approaches in Palaeobotany. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gensel, G., Johnson, N. G., and Strother, P. K. 1990. Early land plant debris (Hooker's “waifs and strays”?). Palaios, 5:520–547.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful Life. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 347 p.Google Scholar
Hueber, F. M. 1982. Taeniocrada dubia Kr. and W.: its conducting strand and helically strengthened tubes. American Journal of Botany, 69:58–59.Google Scholar
Jonker, F. P. 1979. Prototaxites in the lower Devonian. Palaeontographica, B, 171:39–56.Google Scholar
Kenrick, P., and Crane, P. R. 1990. Cell wall ultrastructure of water-conducting elements in early land plants. American Journal of Botany, Supplement, 77:88.Google Scholar
Kœniguer, J.-C. 1975. Les Prototaxites (Nematophytes) Ordoviciens et Dévoniens du Sahara central. Comptes Rendus de 99e Congrès National des Sociétés Savantes (Besançon), 2:383–388.Google Scholar
Lang, W. H. 1937. On the plant-remains from the Downtonian of England and Wales. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 227:245–291.Google Scholar
Rossat, H. 1952. Les nematophytes: Algues incertae sedis. Bulletin mensuel de la Sociétés Linéene de Lyon, 21:39–44, 73–79, 101–103.Google Scholar
Shute, C. H. 1986. Suggestions on the designation and terminology of palaeobotanical type material, p. 275–282. In Spicer, R. A. and Thomas, B. A. (eds.), Systematic and Taxonomic Approaches in Palaeobotany. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Strother, P. K. 1988. New species of Nematothallus from the Bloomsburg Formation of Pennsylvania. Journal of Paleontology, 62:967–982.Google Scholar