Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:58:53.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A device for precision splitting of micropaleontological samples in liquid suspension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

D. B. Scott
Affiliation:
Centre for Marine Geology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada
J. O. R. Hermelin
Affiliation:
Deep Sea Geology Division, University of Stockholm, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden

Extract

The impetus for writing this paper has come from many people who have shown an interest in the device we describe; prior to this paper, we had no reference to provide for interested parties. The original device was described in Elmgren (1973) and illustrated in Thomas (1986). These papers are not readily available to many micropaleontologists; hence, we felt the need to redescribe it here with a few modifications. Traditionally, foraminiferal researchers, especially those working in fossil deposits, work on samples that are first processed and then dried. To split these dry samples to aliquots of manageable numbers of foraminifera, they use the well-known “Otto” microsplitter, which provides accurate splits plus or minus 10–20 percent.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collins, E. S., McCarthy, F. M. G., Medioli, F. S., Scott, D. B., and Honig, C. A. 1990. Biogeographic distribution of modern thecamoebians in a transect along the eastern North American coast, p. 788792. In Hemleben, C., Kaminski, M. A., Kuhnt, W., and Scott, D. B. (eds.), Paleoecology, Biostratigraphy, Paleoceanography and Taxonomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera. NATO ASI Series C, Vol. 327, Mathematics and Physical Sciences.Google Scholar
Elmgren, R. 1973. Methods of sampling sublittoral soft bottom meiofauna. OIKOS Supplementum (Copenhagen), 15:112120.Google Scholar
Honig, C. A., and Scott, D. B. 1987. Post-glacial stratigraphy and sea-level change in southwestern New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 24:354364.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. T., MacKinnon, K. D., Scott, D. B., and Medioli, F. S. 1985. Arcellaceans (“thecamoebians”) in small lakes of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia: modern distribution and Holocene stratigraphic changes. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 15:114137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, C. J. 1988. Subsurface preservation of agglutinated foraminifera in the northwest Atlantic Ocean, p. 325336. In Rögl, F. and Gradstein, F. M. (eds.), Second Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera Vienna, 1986, Proceedings. Abhandlungen der Geologisehen Bundesanstalt, Band 41, Wien.Google Scholar
Schroeder, C. J., Medioli, F. S., and Scott, D. B. 1989. Fragile abyssal foraminifera (including new Komokiacea) from the Nares Abyssal Plain. Micropaleontology, 35:1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. B. 1987. Quaternary benthonic foraminifera from DSDP Sites 612, 613, Leg 95, New Jersey Transect. Initial Reports of Deep Sea Drilling Project, 95:313337.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., and Leger, G. T. 1990. 16. Benthonic foraminifers and implications for intraplate deformation, Site 717, Distal Bengal Fan. Initial Reports of the Ocean Drilling Program, 116 (Pt. B):189206.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., and Medioli, F. S. 1980. Quantitative studies of marsh foraminiferal distributions in Nova Scotia and comparison with those in other parts of the world: implications for sea-level studies. Cushman Special Publication No. 17, 58 p.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., and Medioli, F. S. 1988. Tertiary–Cretaceous reworked microfossils in Pleistocene glacial-marine sediments: an index to glacial activity. Marine Geology, 84:3141.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., and Vilks, G. 1991. Benthonic foraminifera in the surface sediments of the deep-sea Arctic Ocean. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 21:2038.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., Mudie, P. J., Baki, V., MacKinnon, K. D., and Cole, F. E. 1989a. Biostratigraphy and Late Cenozoic paleoceanography of the Arctic Ocean: foraminiferal, lithostratigraphic and isotopic evidence. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 101:260277.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., Mudie, P. J., de Vernal, A., Hillaire-Marcel, C., Baki, V., MacKinnon, K. D., Mediou, F. S., and Mayer, L. 1989b. Lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy and stable isotope stratigraphy of cores from ODP Leg 105 site surveys, Labrador Sea–Baffin Bay. Initial Reports of Ocean Drilling Program, 105(Pt. B):561582.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., Schnack, E. J., Ferrero, L., Espinosa, M., and Barbosa, C. F. 1990. Recent marsh foraminiferal from the east of South America: comparison to the northern hemisphere, p. 717738. In Hemleben, C., Kaminski, M. A., Kuhnt, W., and Scott, D. B. (eds.), Paleoecology, Biostratigraphy, Paleoceanography, Paleoceanography and Taxonomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera. NATO ASI Series C, Vol. 327, Mathematics & Physical Sciences.Google Scholar
Scott, D. B., Suter, J. R., and Kosters, E. 1991. Marsh foraminifera and arcellaceans of the Lower Mississippi Delta: controls on spatial distributions. Micropaleontology, 37:373392.Google Scholar
Thomas, F. C. 1986. Lower Scotian Slope benthic foraminiferal faunas past and present, with taxonomic outline. Unpubl. , Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, 200 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, F. C., Medioli, F. S., and Scott, D. B. 1990. Holocene and latest Wisconsinan benthic foraminiferal assemblages and paleocirculation history, Lower Scotian Slope and Rise. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 20:212245.Google Scholar
Walton, W. R. 1952. Techniques for the recognition of living foraminifera. Contributions to the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, 3:5660.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. A. 1983. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages on the continental margin of Nova Scotia: a multivariate approach. Unpubl. , Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, 348 p.Google Scholar