Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:51:08.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early and Middle Cambrian Hyolitha (Mollusca) from northeastern China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

John M. Malinky
John M. Malinky*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, European Division, APO New York 09102
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The hyolithid species Hyolithes crebescens Resser and Endo, Hyolithes cybele Walcott, and Hyolithes delphus Resser and Endo from the Middle Cambrian of China are assigned respectively to the genera Nevadotheca Malinky, Novakotheca n. gen., family Hyolithidae, and Crestjahitus Syssoiev, family uncertain, all in the order Hyolithida. Recognition of Nevadotheca extends its geographic range from North America to China, and the occurrence of Crestjahitus in the Middle Cambrian of China increases its geographic and stratigraphic distribution from the Early Cambrian of the Soviet Union.

Poor preservation of the type specimens of Hyolithes? aliger Resser and Endo, H.? aplatus Resser and Endo, H.? cariniferus Resser and Endo, H.? daphnis Walcott, H.? delia Walcott, H.? endoi Howell (as H. ornatus Resser and Endo), H.? mantouensis Resser and Endo, and H.? tenuis Resser and Endo renders their generic identification uncertain. Hyolithes (Orthotheca) glabrus Resser and Endo is here transferred to the hyolith order Orthothecida Marek and referred with question to Decoritheca Syssoiev, family Novitatidae.

Morphology of the types of “Hyolithes” fuchouensis Resser and Endo, “H.” kuantungensis Resser and Endo, “H.” sondai Resser and Endo, “Orthotheca” daulis Walcott, and “O.” doris Walcott does not support assignment to the Hyolitha for these species; their phylogenetic affinity is uncertain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , March 1990 , pp. 228 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandel, K. 1986. The reconstruction of “Hyolithes kingi” as annelid worm from Cambrian of Jordan. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Palaeontologische Institüt der Universität Hamburg, 61:35–101.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1872a. On some fossils from the Primordial rocks of Newfoundland. Canadian Naturalist, 6:465–479.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1872b. On some new species of Palaeozoic fossils. Canadian Naturalist (new ser.), 6:213–218.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, E. 1907a. Stratigraphy of Shan-tung, p. 19–58. In Research in China. Vol. 1, Pt. 1, Carnegie Institute of Washington, 54.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, E. 1907b. Reconnaissance in southwest Liau-tung, p. 85–96. In Research in China. Vol. 1, Pt. 1, Carnegie Institute of Washington, 54.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, E. 1907c. Stratigraphy of the middle Yang-tzi Province, p. 265–279. In Research in China. Carnegie Institute of Washington, 54.Google Scholar
Cobbold, E. S., and Pocock, R. W. 1934. The Cambrian of Rushton (Shropshire). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (ser. B), 233:305–409.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. 1840. Ueber das silurische Schichtensystem in Estland. Zeitschrift für Natur und Heilkunde, vols. 1, 2, 210 p., St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Endo, R. 1937. Addenda to Parts I and II, p. 302–366. In Endo, R. and Resser, C. E. (eds.), The Sinian and Cambrian Formations and Fossils of Southern Manchoukuo. Manchurian Science Museum Bulletin 1.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W. 1962. Small conoidal shells of uncertain affinities, p. W98–W143. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part W. Miscellanea. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1879. Gasteropoda, Pteropoda and Cephalopoda. Paleontology of New York. New York State Geological Survey, Vol. 5, Pt. 2, 492 p.Google Scholar
Holm, G. 1893. Sveriges kambrisk-siluriska Hyolithidae och Conulariidae. Sveriges geologiska Undersorning, C112, Stockholm, 172 p.Google Scholar
Howell, B. F. 1946. New names for homonym species of Hyolithes . Journal of Paleontology, 20:71.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1871. Geognostika och palaeontologiska iakttagelser ofver Eophytonsandstein i Vestergotland. Ofversigt af Konglische Vetenskaps-Akademiens Fordhandlingar, 9, 19 p.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M. 1987. Taxonomic revision of lower and middle Paleozoic Orthothecida (Hyolitha) from North America and China. Journal of Paleontology, 61:942–959.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M. 1988. Early Paleozoic Hyolitha from North America; reexamination of Walcott's and Resser's type specimens. Journal of Paleontology, 62:218–233.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M. 1989. New early Paleozoic Hyolithida and Orthothecida (Hyolitha) from North America. Journal of Paleontology, 63:302–319.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M., Linsley, R. M., and Yochelson, E. L. 1987. Taxonomic revision of Hyolitha from the middle Paleozoic of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 61:1173–1186.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1963. New knowledge on the morphology of Hyolithes . Sbornik Geologickych Ved, Paleontologie, 1:53–73.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1966. New hyolithid genera from the Ordovician of Bohemia. Casopis Narodniho Muzea, 135:89–92.Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1969. Paleontologic part, p. 112–320. In Raaben, M. E. (ed.), The Tommotian Stage and the Lower Cambrian Boundary Problem. Nauka Publishers, Moscow.Google Scholar
Novak, O. 1886. Kenntniss der Fauna der Etage F-fl. In der palaeozischen Schichtengruppe Bohmens. Königlischen bohmens Sitzungsberichten der bohmens Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 27 p.Google Scholar
Picard, L. 1942. New Cambrian fossils and Paleozoic problematica from the Dead Sea and Arabia. Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Geology Department Bulletin, 4:1–18.Google Scholar
Qian, Y. 1977. The early Cambrian hyolithids in central and southwest China and their stratigraphical significance. Memoirs of the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, 11:37–89.Google Scholar
Qian, Y. 1979. Hyolitha and some problematica from the lower Cambrian Meishucun Stage in central and southwest China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 18:255–275.Google Scholar
Qian, Y. 1983. Hyolitha, p. 286–289. In Paleontological Atlas of East China; Volume of the Early Paleozoic. Geological Publishing House, Beijing.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., Chen, M., and Chen, H. 1979. Hyolithids and other small shelly fossils from the lower Cambrian Huangshandong formation in the eastern part of the Yangtze Gorge. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 18:207–232.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., and Zhang, S. 1983. Small shelly fossils from the Xihaoping member of the Tongying Formation in Fangxian County of Hubei Province and their stratigraphical significance. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 22:82–94.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., Wen, Yu, Diyong, Liu, and Zongzhe, W. 1985. Restudy of the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary section at Meishucun of Jinning, Yunnan. Kexue Tongbao, 30:1086–1090.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1938. Fourth contribution to the nomenclature of Cambrian fossils. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 97:20–22.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E., and Endo, R. 1937. Description of the fossils, p. 103–301. In Endo, R. and Resser, C. E. (eds.), The Sinian and Cambrian formations and fossils of southern Manchoukuo. Manchurian Science Museum Bulletin 1.Google Scholar
Richter, R., and Richter, E. 1941. Das Kambrium am Toten Meer und die alteste Tethys. Abhandlungen von der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaften, 460:1–50.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1946. Notes on the nomenclature of Hyolithes . Journal of Paleontology, 20:72–85.Google Scholar
Sokolov, B. S., and Zhuravleva, I. T. 1983. Lower Cambrian Stage Subdivision of Siberia. Atlas of Fossils. Transactions of the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, V. 216 p.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1957. On the morphology, systematics, status and taxonomy of the hyolithids. Akademiya Nauk S.S.S.R., Doklady, 116:304–307.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1958. The superorder Hyolithoidea. Fundamentals of Paleontology, Akademiya Nauk S.S.S.R., 2:184–190.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1962. Hyolithids from the Cambrian of the northern slope of the Siberian Platform. Nauka Publishers, Moscow, 63 p.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1968. Stratigraphy and hyolithids of the lower Cambrian of the Siberian Platform. Yakutsk, 67 p.Google Scholar
Val'kov, A. 1975. Biostratigraphy and hyolithids of the Cambrian of the northeast of the Siberian Platform. Akademiya Nauk, S.S.S.R., 139 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884. Paleontology of the Eureka District, Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 8, 298 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1886. Second contribution to the studies on the Cambrian faunas of North America. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 30, 369 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1889. Descriptive notes of new genera and species of the lower Cambrian or Olenellus zone of North America. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 12:33–46.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1905. Cambrian faunas of China. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 29:1–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1911. Cambrian faunas of China, p. 69–108. In Cambrian Geology and Paleontology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1913. The Cambrian faunas of China, p. 1–276. In Research in China. Carnegie Institute of Washington, 3.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1914. The Cambrian faunas of eastern Asia, p. 1–75. In Cambrian Geology and Paleontology III. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Publications, 64.Google Scholar
Yü, C. 1974. Stratigraphical and paleontological handbook of southwest China. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, 454 p.Google Scholar