Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:53:02.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution of the Early Silurian rhynchonellide brachiopod Stegerhynchus, Anticosti Island, eastern Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Jisuo Jin  and
Paul Copper
Jisuo Jin
Affiliation:
1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London N6A 5B7, Canada
Paul Copper
Affiliation:
2Department of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stegerhynchus was perhaps the most common rhynchonellide brachiopod in the Early Silurian (Llandovery) postextinction brachiopod fauna of North America. In shell morphology, it closely resembles the Late Ordovician rhynchonellide Rhynchotrema in having a rostrate shell posterior and simple, strong costae. It differs internally from Rhynchotrema primarily in having a much-reduced septalium (=cruralium). Superficially Stegerhynchus has a conservative, typically simple, rhynchonellide morphology, but detailed biometric analysis of large samples from the >400 m-thick Llandovery (mid-Aeronian to mid-Telychian) tropical carbonate succession of Anticosti Island reveals that the genus underwent significant evolutionary and ecophenotypic changes over about five million years. The shell length/width ratios of Stegerhynchus peneborealis from sediments of a low-energy, muddy substrate tend to be lower than those of S. deltolingulatus new species from high-energy, reef or inter-reef settings. A wider shell and hingeline probably had a greater stability on the soft seafloor. Also a wider shell appears to be associated with a larger (relative to shell size) sulcus size at the anterior margin. The changes in relative sulcus size either represent ecophenotypic variation in response to environmental conditions, or a random effect of evolutionary selection through time. Both multivariate and single-character analyses demonstrate that two important biometric features, the apical angle and shell flank rib number, separate all forms of Anticosti Island Stegerhynchus (middle Aeronian to middle Telychian) from the widely cited European species Stegerhynchus borealis (latest Telychian-Wenlock) from the type area of Gotland, Sweden. The temporal changes of these two characters are interpreted to be evolutionary modifications.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 78 , Issue 5 , September 2004 , pp. 866 - 883
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. R. 1984. Comparative hydrodynamic stability of brachiopod shells on current-scoured arenaceous substrates. Lethaia, 17:17–23.Google Scholar
Amsden, T. W. 1968. Articulate brachiopods of the St. Clair Limestone (Silurian), Arkansas, and the Clarita Formation (Silurian), Oklahoma. Paleontological Society Memoir, 1, 117 p.Google Scholar
Amsden, T. W. 1974. Late Ordovician and Early Silurian articulate brachiopods from Oklahoma, southwestern Illinois, and eastern Missouri. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 119, 154 p.Google Scholar
Amsden, T. W. 1978. Articulate brachiopods of the Quarry Mountain Formation (Silurian), eastern Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 125, 75 p.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1847–1848. Über die Brachiopoden der silurischen Schichten von Böhmen. Naturwissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Band 1(1847):357–475; Band 2 (1848):155–256.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1879. Systême silurien du centre de la Bohême. Primière Partie: Recherches Paléontologiques, Volume 5, Classe des Mollusques, Ordre des Brachiopodes, 226 p.Google Scholar
Bassett, M. G., and Cocks, L. R. M. 1974. A review of Silurian brachiopods from Gotland. Fossils and Strata, 3:1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, E. 1862. New species of fossils from different parts of the Lower, Middle, and Upper Silurian rocks of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Palaeozoic Fossils, 1(4):96–168.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1866. Catalogues of the Silurian fossils of the island of Anticosti, with descriptions of some new genera and species. Geological Survey of Canada (separate report), 427, 93 p.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1972. Geological map and notes on the Ordovician and Silurian litho- and biostratigraphy, Anticosti Island, Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada Paper, 71–19, 45 p.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1981. Ordovician and Silurian biostratigraphy, Anticosti Island, Québec, p. 41–59. In Lespérance, P. J. (ed.), IUGS Field Meeting, Anticosti-Gaspé, Québec, Volume 2, Stratigraphy and Paleontology.Google Scholar
Brice, D. 1981. Les brachiopodes Pentamerida, Rhynchonellida et Terebratulida. Mémoires de la Société géologique de Bretagne, 24:193–217.Google Scholar
Chernyshev, T. N. 1937. Siluriikie brakhiopody Mongolii i Tuvy. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Nauchno-issledovatelskii Komitet MNR, Trudy Mongolskoi Komissii, 29, 94 p.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M. 1978. A review of British Lower Palaeozoic brachiopods, including a synoptic revision of Davidson's monograph. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 131, 256 p.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M. 1979. A silicified brachiopod fauna from the Silurian of Iran. Bulletin of British Museum of Natural History (Geology), 32:25–42.Google Scholar
Dalman, J. W. 1828. Uppställning och Beskrifning af de i sverige funne Terebratuliter. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademien Handlingar, 3:85–155.Google Scholar
Davidson, T. 1848. Mémoire sur les brachiopodes du système silurien superieur de l'Angleterre. Société géologique de France Bulletin, 5:309–338.Google Scholar
Davidson, T. 1864–1871. British fossil brachiopoda. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 3(6): Devonian Brachiopoda, 1–131; 3(7): Silurian Brachiopoda, 1–397.Google Scholar
Davidson, T. 1881. On genera and species of spiral-bearing Brachiopoda, from specimens developed by Rev. Norman Glass: with notes on the results obtained by Mr. George Maw from extensive washings of the Wenlock and Ludlow Shales of Shropshire. Geological Magazine, 8:1–13.Google Scholar
de Blainville, H. M. D. 1825–1827. Manuel de malacologie et de conchyliologie: Atlas. N.p., Paris, 109 pls.Google Scholar
Dürkoop, A. 1970. Brachiopoden aus dem Silur, Devon und Karbon in Afghanistan. Palaeontographica (A), 134:153–225.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1909. Fossils from the Silurian formations of Tennessee, Indiana, and Kentucky. Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratory of Denison University, 14:61–107.Google Scholar
Fu, Li-pu. 1983. Early Devonian Rhynchonellida (Brachiopoda) from West Qinling. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 22:542–550. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Gratsianova, R. T. 1967. Brakhiopody i stratigrafiya nizhnego devona Gornogo Altaya. Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 177 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1860. New species of fossils from the Hudson River group of Ohio and other western states. New York State Cabinet of Natural History Annual Report, 13:119–121.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1863. Contributions to Palaeontology. Annual report of the Regents of the University of the State of New York on the condition of the State Cabinet of Natural History, 16:3–226.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1879. The fauna of the Niagara Group. New York State Museum of Natural History Annual Report, 28:98–203.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., and Ryan, P. D. 2002. PAST—Palaeontological Statistics, ver. 0.92. http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past (Denmark).Google Scholar
Havlíček, V. 1961. Rhynchonelloidea des böhmischen älteren Paläozoikums (Brachiopoda). Rozpravy Ustředního ústavu geologického, 27:1–211 p.Google Scholar
Havlíček, V. 1990. Systematic paleontology, p. 45–275. In V. Havlíček and P. Storch, Silurian brachiopods and benthic communities in the Prague Basin (Czechoslovakia). Rozpravy Ustředního ústavu geologického, 48.Google Scholar
Howe, H. J. 1965. Morphology of the brachiopod genera Rhynchotrema, Hypsiptycha, and Lepidocyclus. Journal of Paleontology, 39:1125–1128.Google Scholar
Hurst, J. M. 1980. Silurian Stratigraphy and Facies Distribution in Washington Land and western Hall Land, North Greenland. Gr⊘nlands Geologiske Undersógelse Bulletin, 138, 95 p.Google Scholar
Jiang, Xin-sheng. 1990. On the relation between Stegerhynchus and Ferganella. Bulletin of the Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 12:61–67. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Jin, J. 1989. Late Ordovician-Early Silurian rhynchonellid brachiopods from Anticosti Island, Quebec. Biostratigraphie du Paléozoique, 10, 127 p.Google Scholar
Jin, J., and Caldwell, W. G. E. 1990. Rhytidorhachis, a new Silurian rhynchonellid brachiopod from Gotland, Sweden, and the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Canada. Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre Bulletin, 60:29–41.Google Scholar
Jin, J., and Copper, P. 2000. Late Ordovician and Early Silurian pentamerid brachiopods from Anticosti Island, Québec, Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 18, 140 p.Google Scholar
Jin, J., Caldwell, W. G. E., and Copper, P. 1990. Evolution of the Early Silurian rhynchonellid brachiopod Fenestrirostra in the Anticosti Basin of Québec. Journal of Paleontology, 64:214–222.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. G., and Reso, A. 1964. Probable Ludlovian brachiopods from the Sevy Dolomite of Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 38:74–84.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. G., Boucot, A. J., and Murphy, M. A. 1976. Wenlockian and Ludlovian age brachiopods from the Roberts Mountains Formation of central Nevada. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, 115, 102 p.Google Scholar
Jones, B. 1981. The Silurian brachiopod Stegerhynchus. Palaeontology, 24:93–113.Google Scholar
Khalfin, L. L. 1948. Fauna i stratigrafiya devonskikh otlozhenii Gornogo Altaya. Zapadno-sibirskoe geologicheskoe upravlenie, Politekhnicheskii Institut, Izvestiya 65, 464 p.Google Scholar
Kuhn, O. 1949. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 326 p.Google Scholar
Kulkov, N. P. 1967. Brakhiopody i stratigrafiya silura Gornogo Altaya. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, 151 p.Google Scholar
Kulkov, N. P., and Severgina, L. G. 1989. Stratigrafiya i brakhiopody ordovika i nizhnego silura Gornogo Altaya. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, 717, 223 p.Google Scholar
Kulkov, N. P., Vladimirskaya, E. V., and Rybkina, N. L. 1985. Brakhiopody i biostratigrafiya verkhnego ordovika i silura Tuvy. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, 635, 208 p.Google Scholar
Lamont, A., and Gilbert, D. L. F. 1945. Upper Llandovery Brachiopoda from Coneygore Coppice and Old Storridge Common, near Alfrick, Worcestershire. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 12:641–682.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C. 1970. Late Silurian brachiopods of Prongs Creek, northern Yukon. Journal of Paleontology, 44:480–500.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. C. 1977. Upper Silurian and Lower Devonian brachiopods of Royal Creek, Yukon, Canada. Palaeontographica (A), Part 1, Orthida, Strophomenida, Pentamerida, Rhynchonellida, 159:37–109; Part 2, Spiriferida: Atrypacea, Dayiacea, Athyridacea, Spirifericea, 159:111–138.Google Scholar
Lopushinskaya, T. V. 1972. Novye siluriiskie rinkhonellidy Sibiriskoi platformy, p. 186–187. In Zanina, I. E. (ed.), Novye vidy drevnikh pastenii i bespozvonochnykh SSSR. Nauka, Moskva.Google Scholar
Lopushinskaya, T. V. 1976. Brakhiopody i stratigrafiya siluriiskikh otlozhenii severa Sibirskoi platformy. Ministerstvo Geologii SSSR, SNIIGGiMS, 199, Zapadno-sibirskoe knizhnoe izdatelstvo, Novosibirsk, 94 p.Google Scholar
Nikiforova, O. I. 1937. Brakhiopody verkhnego silura sredneatsiatskoi chasti SSSR. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Paleontologicheskii Institut, Monografii po Paleontologii, 35(1), 94 p.Google Scholar
Nikiforova, O. I., and Modzalevskaya, T. L. 1968. Nekotorye llandoveriiskie i venlokskie brakhiopody severo-zapadnoi Sibirskoi platformy. Nauchno-issledovatelskii Institut Geologii Arktiki, Ministerstvo Geologii SSSR, Uchenye Zapiski, Paleontologiya i Biostratigrafiya, 21:50–81.Google Scholar
Oradovskaya, M. M. 1975. Brachiopoda (Clorindinae, Strophomenida, Rhynchonellida, Spiriferida), p. 80–128. In Oradovskaya, M. M. (ed.), Polevoi atlas siluriiskoi fauny Severo-vostoka SSSR. Magadanskoe knizhnoe Izdatelstvo, Magadan.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C. 1943. The Silurian Faunas of North Greenland, II: The fauna of the Offley Island Formation, Pt. 2, Brachiopoda. Meddelelser om Gr⊘nland, 72(3), 60 p.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1917. The Ordovician and Silurian Brachiopoda of the Girvan District. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 51:795–998.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1927. Palaeontological notes on the Silurian inlier of Woolhope. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 83:531–550.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. 1997. Ecology of articulated brachiopods. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. H, Brachiopoda (revised), 1:441–462.Google Scholar
Rubel, M., and Rozman, Kh. S. 1977. Novye brakhiopody Rhynchonellacea iz silura Estonii, p. 213–239. In Kaljo, D. (ed.), Fatsii i fauna silura Pribaltiki. Akademiya Nauk Estonskoi SSR, Institut Geologii, Tallinn.Google Scholar
Rzhonsnitskaya, M. A. 1959 K sistematike rinkhonellid. Congresto Geologico Internacional (Mexico), Sesión 20, Sección 7: Paleontología, Taxonomia y Evolución, p. 107–121.Google Scholar
Savage, N. M. 2002. Rhynchotrematoidea. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. H, Brachiopoda (revised), 4:1047–1091.Google Scholar
Savage, T. E. 1913. Alexandrian series in Missouri and Illinois. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 24:351–376.Google Scholar
Savage, T. E. 1917. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Alexandrian Series in Illinois and Missouri. Illinois State Geological Survey Bulletin, 23:67–160.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. A., and Ausich, W. I. 2002. Paleoecology of framebuilders in Early Silurian reefs (Brassfield Formation, southwestern Ohio). Palaios, 17:237–248.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1913. Class 2. Brachiopoda, p. 355–420. In von Zittel, K. A. (ed.), Textbook of Palaeontology, 1 (second edition; translated and edited by Eastman, C. R.). Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Sheehan, P. M. 1976. Late Silurian brachiopods from northwestern Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 50:710–733.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1839. Organic remains, p. 579–765. In Murchison, R. I. (ed.), The Silurian System. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. K. S. St. 1937. On Camarotoechia borealis (von Buch, 1834, ex. Schlotheim, 1832). Geological Magazine, 74:33–48.Google Scholar
Temple, J. T. 1970. The lower Llandovery brachiopods and trilobites from Ffridd Mathrafal, near Meifod, Montgomeryshire. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 124, 76 p.Google Scholar
Temple, J. T. 1987. Early Llandovery brachiopods of Wales. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, 139, 137 p.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H. 1928. Geology of Anticosti Island. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir, 154, 481 p.Google Scholar
von Buch, H. 1834. Über Terebrateln. Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin[für 1833], p. 21–144.Google Scholar
Whiteaves, J. F. 1904. Preliminary list of fossils from the Silurian (Upper Silurian) rocks of the Ekwan River, and Sutton Mill Lakes, Keewatin, collected by D. B. Dowling in 1901, with descriptions of such species as appear to be new. Geological Survey of Canada Annual Report, 14:38–59.Google Scholar