Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:51:58.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution of trilobite biofacies in Cambrian basins of the Siberian Platform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Tatyana V. Pegel
Tatyana V. Pegel*
Affiliation:
Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources, Krasny Prospect 67, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia, <(geology@ace.ru)>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cambrian biotic zonation on the Siberian Platform reflects differentiation of the depositional environments (inner shelf, outer shelf and open basin). The combination of the chart of trilobite biofacies replacement and the curve of sea-level fluctuations shows that trilobite biofacies replacement occurs as a rule at times of sign reversal and distinct change in the rates of sea-level rise or fall. The boundaries of major Siberian platform Cambrian chronostratigraphic units, such a stages and series, frequently coincide with the boundaries of biofacies in stratigraphic succession related to sea-level fluctuations. If these fluctuations are gradual and restricted, then the boundaries of the Cambrian stages and series cannot be isochronous levels at a global scale. The known levels for intercontinental correlation on the Siberian Platform include boundaries of the adjacent Triplagnostus gibbus and Tomagnostus fissus Zones from the uppermost Amganian Stage (Middle Cambrian) and the Glyptagnostus stolidotus and Glyptagnostus reticulatus Zones of the lower Upper Cambrian. Both levels correspond to boundaries between highstands and lowstands on the Siberian Platform and appear to serve as boundaries of high rank. Evolution of the trilobite biofacies zonation is illustrated by genera typical for each of the various Cambrian paleogeographic environments on the Siberian Platform.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 74 , Issue 6 , November 2000 , pp. 1000 - 1019
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astashkin, V. A., Pegel, T. V., Shabanov, Yu. Ya., Sukhov, S. S., Sundukov, V. M., Repina, L. N., Rozanov, A. Yu., and Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1991. The Cambrian system on the Siberian Platform. Correlation chart and explanatory notes. International Union of Geological Sciences Publication 27, 133 p.Google Scholar
Datsenko, V. A., Zhuravleva, I. T., Lazarenko, N. P., Popov, Yu. N., and Chernysheva, N. E. 1968. Biostratigraphy and fauna of the Cambrian deposits of the northwest Siberian Platform. Nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii Arktiki Trudy, 155, 213 p., Nedra, Leningrad. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I., and Savitsky, V. E. 1969. Cambrian stratigraphy and biofacies of the Siberian Platform. Western part of the Anabar area. Sibirskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii. geofiziki i mineral'nogo syr'ya Trudy, 43, 408 p., Nedra, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I., Shabanov, Yu. Ya., Rozanov, A. Yu., Savitsky, V. E., Chernysheva, N. E., and Shishkin, B. B. 1976. Elanka and Kuonamka facies stratotypes of the lower boundary of the Middle Cambrian in Siberia. Sibirskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii. geofiziki i mineral'nogo syr'ya Trudy, 211, 168 p., Nedra. Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I., Shabanov, Yu. Ya., Pegel, T. V., Savitsky, V. E., Sukhov, S. S., and Chernysheva, N. E. 1982. The Mayan Stage of the stratotype area (Middle Cambrian of the southeastern part of the Siberian Platform). Mezhvedomstvennyy stratigraficheskiy komitet, 8, 146 p., Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Gogin, I. Ya., Koren', T. N., Pegel, T. V., and Sobolevskaya, R. F. 1997. Atlas of the zonal complexes of the Early Palaeozoic leading faunal groups of northern Russia, graptolites and trilobites. Vserossiyskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy geologicheskiy institut, St. Petersburg, 205 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Krasnov, V. I., Savitsky, V. E., Tesakov, Yu. I., and Khomentovsky, V. V. (eds.). 1983. Resolutions of the All-Union Stratigraphic Meeting on the Pre-Cambrian, Paleozoic and Quaternary Systems of central Siberia. Pt. 1 (Upper Pre-Cambrian and Lower Paleozoic). Sibirskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii, geofiziki i mineral'nogo syr'ya, Novosibirsk, 216 p., 27 charts. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Lazarenko, N. P. 1966. Upper Cambrian biostratigraphy and some new trilobites from the Olenek Uplift and Kharaulakh Mts. Nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii Arktiki, Uchenye Zapiskii Paleontologiya i Biostratigrafiya, 11:33–78, Leningrad. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Lazarenko, N. P. and Nikiforov, N. I. 1968. Trilobite assemblages from Upper Cambrian sediments of the Kulyumbe River (northwestern Siberian Platform). Nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii Arktiki, Uchenye Zapiskii Paleontologiya i Biostratigrafiya, 23:20–80, Leningrad. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Melnikov, N. V., Astashkin, V. A., Kilina, L. I., and Shishkin, B. B. 1989. Paleogeography of the Siberian Platform in the Early Cambrian, p. 10–17. In Matukhin, R. G. (ed.), Phanerozoic paleogeogrqaphy of Siberia. Sibirskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii. geofiziki i mineral'nogo syr'ya, Novosibirsk. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Ogienko, L. V., Byaly, V. I., and Kolosnitsina, G. R. 1974. Biostratigraphy of the Cambrian and Ordovician deposits of the south Siberian Platform. Vostochno-Sibirskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii, geofiziki i mineral'nogo syr'ya,Nedra, Moscow, 207 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1998. A proposed nomenclature for stages and series for the Cambrian of Laurentia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 35:323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegel, T. V. 1989. Trilobite biofacies of the Cambrian Diringde reef complex, southwestern Prianabar, p. 20–34. In Bulynnikova, S. P. and Yadrenkina, A. G. (eds.), Biofacies analysis for paleogeographic reconstruction. Sibirskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii, geofiziki i mineral'nogo syr'ya, Novosibirsk. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Pegel, T. V., and Gogin, I. Ya. 1995. Upper Cambrian trilobites of Southern Verkhoyanye. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 4:67–74. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Pegel, T. V., and Sukhov, S. S. 1996. Towards integrated biotic and abiotic Cambrian stratigraphy of the Siberian Platform: recent data and perspectives. Abstracts of the 30th International Geological Congress, vol. 2, p. 15, Bejing.Google Scholar
Pisarchik, Ya. K., Minaeva, A. A., and Rusetskaya, G. A. 1975. Cambrian paleogeography of the Siberian Platform (with atlas of paleogeographical maps). Nedra, Leningrad, 195 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Robison, R. A., Rozova, A. V., Rowell, A. J., and Fletcher, T. P. 1977. Cambrian boundaries and divisions. Lethaia, 10:257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salikhova, A. K. 1987. New Middle Cambrian trilobites of the Olenek Uplift, p. 79–85. In New species of ancient plants and invertebrates in the Phanerozoic of Siberia. Sibirskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii, geofiziki i mineral'nogo syr'ya, Novosibirsk. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Savitsky, V. E., Evtushenko, V. M., Egorova, L. I., Kontorovitch, A. E. and Shabanov, Yu. Ya. 1972. Cambrian of the Siberian Platform (Yudoma-Olenek section type. Kuonamka assemblage of sediments). Sibirskiy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy institut geologii, geofiziki i mineral'nogo syr'ya Trudy, 130, 198 p., Nedra, Moscow. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Shabanov, Yu. Ya., Astashkin, V. A., Pegel, T. V., Egorova, L. I., Zhuravleva, I. T., Pelman, Yu. L., Sundukov, V. M., Stepanova, M. V., Sukhov, S. S., Fedorov, A. B., Shishkin, B. B., Vaganova, N. V., Ermak, V. I., Ryabukha, K. V., Yadrenkina, A. G., Abaimova, G. P., Lopushinskaya, T. V., Sychev, O. V., and Moskalenko, T. A. 1987. Lower Palaeozoic of the southwestern slope of the Anabar Anteclise (according to borehole data), Nauka, Novosibirsk, 206 p. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Sukhov, S. S. 1997. Cambrian depositional history of the Siberian craton: evolution of the carbonate platforms and basins. Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeography, 17(5):27–39, Sichuan University Press, Chengdu.Google Scholar