Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:19:17.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The first evidence of drilling predation in inoceramids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Peter J. Harries  and
Kenneth M. Schopf
Peter J. Harries
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., SCA 528, Tampa, 33620-5201,
Kenneth M. Schopf
Affiliation:
Center for Science Education, Education Development Center, 55 Chapel St., Newton, Massachusetts 02458,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The inoceramid bivalves first appeared in the Permian of Australia (Browne and Newell, 1966; Waterhouse, 1970), thrived during certain intervals in the Jurassic (e.g., the Toarcian; Harries and Little, 1999), and dominated many benthic marine communities globally from the late Early through the Late Cretaceous. Despite excellent preservation (the prismatic, outer calcitic layer is retained in many cases), ubiquitous presence in Late Mesozoic marine deposits, and intense study (e.g., Tröger, 1967; Kauffman et al., 1977; Crampton, 1996; Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2000; Walaszczyk et al., 2001), no evidence of predatory drilling in inoceramids has been reported to date. Indeed, evidence of predation of any sort on inoceramids throughout their evolutionary history is limited (Harries and Ozanne, 1998; though see Ozanne and Harries, 2002, for an exception to this). There have been several documented examples of non-predatory borings in inoceramids likely made post mortem by organisms such as bryozoans (Morris, 1990) and acrothoracian barnacles. Rare instances of potential nondrilling predatory attacks on inoceramids by fish (Speden, 1971) and ptychodid sharks (Kauffman, 1972), also have been described (see summary in Harries and Ozanne, 1998).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 77 , Issue 5 , September 2003 , pp. 1011 - 1015
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bromley, R. G. 1993. Predation habits of octopus past and present and a new ichnospecies, Oichnus ovalis . Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 40:167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, I. A., and Newell, N. D. 1966. The genus Aphanaia Koninck, 1877, Permian representative of the Inoceramidae. American Museum Novitates, 2252:1–10.Google Scholar
Carriker, M. R., and Yochelson, E. L. 1968. Recent gastropod boreholes and Ordovician cylindrical borings. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 593B, p. B1–B26.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., and Whitehead, H. L. 1987. Predatory borings in the inarticulate brachiopod Artiotreta from the Silurian of Oklahoma. Lethaia, 20:67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, J. S. 1996. Inoceramid bivalves from the Late Cretaceous of New Zealand. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd., Lower Hutt, NZ, Monograph 14, p. 188.Google Scholar
Erickson, J. M. 1974. Revision of the Gastropoda of the Fox Hills Formation, upper Cretaceous (Maestrichtian) of North Dakota. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 66:131–253.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., and Jablonski, D. 1984. Late Triassic naticid drillholes: carnivorous gastropods gain a major adaptation but fail to radiate. Science, 224:78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1966. The Red Bird section of the Upper Cretaceous Pierre Shale in Wyoming, with a section on a new echinoid from the Cretaceous Pierre Shale of Eastern Wyoming by Kier, P.M. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 393-A:A1–A73.Google Scholar
Harper, E. M., Forsythe, G. T. W., and Palmer, T. 1998. Taphonomy and the Mesozoic marine revolution; preservation state masks the importance of boring predators. Palaios, 13:352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, P. J., and Crampton, J. S. 1998. The inoceramids. American Paleontologist, 6:2–6.Google Scholar
Harries, P. J., and Little, C. T. S. 1999. The early Toarcian (Early Jurassic) and the Cenomanian-Turonian (Late Cretaceous) mass extinctions; similarities and contrasts. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 154:39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, P. J., and Ozanne, C. R. 1998. General trends in predation and parasitism upon inoceramids. Acta Geologica Polonica, 48:377–386.Google Scholar
Kabat, A. R. 1990. Predatory ecology of naticid gastropods with a review of shell boring predation. Malacologia, 32:155–193.Google Scholar
Kase, T., and Ishigawa, M. 2003. Mystery of naticid predation history solved: Evidence from a “living fossil” species. Geology, 31:403–406.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1972. Ptychodus predation upon a Cretaceous Inoceramus . Palaeontology, 15:439–444.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G., Hattin, D. E., and Powell, J. D. 1977. Stratigraphic, paleontologic and paleoenvironmental analysis of the Upper Cretaceous rocks of Cimarron County, Northwestern Oklahoma. Geological Society of America Memoir, 149:150.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G., Arthur, M. A., Howe, B., and Scholle, P. A. 1996. Widespread venting of methane-rich fluids in Late Cretaceous (Campanian) submarine springs (Tepee Buttes), Western Interior Seaway, U.S.A. Geology, 24:799–802.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, P. H. 1988. Predation by Miocene gastropods of the Chesapeake Group; stereotyped and predictable. Palaios, 3:436–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, P. H., and Hansen, T. A. 1993. Evolution of the naticid gastropod predator-prey system; an evaluation of the hypothesis of escalation. Palaios, 8:358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, J. I. 1990. The paleontology and paleoenvironments of the Middle Cretaceous (Late Cenomanian-Middle Turonian) Greenhorn Cyclothem at Black Mesa, northeastern Arizona. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1320 p.Google Scholar
Kirkland, J. I. 1996. Paleontology of the Greenhorn Cyclothem (Cretaceous: Late Cenomanian to Middle Turonian) at Black Mesa, Northeastern Arizona. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 9:1–131.Google Scholar
Kitchell, J. A., Boggs, C. H., Kitchell, J. F., and Rice, J. A. 1981. Prey selection by naticid gastropods: experimental tests and application to the fossil record. Paleobiology, 7:533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalewski, M., Dulai, A., and Fürsich, F. T. 1998. A fossil record full of holes; the Phanerozoic history of drilling predation. Geology, 26:1091–1094.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1876. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the upper Missouri country. United States Survey of Wyoming (Hayden) Preliminary Report, 9:351–374.Google Scholar
Morris, P. A. 1990. Incrusting and boring bryozoans from the Dessau Chalk Formation (Cretaceous), Little Walnut Creek, Austin, Texas. AAPG Bulletin, 74:1505.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1834. Synopsis of the organic remains of the Cretaceous group in the United States. Key and Biddle, 1–88.Google Scholar
Newton, C. R. 1983. Triassic origin of shell-boring gastropods. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 15:652–653.Google Scholar
Nixon, M. 1979. Hole-boring in shells by Octopus vulgaris Cuvier in the Mediterranean. Malacologia, 18:431–443.Google Scholar
Ozanne, C. R., and Harries, P. J. 2002. Role of predation and parasitism in the extinction of the inoceramid bivalves: an evaluation. Lethaia, 35:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, C. S., Mapel, W. J., and Bergendahl, M. H. 1964. Stratigraphy and structure of the northern and western flanks of the Black Hills uplift, Wyoming, Montana, and South Dakota. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 404, p. 134.Google Scholar
Schopf, K. M. 1993. Abstaining naticids; clues to paleo-complexity. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 25:52.Google Scholar
Schopf, K. M., and Morris, P. J. 1994. Description of a muscle scar and two other novel features from steinkerns of Hypomphalocirrus (Mollusca; Paragastropoda). Journal of Paleontology, 6:47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1967. Upper Cretaceous gastropods from the Pierre Shale at Red Bird, Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 393-B:B1–B46.Google Scholar
Speden, I. G. 1970. Generic status of the Inoceramus? tegulatus species group (Bivalvia) of the Latest Cretaceous of North America and Europe. Postilla, 145:1–45.Google Scholar
Speden, I. G. 1971. Predation on New Zealand Cretaceous species of Inoceramus (Bivalvia). New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 14:56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tröger, K.-A. 1967. Zur Paläontologie, Biostratigraphie und faziellen Ausbildung der unteren Oberkreide (Cenoman bis Turon). Teil I. Paläontologie und Biostratigraphie der Inoceramen des Cenomans bis Turons Mitteleuropas. Abhandlungen des Staatlichen Museums für Mineralogie und Geologie zu Dresden 12:13–207.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1987. Evolution and Escalation: An Ecological History of Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p. 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walaszczyk, I., and Cobban, W. A. 2000. Inoceramid faunas and biostratigraphy of the Upper Turonian-Lower Coniacian of the Western Interior of the United States. The Palaeontological Association, Special Papers in Palaeontology, 64:1–118.Google Scholar
Walaszczyk, I., Cobban, W. A., and Harries, P. J. 2001. Inoceramids and inoceramid biostratigraphy of the Campanian and Maastrichtian of the United States, Western Interior Basin. Revue de Palèobiologie, Genève, 20:117–234.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, J. B. 1970. Permoceramus, a new inoceramid bivalve from the Permian of eastern. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 13:760–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar