Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:26:12.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The first reported middle Eocene sponge from India; a Raphidonema from the Fulra Limestone Formation, Kutch, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

J. Keith Rigby  and
Manmohan Mohanti
J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
Manmohan Mohanti
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Utkal University, Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751004 (Orissa), India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A single specimen of the new sponge, Raphidonema indica n. sp., is the first Eocene sponge to be reported from India. It was collected from the Fulra Limestone Formation at Lakhpat, Kutch, India. The undulating, cup-like sponge is most similar to R. farringdonense (Sharpe, 1854), but the Indian species has a clustered, mounded excurrent system and numerous tangential canals on the upper, exhalant surface. Skeletal tracts in Raphidonema indica are 0.4–0.5 mm in diameter, in walls that are generally 12–14 mm, but range up to 18 mm thick.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , July 1990 , pp. 510 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biswas, S. K., and Deshpande, S. V. 1975. Geological map of Kutch Basin. Institute of Petroleum Exploration, Oil and Gas Commission, India.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. K., and Deshpande, S. V. 1983. Geology and hydrocarbon prospects of Kutch, Saurashtra and Narmada Basins. Petroleum Asia Journal, November, 1983:111–126.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. K., and Raju, D. S. N. 1973. The rock stratigraphy classification of the Tertiary sediments of Kutch. Bulletin Oil and Natural Gas Commission, 10(1–2):37–45.Google Scholar
De Laubenfels, M. W. 1955. Part E, Archaeocyatha and Porifera, p. E21–E112. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Dendy, A., and Row, R. W. H. 1913. The classification and phylogeny of the calcareous sponges. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1913:704–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunikowski, E. V. 1883. Die Pharetronen aus dem Cenomam von Essen und die systematische Stellung der Pharetronen. Palaeontographica, 29:263–323.Google Scholar
Fromentel, E. de. 1859. Introduction à l'étude des Ésponges fossiles. Mémoires de la Société Linnéennede Normandie, 11:1–50.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, A. 1826–1833. Petrefacta Germaniae, Vol. 1, Divisio Primas. Düsseldorf, 114 p.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1884 (1883). Catalogue of the fossil sponges in the Geological Department of the British Museum (Natural History), London, 248 p.Google Scholar
Pomel, A. 1872. Paléontologie, ou description des animaux fossiles de la Province D'Oran. Zoophytes. 5e Fascicule. Spongiaires, 256 p.Google Scholar
Sharpe, D. 1854. On the age of the fossilferous sands and gravels of Farringdon and its neighborhood. Quarterly Journal Geological Society (London), 10:176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1877. On Pharetrospongia Strahani a fossil holoraphidote sponge from the Cambridge Coprolite Bed. Quarterly Journal Geological Society (London), 33:242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1878. Studien über fossil Spongien.—III. Abtheilung, Monactinellidae, Tetractinellidae und Calcispongiae. Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Physikalischen Klasse, 2:1–138.Google Scholar