Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:08:42.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fossil leaf species from the Fox Hills Formation (Upper Cretaceous: North Dakota, USA) and their paleogeographic significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Daniel J. Peppe
Affiliation:
Yale University, Department of Geology and Geophysics, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, ,
J. Mark Erickson
Affiliation:
St. Lawrence University, Department of Geology, Canton, New York 13617,
Leo J. Hickey
Affiliation:
Yale University, Department of Geology and Geophysics, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, ,

Abstract

Seven fossil leaf species are described from impression fossils collected from the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Fox Hills Formation in south-central North Dakota, USA. They are Marmarthia johnsonii n. sp., Nilssoniocladus yukonensis n. comb., Nilssoniocladus comtula n. comb., Mesocyparis borealis, Rhamnus salicifolius, Paloreodoxites plicatus, and Zingiberopsis magnifolia. These species represent some of the elements of the Fox Hills flora that have paleogeographic ranges to the northwest (N. yukonensis, N. comtula, and M. borealis) and to the southwest (M. johnsonii, R. salicifolius, P. plicatus, and Z. magnifolia) of the Fox Hills type area. The identification and reappraisal of these species represent an effort to understand the biogeographic relationships of Late Cretaceous floras across the Northern Hemisphere.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, A., Ellis, B., Hickey, L. J., Johnson, K. R., Wilf, P., and Wing, S. 1999. Manual of Leaf Architecture—Morphological Description and Categorization of Dicotyledonous and Net-Veined Monocotyledonous Angiosperms. The Leaf Architecture Working Group, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., 65 p.Google Scholar
Bartling, F. G. 1830. Ordines naturaltes plantarum eorumque characters et affinitates. Dieterichianus, Göttingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Batsch, A. 1802. Tabula affinitatum regni vegetabilis. Landes-Industrie-Comptior, Weimar, Germany.Google Scholar
Berry, E. W. 1934. A lower Lance florule from Harding County, South Dakota. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 185-F:127136.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1825. Observations sur les végétaux fossiles refermés dans les Gres de Hoer en Scanie. Annales des sciences naturelles, 4:200224.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1828a. Prodrome d'une histoire des végétaux fossiles. F. G. Levrault, Paris, 223 p.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1828b. Vegetaux Fossiles. F. G. Lavrault, Paris, 628 p.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. 1849. Tableau des genres de végétaux fossiles considérés sous le point de vue de leur classification botanique et de leur distribution géologique. Paris, 127 p.Google Scholar
Bronn, H. G. 1848. Index Palaeontologicus, Nomenclator, Stuggart, 1381 p.Google Scholar
Brown, R. W. 1939. Fossil plants from the Colgate Member of the Fox Hills Sandstone and adjacent strata. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 189-I:239275.Google Scholar
Brown, R. W. 1962. Paleocene flora of the Rocky Mountains and Great Plains. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 375:1119.Google Scholar
Carruthers, W. 1869. On Benia, a new genus of Cycadean fruit from the Yorkshire Oolite. Geological Magazine, 6:9799, pl. 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronquist, A., Takhtajan, A. L., and Zimmerman, W. 1966. On the higher taxa of the Embryobionta. Taxon, 15(4):129134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Candolle, A. P. 1825. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, 2, 1644 p.Google Scholar
de Jussieu, A. L. 1789. Genera Plantarum. Viduam Herissant, Paris, 498 p.Google Scholar
Dorf, E. J. 1942. Upper Cretaceous floras of the Rocky Mountain Region. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, 508:1168.Google Scholar
Dumortier, B. C. 1829. Analyse des familles des plantes, avec l'indication des principaux genres qui s'y rattachent, Tournay, Belgium, 23 p.Google Scholar
Endlicher, S. 1847. Synopsis coniferum. Scheitlin and Zollikofer, Sankt-Gallen-Switzerland, 368 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, S. 1925. Nilssonia-bed of Hokkaido and its flora. Science Reports Series 2: Geology, 7:116.Google Scholar
Erickson, J. M. 1973. Maestrichtian paleogeography in light of the gastropod fauna of the Fox Hills Formation in North Dakota. The Compass of Sigma Gamma Epsilon, 50(2):717.Google Scholar
Erickson, J. M. 1978. Bivalve mollusk range extension in the Fox Hills Formation (Maestrichtian) of North and South Dakota and their implications for the Late Cretaceous geologic history of the Williston Basin. Annual Proceedings of the North Dakota Academy of Science, 32(II):7989.Google Scholar
Erickson, J. M. 1992. Subsurface stratigraphy, lithofacies and paleoenvironments of the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian; Late Cretaceous) adjacent to the type area, North Dakota and South Dakota; toward a more holistic view, p. 199241. In Erickson, J. M. and Hoganson, J. W. (eds.), Proceedings of the F. D. Holland, Jr., Geological Symposium. North Dakota Geological Survey Miscellaneous Series, 76.Google Scholar
Erickson, J. M. 1999. The Dakota Isthmus—closing the Late Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway. Proceedings of the North Dakota Academy of Science, 53:124129.Google Scholar
Eschscholtz, J. F. G. 1826. Mém Acad Imp Sci, St. Petersburg Russia, 285 p.Google Scholar
Golovneva, L. B. 1988. A new species of Microconium (Cupressaceae) from the Late Cretaceous deposits of the north-east of the USSR. Botanicheskiy Zhurnal, 73(1194-1184).Google Scholar
Golovneva, L. B. 1994. Maastrichtian-Danian floras of Koryak Upland. Annals of Komarov Botanical Institute, 13:1146.Google Scholar
Greuter, W., McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T. S., Nicholson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Skog, J. E., Trehane, P., Turland, N. J., and Hawksworth, D. L. 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Koeltz Scientific Books, Konigstein, Germany, 474 p.Google Scholar
Grisebach, A. 1854. Grundriss der systematischen Botanik für akademische Vorlesunger, Göttingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Halle, T. G. 1913. The Mesozoic Flora of Graham Land. Lithographisches Institute des Generalstabs, Stokholm, 123 p.Google Scholar
Harris, T. M. 1942. Notes on the Jurassic flora of Yorkshire. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 9:568587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, T. M. 1964. The Yorkshire Jurassic Flora II. British Museum (Natural History), London, 186 p.Google Scholar
Hayden, F. V. 1868. Notes on the lignite deposits of the West. American Journal of Science and Arts, 45(134):198209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heer, O. 1870. Die Miocene flora und fauna Spitzbergens. Flora Fossilis Artica, 1–3:198.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1878a. Florae fossilis Sachalinensis. Flora Fossilis Artica, 4–5:161.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1878b. Fossilen flora Sibiriens und des Amurlandes. Flora Fossilis Artica, 4–5:158.Google Scholar
Heer, O. 1882. Die fossile Flora Gronlands, erster Theil. Flora Fossilis Artica, 6:1147.Google Scholar
Hickey, L. J. 1977. Stratigraphy and paleobotany of the Golden Valley Formation (Early Tertiary) of western North Dakota. Geological Society of America Memoir, 150:1183.Google Scholar
Hickey, L. J. 1979. A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves, p. 2539. In Metcalfe, C. R. and Chalk, L. (eds.), Anatomy of Dicotyledons. Volume 7. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hickey, L. J., and Peterson, R. K. 1978. Zingiberopsis, a fossil genus of the ginger family from Late Cretaceous to Early Eocene sediments of Western Interior North America. Canadian Journal of Botany, 56:11361152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, L. J., and Wolfe, J. A. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Vegetative morphology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 62:538589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hisinger, W. 1841. Lethaea suecia, supplem. secundi continuato, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hoganson, J. W., and Erickson, J. M. 2005. A new species of Ischyodus (Chondrichthyes: Holocephali: Callorhynchidae) from Upper Maastrichtian shallow marine facies of the Fox Hills and Hell Creek Formations, Williston Basin, North Dakota, USA. Palaeontology, 48:709721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollick, A. 1930. The Upper Cretaceous floras of Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 159:1219.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. R. 1996. Description of seven common fossil leaf species from the Hell Creek Formation (Upper Cretaceous: Upper Maastrichtian) North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana. Proceedings of the Denver Museum of Natural History, 3(12):147.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. R. 2002. Megaflora of the Hell Creek and lower Fort Union Formation in the western Dakotas: Vegetational response to climate change, the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary event, and rapid marine transgression. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 361:329391.Google Scholar
Kimura, T., and Sekido, S. 1975. Nilssoniocladus n. gen. (Nilssoniaceae n. fam.), newly found from the early Lower Cretaceous of Japan. Palaeontographica, 153:111118.Google Scholar
Knowlton, F. H. 1900. Flora of the Montana formation. United States Geological Survey Bulletin, 162:1118.Google Scholar
Knowlton, F. H. 1917. Fossil floras of the Vermejo and Raton formations of Colorado and New Mexico. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 101:223450.Google Scholar
Knowlton, F. H. 1922. The Laramie Flora of the Denver Basin. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 130:1175.Google Scholar
Knowlton, F. H. 1930. The flora of the Denver Basin and associated formations of Colorado. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 155:1139.Google Scholar
Lesquereux, L. 1873. Lignitic Formation and fossil flora, p. 317427. In Hayden, F. V. (ed.), Sixth Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories, Embracing Portions of Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah, Being a Report of Progress of the Explorations for the Year 1872. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Lesquereux, L. 1878. Contributions to the fossil flora of the western territories, Pt. II, The Tertiary flora. United States Geological Survey of the Territories, 7:1366.Google Scholar
Lesquereux, L. 1883. Contributions to the fossil flora of the western territories, Pt. III, The Cretaceous and Tertiary floras. United States Geological Survey of the Territories, 8:1283.Google Scholar
Lindley, J. 1835. An Introduction to the Natural System of Botany, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, J. H. F. 1822. Enumeratio Plantarum Horti Regii botanici Berolinensis altera 2. Berloni, 478 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum, Stockholm, 1–2, 1200 p.Google Scholar
McIver, E. E., and Basinger, J. F. 1987. Mesocyparis borealis gen. et sp. nov.: Fossil Cupressaceae from the Early Tertiary of Saskatchewan, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany, 65:23382351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIver, E. E., and Basinger, J. F. 1993. Flora of the Ravenscrag Formation (Paleocene), southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada. Paleontographica Canadiana, 10:1167.Google Scholar
Miller, P. 1754. The Gardeners Dictionary Abdridged, 4, unpaginated.Google Scholar
Morris, J. 1840. Memoir to illustrate a Geological map of Cutch. Transactions of the Geological Society, 5(2):289.Google Scholar
Murphy, E. C., Hoganson, J. W., and Johnson, K. R. 2002. Lithostratigraphy of the Hell Creek Formation in North Dakota. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 361:934.Google Scholar
Nathorst, A. G. 1909. Uber die Gattung Nilssonia BRONGN. mit besonderer Berucksichtigung schwedischer Arten. Kungl. Svenska vetenskapsakademien. Handlingar, 43(12):140.Google Scholar
Newberry, J. S. 1863. Description of the Fossil Plants collected by Mr. George Gibbs, Geologist to the United States Northwest Boundary Commission, under Mr. Archibald Campbell, United States Commissioner. Boston Journal of Natural History, 7:506524.Google Scholar
Newberry, J. S. 1868. Notes on the later extinct floras of North America, with descriptions of some new species of fossil plants from the Cretaceous and Tertiary strata. Lyceum Natural History New York Annals, 9:176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, J. S. 1898. The later extinct floras of North America. United States Geological Survey Monograph, 35:295.Google Scholar
Peppe, D. J. 2003. Fox Hills I, a new upper Maastrichtian megafloral zone within the Williston Basin of North Dakota. Unpublished , , 155 p.Google Scholar
Perleb, K. J. 1826. Lehrbuch der Natugeschichte des Pflanzenreichs. Magner, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, 174 p.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1829. Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire: or, a description of the strata and organic remains of the Yorkshire Coast, York. 192 p., 114 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, R. W., and Hickey, L. J. 1972. A revised classification of fossil palm and palm-like leaves. Taxon, 21(1):129137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. E., Fay, M. F., Cronk, Q. C. B., Bowman, D., and Chase, M. W. 2000a. A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using RBCL and TRNL-F plastid DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany, 87:13091324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, J. E., Fay, M. F., Cronk, Q. C. B., and Chase, M. W. 2000b. A revision of the tribal classification of Rhamnaceae. Kew Bulletin, 55:311340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, . 1914. Plantae Wilsoniane. Cambridge University Press, 2, 244 p.Google Scholar
Schenk, A. 1867. Die fossile Flora der Grenzschichten des Keupers und Lias Frankens, Wisebaden, 232 p., 245 pls.Google Scholar
Schimper, W. P. 1869. Traite de paleontologie vegetale ou la flore du monde primitif. Bailliere, Paris, 1, 738 p., pls. 731-756.Google Scholar
Schimper, W. P. 1870. Traite de Paleontologie Vegetale, ou la flore de monde primitif dans ses raports avec les formations geologiques et la flore du monde actuel, Paris, 2, 1522, pls. 557-584.Google Scholar
Schimper, W. P. 1872. Traite de Paleontologie Vegetale, ou la flore de monde primitif dans ses raports avec les formations geologiques et la flore du monde actuel, Paris, 2, 522968, pls. 576-590.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C. 1900. The Jurassic Flora. I. The Yorkshire Coast. Catalogue of Mesozoic Plants in the Department of Geology, British Museum (Natural History), London, 3, 341 p., 321 pls.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C. 1919. Fossil Plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 4, 542 p.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, R. E. 1966. Fossil leaves of the Hell Creek and Tullock formations of eastern Montana. Palaeontographica, 119(1–3):5475.Google Scholar
Spicer, R. A., Ahlberg, A., Herman, A. B., Kelley, S. P., Raikevich, M. I., and Rees, P. M. 2002. Palaeoenvironment and ecology of the middle Cretaceous Grebenka flora of northeastern Asia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 184:65105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, R. A., and Herman, A. B. 1996. Nilssoniocladus in the Cretaceous Arctic: new species and biological insights. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 92:229243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, G. K. 1825. Versuch einer geognostischen botanischen Darsellung der Flora der Vorwelt, Leipsic and Prague, 2, 148 p.Google Scholar
Takimoto, H., Ohana, T., and Kimura, T. 1997. Two new Nilssoniocladus species from the Jurassic (Oxfordian) Tochikubo Formation, Northeast Honshu, Japan. Paleontological Research, 1(3):180187.Google Scholar
Thunberg, C. P. 1783. Nova Genera Plantarum, 3, 5570.Google Scholar
Velasco de Leon, P., Cevallos-Ferriz, S. R. S., and Silva-Pineda, A. 1998. Leaves of Karwinskia axamilpense sp. nov. (Rhamnaceae) from Oligocene sediments, near Tepexi de Rodriguez, Puebla, Mexico. Canadian Journal of Botany, 76:410419.Google Scholar
Walter, T. 1788. Flora Caroliniana, 87 p.Google Scholar
Ward, L. F. 1905. Status of the Mesozoic Floras of the United States, Pt. II.—Plates. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 119 plates p.Google Scholar
Watson, J., and Cusak, H. A. 2005. Cycadales of the English Wealden. The Palaeontographical Society, London, 158, 189 p., 110 pls.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, M. 1890. Jurassic plants from Kaga, Hida and Echizen. The Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University, Japan, 3(1):166.Google Scholar