Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:01:31.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The last Western Interior Baculites from the Fox Hills Formation of South Dakota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

W. A. Cobban  and
W. J. Kennedy
W. A. Cobban
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Mail Stop 919, Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225
W. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Geological Collections, University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Species of Baculites are important marker fossils in the Upper Cretaceous rocks of the Western Interior of the United States and provide indices for 20 of the 29 Campanian and Maastrichtian zones recognized by Cobban (in Gill and Cobban, 1966; Cobban, 1977). They often occur in rock-forming proportions (Gill and Cobban, 1966, Pl. 11, fig. 3) and are common up through the lower Maastrichtian Baculites clinolobatus zone. In the type area of the Fox Hills Formation in west-central South Dakota, B. clinolobatus is present in the lower part of the Mobridge Member of the Pierre Shale, but Baculites are rare or absent in the rest of the member as well as in the overlying Elk Butte Member that forms the uppermost part of the Pierre Shale (Waage, 1968, p. 50, 51, fig. 6). Only the diminutive Baculites columna Morton, 1834, has been noted from the succeeding Fox Hills Formation (Waage, 1968). The highest marine Cretaceous rocks of the Western Interior are characterized instead by Sphenodiscus and a range of scaphitid species (Hoploscaphites, Discoscaphites). It is therefore of some interest to describe, for the first time, the baculitids from the very high Cretaceous of the Western Interior. The material described below was collected from the Fox Hills Formation by N. L. Larson, P. L. Larson, and R. A. Farrar of the Black Hills Institute of Geological Research, Hill City, South Dakota. We are grateful to them for allowing us to describe this interesting collection. Specimens cited below are deposited in the collections of the Black Hills Institute (BHI) and in the U.S. National Museum of Natural History (USNM) in Washington, D.C.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , July 1992 , pp. 682 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunnschweiler, R. O. 1966. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the Carnavon Basin of Western Australia. 1. The heteromorph Lytoceratina. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, 58, 58 p.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1977. A new curved baculite from the Upper Cretaceous of Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Journal of Research, 5:457–462.Google Scholar
Elias, M. K. 1933. Cephalopods of the Pierre Formation of Wallace County, Kansas, and adjacent area. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 21:289–363.Google Scholar
Gill, J. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1966. The Red Bird section of the Upper Cretaceous Pierre Shale in Wyoming, with a section on A new echinoid from the Pierre Shale of eastern Wyoming by P. M. Kier. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 393-A:A1–A73.Google Scholar
Gill, J. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1973. Stratigraphic and geological history of the Montana Group and equivalent rocks, Montana, Wyoming, and North and South Dakota. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 776, 37 p.Google Scholar
Gill, T. 1871. Arrangement of the families of mollusks. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 227, 49 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Meek, F. B. 1856. Description of new species of fossils from the Cretaceous formations of Nebraska, with observations on Baculites ovatus and B. compressus, and the progressive development of septa in Baculites, Ammonites and Scaphites. American Academy of Arts and Sciences Memoir, 5:379–441.Google Scholar
Hupsch, J. W. C. A. F. 1768. Neue in der Naturgeschichte des Niederdeutschlands gemachte Entdeckungen einiger selten und wenig bekannten versteinerten Schaalthiere. Metternichisschen Buchhandlung, Frankfurt and Leipzig, 159 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. W. 1905. Annotated list of the types of invertebrate fossils in the collections of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 57:4–28.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1977. Illustrated guide to biostratigraphically important Cretaceous macrofossils, Western Interior basin, USA. Mountain Geologist, 14:225–274.Google Scholar
Kullmann, J., and Wiedmann, J. 1970. Significance of sutures in phylogeny of Ammonoidea. Kansas University Paleontological Contributions Paper 47, 32 p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M. de. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Mémoires de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris (for 1799):63–90.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1801. Système des animaux sans vertèbres. The author, Deterville, Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1959. The Upper Cretaceous ammonites of California. Part 1. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 8:91–171.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1876. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the upper Missouri country. U.S. Geological Survey of the Territories (Hayden), 9, 629 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Hayden, F. V. 1861. Descriptions of new Lower Silurian (Primordial), Jurassic, Cretaceous, and Tertiary fossils, collected in Nebraska Territory ***, with some remarks on the rocks from which they were obtained. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, 1861:415–447.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1834. Synopsis of the Organic Remains of the Cretaceous Group of the United States. Key and Biddle, Philadelphia, 88 p.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G. 1968. Catalogue of invertebrate fossil types at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Special Publication 8, 222 p.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1926. On new ammonites from the English Chalk. Geological Magazine, 63:77–83.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1941. The larger invertebrates of the Navarro Group of Texas (exclusive of corals and crustaceans and exclusive of the fauna of the Escondido Formation). University of Texas Bulletin 4101, 641 p.Google Scholar
Waage, K. M. 1968. The type Fox Hills Formation, Cretaceous (Maestrichtian), South Dakota. Part 1, Stratigraphy and paleoenvironments. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University Bulletin, 27:1–175.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1916. Über Lobus, Suturallobus und Inzision. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie, und Paläontologie, B, 1916:185–195.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1966. Stammesgeschichte und System den posttriadischen Ammonoideen; ein Überblick. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 125:49–79; 127:13–81.Google Scholar