Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:27:48.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Llandovery (early Silurian) crinoids from Hiiumaa Island, western Estonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

William I. Ausich  and
Mark A. Wilson
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, 125 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA 〈ausich.1@osu.edu〉
Mark A. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA 〈mwilson@wooster.edu〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rhuddanian crinoid faunas are poorly known globally, making this new fauna from the Hilliste Formation of western Estonian especially significant. The Hilliste fauna is the oldest Silurian fauna known from the Baltica paleocontinent, thus this is the first example of the crinoid recovery fauna after the Late Ordovician mass extinction. Hiiumaacrinus vinni n. gen. n. sp., Protaxocrinus estoniensis n. sp., Eomyelodactylus sp., calceocrinids, and five holdfast types are reported here. Although the fauna has relatively few taxa, it is among the most diverse Rhuddanian faunas known. Similar to other Rhuddanian crinoid faunas elsewhere, the Hilliste crinoid fauna contains crinoids belonging the Dimerocrinitidae, Taxocrinidae, Calceocrinidae, and Myelodactylidae; most elements of the new fauna are quite small, perhaps indicative of the Lilliput Effect.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 6 , November 2016 , pp. 1138 - 1147
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alroy, J., 2008, Dynamics of extinction and origination rates in the fossil record: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 105, p. 11536–11542.Google Scholar
Alroy, J., 2010a, The shifting balance of diversity among major marine animal groups: Science, v. 329, p. 1191–1194.Google Scholar
Alroy, J., 2010b, Geographic, environmental and intrinsic biotic controls on Phanerozoic marine diversifications: Palaeontology, v. 53, p. 1211–1235.Google Scholar
Angelin, N.P., 1878, Iconographia Crinoideorum: in stratis Sueciae Siluricis fossilium: Samson and Wallin, Holmiae, 62 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1998a, Phylogeny of Arenig to Caradoc Crinoids (Phylum Echinodermata) and suprageneric classification of the Crinoidea: University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Papers, New Series, no. 9, 36 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1998b, Early phylogeny and subclass division of the Crinoidea (phylum Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 72, p. 499–510.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Copper, P., 2010, The Crinoidea of Anticosti Island, Québec (Late Ordovician to early Silurian): Palaeontographica Canadiana, v. 29, 157 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Deline, B., 2012, Macroevolutionary transition in crinoids following the Late Ordovician extinction event (Ordovician to early Silurian): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 361–362, p. 38–48.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W., and Baumiller, T.K., 1994, Demise of the Middle Paleozoic crinoid fauna: a single extinction event or rapid faunal turnover?: Paleobiology, v. 20, p. 345–361.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Wilson, M.A., and Vinn, O., 2012, Crinoids from the Silurian of Western Estonia (Phylum Echinodermata): Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 57, p. 613–631.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Wilson, M.A., and Vinn, O., 2015, Wenlock and Pridoli (Silurian) crinoids from Saaremaa, western Estonia (Phylum Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 89, p. 72–81.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T.K., 1994, Patterns of dominance and extinction in the record of Paleozoic crinoids, in David, B., Guille, A., Féral, J.P., and Roux, M., eds. Echinoderms Through Time (Echinoderms Dijon): Rotterdam, A.A. Balkema, p. 193–198.Google Scholar
Bengtson, P., 1988, Open nomenclature: Palaeontology, v. 31, p. 223–227.Google Scholar
Borths, M.R., and Ausich, W.I., 2011, Ordovician-Silurian Lilliput crinoids during the end-Ordovician biotic crisis: Swiss Journal of Paleontology, v. 130, p. 7–18.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., 1981, Terminology and functional morphology of attachment structures in pelmatozoan echinoderms: Lethaia, v. 14, p. 343–370.Google Scholar
Copper, P., 2001, Reefs during the multiple crises towards the Ordovician–Silurian boundary: Anticosti Island, eastern Canada, and worldwide: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 38, p. 153–171.Google Scholar
Copper, P., 2006, Faunal change across the Ordovician-Silurian mass extinction boundary on Anticosti Island, E Canada: Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, v. 38, p. 403.Google Scholar
Delabroye, A., Munnecke, A., Vecoli, M., Copper, P., Tribovillard, N., Joachimski, M., Desrochers, A., and Servais, T., 2011, Phytoplankton dynamics across the Ordovician/Silurian boundary at low palaeolatitudes: correlations with carbon isotopic and glacial events: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 312, p. 79–97.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., 1986, A new genus of inadunate crinoid with unique stem morphology from the Ashgill of Sweden: Palaeontology, v. 29, p. 235–242.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., 1987, Functional morphology of an unusual pelmatozoan column from the Ashgill Boda Limestone, Sweden: Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, v. 109, p. 255–257.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., and Franzén-Bengtson, C., 1988, Myelodactylid crinoid columnals from the Lower Visby Beds (Llandoverian) of Gotland: Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, v. 110, p. 69–79.Google Scholar
Donovan, S.K., and Pickerill, R., 2016, The invalidity of the trace fossil Tremichnus Brett: Geological Journal, DOI: 10.1002/gj.2849.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1919, Echinodermata of the Brassfield (Silurian) Formation of Ohio: Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratory Denison University, v. 19, p. 3–32.Google Scholar
Harper, D.A., Hammarlund, E.U., and Rasmussen, C.M., 2014, End Ordovician extinctions: a coincidence of causes: Gondwana Research, v. 25, p. 1294–1307.Google Scholar
Hints, O., Ainsaar, L., Männik, P., and Meidla, T., eds., 2008, The Seventh Baltic Stratigraphical Conference: Abstracts and Field Guide, Geological Society of Estonia, 46 p.Google Scholar
Jobson, L.M., 1983, Crinoids and coronoids from the Ordovician of Sweden [M.S. thesis]: University of Liverpool, England.Google Scholar
Mao, Y., Lin, J.-P., and Ausich, W.I., 2015, Chinese origin and radiation of the Palaeozoic crinoid family Petalocrinidae: Palaeoworld, v. 24, p. 445–453.Google Scholar
Meek, F.B., and Worthen, A.H., 1869, Descriptions of new Crinoidea and Echinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of the western states, with a note on the genus Onychaster : Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 21, p. 67–83.Google Scholar
Melchin, M.J., Cooper, R.A., and Sadler, P.M., 2004, The Silurian Period, in Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., and Smith, A.G., eds. A Geologic Time Scale 2004: Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, p. 188–201.Google Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1821, A Natural History of the Crinoidea, or Lily-shaped Animals; With Observations on the Genera, Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites : Bristol, England, C. Frost, 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1883, Echinodermata, in The American Palaeozoic fossils, 2d ed., Cincinnati, Ohio, published by the author, p. 247–334.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Laudon, L.R., 1943, Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids: Geological Society of America Special Paper, v. 46, 151 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., 1978, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2, Crinoidea: Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America, University of Kansas, 1027 p.Google Scholar
Nestor, H., 1995, Ordovician and Silurian reefs in the Baltic area, in Lathuiliére, B., and Geister, J., eds., Coral Reefs in the Past, Present and Future: Publications du Service Geologique du Luxembourg, v. 29, p. 39–47.Google Scholar
Nestor, H., and Einasto, R., 1977, Model of facies and sedimentology for Paleobaltic epicontinental basin, in Kaljo, D.L., ed., Facies and Fauna Silurian of Baltica: Tallinn, Estonia, Institute of Geology AN ESSR, p. 89–121.Google Scholar
Peters, S.E., and Ausich, W.I., 2008, A sampling-adjusted macroevolutionary history for Ordovician-Silurian crinoids: Paleobiology, v. 34, p. 104–116.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J.J. Jr., 1996, Patterns of Phanerozoic extinction: a perspective from global databases, in Walliser, O.H., ed. Global events and event stratigraphy in the Phanerozoic: Berlin, Springer-Verlag, p. 31–51.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1906, Discovery of the disk of Onychocrinus and further remarks on the Crinoidea Flexibilia: Journal of Geology, v. 14, p. 467–523.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1913, Crinoidea, in von Zittel, K.A., ed., Text-book of Paleontology (translated and edited by C. R. Eastman), 2d ed., London, Macmillan & Co., Ltd., v. 1, p. 173–243.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978, Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, K., eds. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2, v. 1: Boulder Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America, University of Kansas Press, p. T58–T216.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A., 1993, Biotic crises in the history of Upper Silurian graptoloids: a paleobiological model: Historical Biology, v. 7, p. 29–50.Google Scholar
Vinn, O., Wilson, M.A., Ausich, W.I., and Toom, U., 2015, Tremichnus in crinoid pluricolumnals from the Silurian of western Estonia (Baltica): Carnets Geol., Madrid, v. 15, p. 239–243.Google Scholar
von Zittel, K.A., 1879, Echinodermata, in Handbuch der Paläontologie: Paläozoologie, v. 1, pt. 1: München, Leipzig, Oldenbourg, p. 308–560.Google Scholar
von Zittel, K.A., 1895, Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie): München, Oldenbourg, 971 p.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1880–1886, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia pt. I, The families Ichthyocrinidae and Cyathocrinidae (1880), p. 226−378, (separate repaginated p. 1−153). Pt. II. Family Sphaeroidocrinidae, with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinidae, and Actinocrinidae (1881), p. 177−411, (separate repaginated, p. 1−237). Pt. III, sec. 1: Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1885), p. 225−364, (separate repaginated, 1−138). Pt. III, sec. 2: Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1886), p. 64−226 (separate repaginated to continue with section 1, p. 139−302).Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., and Webster, D.W., 2014, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, coronates, and hemistreptocrinoids, 1758–2012: http://crinoids.azurewebsites.net/ (accessed April 14, 2016).Google Scholar
Wisshak, M., Kroh, A., Bertling, M., Knaust, D., Nielsen, J.K., Jagt, J.W.M., Newmann, C., and Nielsen, K.S.S., 2015, In defence of an iconic ichnogenus − Oichnus Bromley, 1981: Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, v. 85, p. 445–451.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, J.-P, and Gingras, M.K., 2014, Sedilichnus, Oichnus, Fossichnus, and Tremichnus: ‘small round holes in shells’ revisited: Journal of Paleontology, v. 88, p. 895–950.Google Scholar