Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:27:08.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lockeia, not Pelecypodichnus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Christopher G. Maples  and
Ronald R. West
Christopher G. Maples
Affiliation:
Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence 66046-2598
Ronald R. West
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The nomenclatorial history of the ichnogenera Lockeia and Pelecypodichnus has been confused by duality during the past 20 years. Many authors presume Pelecypodichnus is correct because Lockeia is a nomen oblitum. This presumption is rejected on both objective and subjective grounds. First, Lockeia is not a nomen oblitum. Two major gaps in the citational history of Lockeia exist, the first one of 35 years duration and the second of 43 years duration. Thus, no 50-year gap exists in the valid use of the name Lockeia. Second, the Committee on Zoological Nomenclature was not petitioned to declare Lockeia a nomen oblitum during the period of time that the nomen oblitum concept was in effect. Third, the name Pelecypodichnus implies a specific trace-maker for the trace—a practice we, and others, judge should be avoided. Fourth, topotype specimens and the lectotype of Lockeia are available for study. Fifth, even many of those authors who use Pelecypodichnus instead of Lockeia commonly note the existence of Lockeia as a synonymous generic name. Thus, use of Lockeia by numerous authors in the past 20 years results in no confusion or destabilization of the generic-level taxonomy. Lockeia, the senior synonym of Pelecypodichnus, has been used by numerous authors, is well understood, and therefore should be used instead of Pelecypodichnus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 63 , Issue 5 , September 1989 , pp. 694 - 696
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, A. W., and Maples, C. G. 1984. Trace-fossil distribution across a marine-to-nonmarine gradient in the Pennsylvanian of southwestern Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 58:448–466.Google Scholar
Basan, P. B. 1979. Trace fossil nomenclature: the developing picture. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 28:143–146.Google Scholar
Best, M. B., and Hoeksema, B. W. 1988. Comment on the suggested introduction of “Protected Works.” Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 45:47.Google Scholar
Bjerstedt, T. W. 1987. Latest Devonian–earliest Mississippian nearshore trace-fossil assemblages from West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Maryland. Journal of Paleontology, 61:865–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerstedt, T. W. 1988. Trace fossils from the Early Mississippian Price Delta, southeast West Virginia. Journal of Paleontology, 62:506–519.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G., and Asgaard, U. 1979. Triassic freshwater ichnocoenoses from Carlsberg Fjord, East Greenland. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 28:39–80.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G., and Fürsich, F. T. 1980. Comments on the proposed amendments to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature regarding ichnotaxa. Z.N.(S.) 1973. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 37:6–10.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. K. 1971. Morphology and ethology of trace fossils from the Ouachita Mountains, southeast Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 45:212–246.Google Scholar
Chaplin, J. R. 1982. [Field guidebook to the] Paleoenvironments and biostratigraphy of the Borden and parts of the Newman and Breathitt Formations (Mississippian–Pennsylvanian) in northeastern Kentucky. Twelfth Annual Field Conference, Great Lakes Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 196 p.Google Scholar
Cornelius, P. F. S. 1987. Use versus priority in zoological nomenclature. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 44:79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C., Okolo, S. A., and Walters, G. F. 1983. Trace fossils as evidence in the evolution of Carbonicola. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 44:283–303.Google Scholar
Eagar, R. M. C., Baines, J. G., Collinson, J. D., Hardy, P. G., Okolo, S. A., and Pollard, J. E. 1985. Trace fossil assemblages and their occurrence in Silesian (Mid-Carboniferous) deltaic sediments of the Central Pennine Basin, England, p. 99–149. In Curran, H. A. (ed.), Biogenic Structures: Their Use in Interpreting Depositional Environments. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication No. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekdale, A. A., and Picard, M. D. 1985. Trace fossils in a Jurassic eolianite, Entrada Sandstone, Utah, U.S.A., p. 3–12. In Curran, H. A. (ed.), Biogenic Structures: Their Use in Interpreting Depositional Environments. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication No. 35.Google Scholar
Frey, R. W., and Pemberton, S. G. 1985. Biogenic structures in outcrops and cores. I. Approaches to ichnology. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 33:72–115.Google Scholar
Hakes, W. G. 1976. Trace fossils and depositional environment of four clastic units, upper Pennsylvanian megacyclothems, northeast Kansas. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Article 63, 46 p.Google Scholar
Hakes, W. G. 1977. Trace fossils in Late Pennsylvanian cyclothems, Kansas, p. 209–226. In Crimes, T. P. and Harper, J. C. (eds.), Trace Fossils 2. Geological Journal, Special Issue 9, Seel House Press, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Häntzschel, W. 1962. Trace fossils and problematica, p. W177–W245. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. W, Miscellanea. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Häntzschel, W. 1965. Vestigia invertebratorum et Problematica. Fossilium Catalogus, 1. Animalia. s'Gravenhage, Junk, 142 p.Google Scholar
Häntzschel, W. 1975. Trace fossils and problematica, p. W1–W269. In Teichert, C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. W, Miscellanea, Suppl. 1. Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Häntzschel, W. and Kraus, O. 1972. Names based on trace fossils (ichnotaxa): request for a recommendation. Z.N.(S.) 1973. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 29:137–141.Google Scholar
James, J. F. 1885. The fucoids of the Cincinnati Group, Pt. 2, Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 7:151–166.Google Scholar
James, J. F. 1892 [1891]. Manual of the paleontology of the Cincinnati Group. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 14:45–72.Google Scholar
James, U. P. 1879. Descriptions of new species of fossils and remarks on some others from the Lower and Upper Silurian rocks of Ohio. The Paleontologist, 3:17–24.Google Scholar
Kamola, D. L. 1984. Trace fossils from marginal-marine facies of the Spring Canyon Member, Blackhawk Formation (Upper Cretaceous), east-central Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 58:529–541.Google Scholar
Key, K. H. L. 1988. Use versus priority: comments on a paper by P. F. S. Cornelius, with alternative proposals for the conservation of well-known names. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 45:45–46.Google Scholar
Lemcke, H. 1973. Comments on the application concerning trace fossils. Z.N.(S.) 1973. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 30:30.Google Scholar
Lockley, M. G., Rindsberg, A. K., and Zeiler, R. M. 1987. The paleoenvironmental significance of the nearshore Curvolithus ichnofacies. Palaois, 2:255–262.Google Scholar
Melville, R. V. 1979. Further proposed amendments to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature Z.N.(G.) 182. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 36:11–14.Google Scholar
Osgood, R. G. Jr. 1970. Trace fossils of the Cincinnati area. Palaeontographica Americana, 6(41):279–444.Google Scholar
Pemberton, S. G., and Frey, R. W. 1982. Trace fossil nomenclature and the Planolites–Palaeophycus dilemma. Journal of Paleontology, 56:843–881.Google Scholar
Pemberton, S. G., and Jones, B. 1988. Ichnology of the Pleistocene Ironshore Formation, Grand Cayman Island, British West Indies. Journal of Paleontology, 62:495–505.Google Scholar
Sarjeant, W. A. S. 1979. Code for trace fossil nomenclature. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 28:147–167.Google Scholar
Sarjeant, W. A. S. and Kennedy, W. J. 1973. Proposal of a code for the nomenclature of trace fossils. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 10:460–475.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1953. Über die Methoden der Palichnologie, die fossilien Ruhenspuren (Cubichnia). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 98:87–124.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. 1975. Classification of trace fossils, p. 39–54. In Frey, R. W. (ed.), The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York, 562 p.Google Scholar
Smith, J. 1909. Upland Fauna of the Old Red Sandstone of Carrick, Ayrshire. A. W. Cross, Kilwinning, 41 p.Google Scholar
Tasch, P. 1964. Conchostracan trails in bottom clay muds and on turbid water surfaces. Kansas Academy of Sciences, Transactions, 67:126–128.Google Scholar
The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1964. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 176 p.Google Scholar
The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1985. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, Third Edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature in association with British Museum (Natural History), London, 338 p.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H. 1927. Geology of Anticosti Island. Canada Department of Mines, Geological Survey, Memoir 154, 481 p.Google Scholar
Voigt, E., and Hartmann, G. 1970. Über rezente vergipste Ostracodenfärten. Senckenbergiana Maritima, 2:102–118.Google Scholar
Walker, E. F. 1985. Arthropod ichnofauna of the Old Red Sandstone at Dunure and Montrose, Scotland. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 76:287–297.Google Scholar
Wright, A. D., and Benton, M. J. 1987. Trace fossils from Rhaetic shore-face deposits of Staffordshire. Palaeontology, 30:407–428.Google Scholar