Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:33:40.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mesozoic and Cenozoic fossil isopods of North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Robert W. Wieder  and
Rodney M. Feldmann
Robert W. Wieder
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
Rodney M. Feldmann
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nine species of fossil isopods have been studied from Cretaceous to Pleistocene rocks of North America. This represents all known species from the Mesozoic and Cenozoic fossil record on this continent. Four species of Palaega were studied. Palaega goedertorum Wieder and Feldmann, 1989, from upper Eocene to lower Miocene rocks of Washington state, has served recently as the basis for restructuring the genus. Emendations are made to species descriptions of Palaega guadalupensis and P. williamsonensis from the Cretaceous rocks of Texas. The fourth species of Palaega, P. lamnae, also from the Cretaceous rocks of Texas, although of doubtful affinities with this genus, was not removed due to lack of sufficient information to reassign it. Two new species are described, Cirolana enigma, from Lower Cretaceous rocks of South Dakota, and Archaeoniscus texanus, from the Cretaceous of Texas. This is the first report of Cirolana from the fossil record. Two sphaeromatid isopods were included: one, Sphaeroma burkartii from Tertiary rocks of Mexico, was not located for study; the other, Eocopea oculata, is from Miocene rocks of southern California. Two specimens of the valviferan genus Saduria, from Pleistocene deposits in Canada, were also studied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 6 , November 1992 , pp. 958 - 972
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, A. 1852. Appendix, p. ccvi–ccvii. In Sutherland, P. C., Journal of a Voyage in Baffin's Bay and Barrow Straits in the Years 1850–1851. Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, London.Google Scholar
von Ammon, L. 1882. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der fossilen Asseln. Sitzungberichte der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 12:507–551.Google Scholar
Barcena, D. M. 1876. Descripcion de un Crustáceo fósil del género Spheroma (Spheroma burkartii) y resena geologica del Valle de Ameca de Jalisco. La Naturaleza, 3:355–361.Google Scholar
Bowman, T. E. 1971. Palaega lamnae, new species (Crustacea: Isopoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 45:540–541.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1834. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Rankenfüsser (Cirripedia). G. Reimer, Berlin, 56 p.Google Scholar
Dahl, F. 1916. Die asseln order Isopoden Deutschland. Jena, 90 p.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1853. Crustacea, Part 2. United States Exploring Expedition During the Years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 Under the Command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., 14:689–1618.Google Scholar
Edwards, E. C. 1941. Edison Oil Field and vicinity, Kern County, California, p. 1–8. In Levorsen, A.I. (ed.), Stratigraphic Type Oil Fields. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. 1990. Comments on Case 2721—Bathynomus A. Milne Edwards, 1879 (Crustacea, Isopoda): proposed precedence over Palaega Woodward, 1870. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 47(4):290–291.Google Scholar
Gadd, N. R. 1971. Pleistocene geology of the Central St. Lawrence Lowland with selected passages from an unpublished manuscript: The St. Lawrence Lowland, by J. W. Goldthwait. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 359, 153 p.Google Scholar
Gadd, N. R. 1980. Maximum age for a concretion at Green Creek, Ontario. Géographie Physique et Quaternaire, 34:229–238.Google Scholar
George, R. Y. 1972. Biphasic moulting in isopod Crustacea and the finding of an unusual mode of moulting in the Antarctic genus Glyptonotus . Journal of Natural History, 6:651–656.Google Scholar
Haack, W. 1918. Ueber einen Isopoden aus dem Sepulit des westlichen Osnegs (Archaeoniscus Brodei, Milne-Edwards). Jahrbuch der Königlichen Preussichen Geologischen Landesanstalt, 39:73–102.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. J. 1890. Cirolanidae et familiae nounullae propinque Musei Hauniensis. Kongelit Videnskabernes Selskab Skrifter, 6, Raekke, Naturvidenskabelig og Mathematisk Afdeling, 5:237–426.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R. 1969. Peracarida, p. R360–R393. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R, Arthropoda 4. Geological Society of American and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Iverson, E. W., and Chivers, D. D. 1984. A new genus and species of the Sphaeromatidae (Crustacea: Isopoda: Flabellifera) from the Miocene of Kern County, California. Journal of Paleontology, 58:104–108.Google Scholar
Kindle, E. M. 1923. Range and distribution of certain types of Canadian Pleistocene concretions. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 34:609–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindle, E. M. 1928. A crustacean new to the Pleistocene fauna of Canada. Canadian Field Naturalist, 42:211–212.Google Scholar
Krøyer, H. 1846–1849. Karcinologiste Bidrag. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift II, p. 366–466.Google Scholar
Kunth, A. 1870. Ueber wenig bekannte Crustaceen von Solenhofen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 22:771–802.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1804. Histoire naturelle crustacés et insectes, VI, VII, 1802–1805. F. Dufart, Paris [not seen].Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1817. Les crustacés, les arachnides et les insectes, p. 1–653. In Cuvier, G., Le regne animal distribue d'apes son organisation, pour servir de base a l'histoire naturelle des animaux et d'introduction a l'anatomie comparée. Edition 1, Vol. 3. D'eterville, Paris.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1813. Crustaceology. Edinburgh Encyclopedia, VII, 1813–1814, p. 221–277.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1815. A tabular view of the external characters of four classes of animals which Linne arranged under Insecta. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 11:306–400.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1817–1818. A general notice of the animals taken by Mr. John Cranch, during the expedition to explore the source of the River Zaire, p. 407–419 [1818], 1 pl. [1817]. In Tuckey, J. K., Narrative of an expedition to explore the River Zaire, usually called the Congo, in South Africa, in 1816, under the direction of Captain J. K. Tuckey, R. N., to which is added, the journal of Professor Smith; some general observations on the country and its inhabitants; and an appendix: containing the natural history of that part of the Kingdom of Congo through which the Zaire flows. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Martin, B. D. 1963. Rosedale channel—evidence for late Miocene submarine erosion in great valley of California. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 47:441–456.Google Scholar
Martin, J. W., and Kuck, H. G. 1990. Bathynomus A. Milne Edwards, 1879 (Crustacea, Isopoda): proposed precedence over Palaega Woodward, 1870. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 47(1):27–29.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, A. 1879. Sur un isopode gigantesque des grandes profondeurs de la mer. Comptes rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, 83:21–23.Google Scholar
Milne Edwards, H. 1843. Note sur deux Crustacés fossiles de l'Ordre des Isopodes. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 2e ser. (Zoologie), 20:326–329.Google Scholar
Munster, G. 1840. Ueber einige Isopoden in den Kalkschiefern von Bayern. Beitrage zur Petrefactenkunde, Part 3, 19–23.Google Scholar
Murray, G. E. 1961. Geology of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Province of North America. Harper Brothers, New York, 692 p.Google Scholar
Pessagno, E. A. Jr. 1969. Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy of the Western Gulf Coast area of Mexico, Texas and Arkansas. Geological Society of America Memoir 111, 139 p.Google Scholar
Post, E. V., and Bell, H. III. 1961. Chilson member of the Lakota Formation in the Black Hills, South Dakota and Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 424-D:D173–D178.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1935. Fossil Crustacea of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. Geological Society of America Special Paper 2, 160 p.Google Scholar
Reiff, E. 1936. Isopoden aus dem Lias Delta (Amaltheenschichten) Schwabens. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 18:49–90.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. 1905. A monograph on the isopods of North America. U.S. National Museum Bulletin, 54, 727 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubey, W. W. 1930. Lithologic studies of the fine-grained Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks of the Black Hills region. U.S. Geological Survey Profesional Paper 165-A:1–54.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O. 1882. Revision auf Gruppen Isopoden Chelifera. Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab, 1882:1–54.Google Scholar
Schioedt, J. C., and Meinert, F. 1879–1880. Symbolae ad Monographiam Cymothoarum, Crustaceorum Isopodum familiae. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, 7:321–415.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1970. Isopod from the Pennsylvanian of Illinois. Science, 169:854–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, G. A. 1969. How to Know the Marine Isopod Crustaceans. Wm. C. Brown Company, Dubuque, Iowa, 359 p.Google Scholar
Snavely, P. D. Jr., Niem, A. R., Macleod, N. S., Pearl, J. E., and Rau, W. W. 1980. Makah Formation—a deep-marginal-basin sequence of late Eocene and Oligocene age in the northwestern Olympic Peninsula, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1162-B, 28 p.Google Scholar
Sohn, I. G. 1979. Nonmarine ostracodes in the Lakota Formation (Lower Cretaceous) from South Dakota and Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1069, 24 p.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1936. Stratigraphic relations of the Austin, Taylor, and equivalent formations in Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 186-G, p. 133–146.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W., King, P. B., Monroe, W. H., and Imlay, N. W. 1942. Correlation of the outcropping Cretaceous rocks of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain and Trans-Pecos region. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 53:435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terasmae, J. 1965. Surficial geology of the Cornwall and St. Lawrence seaway project areas, Ontario. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 121, 54 p.Google Scholar
Van Straelen, V. 1928. Contribution a l'étude des Isopodes Mésoet Cénozoioques. Mémoirs, Academie Royale des Belgique, Classe de Sciences Collection, Second Series, 9:1–68.Google Scholar
Waage, K. M. 1959. Stratigraphy of the Inyan Kara Group in the Black Hills. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1081-B, 90 p.Google Scholar
Wieder, R. W., and Feldmann, R. M. 1989. Palaega goedertorum, a fossil isopod (Crustacea) from late Eocene to early Miocene rocks of Washington State. Journal of Paleontology, 63:73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolcott, D. E. 1967. Geology of the Hot Springs quadrangle, Fall River and Custer Counties, South Dakota. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1063-K:427–442.Google Scholar
Wolfe, E. W., and McKee, E. H. 1968. Geology of the Grays River quadrangle, Wahkiakum and Pacific Counties, Washington. Washington Division of Mines and Geology. Geologic Map GM-4, scale 1:62,500.Google Scholar
Wolfe, E. W., and McKee, E. H. 1972. Sedimentary and igneous rocks of the Grays River quadrangle, Washington. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1335, 70 p.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1870. Contributions to British fossil Crustacea. Geological Magazine, 7:493–497.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1879. On the occurrence of Branchipus (or Chirocephalus) in a fossil state, associated with Eosphaeroma and with numerous insect remains, in the Eocene freshwater (Bembridge) Limestone of Gurney Bay, Isle of Wight. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 35:342–350.Google Scholar