Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:22:43.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The new Devonian (Givetian) heteractinid sponge Gondekia from Ontario, Canada, and evolution of the astraeospongiids and eiffeliids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

J. Keith Rigby
J. Keith Rigby*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The new genus and species, Gondekia hastula, are described from the Middle Devonian (Givetian) Hungry Hollow Formation of southwestern Ontario. Astraeospongium lancifer Reimann, 1945, is also included in the new genus and A. acicularis is considered a synonym of that species. Gondekia has a flat saucer-like form and a felted, but thin, skeleton composed of at least three orders of regularly spaced and oriented simple sexiradiates. Gondekia is placed in the Eiffeliidae but is convergent toward the Astraeospongiidae in having a somewhat thickened wall.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , January 1991 , pp. 38 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © The Journal of Paleontology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowerbank, J. S. 1864. A monograph of the British Spongiadae. Vol. 1, Ray Society, London, 290 p.Google Scholar
Coley, T. B. 1954. Stratigraphic distribution and correlation of some Middle Devonian Ostracoda. Journal of Paleontology, 28:452–464.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1970. The evolution and ecologic history of sponges during Paleozoic times, p. 3–22. In Fry, W. G. (ed.), The Biology of the Porifera. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 25, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Kruse, P. D. 1987. Further Australian Cambrian sphinctozoans. Geological Magazine, 124:543–553.Google Scholar
Kruse, P. D. 1990. Cambrian paleontology of the Daly Basin. Northern Territory Geological Survey (Australia) Report 7, 58 p.Google Scholar
Landing, E. C., and Brett, C. E. 1987. Trace fossils and regional significance of a Middle Devonian (Givetian) disconformity in southeastern Ontario. Journal of Paleontology, 61:205–230.Google Scholar
Laubenfels, M. W. de. 1955. Porifera, p. E21–E112. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American Geology and Paleontology. Cincinnati (published by the author), 664 p.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. W. 1967. Stratigraphy of the Silica Formation of Ohio and the Hungry Hollow Formation of Ontario, with paleogeographic interpretations. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters, 52:175–186.Google Scholar
Poole, W. H., Williams, S. H., and Kelly, D. G. 1970. Geology of southeastern Canada, p. 229–304. In Douglas, R. J. W. (ed.), Geology and Economic Minerals of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Economic Geology Report No. 1.Google Scholar
Reimann, I. G. 1945. New Middle Devonian octactinellids. Paleontological Contributions, Buffalo Society Natural History Bulletin, 19(2):16–21.Google Scholar
Richardson, E. S. Jr. 1950. A Middle Devonian octactinellid sponge from New York. Fieldiana: Geology, 10:79–88.Google Scholar
Rickard, L. V. 1984. Correlation of the subsurface Lower and Middle Devonian of the Lake Erie region. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 95:814–828.Google Scholar
Rietschel, S. 1968. Die Octactinellida and ihnen verwandte palaözoische Kalkschwämme (Porifera, Calcarea). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 42:13–32.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1967. A new polyactinal sponge from the Antelope Valley Formation (Ordovician) in the Toquima Range, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 41:511–515.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1983. Heteractinida, p. 70–89. In Broadhead, T. W. (ed.), Sponges and Spongiomorphs, Notes for a Short Course. University of Tennessee Department of Geological Sciences, Studies in Geology, 7.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1986. Sponges of the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian), British Columbia. Palaeontographica Canadiana, Monograph 2, 105 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1990. Evolution of Paleozoic heteractinid calcareous sponges and demosponges—patterns and records. Proceedings, Conference on Fossil and Recent Sponges, Berlin, 1988, Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Nitecki, M. W. 1975. An unusually well preserved heteractinid sponge from the Pennsylvanian of Illinois and a possible classification and evolutionary scheme for the Heteractinida. Journal of Paleontology, 49:329–339.Google Scholar
Roemer, C. F. 1848. Die silurische Fauna des westlichen Tennessee. Eine palaeontologische Monographie. Breslau, 100 p.Google Scholar
Sanford, B. V. 1968. Devonian of Ontario and Michigan. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Devonian System, Calgary, 1967, Alberta Society of Petroleum Geologists, 1:973–999.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1920. Middle Cambrian Spongiae, Cambrian geology and paleontology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67(6):261–364.Google Scholar