Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:54:08.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Early Devonian styginid trilobites from Victoria, Australia, with revision of some spinose styginids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

David J. Holloway*
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Palaeontology, Museum of Victoria, 328 Swanston Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

Abstract

A distinctive new genus (Xyoeax) and two new species (Xyoeax eponcus, Scutellum sudorum) of styginid trilobites are described from the late Early Devonian (Emsian) Murrindal Limestone of eastern Victoria, Australia. Limited material of a third styginid species not belonging to any named genus is also described from the same locality. Xyoeax is considered to be closely related to Ancyropyge Clarke, 1891, and Weberopeltis Maksimova in Moore, 1959, and less closely related to Kolihapeltis Prantl and Přibyl, 1947. Weberopeltis is revised and newly diagnosed. Several species previously assigned to Weberopeltis are transferred to the new genus Exastipyx, which is considered to be related to Cornuscutellum Snajdr, 1960. Ancyropyge, Exastipyx, Weberopeltis, and Xyoeax all have pygidia with long pleural spines derived by reduction of the pleural field between the pleural ribs, whereas Kolihapeltis and Cornuscutellum lack pygidial spines. Pygidial morphology of Xyoeax type has thus arisen independently in separate styginid lineages. The type species of Altaepeltis Maksimova, 1968 is established as Weberopeltis bublitchenkoi Maksimova, 1960, by monotypy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, G. K. B. 1970. Trilobiten des jüngeren Siluriums sowie des Unter- und Mitteldevons. Volume 2. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 525:1233.Google Scholar
Ancigin, N. J. 1977. Trilobity, p. 106114. In Biostratigrafiya i fauna rannego devona vostochnogo sklona Urala. Nedra, Moscow. [Ministerstvo geologii RSFSR. Ural'skoe territorial'noe geologicheskoe upravlenie.]Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1872. Systême silurien du Centre de la Bohême, lère Partie, Recherches paléontologiques, Volume 1, Trilobites, Crustacés divers et Poissons, Supplément. 2 volumes, published by the author, Prague and Paris, 647 p.Google Scholar
Chapman, F. 1915. New or little-known Victorian fossils in the National Museum. Part 18. Some Yeringian trilobites. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 28:157171.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1971. Taxonomy and ontogeny of Siluro-Devonian trilobites from near Yass, New South Wales. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 137:1108.Google Scholar
Chernysheva, N. E. (ed.). 1960. Osnovy paleontologii. Chlenistonogie trilobitoobraznye i rakoobraznye. Nedra, Moscow, 515 p.Google Scholar
Chlupač, I. 1993. Trilobites from the Givetian and Frasnian of the Holy Cross Mountains. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 37:395406.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1891. Notes on the genus Acidaspis. New York State Museum Annual Report, 44:91101.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A., and Cloud, P. E. 1938. New Devonian fossils from Calhoun County, Illinois. Journal of Paleontology, 12:444460.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1974. The trilobites of the Chair of Kildare Limestone (Upper Ordovician) of eastern Ireland. Part 2. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society London, 128(539):6198.Google Scholar
Ellermann, I. 1992. Trilobiten aus dem Unterdevon der Karnischen Alpen/Österreich. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 221:162.Google Scholar
Feist, R. 1970. Breviscutellum (Meridioscutellum) n. sg. (Trilobitae) et son développement larvaire. Geobios, 3:4173.Google Scholar
Feist, R. 1974. Devonische Scutelluidae (Trilobitae) aus der östlichen Montagne Noire (Südfrankreich). Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 147:70114.Google Scholar
Gortani, M. 1907. Contribuzioni allo studio del Paleozoico Carnico. II. Faune devoniane. Palaeontographia Italica, 13:85147.Google Scholar
Gortani, M. 1915. Contribuzioni allo studio del Paleozoico Carnico. V. Fossili eodevonici della base del Capolago (Seekopfssockel). Palaeontographia Italica, 21:117187.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M. 1888. Natural History of New York. Palaeontology, Volume 7. Containing Descriptions of the Trilobites and other Crustacea of the Oriskany, Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage, Chemung and Catskill Groups. New York State Geological Survey, Albany, 236 p.Google Scholar
Hawle, I., and Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. J. G. Calve'sche Buchhandlung, Prague, 177 p.Google Scholar
Holloway, D. J., and Neil, J. V. 1982. Trilobites from the Mount Ida Formation (Late Silurian-Early Devonian), Victoria. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 94:133154.Google Scholar
Horný, R., and Bastl, F. 1970. Type Specimens of Fossils in the National Museum Prague, Vol. 1, Trilobita. Museum of Natural History, Prague, 354 p.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A. 1989. Some aberrant exoskeletons from fossil and living arthropods. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 27:491498.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1957. Notes on two Devonian trilobites from the Kitakami Mountains in Japan. Journal of the Faculty of Science University of Tokyo, Section II, Geology, Mineralogy, Geography, Geophysics, 11:110.Google Scholar
Lane, P. D., and Thomas, A. T. 1983. A review of the trilobite suborder Scutelluina. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 30:141160.Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1960. Devonskie i kamennougol'nye trilobity Rudnogo Altaya. (Paleontologicheskoe obosnovanie stratigrafii paleozoya Rudnogo Altaya, Vypusk 7.)Gosudarstvennoe nauchno-tekhnicheskoe izdatel'stvo, Moscow, 123 p.Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1968. Devonskie skutellyuidy Sovetskoi Arktiki i nekotorye voprosy filogeniisemeistva Scutelluidae. Ezhegodnik Vsesoyuznogo paleontologicheskogo obshchestva, 18:148165.Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1977a. Devonskie trilobity Novoi Zemli i drugikh raionov Sovetskoi Arktiki. Ezhegodnik Vsesoyuznogo paleontologicheskogo obshchestva, 20:140185.Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1977b. Novye srednedevonskie trilobity nekotorykh regionov SSSR, p. 6874. In Stukalina, G. A. (ed.), Novye vidy drevnikh rastenii i bespozvonochnykh SSSR, Vypusk 4. Nauka, Moscow.Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1978. Nekotorye novye devonskie trilobity. Ezhegodnik Vsesoyuznogo paleontologicheskogo obshchestva, 21:94109.Google Scholar
Maksimova, Z. A. 1979. Novye vidy devonskikh trilobitov SSSR. Ezhegodnik Vsesoyuznogo paleontologicheskogo obshchestva, 22:1942.Google Scholar
Mawson, R. 1987. Early Devonian conodonts from Buchan and Bindi, Victoria, Australia. Palaeontology, 30:251297.Google Scholar
Mawson, R., Talent, J. A., Bear, V. C., Benson, D. S., Brock, G. A., Farrell, J. R., Hyland, K. A., Pyemont, B. D., Sloan, T. R., Sorentino, L., Stewart, M. I., Trotter, J. A., Wilson, G. A., and Simpson, A. C. 1988. Conodont data in relation to resolution of stage and zonal boundaries for the Devonian of Australia. Memoir of the Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, 14:485527.Google Scholar
Mawson, R., Brock, G. A., and Engelbretsen, M. J. 1992. Conodont data in relation to sequences about the Pragian-Emsian boundary (Early Devonian) in south-eastern Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 104:2356.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. (ed.). 1959. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part O. Arthropoda 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas, 560 p.Google Scholar
Münster, G. 1840. Die Versteinerungen des Übergangskalkes mit Clymenien und Orthoceratiten von Oberfranken, p. 33121. In Beiträge zur Petrefactenkunde, Vol. 3. Bayreuth.Google Scholar
Ormiston, A. R. 1967. Lower and Middle Devonian trilobites of the Canadian arctic islands. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 153:1148.Google Scholar
Owen, A. W., and Bruton, D. L. 1980. Late Caradoc–early Ashgill trilobites of the central Oslo region, Norway. Scandinavian Science Press, Klampenborg, Denmark. [Palaeontological Contributions from the University of Oslo No. 245.]Google Scholar
Philip, G. M. 1966. Lower Devonian conodonts from the Buchan Group, eastern Victoria. Micropaleontology, 12:441460.Google Scholar
Prantl, F., and Přibyl, A. 1947. Klasifikace a rozdělení rod$uR Scutellum Pusch, 1833 z českého paleozoika. Rozpravy České akademie věd a umění, 56(9):129. [English translation in Bulletin international de l'Académie tchéque des Sciences, 47(9), 1947.]Google Scholar
Přibyl, A., and Vaněk, J. 1971. Studie über die Familie Scutelluidae Richter et Richter (Trilobita) und ihre phylogenetische Entwicklung. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geologica, 1971(4):361394.Google Scholar
Pusch, G. G. 1833. Geognostische Beschreibung von Polen, so wie der übrigen Nordkarpathen-Länder. Erste Teil. Stuttgart und Tübingen, 338 p.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1928. Notes on the Bronteidae [=Goldiidae]. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 10, 1:4978.Google Scholar
Richter, R., and Richter, E. 1926. Die Trilobiten des Oberdevons. Beiträge zur Kenntnis devonischer Trilobiten. 4. Abhandlungen der preussischen geologischen Landesanstalt, 99:1314.Google Scholar
Richter, R., and Richter, E. 1955. Scutelluidae n. n. (Tril.) durch “kleine Änderung” eines Familien-Namens wegen Homonymie. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 36:291293.Google Scholar
Richter, R., and Richter, E. 1956. Grundlagen für die Beurteilung und Einteilung der Scutelluidae (Tril.). Senckenbergiana lethaea, 37:79124.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1960. Studie o čeledi Scutelluidae (Trilobitae). Rozpravy Ústředního ústavu geologického, 26:1264. [in Czech with English summary.]Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1987. The subfamily Thysanppeltinae in the Bohemian Lower Palaeozoic (Styginidae, Trilobita). Časopis Národního musea v Praze, řada přírodovědná, 156:9296.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1989. Kolihapeltis from the Bohemian Devonian (Styginidae, Trilobita). Časopis pro mineralogii a geologii, 34:353361.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1990. Five extremely malformed scutelluid pygidia (Styginidae, Trilobita). Věstník Ústředního ústavu geologického, 65:115118.Google Scholar
Spassky, J. N. 1990. Rannedevonskie Scutelluidae (trilobity) Novoi Zemli. Ezhegodnik Vsesoyuznogo paleontologicheskogo obshchestva, 32:153166.Google Scholar
Talent, J. A. 1956. Devonian brachiopods and pelecypods of the Buchan Caves Limestone, Victoria. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 68:156.Google Scholar
Talent, J. A. 1965. The stratigraphic and diastrophic evolution of central and eastern Victoria in Middle Palaeozoic times. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 79; 179195.Google Scholar
Teichert, C., and Talent, J. 1958. Geology of the Buchan area, East Gippsland. Geological Survey of Victoria Memoir, 21:156.Google Scholar
Vaněk, J. 1968. Weberopeltis matutina sp. n. (Trilobita) from the Devonian of the Barrandian. Věstník Úst&edního ústavu geologického, 43:127128.Google Scholar
Vodges, A. W. 1890. A bibliography of Paleozoic Crustacea from 1698 to 1889, including a list of North American species and a systematic arrangement of genera. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey, 63:1177.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. W. 1982. Geology of the Rocky Camp-Murrindal area. , .Google Scholar
Weber, V. N. 1932. Trilobity Turkestana. Trudy Geologicheskogo Komiteta, 178:1157. [with English summary.]Google Scholar
Weber, V. N. 1945. O rode Thysanopeltis Corda i nekotorykh uralskikh Bronteidae. Materialy vsesoyuznogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo geologicheskogo Instituta, Paleontologiya i stratigrafiya, Sbornik, 4:2445. [with English summary.]Google Scholar
Wright, A. J., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1988. Early Devonian trilobites from the Jesse Limestone, New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 62:93103.Google Scholar