Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:44:08.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New interpretation of the wings of the pterosaur Rhamphorhynchus muensteri based on the Zittel and Marsh specimens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

S. Christopher Bennett
S. Christopher Bennett*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Fort Hays State University, Hays, Kansas 67601-4099, USA 〈cbennett@fhsu.edu〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Zittel wing of Rhamphorhynchus muensteri is reinterpreted as preserving negative impressions of closely spaced broad flat actinofibrils that were replaced by calcite but were prepared away by the specimen’s finder. The Marsh specimen preserves positive impressions of the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the wing, which show that the skin was smooth with fine wrinkles and that actinofibrils were not on the wing surface. Based on comparisons of those specimens, the dactylopatagium consisted of dorsal and ventral skins of epidermis and dermis surrounding a common hypodermis core, and keratinous actinofibrils developed in place within the dorsal epidermis adjacent to a layer of linear collagen fibers in the dorsal dermis. The actinofibrils and linear collagen fibers together formed the main functional structure of the dactylopatagium. That structure made the dactylopatagium somewhat stiff and essentially inextensible so that it folded up along discrete fold lines that probably were genetically determined. A pneumatic retrophalangeal wedge behind the antebrachium through at least wing phalanx 3 streamlined the transition between the thick wing spar and thin patagium.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 89 , Issue 5 , September 2015 , pp. 845 - 869
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammon, L.v., 1909, Über ein schönes Flughautexemplar von Rhamphorhynchus: Geognostische Jahreshefte, v. 21, p. 227–228.Google Scholar
Barthel, K.W., 1978, Solnhofen: Ein Blick in die Erdgeschichte: Thun, Ott Verlag und Druckerei, 393 p.Google Scholar
Beckemeyer, R.J., and Hall, J.D., 2007, The entomofauna of the Lower Permian fossil insect beds of Kansas and Oklahoma, USA: African Invertebrates, v. 48, p. 23–39.Google Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 1995, The function of the structural fibers in pterosaur wings: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 15(Supplement to #3), p. 19A.Google Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 1997a, Terrestrial locomotion of pterosaurs: a reconstruction based on Pteraichnus trackways: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 17, p. 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 1997b, The arboreal leaping theory and the origin of pterosaur flight: Historical Biology, v. 12, p. 265–290.Google Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 2000, Pterosaur flight: the role of actinofibrils in wing function: Historical Biology, v. 14, p. 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 2001, The osteology and functional morphology of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon: Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, v. 260, p. 1–153.Google Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 2002, Soft tissue preservation of the cranial crest of the pterosaur Germanodactylus from Solnhofen: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 22, p. 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 2007, A second specimen of the pterosaur Anurognathus ammoni: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 81, p. 376–398.Google Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 2013a, New information on body size and cranial display structures of Pterodactylus antiquus, with a revision of the genus: Paläontologishe Zeitschrift, v. 87, p. 269–289.Google Scholar
Bennett, S.C., 2013b, Reinterpretation of the wings of Pterodactylus antiquus based on the Vienna specimen: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Program and Abstracts, v. 2013, p. 85.Google Scholar
Böhm, R., 1962, Beitrag zu den postnatalen Veränderungen der Lederhaut des Haushuhnes (Acta universitatis agriculturae, Brno), Sborník Vysoké školy zemědělské v Brně: Spisy Fakulty veterinární, v. 10, p. 95–100.Google Scholar
Bonde, N., and Christiansen, P., 2003, The detailed anatomy of Rhamphorhynchus: axial pneumaticity and its implications, in Buffetaut, E., and Mazin, J.-M., eds., Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs: Geological Society Special Publications, v. 217, p. 217–232.Google Scholar
Bramwell, C.D., and Whitfield, G.R., 1974, Biomechanics of Pteranodon: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, v. B267, p. 503–581.Google Scholar
Brooks, A.N., MacCready, P.B., Lissaman, P.B.S., and Morgan, W.R., 1985, Development of a wing-flapping flying replica of the largest pterosaur: AIAA Paper, p. 85–1446.Google Scholar
Buisonjé, P.H.de., 1981, Ctenochasma porocristata nov. sp. from the Solnhofen Limestone, with some remarks on other Ctenochasmatidae: Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, v. (B)84, p. 411–436.Google Scholar
Cowley, M., 1986, Quetzalcoatlus northropi: Model Aviation, v. 12, p. 84–90, 158, 160–162, 164.Google Scholar
Czerkas, S.A., and Ji, Q., 2002, A new rhamphorhynchoid with a headcrest and complex integumentary structures, in Czerkas S.J., ed., Feathered dinosaurs and the origin of flight: The Dinosaur Museum Journal, v. 1, p. 15–41.Google Scholar
Döderlein, L., 1929a, Über Rhamphorhychus und sein Schwanzsegel. Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung, v. 1929, p. 1–46.Google Scholar
Döderlein, L., 1929b, Ein Pterodactylus mit Kehlsack und Schwimmhaut. Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung, v. 1929, p. 65–76.Google Scholar
Elgin, R.A., Hone, D.W.E., and Frey, E., 2011, The extent of the pterosaur flight membrane: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 56, p. 99–111.Google Scholar
Frey, E., Tischlinger, H., Buchy, M.-C., and Martill, D.M., 2003, New specimens of Pterosauria (Reptilia) with soft parts with implications for pterosaurian anatomy and locomotion, in Buffetaut, E., and Mazin, J.-M., eds., Evolution and Palaeobiology of Pterosaurs: Geological Society Special Publications, v. 217, p. 233–266.Google Scholar
Frey, E., Tischlinger, H., Krüger, W., and Hone, D., 2007, Pterosaurier als Flugmaschinen - Bionische Forschung in der Paläontologie? Fossilien, v. 24, p. 79–84.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, A., 1831, Beiträge zur Kenntnis verschiedener Reptilien der Vorwelt: Nova acta Academiae caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae germanicae naturae curiosorum, v. 15, p. 61–128.Google Scholar
Gregory, R.L., 1997, Knowledge in perception and illusion: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, v. 352, p. 1121–1128.Google Scholar
Gross, W., 1937, Über einen neuen Rhamphorhynchus gemmingi. H. v. M. des Natur-Museums Senckenberg: Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, v. 437, p. 1–16.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, M., 1988, Analysis of vertebrate structure, 3rd ed., New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 701 pp.Google Scholar
Hill, H., and Bruce, V., 1993, Independent effects of lighting, orientation, and stereopsis on the hollow-face illusion: Perception, v. 22, p. 887–897.Google Scholar
Hill, H., and Bruce, V., 1994, A comparison between the hollow-face and ‘hollow-potato’ illusions: Perception, v. 23, p. 1335–1337.Google Scholar
Holst, E.v., 1957, Der Saurierflug: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 31, p. 15–22.Google Scholar
Johnston, A., Hill, H., and Carman, N., 1992, Recognising faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal: Perception, v. 21, p. 365–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellner, A.W.A., 1996, Reinterpretation of a remarkably well preserved pterosaur soft tissue from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 16, p. 718–722.Google Scholar
Kellner, A.W.A., Wang, X., Tischlinger, H., Campos, D.A., Hone, D.W.E., and Xi, M., 2010, The soft tissue of Jeholopterus (Pterosauria, Anurognathidae, Batrachognathinae) and the structure of the pterosaur wing membrane: Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, v. 277, p. 321–329.Google Scholar
Kleffner, D.A., and Ramachandran, V.S., 1992, On the perception of shape from shading: Perception & Psychophysics, v. 52, p. 18–36.Google Scholar
Langer, M.S., and Bülthoff, H.H., 2001, A prior for global convexity in local shape-from-shading. Perception, v. 30, p. 403–410.Google Scholar
Lockley, M.G., Logue, T.J., Moratalla, J.J., Hunt, A.P., Schultz, R.J., and Robinson, J.W., 1995, The fossil trackway Pteraichnus is pterosaurian, not crocodilian: implications for the global distribution of pterosaur tracks: Ichnos, v. 4, p. 7–20.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, D., 2012, A flapping of wings: Science, v. 335, p. 1430–1433.Google Scholar
Marsh, O.C., 1882, The wings of pterodactyls: American Journal of Science, Series 3, v. 23, p. 251–256.Google Scholar
Martill, D.M., and Unwin, D.M., 1989, Exceptionally well preserved pterosaur wing membrane from the Cretaceous of Brazil: Nature, v. 340, p. 138–140.Google Scholar
McGowan, C., 1991, Dinosaurs, spitfires, and sea dragons: Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 384 pp.Google Scholar
Monninger, S., Frey, E., Elgin, R., Tischlinger, H., Sartori, J., and Schneider, P., 2010, Folds, wrinkles and the material properties of the pterosaurian flight membrane: Acta Geoscientica Sinica, v. 31(Supplement 1), p. 52.Google Scholar
Monninger, S., Frey, E., and Tischlinger, H., 2012, Supporting structures in the flight membrane of pterosaurs, in Royo-Torres, R., Gascó, F., and Alcalá, L., eds., 10th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Paleontologists: ¡Fundamental! v. 20, p. 165–168.Google Scholar
Mosimann, J. E., 1956, Variation and relative growth in the plastral scutes of the turtle Kinostrnon intergrum Leconte: Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, v. 97, 43 pp.Google Scholar
Padian, K., 1983a, A functional analysis of flying and walking in pterosaurs: Paleobiology, v. 9, p. 218–239.Google Scholar
Padian, K., 1983b, Osteology and functional morphology of Dimorphodon macronyx (Buckland) (Pterosauria: Rhamphorhynchoidea) based on new material in the Yale Peabody Museum: Postilla, v. 189, p. 1–44.Google Scholar
Padian, K., 1985, The origins and aerodynamics of flight in extinct vertebrates: Palaeontology, v. 28, p. 413–433.Google Scholar
Padian, K., 1987a, A comparative phylogenetic and functional approach to the origin of vertebrate flight, in Fenton, M.B., Racey, P., and Rayner, J.M.V., eds., Recent Advances in the Study of Bats: New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 3–22.Google Scholar
Padian, K., 1987b, The case of the bat-winged pterosaur. Typological taxonomy and the influence of pictorial representation on scientific perception, in Czerkas, S.J., and Olson, E.C., eds., Dinosaurs past and present: An exhibition and symposium organized by the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, v. 2: Seattle and Los Angeles, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and University of Washington Press, p. 65–81.Google Scholar
Padian, K., 1991, Pterosaurs: were they functional birds or functional bats?, in Rayner, J.M.V., and Wootton, R.J., eds., Biomechanics in Evolution: New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 145–160.Google Scholar
Padian, K., and Rayner, J.M.V., 1993, The wings of pterosaurs: American Journal of Science, v. 293–A, p. 91–166.Google Scholar
Palmer, C., 2010, Flight in slow motion: aerodynamics of the pterosaur wing: Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, v. 278, p. 1881–1885.Google Scholar
Pennycuick, C.J., 1988, On the reconstruction of pterosaurs and their manner of flight, with notes on vortex wakes: Biological Reviews, v. 63, p. 299–331.Google Scholar
Rietschel, S., 1984, Feathers and wings of Archaeopteryx, and the question of her flight ability, in Hecht, M.K., Ostrom, J.H., Viohl, G., and Wellnhofer, P., eds., The Beginnings of Birds. Proceedings of the International Archaeopteryx Conference, Eichstätt: Eichstätt, Freundes Jura-Museums Eichstätt, p. 251–260.Google Scholar
Schaller, D., 1985, Wing evolution, in Hecht, M.K., Ostrom, J.H., Viohl, G., and Wellnhofer, P., eds., The Beginnings of Birds. Proceedings of the International Archaeopteryx Conference, Eichstätt, Freundes Jura-Museums Eichstätt, Eichstätt, p. 333–348.Google Scholar
Schaller, D., 2007, The supraordinate pterosaur evolution as deduced for the evolution of their wings: Munich, Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Short, G.H., 1914, Wing adjustments of pterodactyls: Aeronautical Journal, v. 18, p. 336–343.Google Scholar
Sömmering, T.v., 1812, Über einen Ornithocephalus: Denkschriften der Kœniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München, Abhandlungen der mathematisch-physikalischen Classe, v. 3, p. 89–158.Google Scholar
Tischlinger, H., and Frey, E., 2010, Multilayered is not enough! New soft tissue structures in the Rhamphorhynchus flight membrane: Acta Geoscientica Sinica, v. 31(Supplement 1), p. 64.Google Scholar
Unwin, D.M., 1997, Pterosaur tracks and the terrestrial ability of pterosaurs: Lethaia, v. 29, p. 373–386.Google Scholar
Unwin, D.M., and Bakhurina, N.N., 1994, Sordes pilosus and the nature of the pterosaur flight apparatus: Nature, v. 371, p. 62–64.Google Scholar
Wanderer, K., 1908, Rhamphorhynchus Gemmingi H. v. Meyer: Palaeontographica, v. 55, p. 195–216.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P., 1970, Die Pterodactyloidea (Pterosauria) der Oberjura-Plattenkalke Suddeutschlands. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften: Mathematisch-Wissenschaftlichen Klasse Abhandlungen, v. 141, p. 1–133.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P., 1975, Die Rhamphorhynchoidea (Pterosauria) der Oberjura-Plattenkalke Süddeutschlands: Palaeontographica, A, v. 148, p. 1–33, v. 148, p. 132–186, v. 149, p. 1–30.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P., 1987, Die Flughaut von Pterodactylus (Reptilia: Pterosauria) am Beispiel des Wieners Exemplares von Pterodactylus kochi (Wagner): Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, v. 88A, p. 149–162.Google Scholar
Wellnhofer, P., 2009, Archaeopteryx: The Icon of Evolution: Munich, Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, 208 pp.Google Scholar
Witmer, L.M., 1995, The Extant Phylogenetic Bracket and the importance of reconstructing soft tissues in fossils, in Thomason, J., ed., Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology: New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 19–33.Google Scholar
Zangerl, R., 1969, The turtle shell, in Gans, C., ed., The Biology of the Reptilia, v. 1, Morphology A: London and New York, Academic Press, p. 311–340.Google Scholar
Zittel, K.A., 1882, Über Flugsaurier aus dem lithographischen Schiefer Bayerns: Palaeontographica, v. 29, p. 47–80.Google Scholar