Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:43:14.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The paleoecology of a Late Ordovician shale unit from southwest Ohio and southeastern Indiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Robert C. Frey*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Geology, Centenary College, Shreveport, Louisiana 71134-0188

Abstract

The Treptoceras duseri shale unit within the Waynesville Formation of Late Ordovician (early Richmondian) age in southwest Ohio and the equivalent Trilobite shale unit in the same formation exposed in adjacent portions of Indiana represent an Ordovician shallow marine mud-bottom epeiric sea facies. These fine-grained elastics contain a moderately diverse mollusk-trilobite assemblage dominated by vagrant epifaunal detritus-feeding calymenid and asaphid trilobites, large endobyssate and infaunal filter-feeding pelecypods, and nektonic nautiloids. Articulate brachiopods, ectoprocts, and pelmatozoan echinoderms form only minor elements of this fauna.

This mollusk-trilobite assemblage was common in Late Ordovician shallow marine clastic environments where mobility was an asset and there was an abundance of oxygen and food resources. Such assemblages are characteristic of the Lorraine Fauna of Late Ordovician (Edenian to Richmondian) age that occurs from the Ohio Valley north and east into New York, Ontario, Quebec, and Ireland. These early Paleozoic mud-bottom assemblages were considerably modified by the Late Ordovician extinction event and were replaced in the Silurian and Devonian by distinctly different assemblages dominated by large epifaunal strophomenid and spiriferid brachiopods, crinoids, and phacopid trilobites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anstey, R. L. and Fowler, M. L. 1969. Lithostratigraphy and depositional environment of the Eden Shale (Ordovician) in the tri-state area of Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio. Journal of Geology, 77:668682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Bottjer, D. J. 1982. Tiering in suspension-feeding communities on soft sub-Strata throughout the Phanerozoic. Science, 216:173174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I., Kammer, T. W. and Lane, N. G. 1979. Fossil communities of the Borden (Mississippian) Delta in Indiana and northern Kentucky. Journal of Paleontology, 53:11821196.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K., Scotese, C. R. and Ziegler, A. F. 1980. Before Pangea: the geography of the Paleozoic world. American Scientist, 68:2638.Google Scholar
Bird, J. M. and Dewey, J. F. 1970. Lithosphere plate-continental margin tectonics and the evolution of the Appalachian orogen. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 81:10311060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, D. S. 1980. Biogenic structures as indicators of depositional rates. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 64:680.Google Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. 1969. Evolution of Paleozoic benthic marine invertebrate communities. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 6:4559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. 1970a. Upper Ordovician ecology of the central Appalachians. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, Bulletin 34, 150 p.Google Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. 1970b. Late Ordovician benthic marine communities in north-central New York. New York State Museum and Science Series Bulletin, 414:134.Google Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. and Bretsky, S. S. 1975. Succession and repetition of Late Ordovician fossil assemblages from the Nicolet River valley, Quebec. Paleobiology, 1:225237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretsky, P. W. and Bretsky, S. S. 1976. The maintenance of evolutionary equilibrium in Late Ordovician benthic marine invertebrate faunas. Lethaia, 9:223233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucher, W. H. 1917. Large current-ripples as indicators of paleogeography. United States National Academy of Science Proceedings, 3:285291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A. J. and Brewster, F. J. 1979. Size distribution and growth of the fan-shell Pinna bicolor Gmelin (Mollusca: Eulamellibranchia) in South Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Resource, 30:2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, R. S. 1981. Bioturbation and biodeposition, p. 357399. In Boucot, A. J., Principles of Benthic Marine Paleoecology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cressman, E. R. 1973. Lithostratigraphy and fauna of the Lexington Limestone (Ordovician) of central Kentucky. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 768, 61 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressman, E. R. and Karklins, O. L. 1970. Lithology and fauna of the Lexington Limestone (Ordovician) of central Kentucky, p. 1728. In Guidebook for Field Trips, 18th Annual Meeting, Southeast Section of the Geological Society of America. Kentucky Geological Survey, Lexington.Google Scholar
Dennison, J. M. 1976. Appalachian Queenston Delta related to eustatic sea-level drop accompanying Late Ordovician glaciation centered in Africa, p. 107120. In Bassett, M. G. (ed.), The Ordovician System. University of Wales Press and the National Museum of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1946. Ordovician Cephalopoda of the Cincinnati region, Part 1. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 29(116):1556.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1914. Notes on the Lorraine faunas of New York and the Province of Quebec. Bulletin of the Science Laboratory, Denison University, 17:247340.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1916. Upper Ordovician formations in Ontario and Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 83, 279 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1924. Upper Ordovician faunas of Ontario and Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 138, 255 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, W. T. 1962. Stratigraphy and paleoecology of the Richmond Group in southeastern Indiana. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 73:621642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, W. T. 1968. Quantitative paleoecologic analysis of fossil communities in the Richmond Group. Journal of Geology, 76:613640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, R. C. 1980. Paleoecology of the Upper Ordovician pelecypod Ambonychia. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 12(5):226227.Google Scholar
Frey, R. C. 1981. Narthecoceras (Cephalopoda) from the Upper Ordovician (Richmondian) of southwest Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 55:12171224Google Scholar
Frey, R. C. 1983. The paleontology and paleoecology of the Treptoceras duseri shale unit (Late Ordovician, Richmondian) of southwest Ohio. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, 719 p.Google Scholar
Frey, R. C. 1985. A well-preserved specimen of Schuchertoceras (Cephalopoda, Ascocerida) from the Upper Ordovician (basal Richmondian) of southwest Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 59:15061511Google Scholar
Fursich, T. F. 1978. The influence of faunal condensation and mixing on the preservation of fossil benthic communities. Lethaia, 11:243250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, J. J. 1957. Structure and classification of the Stromatoporoidea. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 37(164):1480.Google Scholar
Giuseffi, D. F. 1982. Paleoecology and community analyses of selected shale intervals in the Mount Hope Member of the Fairview Formation (Cincinnatian Series, Ohio) with a comparison to a shale from the Fort Ancient Member of the Waynesville Formation. Unpubl. M.S. thesis, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, 140 p.Google Scholar
Harrison, W. B. 1984. Influence of physical disturbance and substrate condition on benthic molluscan assemblages preserved in the Kope Formation (Upper Ordovician), Cincinnati, Ohio. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 16(3):144.Google Scholar
Hay, H. B. 1981. Lithofacies and formations of the Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician), southeastern Indiana and southwestern Ohio. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, 236 p.Google Scholar
Hinterlong, G. S. 1981. Paleoecologic succession in the Corryville member (McMillan Formation, Upper Ordovician), Stonelick Creek, Clermont County, Ohio. Unpubl. M.S. thesis, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, 120 p.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. and Bottjer, D. J. 1983. Soft-bottom epifaunal suspension-feeding assemblages in the Late Cretaceous, p. 747812. In Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C. 1972. The ecology of the molluscs of Thalassia communities, Jamaica, West Indies. II—Molluscan population variability along an environmental stress gradient. Marine Biology, 14:304337.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. G. 1960. Models and methods for analysis of the mode of formation of fossil assemblages. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 71:10751086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreisa, R. D. 1981. Storm-generated sedimentary features in subtidal marine facies with examples from the Middle and Upper Ordovician of southwestern Virginia. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 51:823848.Google Scholar
Larson, D. W. and Rhoads, D. C. 1983. Evolution of infaunal communities and sedimentary fabrics, p. 627647. In Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecompte, M. 1956. Stromatoporoidea, p. 107144. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part F, Coelenterata. Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Levinton, J. S. and Bambach, R. K. 1975. A comparative study of Silurian and Recent deposit-feeding bivalve communities. Paleobiology, 1:97124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, D. M. 1973. Edenian (Upper Ordovician) benthic community ecology in north-central Kentucky. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 318 p.Google Scholar
Manten, A. A. 1971. Silurian Reefs of Gotland. Developments in Sedimentology 13. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 539 p.Google Scholar
Marsaglia, K. M. and Klein, G. D. 1983. The paleogeography of Paleozoic and Mesozoic storm depositional systems. Journal of Geology, 91:117142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, W. D. 1975. The petrology of a composite vertical section of Cincinnatian Series limestones (Upper Ordovician) of southwestern Ohio, southeastern Indiana, and northern Kentucky. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 45:907925.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. et al. 1981. Stratigraphy, sedimentology, and paleoecology of the Cincinnatian Series (Upper Ordovician) in the vicinity of Cincinnati, Ohio, p. 3171. In Roberts, T. G. (ed.), Geological Society of America Cincinnati '81 Field Trip Guidebooks, v. 1: Stratigraphy, Sedimentology. American Geological Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. D. 1924. Geology of the Stonewall Quadrangle, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Bureau of Geology, Bulletin 2, 248 p.Google Scholar
Nussman, D. G. 1975. Paleoecology and pyritization, p. 173223. In Kesling, R. V. and Chilman, R. B., Strata and Megafossils of the Middle Devonian Silica Formation. Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology 8, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pojeta, J. 1971. Review of Ordovician pelecypods. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 695, 46 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, P., Maynard, J. B. and Pryor, W. A. 1980. Sedimentology of Shale. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 306 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, J. F. 1980. Carbonate ramp-to-basin transitions and foreland basin evolution, Middle Ordovician, Virginia Appalachians. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 64:15751612.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1926. Utica and Lorraine Formations of New York. Part 2 (Molluscs, Crustacea, Miscellanea). Proceedings of the State Museum of New York, Bulletin 272:5210.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R. et al. 1979. Paleozoic base maps. Journal of Geology, 87:217277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. 1982. Mass extinctions in the Phanerozoic oceans: review, p. 283289. In Silver, L. T. and Schultz, P. H. (eds.), Geological Implications of Impacts of Large Asteroids and Comets on the Earth. Geological Society of America Special Paper 190, Boulder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. and Sheehan, P. M. 1983. Diversification, faunal change, and community replacement during the Ordovician radiations, p. 673717. In Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecht, R. W. and Brenner, R. L. 1979. Storm-wave genesis of bioclastic carbonates in Upper Jurassic epicontinental mudstones. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 49:13071322.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1972. Functional morphology and evolution of byssally-attached bivalve mollusks. Journal of Paleontology, 46:165212.Google Scholar
Steele-Petrovic, H. M. 1975. An explanation for the tolerance of brachiopods and relative intolerance of filter-feeding bivalves for soft muddy bottoms. Journal of Paleontology, 49:552556.Google Scholar
Steele-Petrovic, H. M. 1979. The physiological differences between articulate brachiopods and filter-feeding bivalves as a factor in the evolution of marine level-bottom communities. Palaeontology, 22:101134.Google Scholar
Swadley, W. C. 1980. The Marble Hill bed: an offshore bar-tidal channel complex in the Upper Ordovician Drakes Formation of Kentucky. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1126-D, 8 p.Google Scholar
Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L. 1979. Evolution of substratum preference in bivalves (Mollusca). Journal of Paleontology, 53:112120.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1983. Sediment-mediated biological disturbance and the evolution of marine benthos, p. 479625. In Tevesz, M. J. S. and McCall, P. L. (eds.), Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunniclift, S. P. 1982. A revision of late Ordovician bivalves from Pomeroy, County Tyrone, Ireland. Palaeontology, 25:4388.Google Scholar
Walker, K. R. and Bambach, R. K. 1974. Feeding by benthic invertebrates: classification and terminology for paleoecological analysis. Lethaia, 7:6778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, G. W., Greene, R. C. and Simmons, G. C. 1965. Calloway Creek Limestone and Ashlock and Drakes Formations (Upper Ordovician) in south-central Kentucky. United States Geological Survey Bulletin 1224-D, 36 p.Google Scholar
Weir, G. W., Peterson, W. L. and Swadley, W. C. 1984. Lithostratigraphy of Upper Ordovician strata exposed in Kentucky. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1151-E, 121 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. W. 1957. Corals (Paleozoic), p. 773778. In Ladd, H. (ed.), Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology. Geological Society of America Memoir 67, Vol. 2, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedman, L. A. 1985. Community paleoecological study of the Silica Shale equivalent of northeastern Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 59:160182.Google Scholar
Wray, J. L. 1977. Calcareous Algae. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 106 p.Google Scholar