Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:12:18.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A quadrupling of Famennian pelmatozoan diversity: New Late Devonian blastoids and crinoids from northwest China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Johnny A. Waters ,
Christopher G. Maples ,
N. Gary Lane ,
Sara Marcus ,
Liao Zhou-Ting ,
Liu Lujun ,
Hou Hong-Fei  and
Wang Jin-Xing
Johnny A. Waters
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, State University of West Georgia, Carrollton 30118
Christopher G. Maples
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405
N. Gary Lane
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405
Sara Marcus
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405 Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66047
Liao Zhou-Ting
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Nanjing, PRC
Liu Lujun
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Nanjing, PRC
Hou Hong-Fei
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, PRC
Wang Jin-Xing
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, PRC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new diverse Famennian echinoderm fauna (∼600 specimens representing 33 genera and 47 species) dominated by blastoids and cladid, small-calyx camerate, and flexible crinoids is reported from the Hongguleleng Formation, Junggar Basin, Xinjiang-Uygar Autonomous Region, China. Two stratigraphically distinct pelmatozoan faunas were collected: one from the lower member of the Hongguleleng Formation (crepida Zone to marginifera Zone) and one from the upper member of the Hongguleleng Formation (praesulcata Zone). Both faunas are distinctively “Carboniferous” in aspect. The older fauna is dominated by cladids and small-calyx camerates, whereas the younger fauna is dominated by blastoids.

Discovery of these two faunas has more than doubled the number of Famennian echinoderm specimens known in the world and more than quadrupled the number of known taxa. Latest Devonian (Famennian) and earliest Carboniferous stemmed-echinoderm (pelmatozoan) faunas traditionally have been considered to be very low diversity relative to earlier Frasnian and later Early Carboniferous faunas. Furthermore, Carboniferous pelmatozoan faunas seemingly arose suddenly, with unclear ancestral ties to Devonian taxa. The Hongguleleng faunas are critical in understanding pelmatozoan biogeography and evolution in the aftermath of Devonian extinction event(s) prior to the Carboniferous echinoderm diversification, as they indicate that diversification and re-radiation of stemmed echinoderms already were well underway before the close of the Famennian.

Collections from field excursions in 1993 and 1995 include seven new taxa of blastoids and nine new taxa of crinoids among the twenty-four total taxa reported. New blastoid taxa are Emuhablastus planus, Tripoblastus plicatus, Breimeriblastus pyramidalis, B. gracilis, Conoblastus invaginatus, Sinopetaloblastus grabaui, and Hyperoblastus emuhaensis. Together with collections from 1991, we have amassed 333 blastoid specimens, representing 13 genera and 15 species. Emuhablastus planus, new genus and species, is the oldest genus of the Family Codasteridae, extending the familial record back from the Viséan to the Famennian. The hyperoblastid genera, Breimeriblastus, new genus, and Conoblastus, new genus, apparently represent transitional genera between a Pentremitidea-like ancestor and a Pentremites-like descendant. These taxa imply that the fissiculate-spiraculate transition may have occurred in a mosaic fashion during the Middle to Upper Devonian. Hyperoblastus emuhaensis, new species, is the first report of the genus from rocks of Famennian age or from Asia.

New crinoid taxa include Athabascocrinus orientale, Hexacrinites pinnulata, Abactinocrinus devonicus, Euonychocrinus websteri,? Parisocrinus nodosus,? P. conicus, Bridgerocrinus discus, Julieticrinus romeo, and Sostronocrinus quadribrachiatus. In addition, we propose several other taxonomic reassignments based on new collections. Uperocrinus zhaoae is reassigned to the genus Actinocrinus based on the presence of pentagonal or hexagonal primibrachials in the cup, even though the primibrachials have a pseudo-quadrate appearance. Bridgerocrinus delicatulus is reassigned to Logocrinus based on the presence of three, rather than two, primibrachials. Sostronocrinidae, new family, is erected for genera with 20 arms that otherwise might be placed in the Family Scytalocrinidae. Genera included within the Sostronocrinidae, new family, are Sostronocrinus, Hertocrinus, Tundracrinus, and Amadeusicrinus new genus. Bridgerocrinus minutus is reassigned to the genus Sostronocrinus. Pachylocrinus subpentagonalis is reassigned to Amadeusicrinus new genus. “Decadocrinus” xinjiangensis is reassigned to Grabauicrinus new genus, which is erected for decadocrinids with 10 arms, all of which branch on the second primibrachial.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 77 , Issue 5 , September 2003 , pp. 922 - 948
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, N. P. 1878. Iconographia crinoideorum in stratis Sueciae Siluricis fossilium. Samson & Wallin, Holmiae, 62 p.Google Scholar
Arendt, Y. A. 1983. A new Middle Carboniferous camerate crinoid genus from the Moscow Basin. Paleontologischeskii Zhurnal, 4:101–105.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1998. Early phylogeny and subclass division of the Crinoidea (Phylum Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 72:499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, T., and Austin, T. Jr. 1842. XVIII.–Proposed arrangement of the Echinodermata, particularly as regards the Crinoidea, and a subdivision of the class Adelostella (Echinidae). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 1, 10:106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, T., and Austin, T. Jr. 1843. XXXIII.–description of several new genera and species of Crinoidea. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 1, 11:195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1890. British fossil crinoids, II: the classification of the Inadunata. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 6, 5:310–334.Google Scholar
Breimer, A., and Dop, A. J. 1975. An anatomic and taxonomic study of some Lower and Middle Devonian blastoids from Europe and North America. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen, Proc. B. 78:39–61.Google Scholar
Breimer, A., and Macurda, D. B. Jr. 1972. The phylogeny of the fissiculate blastoids. Verhangelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeeling Natuurkunde Eerste Reeks, Deel 26, no. 3, 390 p., 34 pls., 104 textfigs., 2 tables.Google Scholar
Bronn, H. G. 1849. Index palaeontologicus, unter Mitwirking der Herren Prof. Goppert, H. R. und von Meyer, H., 1381 p.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1967. The actinocrinitid genera Abactinocrinus, Aacocrinus, and Blairocrinus . Journal of Paleontology, 41:675–705.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. 1988. The early evolution of the Crinoidea, p. 235–244. In Paul, C. R. C. and Smith, A. B. (eds.), Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 373 p.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. Jr., and Carpenter, P. H. 1886. Catalogue of the Blastoidea in the Geological Department of the British Museum (Natural History), with an account of the morphology and systematic position of the group, and a revision of the genera and species. British Museum Catalogue, London, xvi+322 p., 20 pls., 8 figs.Google Scholar
Fay, R. O. 1961. Blastoid Studies. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Echinodermata Article 3, 147 p., 54 pls., 221 figs. [30 October 1961]Google Scholar
Fay, R. O. 1964. An outline classification of the Blastoidea. Oklahoma Geology Notes, 24:81–90.Google Scholar
Goldring, W. 1923. The Devonian crinoids of the state of New York. New York State Museum Memoir 16, 670 p.Google Scholar
Goldring, W. 1935. Some Upper Devonian crinoids from New York. Annals of the Carnegie Museum. 24(164):337–349.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1862. Preliminary notice of some of the species of Crinoidea, known in the Upper Helderberg and Hamilton groups of New York. New York State Cabinet of Natural History Annual Report, 15:115–153.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1879. Notice of some remarkable crinoidal forms from the lower Helderberg group. New York State Museum of Natural History Annual Report, 28:205–210.Google Scholar
Haude, R., and Thomas, E. 1989. Ein Oberdevon-/Unterkarbon-profil im velberter sattel (Nordliches Rheinisches Schiefergebirge) mit neuen arten von (?)Sostronocrinus (Echinodermata). Bulletin de la Societe Belge de Geologie, 98:373–383.Google Scholar
Hou, H. F., Lane, N. G., Waters, J. A., and Maples, C. G. 1993 [1994]. Discovery of a new Famennian echinoderm fauna from the Hongguleleng Formation of Xinjiang, with redefinition of the formation. Stratigraphy and Paleontology of China, 2, 1–18. [published in 1994]Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1918. Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen. Palaontologische Zeitschrift, Volume 3, 128 p.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A., and Jell, J. S. 1999. Crinoids, a Blastoid and a Cyclocystoid from the Upper Devonian Reef Complex of the Canning Basin, Western Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Musuem, 43(1):201–236.Google Scholar
Joysey, K. A. 1959. A study of variation and relative growth in the blastoid Orbitremites. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, series B, no. 688, 242:99–125, pl. 2, 9 text-figs. [1 January 1959]Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W., and Ausich, W. I. 1992. Advanced cladid crinoids from the Middle Mississippian of the east-central United States: primitive-grade calyces. Journal of Paleontology, 66:461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammer, T. W., and Ausich, W. I. 1993. Advanced cladid crinoids from the Middle Mississippian of the east-central United States: intermediate-grade calyces. Journal of Paleontology. 67:614–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammer, T. W., and Ausich, W. I. 1994. Advanced cladid crinoids from the Middle Mississippian of the east-central United States: advanced-grade calyces. Journal of Paleontology, 68:339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammer, T. W., and Ausich, W. I. 1996. Primitive cladid crinoids from Upper Osagean-Lower Meramecian (Mississippian) rocks of east-central United States. Journal of Paleontology, 70:835–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, S. M. 1986. Classification and evolution of Class Crinoidea. Abstracts of the 4th North American Paleontological Convention, p. A23.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1964. Decadocrinus hughwingi, a new Middle Devonian crinoid from the Silica Formation in northeastern Ohio. University of Michigan, Contributions of the Museum of Paleontology, 19:135–142.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G., and Moore, R. C. 1978. Order Cyathocrinina, p. T578–T606. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata, 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G., Waters, J. A., and Maples, C. G. 1997. Echinoderm faunas of the Hongguleleng Formation, Late Devonian (Famennian), Xinjiang-uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. The Paleontological Society, Memoir 47, 43 p.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G., Maples, C. G., and Waters, J. A. 2001a. Revision of Late Devonian (Famennian) and some Early Carboniferous (Tournaisian) crinoids and blastoids from the type Devonian area of North Devon. Palaeontology, 44:1043–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, N. G., Maples, C. G., and Waters, J. A. 2001b. Revision of Strunian cinoids and bastoids from Germany. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 75:233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, N. G., Waters, J. A., Maples, C. G., and Marcus, S. A. 1995. Paleozoic echinoderms from China. Mid-American Paleontological Society (M.A.P.S.) Digest, 18(4):84–97.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R. 1936. Notes on the Devonian crinoid fauna of the Cedar Valley Formation of Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 10:60–66.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., and Beane, B. H. 1937. The crinoid fauna of the Hampton Formation at Le Grand, Iowa. Iowa University Studies in Natural History, 17:227–272.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., and Severson, J. L. 1953. New crinoid fauna, Mississippian Lodgepole Formation, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 27:505–536.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., Parks, J. M., and Spreng, A. C. 1952. Mississippian crinoid fauna from the Banff Formation. Sunwapta Pass, Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, 26:544–575.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Sharps, R., McWilliams, M., Li, Y., Li, Q., and Zhang, W., 1991. Late Paleozoic paleomagnetic results form the Junggar block, north-western China. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96(B 10): 16047–16060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, G. C. 1979. Abnormal specimens of the middle Devonian genus Bactrocrinites and their effect on the taxonomy of the genus. Journal of Paleontology, 53:18–28.Google Scholar
McIntosh, G. C. 1984. Devonian cladid inadunate crinoids: family Botryocrinidae Bather, 1899. Journal of Paleontology, 58:1260–1281.Google Scholar
McIntosh, G. C. 1986. Phylogeny of the dicyclic inadunate crinoid order Cladida. Fourth North American Paleontological Convention Abstracts: A31.Google Scholar
McIntosh, G. C. 2001. Devonian cladid crinoids: families Glossocrinidae Goldring, 1923, and Rutkowskicrinidae new family. Journal of Paleontology, 75:783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKerrow, W. S., and Scotese, C. R. (eds.). 1990. Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography. The Geological Society of London Memoir 12, 435 p.Google Scholar
Macurda, D. B. Jr. 1977. Two Carboniferous blastoids from Scotland. Palaeontology, 20(1):225–236.Google Scholar
Macurda, D. B. Jr., and Breimer, A. 1977. Strongyloblastus, A Mississippian blastoid from western Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 51:693–700.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, H. 1929. Outline of a classification of Echinodermata. The Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University, Sendai, Japan, series 2 (Geology), 13:27–33.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, I. 1996. Pre-Cretaceous evolution of SE Asian terranes, p. 97–122. In Hall, and Blundell, (eds.), Tectonic Evolution of Southeast Asia. Geological Society Special Publication 106.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A natural history of the Crinoidea or lily-shaped animals, with observations on the genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites . Bryan & Co., Bristol, 150 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. et al. 1978. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata 2, Crinoidea, v. 2, p. T403–T812. Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Paper 46, 153 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Plummer, F. B. 1940. Crinoids from the Upper Carboniferous and Permian strata in Texas. Texas University Bulletin 3945, 468 p.Google Scholar
Morris, J. 1843. A catalogue of British fossils comprising all the genera and species hitherto described; with references to their geological distribution and to the localities in which they have been found. Van Voorst, London, x+ 222 p.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1843. Genus Taxocrinus , p. 59. In Morris, J., A catalogue of British fossils, Comprising all the genera and species hitherto described; with reference to their geological distribution and to the localities in which they have been found. John Van Voorst. London, 222 p.Google Scholar
Racki, G. 1998. Frasnian-Famennian biotic crisis: undervalued tectonic control? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 141:177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Say, T. 1825. On the species of the Linnaean genus Asterias inhabiting the coasts of the United States. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Journal, 5:141–154.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R., and McKerrow, W. S. 1990. Revised world maps and introduction, p. 1–21. In McKerrow, W. S. and Scotese, C. R. (eds.), Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography. The Geological Society, London, Memoir 12.Google Scholar
Sengör, A. M. C., Natal'in, B. A., and Burtman, V. S. 1993. Evolution of the Altaid tectonic collage and Palaeozoic crustal growth in Eurasia. Nature, 364:299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, M. J., and Sevastopulo, G. D. 1993. The origin of articulate crinoids. Palaeontology, 36:91–109.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1906. Discovery of the disc of Onychocrinus, and further remarks on the Crinoidea Flexibilia. Journal of Geology, 14:467–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, F. 1913. Crinoidea, p. 173–243. In Zittel, K. A. (ed.), Textbook of Paleontology (Second edition). Volume 1. Macmillan & Co., Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L. 1940. Four new crinoid species from the Wewoka formation and two from the Ochelata group. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 25:101–108.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L., and Leverson, C. O. 1973. Additional crinoid specimens from the Shellrock Formation (Upper Devonian) of Iowa. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Sciences, 80:182–184.Google Scholar
Strimple, H. L., and McGinnis, M. R. 1969. New crinoid from the Gilmore City Formation, Lower Mississippian of Iowa. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 42, pt. 5, p. 21–22.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. O. 1924. Echinoderms of the Iowa Devonian. Iowa Geological Survey, 29:385–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978. Subclass Camerata, p. T408–T519. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata. 2(2). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrrence.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1880. Revision of the Palaeocrino-idea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1879, p. 226–378.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1885. Revision of the Palaeocrino-idea, Pt. 3, Section 1, Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1884, p. 225–364.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1886. Revision of the Palaeocrino-idea, Pt. 3, Section 2, Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1885, p. 64–226.Google Scholar
Waters, J. A. 1990. The palaeobiogeography of the Blastoidea (Echinodermata), p. 339–352. McKerrow, W. S. and Scotese, C. R. (eds.), Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography. Geological Society [London] Memoir 12.Google Scholar
Waters, J. A., and Horowitz, A. S. 1993. Ordinal-level evolution in the Blastoidea. Lethaia, 26:207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webby, B. D. 1965. Quantoxocrinus, a new Devonian inadunate crinoid from West Somerset, England. Palaeontology, 11:513–525.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D., Hafley, D. J., Blake, D. B., and Glass, A. 1999. Crinoids and stelleroids (Echinodermata) from the Broken Rib Member, Dyer Formation (Late Devonian, Famennian) of the White River Plateau, Colorado. Journal of Paleontology, 73(3):461–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, G. D., Lane, N. G., Maples, C. G., Waters, J. A., and Horowitz, A. S. 1998. Frasnian-Famennian extinction was a non-event for crinoids, blastoids, and Bryozoans. Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, Program with Abstracts: 30(7):30–31.Google Scholar
Whidborne, G. F. 1898. A monograph of the Devonian fauna of the South of England. Volume III, Pt. III. The fauna of the Marwood and Pelton of North Devon and Somerset (continued). Palaeontographical Society, v. 52, p. 179–236, pls. 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, F. 1996. New knowledge on the age of Hongguleleng Formation in the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin, northern Xinjiang. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica. 13(3):277–285.Google Scholar
Xu, I. W. 1963. Some “hexagonal lilies” (Hexacrinites) from the Middle Devonian section in the Syansyan district of Kwangsi Province. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 11:108–118.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, N. N. 1928. Two new crinoid genera (Poteriocrinidae) from the upper Paleozoic of the Pechora region. Akademie Nauk SSSR, Geologie Muzeya, Trudy, 3:1–8.Google Scholar
Zhao, X. 1994. Devonian, p. 111–130. In Hongfu, Yin (ed.), The Palaeobiogeography of China. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Zhao, Z. X. 1986. The conodonts from Hobokasar Formation of Aljiati hill, northern Xinjiang. Xinjiang Shiyou Dizhi, 7(3):89–107.Google Scholar
Zhao, Z. X., and Wang, C. Y. 1990. Age of the Honggulelong Formation in the Junggar Basin of Xinjiang. Journal of Stratigraphy, 14:145–147.Google Scholar