Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:54:30.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systematic and biostratigraphic significance of the American rudist bivalve Durania aguilae Adkins, 1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Simon F. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Geology, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica,
Jose Maria Pons
Affiliation:
Departament de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain,

Abstract

The rudist bivalve Durania aguilae Adkins was described from the Mendez Formation in Mexico and originally attributed to the Santonian. We revise this species and show that it belongs to the genus Chiapasella Müllerried. We also recognize that Chiapasella aguilae (Adkins) is a senior synonym of Chiapasella trechmanni Mitchell and Gunter, an important biostratigraphic indicator in the late late Maastrichtian of Jamaica. Chiapasella aguilae is therefore an important late late Maastrichtian marker fossil that has been recorded from Jamaica, Mexico, and Cuba.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © 2010, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W. S. 1930. New rudistids from the Texas and Mexican Cretaceous. The University of Texas Bulletin, Contributions to Geology, 3001: 77100, 121–133.Google Scholar
Alencáster, G. and Pons, J. M. 1992. New observations on the Upper Cretaceous rudists of Chiapas: Comparison between American and European faunas and taxonomic implications. Geologica Romana, 28: 327339.Google Scholar
Boissevain, H. and MacGillavry, H. J. 1932. Some remarks on Barrettia sparcilirata Whitfield and Chiapasella radiolitiformis (Trechmann). Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, 35: 13031312.Google Scholar
Chubb, L. J. 1956. Some rarer rudists from Jamaica, B.W.I. Palaeontographica Americana, 4: 231.Google Scholar
Chubb, L. J. 1971. Rudists of Jamaica. Palaeontographica Americana, 7: 161257.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C., Stinnesbeck, W., and López-Oliva, J. G. 2004. Maastrichtian cephalopods from Cerralvo, north-eastern Mexico. Palaeontology, 47: 15751627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ifrim, C., Stinnesbeck, W., and Schafhauser, A. 2005. Maastrichtian shallow-water ammonites from northeastern Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 22: 4864.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. F. 2005. The oldest barnacle from the Caribbean is a rudist bivalve. Cretaceous Research, 26: 895897.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. F. and Gunter, G. C. 2002. Biostratigraphy and taxonomy of the rudist Chiapasella in the Titanosarcolites Limestones (Maastrichtian) of Jamaica. Cretaceous Research, 23: 473487.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. F. and Ramsook, R. 2009. Rudist bivalve assemblages from the Back Rio Grande Formation (Campanian, Cretaceous) of Jamaica and their stratigraphical significance. Cretaceous Research, 30: 307321.Google Scholar
Müllerried, F. K. G. 1931. Chiapasella, un paquiodonto extrañísimo de la América. Anales del Instituto de Biología, México, 2: 243253.Google Scholar
Müllerried, F. K. G. 1942. El Valle de Tixtla, cuenca de desagüe subterráneo temporal, en el Estado de Guerrero. Revista geográfica del Instituto panamericano de Geografía e Historia, México, 1942: 1748.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. H. 1933. Nuevos rudistas de Cuba. Revista de Agricultura, 14: 95125.Google Scholar
Pons, J. M. and Vicens, E. 2008. The structure of the outer shell layer in radiolitid rudists, a morphoconstructional approach. Lethaia, 41: 219234.Google Scholar
Rutten, M. G. 1936. Rudistids from the Cretaceous of northern Santa Clara province, Cuba. Journal of Paleontology, 10: 134142.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C. T. 1924. The Cretaceous limestones of Jamaica and their Mollusca. Geological Magazine, 61: 385410.Google Scholar