Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:02:04.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomic revision of Hyolitha from the middle Paleozoic of North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

John M. Malinky ,
Robert M. Linsley  and
Ellis L. Yochelson
John M. Malinky
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20560
Robert M. Linsley
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Colgate University, Hamilton, New York 13346
Ellis L. Yochelson
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20560
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Collection of over a dozen specimens of Hyolithes aclis Hall from the Middle Devonian of New York indicates that this species belongs to a new genus, Hallotheca, to which the species Hyolithes halli (Hall) is also assigned. However, the generic assignments of the Silurian species Hyolithes cliftonensis Foerste and the Devonian species H. centennialis Barrett, H. ceratophilus Clarke, H. neapolis Clarke, and H. triliratus Hall are uncertain because of poor preservation of their type specimens. Use of these names should be confined to the types until better preserved topotypes become available. Finally, H. cooperi (Williams) consists of organisms of uncertain affinities, and the type of H. principalis Hall may be a fragment of Devonian sandstone rather than an organism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 61 , Issue 6 , November 1987 , pp. 1173 - 1186
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, L. E. 1985. Mahantango conulariid considered a hyolithid. Pennsylvania Geology, 16(3):14–16.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1867. Systeme Silurien du Centre de la Boheme. Ordre des Pteropodes. Vol. 3, Prague, 179 p.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. T. 1876. Notes on the lower Helderburg rocks of Port Jervis, New York, with descriptions of a new pteropod. Annals of the Lycaeum of Natural History, New York, 11:290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Baird, G. C. 1982. Moscow-Genesee stratigraphic relationships in western New York; evidence for regional erosive beveling in the Late Devonian. New York State Geological Association, 54th Annual Meeting Field Trip Guidebook, Amherst, New York, p. 19–63.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1885. On the higher Devonian faunas of Ontario County, New York. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 16, 86 p.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1894. New or rare species of fossils from the horizon of the Livonia salt shaft. 13th Annual Report of the New York State Geologist, p. 160–180.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1907. Some new Devonic fossils. New York State Museum Bulletin, 107:153–291.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. M. 1908. Early Devonic history of New York and eastern North America. New York Museum Memoir 9, 366 p.Google Scholar
Cleland, H. F. 1903. A study of the fauna of the Hamilton Formation of the Cayuga Lake section in central New York. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 206, 112 p.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. 1840. Ueber das silurische Schichtensystem in Ehstland. Zeitschrift fur Natur- und Heilkunde, St. Petersburg, Vols. 1, 2, 210 p.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. 1860. Lethaea Rossica ou paleontologie de la Russie, Stuttgart. Vol. 1, 1657 p.Google Scholar
Ellison, R. L. 1965. Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Mahantango Formation in south-central Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Geological Survey Bulletin G48, 298 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W. 1962. Small conoidal shells of uncertain affinities, p. W98–W140. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. W, Miscellanea. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1903. Silurian and Devonian limestones of western Tennessee. Journal of Geology, 11:554–583, 679–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1909. Fossils from the Silurian formations of Tennessee, Indiana and Illinois. Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratories of Dennison University, 14:61–107.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1862. Contributions to paleontology; comprising descriptions of new species of fossils, from the Upper Helderburg, Hamilton and Chemung Groups. New York State Cabinet of Natural History, 15th Annual Report, p. 29–198.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1876. Illustrations of Devonian fossils: Gasteropoda, Pteropoda and Cephalopoda (plates only). New York State Geological Survey, 74 Pls.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1879. Gasteropoda, Pteropoda and Cephalopoda. Paleontology of New York. New York State Geological Survey, Vol. 5, Pt. 2, 492 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1888. Supplement containing descriptions and illustrations of Pteropoda, Cephalopoda and Annelida. New York State Geological Survey, Vol. 5, Pt. 2, 24 p.Google Scholar
Harrison, W. B., and Harrison, L. K. 1975. A Maquoketa-like molluscan community in the Brassfield Formation (Early Silurian) of Adams County, Ohio. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 67:193–234.Google Scholar
La Rocque, A. 1949. New uncoiled gastropods from the Middle Devonian of Michigan and Manitoba. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 7:113–122.Google Scholar
Lesley, J. P. 1889. A dictionary of fossils of Pennsylvania. Geological Survey of Pennsylvania, Report P4, Vol. 1, 437 p.Google Scholar
Linsley, D. M. 1985. Cyclic deposition and stratigraphy in the Upper Marcellus and Skaneateles Formations in east-central New York. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 18:31.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M. 1987. Taxonomic revision of lower and middle Paleozoic Orthothecida (Hyolitha, Mollusca) from North America and China. Journal of Paleontology, 61:942–959.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1963. New knowledge on the morphology of Hyolithes . Sbornick Geologickych Ved, Paleontologie, 1:53–73.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1967. The class Hyolitha in the Caradoc of Bohemia. Sbornik Geologickych Ved, Paleontologie, 9:51–112.Google Scholar
McLearn, F. H. 1924. Paleontology of the Silurian rocks of Arisaig, Nova Scotia. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 137, 180 p.Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1969. Paleontologic part, p. 112–320. In Raaben, M. E. (ed.), The Tommotian Stage and the Lower Cambrian Boundary Problem. Nauka Publishing House, Moscow.Google Scholar
Northrop, S. A. 1939. Paleontology and stratigraphy of the Silurian rocks of the Port Daniel-Black Cape Region, Gaspe. Geological Society of America Special Paper 21, 302 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, O. 1891. Revision der palaeozischen Hyolithiden Bohmens. Abhandlungen bohmens der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften Mathematik-naturwissenschaften. Vol. 7, 28 p.Google Scholar
Peck, J. H., and McFarland, H. B. 1954. Whitfield collection of types at the University of California. Journal of Paleontology, 28:297–309.Google Scholar
Qian, Y. 1983. Hyolitha, p. 286–289. In Paleontological Atlas of East China. Volume of the Early Paleozoic. Geological Publishing House, Beijing.Google Scholar
Remele, A. 1888. Ueber einige Glossophoren aus Untersilurische-Geschieben der norrdeutschen Diluvium. Deutsche geologische Gesellschaft Zeitschrift, 40:666–670.Google Scholar
Ringueberg, E. N. S. 1888. Some new species of fossils from the Niagara shales of western New York. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1888, p. 131–137.Google Scholar
Rollins, H. B., Eldredge, N., and Linsley, R. M. 1972. Paleontological problems of the Hamilton Group (Middle Devonian). New York State Geological Association, 44th Annual Meeting, Field Trip Guidebook, p. F1–F28.Google Scholar
Selleck, B. W. 1983. Cyclic shallowing-upward sequences in the Hamilton Group of central New York. New York State Geological Association, 49th Annual Meeting, Field Trip Guidebook, Trip B–8, p. 1–23.Google Scholar
Selleck, B. W., and Linsley, R. M. 1984. Sedimentology and faunal assemblages in the Hamilton Group of central New York. New York State Geological Association, Field Trip Guidebook 56th Annual Meeting, p. 221–236.Google Scholar
Sharpe, D. 1845. Contributions to the geology of North Wales. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 2:282–315.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1946. Notes on the nomenclature of Hyolithes . Journal of Paleontology, 20:72–85.Google Scholar
Stewart, G. A. 1923. The fauna of the Little Salina Limestone in Ste. Genevieve County, p. 213–276. In Branson, E. B. (ed.), The Devonian of Missouri. Missouri Bureau of Geology and Mines, Vol. 27.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1972. Biostratigraphy and orthothecomorph hyoliths from the Lower Cambrian of the Siberian Platform. Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 152 p.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1974. Biostratigraphy and paleontology of the Lower Cambrian of Europe and northern Asia. Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 248 p.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1903. The Paleozoic Faunas. Report on Paleontology, New Jersey Geological Survey. Vol. 3, 462 p.Google Scholar
Whiteaves, J. F. 1892. The fossils of the Devonian rocks of the islands, shores or immediate vicinity of Lakes Manitoba and Winnipegosis. Contributions to Paleontology, Geological Survey of Canada, 1:255–359.Google Scholar
Willard, B., and Cleaves, A. B. 1933. Hamilton group of eastern Pennsylvania. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 44:757–787.Google Scholar
Williams, J. S. 1935. Paleontology, p. 830–859. In Cooper, G. A. and Williams, J. S., Tully Formation of New York. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 48.Google Scholar
Williams, J. S. 1946. Hyolithes cooperi, new name. Journal of Paleontology, 20:87.Google Scholar
Wilmarth, M. G. 1938. Lexicon of geologic names of the United States (including Alaska). U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, Pt. 1, p. 1–1244, and Pt. 2, p. 1245–2396.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1984. Speculative functional morphology and morphology that could not function: the example of Hyolithes and Biconulites . Malacologia, 25:255–264.Google Scholar
Zazvorka, V. 1928. Revision of the Hyolithi from d. Palaeontolographica Bohemiae. No. 13, 22 p.Google Scholar