Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:19:08.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomy and biostratigraphic significance of Icriodus orri Klapper and Barrick and related Middle Devonian conodont species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2016

Katarzyna Narkiewicz  and
Pierre Bultynck
Katarzyna Narkiewicz
Affiliation:
Polish Geological Institute-National Research Institute, Warszawa, Poland 〈katarzyna.narkiewicz@pgi.gov.pl〉
Pierre Bultynck
Affiliation:
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium 〈pierre.bultynck@naturalsciences.be〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study of the Eifelian icriodid conodonts is based on collections from Belarus and the Michigan Basin (USA). It is here proposed that forms originally included in Icriodus orri Klapper and Barrick, 1983 can be attributed to I. retrodepressus Bultynck, 1970, Icriodus orri sensu stricto, and Icriodus michiganus new species, each displaying a distinct morphology, stratigraphical range, and geographic distribution. Icriodus retrodepressus, characterized by a triangular spindle, deep depression in its posterior part, and a well-pronounced spur and antispur, appeared in the lower partitus Zone of the lowermost Eifelian and disappeared in the upper Eifelian kockelianus Zone. Icriodus michiganus n. sp., distinguished by a lachrymiform spindle with a shallow posterior depression, ranges from the lower costatus Zone to the upper kockelianus Zone. Icriodus orri differs from the other two species by the occurrence of transverse denticle rows with lateral denticles displaying sharp edges. It ranges from the upper kockelianus Zone to the ensensis Zone of the uppermost Eifelian. Icriodus retrodepressus first occurred in the European part of the Euramerican continent and later migrated into the North American area. Icriodus michiganus n. sp. has been found in the interior part of the North American Craton and near the eastern Euramerican margin. Icriodus orri occurs in the North American interior, in British Columbia (Canada), and in the eastern part of Euramerica (Belarus). The introduction of I. retrodepressus can be related to the transgressive Choteč Event, whereas that of I. orri to a transgressive stage of the Ie eustatic cycle.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 6 , November 2016 , pp. 1181 - 1196
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkyová, S., 2009, Lower-Middle Devonian (upper Emsian-Eifelian, serotinus-kockelianus zones) conodont faunas from the Prague Basin, the Czech Republic: Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 84, p. 667–686.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G., and Ziegler, W., 1957, Die Conodontenchronologie des Mitteldevons und des tiefsten Oberdevons: Abhandlugen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, v. 22, p. 1–135.Google Scholar
Branson, E.B., and Mehl, M.G., 1938, The conodont genus Icriodus and its stratigraphic distribution: Journal of Paleontology, v. 12, p. 156–166.Google Scholar
Braun, W.K., Norris, A.W., and Uyeno, T.T., 1988, Late Givetian to early Frasnian biostratigraphy of western Canada: The Slave Point – Waterways boundary and related events, in McMillan, N.J., Embry, A.F., and Glass, D.J., eds., Devonian of the World, Volume 3, Paleontology, Paleoecology and Biostratigraphy: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, v. 14, p. 221–250.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., Baird, G.C., Bartholomew, A.J., DeSantis, M.K., and Ver Straeten, C.A., 2011, Sequence stratigraphy and a revised sea-level curve for the Middle Devonian of eastern North America: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 304, p. 21–53.Google Scholar
Bultynck, P., 1970, Révision stratigraphique et paléontologique (Brachiopodes et Conodontes) de la coupe type du Couvinien: Mémoires de l’Institut Géologique de l’Université de Louvain, v. 26, p. 1–152.Google Scholar
Bultynck, P., 1976, Comparative study of Middle Devonian conodonts from north Michigan (U.S.A.) and the Ardennes (Belgium–France): Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, v. 15, p. 119–141.Google Scholar
Bultynck, P., 1987, Pelagic and neritic conodont successions from the Givetian of pre-Sahara Morocco and the Ardennes: Bulletin Institut Royal Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, v. 57, p. 149–181.Google Scholar
Bultynck, P., 2003, Devonian Icriodontidae: biostratigraphy, classification and remarks on paleoecology and dispersal: Revista Española de Micropaleontologia, v. 35, p. 295–314.Google Scholar
Bultynck, P., and Godefroid, J., 1974, Excursion G, in Bouckaert, J., and Streel, M., eds., Guidebook International Symposium on Belgian Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Visean, Namur 1974: Geological Survey of Belgium, Brussels, p. 1–42.Google Scholar
Bultynck, P., Coen-Aubert, M., and Godefroid, J., 2000, Summary of the state of correlation in the Devonian of the Ardennes (Belgium–NE France) resulting from the decisions of the SDS, in Bultynck, P., ed., Recognition of Devonian Series and Stage Boundaries in Geological Areas, Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 225, p. 91–114.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B.D.E., 1978, Aspects of late Early and Middle Devonian conodont biostratigraphy of western and northwestern Canada: Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, v. 18, p. 161–231.Google Scholar
Clausen, C.-D., Weddige, K., and Ziegler, W., 1993, Devonian of the Rhenish Massif: Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy Newsletter, v. 10, p. 18–19.Google Scholar
Dzik, J., 1976, Remarks on the evolution of Ordovician conodonts: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 21, p. 395–455.Google Scholar
Garcia-Lopez, S., 1987, Los conodontos y su aplicacion al estudio de las divisions chronostratigraficas mayores del Devonico Asturleones (España): Publicaciones Especiales del Boletin Geologico y Minero de España, Madrid, 1987, p. 1–112.Google Scholar
Golubtsov, V.K., Kruchek, S.A., Obukchovskaya, T.G., and Pushkin, V.I., 2000, The Devonian of Belarus, in Bultynck, P., ed., Recognition of Devonian Series and Stage Boundaries in Geological Areas, Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 225, p. 239–242.Google Scholar
Hinde, G.J., 1879, On conodonts from the Chazy and Cincinnati Group of the Cambro-Silurian, and from the Hamilton and Genesee-Shale Division of the Devonian, in Canada and United States: Geological Society of London, Quarterly Journal, v. 35, p. 351–369.Google Scholar
House, M.R., 1985, Correlation of mid-Palaeozoic ammonoid evolutionary events with global sedimentary perturbations: Nature, v. 313, p. 17–22.Google Scholar
Huddle, J.W., 1934, Conodonts from the New Albany Shale of Indiana: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 21, p. 1–136.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.G., Klapper, G., and Sandberg, C.A., 1985, Devonian eustatic fluctuations in Euramerica: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 96, p. 567–587.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.G., Klapper, G., and Elrick, M., 1996, Devonian transgressive-regressive cycles and biostratigraphy, Northern Antelope Range, Nevada: Establishment of reference horizons for global cycles: Palaios, v. 11, p. 3–14.Google Scholar
Khalymbadzha, V.G., 1990, Konodonty Eifelskovo Jarusa SSSR: Izdatelstvo Kazanskogo Universiteta, p. 1–86. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Klapper, G., 1975, Icriodus arkonensis Stauffer, 1938, in Ziegler, W., ed., Catalogue of Conodonts, II: Stuttgart, Germanym Schweizerbart (Nägele und Obermiller), p. 73, 77.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Barrick, J.E., 1983, Middle Devonian (Eifelian) conodonts from Spillville Formation in northern Iowa and southern Minnesota: Journal of Paleontology, v. 57, p. 1212–1243.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Johnson, J.G., 1980, Endemism and dispersal of Devonian conodonts: Journal of Paleontology, v. 54, p. 400–455.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Ziegler, W., 1967, Evolutionary development of the Icriodus latericrescens group (Conodonta) in the Devonian of Europe and North America: Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, v. 127, p. 68–83.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., and Ziegler, W., 1979, Devonian conodont biostratigraphy, in House, M.R., Scrutton, C.T., and Bassett, M.G., eds., The Devonian System: Special Paper in Palaeontology, v. 23, p. 199–224.Google Scholar
Klapper, G., Ziegler, W., and Mashkova, T.V., 1978, Conodonts and correlation of Lower-Middle Devonian boundary beds in the Barrandian area of Czechoslovakia: Geologica et Palaeontologica, v. 12, p. 103–116.Google Scholar
Klug, C.R., 1983, Conodonts and biostratigraphy of the Muscatatuck Group (Middle Devonian), south-central Indiana and north-central Kentucky: Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, v. 71, p. 79–112.Google Scholar
Kruchek, S.A., Pushkin, V.I., and Obuchovskaya, T.G., 2001, Eifelskij jarus, in Makhnach, R.G., Garetsky, A.W., and Matveev, A.V., eds., Geologiya Belarusi: Institut Geologicheskix Nauk NAN Belarusi, Minsk, 2001, p. 196–202.Google Scholar
Malec, J., 2003, Góry Świętokrzyskie, in Nehring-Lefeld, M., Malec, J., Woroncowa-Marcinowska, T., Matyja, H., Hajdukiewicz, J., and Chorowska, M., Typ, gromada Conodonta Eichenberg, 1930, in Malinowska, L., ed., Budowa Geologiczna Polski, Atlas Skamieniałości Przewodnich i Charakterystycznych, Dewon. 3: Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny i Ministerstwo Środowiska, (part 1b−z. 1), pl. 343; (part 1b−z. 2), p. 554.Google Scholar
Mawson, R., and Talent, J.A., 1989, Late Emsian-Givetian stratigraphy and conodont biofacies—carbonate slope and offshore shoal to sheltered lagoon and nearshore carbonate ramp—Broken River, North Queensland, Australia: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 117, p. 205–259.Google Scholar
Morrow, D.W., and Geldsetzer, H.H.J., 1988, Devonian of the eastern Canadian Cordillera, in McMillan, N.J., Embry, A.F., and Glass, D.J., eds., Devonian of the World, Volume 1: Regional Syntheses: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, v. 14, p. 85–121.Google Scholar
Müller, K.J., and Müller, E.M., 1957, Early Upper Devonian (Independence) conodonts from Iowa, Part 1: Journal of Paleontology, v. 31, p. 1069–1108.Google Scholar
Narkiewicz, K., and Kruchek, S.A., 2008, Conodont-based correlation of the Middle Devonian in SE Poland and Belarus—preliminary data, in Makhnach, A.A., ed., Aktualnyje Problemy Geologii Bielarusi i Smiezhnych Teritorii, Materialy Miezhdunarodnoj Nauchnoj Konferencii Posviashchonoj 90-letia so Dnia Rozdhenia Akademika NAN Belarusi Aleksandra Semionovicha Maxnacha, Minsk, Belarus, Bialoruskiy Nauchno-Issledovatelskiy Geologorazviedochnyj Instytut, p. 188–194.Google Scholar
Orr, R.W., 1971, Conodonts from Middle Devonian strata of the Michigan Basin: Indiana Geological Survey Bulletin, v. 45, p. 1–110.Google Scholar
Schumacher, D., 1971, Conodonts from the Middle Devonian Lake Church and Milwaukee formations, in Clark, D.L., ed., Conodonts and Biostratigraphy of the Wisconsin Paleozoic: Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Information Circular, v. 19, p. 55–148.Google Scholar
Scotese, C.R., 2002, PALEOMAP Project. http://www.scotese.com (accessed May 2015).Google Scholar
Sparling, D.R., 1983, Conodont biostratigraphy and biofacies of lower Middle Devonian limestones, north-central Ohio: Journal of Paleontology, v. 57, p. 825–864.Google Scholar
Sparling, D.R., 1988, Middle Devonian stratigraphy and conodont biostratigraphy, north-central Ohio: Ohio Journal of Science, v. 88, p. 2–18.Google Scholar
Sparling, D.R., 1995, Conodonts from the Middle Devonian Plum Brook Shale of north-central Ohio: Journal of Paleontology, v. 69, p. 1123–1139.Google Scholar
Sparling, D.R., 1999, Conodonts from the Prout Dolomite of north-central Ohio and Givetian (upper Middle Devonian) correlation problems: Journal of Paleontology, v. 73, p. 892–907.Google Scholar
Stauffer, C.R., 1938, Conodonts of the Olentangy Shale: Journal of Paleontology, v. 12, p. 411–443.Google Scholar
Stewart, G.A., and Sweet, W.C., 1956, Conodonts from the Middle Devonian bone beds of central and west-central Ohio: Journal of Paleontology, v. 30, p. 261–273.Google Scholar
Taylor, G.C., and MacKenzie, W.S., 1970, Devonian stratigraphy of northeastern British Columbia: Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, v. 186, p. 62.Google Scholar
Tolokonnikova, Z., and Ernst, A., 2010, Palaeobiogeography of Famennian (Late Devonian) bryozoans: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 298, p. 360–369.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T.T., 1979, Devonian conodont biostratigraphy of Powell Creek and adjacent areas, western District of MacKenzie, in Stelck, C.R., and Chatterton, B.D.E., eds., Western and Arctic Canadian Biostratigraphy: Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, v. 18, p. 233–257.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T.T., 1991, Pre-Famenian Devonian conodont biostratigraphy of selected intervals in the eastern Canadian Cordillera, in Orchard, M.J., and McCracken, A.D., eds., Ordovician to Triassic Conodont Paleontology of the Canadian Cordillera: Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, v. 417, p. 129–161.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T.T., 1998, Conodonts fauna, in Norris, W.A., and Uyeno, T.T., eds., Middle Devonian Brachiopods, Conodonts, Stratigraphy, and Transgressive-Regressive Cycles, Pine Point Area, South of Great Slave Lake, District of Mackenzie, Northwest Territories: Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, v. 522, part 2, p. 146–190.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T.T., and Lespérance, P.J., 1997, Middle Devonian (Eifelian) conodonts, and their stratigraphic implications, from the mid-Appalachians of Québec: Geological Society of America Special Paper, v. 321, p. 145–160.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T. T., Telford, P.G., and Sanford, B.V., 1982, Devonian conodonts and stratigraphy of southwestern Ontario: Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, v. 332, p. 1–53.Google Scholar
Walliser, O.H., 1996, Global events in the Devonian and Carboniferous, in Walliser, O.H., ed., Global Events and Event Stratigraphy in the Phanerozoic, Berlin, Germany, Springer, p. 225–250.Google Scholar
Walliser, O.H., 2000, The Eifelian-Givetian stage boundary, in Bultynck, P., ed., Recognition of Devonian Series and Stage Boundaries in Geological Areas, Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 225, p. 37–47.Google Scholar
Walliser, O.H., and Bultynck, P., 2011, Extinctions, survival and innovations of conodont species during the Kačák Episode (Eifelian-Givetian) in south-eastern Morocco: Bulletin Institut Royal Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, v. 81, p. 5–25.Google Scholar
Weddige, K., 1977, Die Conodonten der Eifel-Stufe im Typusgebiet und in benachbarten Faziesgebieten: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 58, p. 271–419.Google Scholar
Weddige, K., 1988, Eifel conodonts, in Ziegler, W., ed., Guide to Field Trips. Part 1: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 102, p. 103–110.Google Scholar
Weddige, K., Werner, R., and Ziegler, W., 1979, The Emsian-Eifelian boundary: An attempt at correlation between the Eifelian and Ardennes region: Newsletter Stratigraphy, v. 8, p. 159–169.Google Scholar
Werner, R., and Ziegler, W., 1982, Proposal of a boundary stratotype for the Lower-Middle Devonian Boundary (partitus-Boundary), in Werner, R., and Ziegler, W., eds., On Devonian Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of the Ardenno-Rhenish Mountains and Related Devonian Matters: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 55, p. 13–84.Google Scholar
Wittekindt, H., 1966, Zur Conodonten-Chronologie des Mitteldevons: Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland und Westfalen, v. 9, p. 621–646.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., 1975, Icriodus retrodepressus Bultynck 1970, in Ziegler, W., ed., Catalogue of Conodonts, II, Stuttgart, Germany, Schweizerbart (Nägele und Obermiller), p. 73, 77.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., 2000, The Lower Eifelian boundary, in Bultynck, P., ed., Recognition of Devonian Series and Stage Boundaries in Geological Areas, Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 225, p. 27–36.Google Scholar