Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:20:54.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Upper Campanian ammonites from the Mount Laurel Sand at Biggs Farm, Delaware

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

W. J. Kennedy  and
W. A. Cobban
W. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Geological Collections, University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom
W. A. Cobban
Affiliation:
qU.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Mail Stop 919, Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mount Laurel Sand at Biggs Farm, Delaware, yielded a diverse ammonite fauna comprising Pachydiscus (Pachydiscus) sp., Placenticeras cf. P. placenta (DeKay, 1828), Placenticeras n. sp., Eulophoceras sp., Nostoceras (Nostoceras) draconis Stephenson, 1941, Didymoceras cheyennense (Meek and Hayden, 1856a), Anaklinoceras reflexum Stephenson, 1941, Anaklinoceras tenuicostatum n. sp., Oxybeloceras meekanum (Whitfield, 1877), Solenoceras annulifer Morton, 1841, Baculites ovatus Say, 1820, B. undatus Stephenson, 1941, Hoploscaphites vistulensis Błaszkiewicz, 1980, and Jeletzkytes compressus (Roemer, 1841). The last named two species occur in Europe and indicate an upper but not uppermost upper Campanian horizon. Several species also occur in the Western Interior and suggest correlation with the Didymoceras cheyennense zone and part of the Baculites compressus zone of the upper Campanian in that region.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 68 , Issue 6 , November 1994 , pp. 1285 - 1305
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W. S. 1928. Handbook of Texas Cretaceous fossils. University of Texas Bulletin, 2838, 385 p.Google Scholar
Birkelund, T. 1965. Ammonites from the Upper Cretaceous of West Greenland. Meddelelser om Gronland, 179, 192 p.Google Scholar
Birkelund, T., Hancock, J. M., Hart, M. B., Rawson, P. F., Remane, J., Robaszynski, F., Schmid, F., and Surlyk, F. 1984. Cretaceous stage boundaries—proposals. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 33:3–20.Google Scholar
Błaszkiewicz, A. 1980. Campanian and Maastrichtian ammonites of the Middle Vistula Valley, Poland: a stratigraphic-paleontologic study. Prace Instytut Geologiczny, 92:1–63.Google Scholar
Burnett, J. A., Hancock, J. M., Kennedy, W. J., and Lord, A. R. 1992. Macrofossil, planktonic foraminiferal and nannofossil zonation at the Campanian/Maastrichtian boundary. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 27:157–172.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1970. Occurrence of the Late Cretaceous ammonites Didymoceras stevensoni (Whitfield) and Exiteloceras jenneyi (Whitfield) in Delaware. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 700-D:71–76.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1973. The late Cretaceous ammonite Baculites undatus Stephenson in Colorado and New Mexico U.S. Geological Survey Journal of Research, 1:459–465.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1974a. Ammonites from the Navesink Formation at Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 845, 21 p.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1974b. Some ammonoids from the Ripley Formation of Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia. U.S. Geological Survey Journal of Research, 2:81–88.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1855. Descriptions of eighteen new Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, 7:265–268.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1860. Descriptions of new species of Cretaceous and Eocene fossils of Mississippi and Alabama. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 4:275–298.Google Scholar
DeKay, J. E. 1828. Report on several fossil multilocular shells from the state of Delaware: with observations on a second specimen of the new fossil genus EURYPTERUS. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History, 2:273–279.Google Scholar
Donovan, D. T. 1953. The Jurassic and Cretaceous stratigraphy and palaeontology of Traill, East Greenland. Meddelelser om Gronland, 111, 4, 150 p.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1890. Sur la classification des Cératites de la Craie. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, (3), 18:275–292.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1928. Les ammonites de la Craie supérieure en Egypte et au Sinai. Mémoires de l'Academie des Sciences de l'Institut de France, 60, 44 p.Google Scholar
Easton, W. H. 1960. Invertebrate Paleontology. Harper, New York, 701 p.Google Scholar
Ernst, G., and Schmid, F. 1979. Multistratigraphische Untersuchungen in der Oberkreide des Raumes Braunschweig-Hannover. International Union of Geological Science, A, 6:11–46.Google Scholar
Frech, F. 1915. Die Bedeutung von Scaphites für die Gliederung der Oberkreide, Pt. 1 of Über Scaphites. Centralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Jahrgang 1915:553–568.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. 1861. Synopsis of the Mollusca of the Cretaceous formation, including the geographical and stratigraphic range and synonymy. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 8:57–257.Google Scholar
Giebel, C. G. 1847–1856. Fauna der Vorwelt mit steter Berucksichtigung der lebenden Tiere. F.A. Brockhaus, Leipzig, 856 p.Google Scholar
Gill, J. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1973. Stratigraphy and geologic history of the Montana Group and equivalent rocks, Montana, Wyoming and North and South Dakota. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 776, 37 p.Google Scholar
Gill, T. 1871. Arrangement of the families of mollusks. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 227, 49 p.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1921. A Textbook of Geology, Pt. 2, Historical Geology. D.C. Heath and Co., New York, 976 p.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W., and Shimer, H. W. 1910. North American Index Fossils: Invertebrates, 2. A.G. Seiler and Co., New York, 909 p.Google Scholar
Grossouvre, A. de. 1894. Recherches sur la craie supérieure, 2, Paléontologie. Les ammonites de la craie supérieure. Mémoires du Service de la Carte Géologique détaille de la France, 264 p. (1893 imprint).Google Scholar
Haas, O. 1943. Some abnormally coiled ammonites from the Upper Cretáceous of Angola. American Museum Novitates, 1222, 18 p.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. M., Russell, E. E., Taylor, R. H., and Gayle, A. S. 1992. The relative stratigraphic position of the foraminiferal and belemnite standards for the Campanian–Maastrichtian boundary. Geological Magazine, 129:787–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauer, F. Von. 1858. Uber die Cephalopoden aus den Gosauschichten. Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Osterreich, 1:7–14.Google Scholar
Hayden, F. V. 1859. Catalogue of the collections in geology and natural history obtained by the expedition under command of Lieut. G. K. Warren, p. 673–705. In Warren, G. K., Preliminary Account of Explorations in Nebraska and Dakota in the Years 1855–56–57. U.S. War Department, Annual Report 1858 (U.S. 35th Congress, Second Session, House Executive Document 2).Google Scholar
Hirsch, K. F. 1975. Die Ammoniten des Pierre Meeres (Oberkreide) in den westlichen USA. Der Aufschluss, Jahrgang 26, 3:102–113.Google Scholar
Houlik, C. W. Jr., Olsson, R. K., and Aurisano, R. W. 1983. Upper Cretaceous (Campanian–Maestrichtian) marine strata in the subsurface of northern Delaware. Southeastern Geology, 24:57–65.Google Scholar
Howarth, M. K. 1965. Cretaceous ammonites and nautiloids from Angola. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Geology), 10:335–412.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1889. Genesis of the Arietidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 673, 239 p.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1894. Phylogeny of an acquired characteristic. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 32:349–647.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopoda, p. 502–604. In Von Zittel, K. A., 1896–1900, Textbook of Palaeontology, translated by Eastman, C.R.Macmillan, London and New York.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1903. Pseudoceratites of the Cretaceous. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph, 44, 351 p.Google Scholar
Izett, G. A., Cobban, W. A., and Gill, J. R. 1971. The Pierre Shale Near Kremmling, Colorado, and its correlation to the east and the west. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 684-A:A1–A19.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. W. 1905. Annotated list of the types of invertebrate Cretaceous fossils in the collection of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Proceedings, 57:4–28.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. 1984. Ammonite faunas and the “standard zones” of the Cenomanian to Maastrichtian Stages in their type areas, with some proposals for the definition of stage boundaries by ammonites. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Denmark, 33:147–161.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1976. Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography and biostratigraphy. Palaeontological Association of London Special Papers in Palaeontology, 17, 94 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1993. Ammonites from the Saratoga Chalk (Upper Cretaceous), Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology, 67:404–434.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Scott, G. R. 1992. Ammonite correlation of the uppermost Campanian of Western Europe, the U.S. Gulf Coast, Atlantic Seaboard and Western Interior, and the numerical age of the base of the Maastrichtian. Geological Magazine, 129:497–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullmann, J., and Wiedmann, J. 1970. Significance of sutures in phylogeny of Ammonoidea. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 44:1–32.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. P. B. A. de M. de. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Mémoires de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, 1:63–90.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. P. B. A. de M. de. 1801. Système des animaux sans vertèbres. The author, Deterville, Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
Lauginiger, E. M. 1988. Cretaceous fossils from the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. Delaware Geological Survey Special Publication, 18, 57 p.Google Scholar
Lewy, Z. 1967. Some late Campanian nostoceratid ammonites from southern Israel. Israel Journal of Earth Sciences, 16:165–173.Google Scholar
Lewy, Z. 1969. Late Campanian heteromorph ammonites from southern Israel. Israel Journal of Earth Sciences, 18:109–135.Google Scholar
Lewy, Z. 1986. Anaklinoceras reflexum Stephenson in Israel and its stratigraphic significance. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 16:1–8.Google Scholar
Logan, W. N. 1898. The invertebrates of the Benton, Niobrara and Fort Pierre Groups. University Geological Survey of Kansas, 4 (Paleontology) (Upper Cretaceous 8):431–518.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1938. A biostratigraphic study on the Cretaceous deposits of the Naibuti Valley, South Karahuto. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy of Japan, 14:190–194.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1864. Check list of the invertebrate fossils of North America; Cretaceous and Jurassic. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 177, 40 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1876. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the upper Missouri country. Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories, 9, 629 p.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Hayden, F. V. 1856a. Descriptions of new species of Gastropoda and Cephalopoda from the Cretaceous formation of Nebraska Territory. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8 (for 1856):70–72.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Hayden, F. V. 1856b. Descriptions of new fossil species of Mollusca collected by Dr. F.V. Hayden, in Nebraska Territory; together with a complete catalogue of all the remains of Invertebrata hitherto described and identified from the Cretaceous and Tertiary formations of that region. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8:265–286.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Hayden, F. V. 1858. Descriptions of new organic remains collected in Nebraska Territory … together with some remarks on the geology of the Black Hills and portions of the surrounding country. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Proceedings for 1858:41–59.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Hayden, F. V. 1860. Descriptions of new organic remains from the Tertiary, Cretaceous, and Jurassic rocks of Nebraska. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Proceedings for 1860:175–185.Google Scholar
Mikhailov, N. P. 1951. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the southern part of European Russia and their importance for zonal stratigraphy (Campanian, Maastrichtian). Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Akademia Nauk SSSR, 129(Geology Series 50), 143 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Moberg, J. C. 1885. Cephalopoderna i Sveriges Kritsystem, 2d Artbeskrifning. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Series C, no. 73, 64 p.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1841. Description of several new species of fossil shells from the Cretaceous deposits of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1:106–110.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1842. Description of some new species of organic remains of the Cretaceous Group of the United States; with a tabular view of the fossils hitherto discovered in this formation. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8:207–227.Google Scholar
Nowak, J. 1911. Untersuchungen über die Cephalopoden der oberen Kreide in Polen. II. Teil. Die Skaphiten. Bulletin de l'Academie des Sciences de Cracovie, Classe des Sciences Mathematiques et Naturelles, Série B Sciences Naturelles for 1911:547–589.Google Scholar
Nowak, J. 1916. Zur Bedeutung von Scaphites für die Gliederung der Oberkreide. Verhandlungen der Geologischen Reichsanstalt (Staatanstalt-Landesanstalt) Wien, for 1916:55–67.Google Scholar
Ødum, H. 1953. De geologiska resultaten från borringarna vid Höllviken, Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning Afhandlingar och Uppsatser, C 46, 527, 37 p.Google Scholar
Olsson, R. K. 1980. The New Jersey coastal plain and its relationship to the Baltimore Canyon Trough. New York Geological Association, 52nd Annual Meeting Guidebook:116–129.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D. 1840–1842. Paléontologie française: Terrains crétacés. 1. Céphalopodes. Masson, Paris, 1–120(1840); 121–430 (1841); 431–662 (1842).Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D. 1850–1852. Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés, 2. V. Masson, Paris, 428 p.Google Scholar
Owen, D. D. 1852. Report of a geological survey of Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota and incidentally of a portion of Nebraska Territory. Lippincott, Grambo and Co., Philadelphia, 638 p.Google Scholar
Owens, J. P., Minard, J. P., Sohl, N. F., and Mello, J. F. 1970. Stratigraphy of the outcropping post-Magothy Upper Cretaceous formations in southern New Jersey and northern Delmarva Peninsula, Delaware and Maryland. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 674, 60 p.Google Scholar
Owens, J. P., Sohl, N. F., and Minard, J. P. 1977. A field guide to the Cretaceous and lower Tertiary beds of the Raritan and Salisbury Embayments, New Jersey, Delaware and Maryland. American Association of Petroleum Geologists-Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 113 p.Google Scholar
Petters, S. W. 1976. Upper Cretaceous subsurface stratigraphy of Atlantic coastal plain of New Jersey. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 60:87–107.Google Scholar
Pickett, T. E. 1972. Guide to common Cretaceous fossils of Delaware. Delaware Geological Survey Report of Investigations, 21, 28 p. (reprinted 1978 and 1987).Google Scholar
Pickett, T. E. 1987. Upper Cretaceous and Quaternary stratigraphy of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. Geological Society of America Centennial Field Guide 5, Northeastern Section:23–24.Google Scholar
Reeside, J. B. Jr. 1962. Cretaceous ammonites of New Jersey. Bulletin of the New Jersey Bureau of Geology and Topography, 61:113–137.Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. C. 1983. Scaphitids from the Upper Campanian–Lower Maastrichtian Bearpaw Formation of the western interior of Canada. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Canada, 354, 103 p.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G., and Shapiro, E. 1963. An invertebrate macrofauna from the Upper Cretaceous of Delaware. Delaware Geological Survey Report of Investigations, 3, 37 p.Google Scholar
Roemer, A. 1840–1841. Die Versteinerungen des norddeutschen Kreidegebirges. Hahn'schen Hofbuchhandlung, Hannover, 145 p. (1–48, 1840; 49–145, 1841).Google Scholar
Say, T. 1820. Observations on some species of zoophytes, shells, etc., principally fossil. American Journal of Science, 2:34–45.Google Scholar
Schluter, C. 1871–1876. Cephalopoden der oberen deutschen Kreide. Palaeontographica, 21:1–24(1871); 21:25–120 (1872); 24:121–264 (1876).Google Scholar
Schmid, F., and Ernst, G. 1975. Ammoniten aus dem Campan der Lehrter Westmulde und ihre stratigraphische Bedeutung. I. Teil; Scaphites, Bostrychoceras und Hoplitoplacenticeras. Bericht der Naturhistorischen Gesellschaft zu Hannover, 119:315–359.Google Scholar
Schulz, M. G., Ernst, G., Ernst, H., and Schmid, F. 1984. Coniacian to Maastrichtian stage boundaries in the standard section for the Upper Cretaceous White Chalk of NW Germany (Lägerdorf–Kronsmoor–Hemmoor): definitions and proposals. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 33:203–215.Google Scholar
Scott, G. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1965. Geologic and biostratigraphic map of the Pierre Shale between Jarre Creek and Loveland, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigations Series, Map 1-439.Google Scholar
Scott, G. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1975. Geologic and biostratigraphic map of the Pierre Shale in the Canon City-Florence basin and the Twelvemile Park area, south-central Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigations Series, Map 1–937.Google Scholar
Scott, G. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1986a. Geologic and biostratigraphic map of the Pierre Shale in the Colorado Springer-Pueblo area, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigations Series Map I-1627.Google Scholar
Scott, G. R., and Cobban, W. A. 1986b. Geologic, biostratigraphic, and structure map of the Pierre Shale between Loveland and Round Butte, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geological Investigations Series Map I-1700.Google Scholar
Sherborn, C. D. 1889. On the dates of the “Paléontologie Française” of d'Orbigny. Geological Magazine, 6:223–225.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1861. Descriptions of new Cretaceous fossils from Texas. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 8:188–205.Google Scholar
Sornay, J. 1955. Scaphites compressus d'Orbigny. Palaeontologia Universalis, 4, 2 p.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1815–1818. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, 2:1–194. The author, London.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1922. On the Senonian ammonite fauna of Pondoland. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 10:113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1926. On new ammonites from the English Chalk. Geological Magazine, 63:77–83.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1941. The larger invertebrates of the Navarro Group of Texas (exclusive of corals and crustaceans and exclusive of the fauna of the Escondido Formation). University of Texas Bulletin, 4101, 641 p.Google Scholar
Tate, R. 1865. On the correlation of the Cretaceous formations of the northeast of Ireland. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 21:15–44.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1916. Über Lobus, Suturallobus und Inzision. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Pälaontologie for 1916:185–195.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1907. A report on the Cretaceous paleontology of New Jersey, based upon the stratigraphic studies of George N. Knapp. Geological Survey of New Jersey, Paleontology Series, 4:1–1107.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1877. Preliminary report on the paleontology of the Black Hills, containing descriptions of new species of fossils from the Potsdam, Jurassic, and Cretaceous formations of the Black Hills of Dakota. U.S. Geographical and Geological Survey of the Rocky Mountain Region, 49 p.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1880. Paleontology of the Black Hills of Dakota, p. 325–468. In Newton, H. and Jenney, W. P., Report on the Geology and Resources of the Black Hills of Dakota. U.S. Geographical and Geological Survey of the Rocky Mountain Region (Powell).Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1892. Gasteropoda and Cephalopoda of the Raritan Clays and Greensand Marls of New Jersey. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph, 18, 402 p.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1902. Observations on and emended description of Heteroceras simplicostatum Whitfield. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 16:76–72.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1962. Ammoniten aus der Vascogotischen Kreide (Nordspanien). 1, Phylloceratina, Lytoceratina. Palaeontographica, 118A:119–237.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1966. Stammesgeschichte und System den posttriadischen Ammonoideen; ein Uberblick. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen, 125:49–79; 127:13–81.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. E. 1972. Regional Geology of Northern Ireland. H. M. Stationery Office, Belfast, 115 p.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W., and Wright, E. V. 1951. A survey of the fossil Cephalopoda of the Chalk of Great Britain. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, 40 p.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1884. Handbuch der Palaeontology, 1, p. 329–522. Abt. 2, Lief 3, Cephalopoda. R. Oldenbourg, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1895. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie). R. Oldenbourg, Munich and Leipzig, 972 p.Google Scholar
Zullo, V. A. 1987. Scapelloid and brachylepadomorph barnacles (Cirripedia, Thoracica) from the Upper Cretaceous Mt. Laurel Sand, Delaware. Journal of Paleontology, 61:333–348.Google Scholar