Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:09:21.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Upper Cretaceous gastropods (Fissurellidae, Haliotidae, Scissurellidae) from Puerto Rico and Jamaica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Norman F. Sohl
Norman F. Sohl*
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 22092
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fissurellid, haliotid, and scissurellid gastropods described herein are representatives of a diverse, but poorly documented, molluscan assemblage from the Upper Cretaceous carbonate-platform deposits of the Caribbean Faunal Province. Among the Fissurellidae, the Emarginulinae are represented by Emarginula pojetai n. sp., E. marchmontensis n. sp., E. sp., Puncturella (Alatrix) leesi n. sp., and P. (A.) sp.; the Diodorinae by Diodora decussata n. sp., Diodora hazeli n. sp., Diodora? pedinostoma n. sp., and D. sp.; the Fissurellinae by Fissurella kollmanni n. sp. Haliotis antillesensis n. sp. is only the second verifiable member of the family Haliotidae to be described from the Cretaceous and Scissurella marchmontensis n. sp. represents the first record of the Scissurellidae in that period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , May 1992 , pp. 414 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbass, H. L. 1963. A monograph on the Egyptian Cretaceous gastropods. [Cairo] Geological Museum, Paleontological Series, Monograph 2, 146 p.Google Scholar
Abdel-Gawad, G. I. 1986. Maastrichtian non-cephalopod mollusks (Scaphopoda, Gastropoda and Bivalvia) of the middle Vistula valley, central Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica, 36(1–3):1–211.Google Scholar
Adams, C. B. 1852. Catalogue of shells collected at Panama, with notes on synonomy, station, and habitat. Annals Lyceum of Natural History New York, 5:229–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, F. M. 1902. Cretaceous deposits of the Pacific Coast. California Academy of Sciences Proceedings, 2:1–54.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 1982. Morphologie und Bildung der fruhontogenetischen Gehause bei conchiferen Mollusken. Facies, 7:1–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batten, R. L. 1975. The Scissurellidae—are they neotenously derived fissurellids (Archaeogastropoda). Novitates of the American Museum of Natural History, 2567, 29 p.Google Scholar
Binckhorst, J. T. 1873. Monographie des gastéropodes et des céphalopodes de la Craie supérieure du Limbourg. C. Muquart, Brussels-Leipzig, 83 p.Google Scholar
Bosquet, J. 1851. Ueber drei neue fossile arten der Gattung Emarginula. Palaeontographica, 1:326–328.Google Scholar
Bruguière, J. G. 1789. Encyclopédie méthodique, ou par ordre de matière. Histoire naturelle des Vers, 1:1–344.Google Scholar
Buvignier, A. 1852. Statistique géologique, minéralogique, et paléontologique du départment de la Meuse. Baillière, Paris, 694 p.Google Scholar
Coquand, H. 1859. Synopsis des animaux et des végétaux fossils observés dans la formation crétacée du sud-ouest de la France. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, séries 2, 16:945–1023.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1907. Description des gastéropodes et pélécypodes, p. 6–42. In Pellat, E. and Cossmann, M., Le Barrémian supérieur a faciès Urgonien de Brouzet-les-Alais (Gard). Paleontologie. Société géologique de France Mémoire 37.Google Scholar
Cotton, B. C. 1959. South Australian Mollusca, Archaeogastropoda. Handbook of the Flora and Fauna of South Australia. Government Printer, Adelaide, 449 p.Google Scholar
Cotton, B. C., and Godfrey, K. 1934. South Australian shells, part 10. South Australian Naturalist, 15:41–56.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1924. Cretaceous Gastropoda from Portuguese East Africa. Annals of the Transvaal Museum, 11(3):201–216.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1960. Haliotidae p. 1221–1223. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. I, Mollusca I. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R., and Keen, A. M. 1960. Fissurellidae, p. 1226–1231. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. I, Mollusca I. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1797. Tableau élémentaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux. Paris, 710 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1881. Reports on the dredging under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, 1877–79, by the U.S. Coast Survey Steamer “Blake.” Museum of Comparative Zoology Harvard, Bulletin, 9(2):33–144.Google Scholar
Delpey, G. 1942. Etudes sur les gastéropodes Albiens. Travaux Laboratoir Géologique Grenoble, 24:74–96.Google Scholar
Dommelen, H. van. 1971. Ontogenetic, phylogenetic, and taxonomic studies of the American species of Pseudovaccinites and Torreyites and the multiple fold hippuritids. Unpubl. , University of Amsterdam, 125 p.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. 1837. Mémoire sur les couches du sol en Touraine, et description des coquilles de la craie et des faluns. Mémoires Sociéte Géologique de France, 2(2):214–241.Google Scholar
Eichman, C. J. 1955. A new Cretaceous Emarginula. Nautilus, 8:113.Google Scholar
Favre, E. 1869. Description des mollusques fossiles de la craie des environs de Lemburg. H. George, Genève. 187 p.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1822. The Philosophy of Zoology; or a General View of the Structure, Functions, and Classification of Animals. Edinburgh, Vol. 2, 618 p.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous fossils. California Geological Survey, Paleontology, Vol. 1, p. 55–236.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. S. 1877. British Cretaceous Patellidae and other patelloid Gastropoda. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 33:192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geinitz, H. B. 1871–1875. Das Elbthalgebirge in Sachsen. Erster theil, der unter Quader. Palaeontographica, 20, 319 p.Google Scholar
Glover, L. III. 1971. Geology of the Coamo area Puerto Rico and its relation to the Volcanic Arc-Trench association. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 636, 102 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, A. A. 1859. Description of shells collected in the North Pacific expedition under Captains Ringold and Rodgers. Proceedings Boston Society of Natural History, 7:161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1821. A natural arrangement of Mollusca, according to their internal structure. London Medical Repository, Monthly Journal and Review, 15:229–239.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1834. The animal kingdom arranged in conformity with its organization, by the Baron Cuvier, the Mollusca and Radiata, p. 595–601. In Griffith, E. and Pidgeon, E., The Animal Kingdom arranged…, Whittaker, London.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of recent Mollusca. Zoological Society of London Proceedings, 179, Pt. 15:129–219.Google Scholar
Gueranger, M. E. 1867. Album paléontologique du Départment de la Sarthe, representant au moyen de la photographie le fossiles recuillis dans cette circoncription. Le Mans, 20 p.Google Scholar
Haber, G. 1932. Gastropoda, Amphineura et Scaphopoda jurassica I, p. 1–304. In Junk, W. (ed.), Fossilium Catalogus I, Animalia Pt. 53. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hazprunar, G. 1989. New slit-limpets (Scissurellacea and Fissurellacea) from hydrothermal vents. Pt. 2. Anatomy and relationships. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, 408:1–17.Google Scholar
Holzapfel, E. 1888. Die Mollusken der Aachener Kreide. Palaeontographica, 88:29–180.Google Scholar
Jiang, M., and Robinson, E. 1987. Calcareous nannofossils and larger foraminifera in Jamaican rocks of Cretaceous to Eocene age, p. 24–51. In Ahmad, R. (ed.), Proceedings of a workshop on the status of Jamaican Geology. Geological Society of Jamaica, Special Issue 1987.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1979. Middle Cretaceous bivalve zones and stage implications in the Antillean Subprovince, p. XXX.1–XXX.11. In International Conference on Mid-Cretaceous Events, 1st., Uppsala, 1975. Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Nice Annales, 4.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G., and Sohl, N. F. 1974. Structure and evolution of Antillean Cretaceous rudist frameworks. Naturforschende Gesellschaft Basel Verhandlungen, 84(1):399–467.Google Scholar
Kaunhowen, F. 1898. Die gastropoden der Maestrichter Kreide. Paleontologische Abhandlungen 8, 132 p.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1960. Scissurellidae, p. 1221. In Moore, R.C. (ed.). Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. I, Mollusca 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Kner, R. 1850. Versteinerungen des Kreidemergels von Lemberg und seiner Umgebung. Haidinger's Naturwissenschaft Abhandlungen, 3(2):1–42.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Société Histoire Naturelle Paris, Mémoire, VII, p. 63–91.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M. 1801. Système des Animaux sans Vertèbres, ou Tableu général des Classes, des Ordres et des Genres de ces Animaux, Paris, 432 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linné, C. von. 1758. Systèma naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines genera species cum characteribus, diferentiis, synonimis, locis. Edito X, reformata. Holmiae, v. 1, 824 p.Google Scholar
Lowe, R. T. 1827. On Balanus punctatus, Puncturella flemingii, &c.; together with some corrections relative to Turbo carneus, and some of the Chitones before described. Zoological Journal, 3:76–80.Google Scholar
Lundgren, B. 1894. Jämförelse mellan molluskfaunan mammilatus och mucronata zonerna: I Nordöstra Skåne (Kristiandstadsomradet). Konglige Svenska vetenskap-akademiens handlingar, 26(6):3–58.Google Scholar
MacGillavry, H. J. 1977. Senonian rudists from Curacao and Bonaire—a typical Antillean fauna, p. 101–102. In Caribbean Geological Conference, 8th, Curacao, 1977, Abstracts: GUA Papers of Geology, 1(9).Google Scholar
Marliere, R. 1939. La transgression albienne et cenomanienne dans le Hainaut. Mémoire de l'Academie Royale des Histoire naturelle Belgique, 89:1–440.Google Scholar
McLean, J. H. 1984. Are fissurellids bellerophont derivatives? Malacologia, 25(1):3–20.Google Scholar
McLean, J. H. 1989. New slit limpets (Scissurellacea and Fissurellacea) from hydrothermal vents. Part 1. Systematic descriptions and comparisons based upon shell and radular characters. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science, 407:1–29.Google Scholar
Meyer, O., and Aldrich, T. H. 1886. The Tertiary fauna of Newton and Wautubbee, Mississippi. Cincinnati Society of Natural History, Journal, 9(2):40–64.Google Scholar
Montagu, G. 1803. Testacea Britannica or Natural History of British Shells. London, 2 vols., 606 p.Google Scholar
Montfort, D. P. de. 1810. Conchyliogie systématique et classification méthodique des coquilles; offrant leur figures, leur arrangement générique, leurs descriptions charactéristiques, leurs noms; ainsi que leur synonymie en plusieurs langues. Paris, Vol. 2, 676 p.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1964. Neogene molluscs from northwestern Ecuador. Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York, 256 p.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d'. 1824. Monographie d'un nouveau genre de mollusque gastéropode de la famille des trochides. Memoire Société Histoire Naturelle de Paris, 1:340–345.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d'. 1842–1843. Paláeontologie francaise, Terrains Crétacés. Vol. 2, Gastéropodes. G. Masson, Paris, 456 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1937. The Claibornian Scaphopoda, Gastropoda and dibranchiate Cephalopoda of the southern United States. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 7(32):1–730.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W. 1942. Substitutes for molluscan homonyms. Journal of Paleontology, 16:674.Google Scholar
Passy, A. 1832. Géologie de la Seine-Inférieure. Rouen, 371 p.Google Scholar
Peron, F. 1816. Voyage de Decouvertes aux Terres Australes, exécuté par Ordre de S. M. l'Empereur Napoléon, Roi d'Italie, sur les Corvettes le Géographe, le Naturaliste, la Goelette et le Casaurina pendant les Années 1800–1804. Paris, 2:80.Google Scholar
Pervinquiere, L. 1912. Études de paléontologie tunisienne, II. Gastéropodes et lamellibranches des terrains Crétacés. F. R. de Rudeval, Paris, 352 p.Google Scholar
Pessagno, E. A. Jr. 1979. Middle Cretaceous planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Antillean–Caribbean region and eastern Mexico, p. XXVIII.1–XXVIII.10. In International Conference on Mid-Cretaceous Events, 1st., Uppsala, 1975. Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Nice Annales, 4.Google Scholar
Pictet, F. J., and Campiche, G. 1861–1864. Description des fossiles du terrain Crétacé environs de Sainte Croix. Matériel Paléontologie Suisse, 3(2), Genève, 752 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. 1815. Analyse de la nature ou tableau de l'universe et des corps organisés. Palermo, 224 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuss, A. E. 1845–1846. Die Versteinerungen de Bohmischen Kreideformation. E. Schweitzerbart, Stuttgart, 206 p.Google Scholar
Ryckholt, P. de. 1847. Mélanges paléontologiques. Mémoires couronnes et Mémoires des savants étrangers de l'Academie de Belgique, 24:1–176.Google Scholar
Salvini-Plawen, L. 1980. A reconsideration of systematics in the Mollusca (phylogeny and higher classification). Malacologia, 19:249–278.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. 1984. Mesozoic biota and depositional systems of the Gulf of Mexico–Caribbean Region, p. 49–64. In Westermann, G. E. G. (ed.), Jurassic–Cretaceous Biochronology and Paleogeography of North America. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 27.Google Scholar
Seeley, H. 1861. Some new gastropods from the Upper Greensand. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7:281–295.Google Scholar
Skwarko, S. K. 1966. Cretaceous stratigraphy and paleontology of the Northern Territory. Department of Natural Development, Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Bulletin 73, 135 p.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1971. North American biotic provinces delineated by gastropods, p. 1610–1638. In Yochelson, E. L. (ed.), Cretaceous Biogeography. North American Paleontological Convention, Chicago1969, Proceedings Pt. L.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1979. Notes on middle Cretaceous macrofossils from the Greater Antilles, p. XXXI.1–XXXI.6In International Conference on Mid-Cretaceous events, 1st., Uppsala, 1975. Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Nice Annales, 4.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1987. Cretaceous gastropods: contrasts between Tethys and the temperate provinces. Journal of Paleontology, 61:1085–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohl, N. F., and Koch, C. 1983. Upper Cretaceous (Maestrichtian) Mollusca from the Haustator bilira Assemblage Zone in the east Gulf Coastal Plain. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 83–451, 237 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohl, N. F., and Kollmann, H. A. 1985. Cretaceous actaeonellid gastropods from the Western Hemisphere. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1304, 104 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solger, F. 1904. Die fossilien der Mungokreide in Kamerun und ihre geologische Bedeutung. Beitrage zür Geologie Kamerun. Stuttgart, p. 85–242.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1850. Description of shells from the Chalk formations, p. 381–386. In Dixon, F., The Geology and Fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of Sussex. London.Google Scholar
Spengel, J. W. 1881. Die Geruchsorgane und das nervensystem der Mollusken. Zeitschrift wissenschaft Zoologie, 35:333–383.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1895. The fauna of the Knoxville beds. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 133, 132 p.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1947. Studies of some Comanche pelecypods and gastropods. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 211, 256 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1952. The larger invertebrate fossils of the Woodbine Formation of Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 242, 246 p.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1926. Gabb's California fossil type gastropods. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Proceedings, 78:287–447.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A treatise on malacology or shells and shell fish. London, 419 p.Google Scholar
Talmadge, R. R. 1947. Validity of the genus Exohaliotis. Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia, 1:32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Termier, G. 1954. Gastéropodes du Crétacé supérieur dans le sud-ouest de la France (Groupe II). Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 89:323–382.Google Scholar
Theile, J. 1925. Mollusca=Weichtiere: Handbuch der Zoologie, gegrundet W. Kukenthal, 5:15–258. Berlin, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1935. A new species of Haliotis from the Pliocene of southern California. Journal of Paleontology, 9:251–252.Google Scholar
Weinzittle, V. 1910. Gastropoda českho Kridoveho ufvaru. Palaeontographica Bohemica 8, 56 p.Google Scholar
Wenz, W. 1938–1944. Gastropoda, Teil I, Allgemeiner Teil und Prosobranchia, p. 1–1639. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Vol. 6. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1928. Miocene Mollusca from Bowden, Jamaica, Part 2, Gastropoda. Carnegie Institution Washington, Publication 385, 594 p.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1931. A Miocene Haliotis from southern California. Journal of Paleontology, 5:34–39.Google Scholar
Zareczny, S. 1874. O średniem ogniwie warstw cenomańskich w Galicyi wschodniej. Sprawozdanie komisyi Fizyjograficznej Akademija umiejetnosci w Krakówie. 8:99–183.Google Scholar