Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:46:23.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of payout choice from individual deferred annuities in Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2014

KYONGHEE LEE
KYONGHEE LEE*
Affiliation:
Department of Risk Management and Insurance, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, The Republic of Korea (e-mail: khlee@smu.ac.kr)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyse annuitization rates by policyholders with individual deferred annuities in Korea to assess the impact of different tax policies on payout decisions between 2008 and 2011. Under the Korean tax system, two types of individual deferred annuities were sold: qualified (taxed for lump sums) and non-qualified (tax free for lump sums). Our results show that policyholders with qualified contracts are more likely to select a life annuity option than a lump-sum distribution, compared to policyholders of non-qualified contracts. This suggests that policyholders are more likely to use non-qualified contracts as savings vehicles than as longevity insurance.

Keywords

Annuitizationindividual deferred annuitiesKoreamarket typepayout
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 224 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameriks, J. (2002) Recent trends in the selection of retirement income streams among TIAA-CREF participants. Research Dialogue, 74(December 2002): 1–19.Google Scholar
Attanasio, O. and Rohwedder, S. (2003) Pension wealth and household saving: evidence from pension reforms in the United Kingdom. American Economic Review, 93(5): 1499–1521.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. (2013) Annuity and lump-sum decisions in defined benefit plans: the role of plan rules. EBRI Issue Brief, 381(January): 1–20.Google Scholar
Benartzi, S., Previtero, A. and Thaler, H. (2011) Annuitization puzzles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4): 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. (2003) Redistribution and Insurance: mandatory annuitization with mortality heterogeneity. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 70(1): 17–41.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (2007) Rational and behavioural perspectives on the role of annuities in retirement planning. NBER Working Paper, No. 13537. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Brown, J., Kling, J., Mullainathan, S. and Wrobel, M. (2008) Why don't people insure late-life consumption? A framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle. American Economic Review, 98(2): 304–309.Google Scholar
Bütler, M. (2009) Switzerland: high replacement rates and generous subsistence as a barrier to work in old age. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 34(4): 561–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bütler, M. and Ruesch, M. (2007) Annuities in Switzerland. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4438, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Bütler, M. and Staubli, S. (2010) Payouts in Switzerland: explaining developments in Annuitization. SCALA Discussion Paper No. 1/2010, Research Centre for Aging, Welfare and Labor Market Analysis. St. Gallen, Switzerland: Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.Google Scholar
Bütler, M. and Teppa, F. (2007) the choice between an annuity and a lump sum: results from swiss pension funds. Journal of Public Economics, 91(10): 1944–1966.Google Scholar
Bütler, M., Staubli, S. and Zito, M. (2010) The role of the Annuity's value on the decision (Not) to Annuitize: evidence from a large policy change. Discussion Paper No. 2010–05. St. Gallen, Switzerland: Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.Google Scholar
Bütler, M., Staubli, S. and Zito, M. (2013) How much does demand react to a large price change? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(3): 808–824.Google Scholar
Chalmers, J. and Reuter, J. (2012) How do retirees value life annuities? Evidence from public employees. Review of Financial Studies, 25(8): 2601–2634.Google Scholar
Financial Supervisory Service. (2011) Press Release: The Trends of the Three-Pillar System in Korea. Seoul, Korea: 24 March.Google Scholar
Financial Supervisory Service. (2012a) Press Release: Performance of Korean Retirement Pension Plans. Seoul, Korea: 20 August.Google Scholar
Financial Supervisory Service. (2012b) Press Release: Consumer Report for Korean Qualified Individual Annuity Market. Seoul, Korea: 16 October.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, A. and Poterba, J. (2002) Selection effects in the United Kingdom individual annuities market. Economic Journal, 112(476): 28–50.Google Scholar
Fong, J., Mitchell, O. and Koh, B. (2010) Longevity risk management in Singapore's National pension system. Pension Research Council Working Paper, No. 2010-10. Philadelphia, PA: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W. Y. and Scott, S. (2007) Behavioral obstacles in the annuity market. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(6): 71–82.Google Scholar
Hurd, M. and Panis, C. (2006) The choice to cash out pension rights at job change or retirement. Journal of Public Economics, 90(12): 2213–2227.Google Scholar
Inkmann, J., Lopes, P. and Michaelides, A. (2011) How deep is the annuity market participation puzzle? Review of Financial Studies, 24(1): 279–319.Google Scholar
Kim, S.-B. (2012) Korea's low-income self-employed and their policy needs. SERI Quarterly, 5(2): 84–90.Google Scholar
Korea Insurance Development Institute. (2012) Monthly Insurance Report. Seoul, Korea: Insurance Research Center, Korea Insurance Development Institute.Google Scholar
Korea Insurance Development Institute. (2011) Press Release: The Ownership of Korean Insurance Products. Seoul, Korea: 29 December.Google Scholar
Korea Life Insurance Association (2010) The Sixty-Year-Old History of Korea Life Insurance Association. Seoul, Korea: Korea Life Insurance Association.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2007) baby boomer retirement security: the role of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(1): 205–224.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2012) Press Release: The Korean Retirement Readiness Survey. Seoul, Korea: 26 September.Google Scholar
Mitchell, O., Poterba, J., Warshawsky, M. and Brown, J. R. (1999) New evidence on the money's worth of individual annuities. American Economic Review, 89(5): 1299–1318.Google Scholar
Mottola, G. and Utkus, S. (2007) Lump sum or annuity? an analysis of choice in DB pension payouts. Vanguard Center for Retirement Research, 30(November): 1–10.Google Scholar
Queisser, M. and Whitehouse, E. (2003) Individual choice in social protection: the case of swiss pensions. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 11, Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Statistics Korea. (2011) Life Tables for Korea. Daejeon, Korea: Statistics Korea.Google Scholar