Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:07:01.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of age on portfolio choices: evidence from an Italian pension fund*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2014

GIUSEPPE CAPPELLETTI ,
GIOVANNI GUAZZAROTTI  and
PIETRO TOMMASINO
GIUSEPPE CAPPELLETTI
Affiliation:
Bank of Italy – Economic Research and International Relations Area (giuseppe.cappelletti@bancaditalia.it)
GIOVANNI GUAZZAROTTI
Affiliation:
Bank of Italy – Economic Research and International Relations Area (giovanni.guazzarotti@bancaditalia.it)
PIETRO TOMMASINO
Affiliation:
Bank of Italy – Economic Research and International Relations Area (pietro.tommasino@bancaditalia.it)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to optimal portfolio theories, investors should reduce their exposure to stock market risk as they grow old. Indeed, older workers, with only a few years left before retirement, are particularly vulnerable to unexpected falls in stock prices. Despite the theoretical and – as shown by the recent financial crisis – policy relevance of the issue, empirical evidence on this topic has been scant and inconclusive. The aim of the present paper is to assess the effect of age on portfolio choices, using a new panel dataset from an Italian defined-contribution pension plan. We find that on average holdings of risky assets do indeed significantly decrease with age. However, the effect is non-linear, being much stronger in the last part of one's career. Moreover, we also document that inertial behaviour is quite widespread, and can be very costly. Results are confirmed when we control for individual fixed effects and cohort effects.

Keywords

G11G23Pension fundsportfolio choice
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 389 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Bank of Italy. We thank Giorgio Gobbi, Sandro Momigliano, Valentina Nigro, Domenico Depalo, two anonymous referees, and seminar participants at the Bank of Italy, the 10th Anniversary Conference of CERP (Turin, September 2009), the Netspar Pension Workshop (Amsterdam, February 2010) and LUISS (Rome, April 2010) for useful comments.

References

Agnew, J., Balduzzi, P. and Sunden, A. (2003) Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401 (k) plan. American Economic Review, 93(1): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ai, C. and Norton, E. C. (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1): 123–129.Google Scholar
Ameriks, J. and Zeldes, S. P. (2004) How do household portfolio shares vary with age? Columbia University Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
Baetschmann, G., Staub, K. and Winkelmann, R. (2011) Consistent estimation of the fixed effects ordered logit model. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank of Italy (2008) Italian household budgets in 2006, Supplement to the Statistical Bulletin.Google Scholar
Barber, B. M. and Odean, T. (2001 a) Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1): 261–292.Google Scholar
Barber, B. M. and Odean, T. (2001 b) Trading is hazardous to your wealth: the common stock investment performance of individual investors. Journal of Finance, 55(2): 773–806.Google Scholar
Bartolucci, F. and Nigro, V. (2010) A dynamic model for binary panel data with unobserved heterogeneity admitting a n-Consistent conditional estimator. Econometrica, 78(2): 719–733.Google Scholar
Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R. H. (2001) Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. American Economic Review, 91(1): 79–98.Google Scholar
Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R. H. (2002) How much is investor autonomy worth? Journal of Finance, 57(4): 1593–1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R. H. (2007) Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behaviour. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3): 81–104.Google Scholar
Bertaut, C. (1998) Stockholding behavior of U.S. households: evidence from the 1983–1989 survey of consumer finances. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(2): 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikker, J. A., Broeders, D. W. G. A., Hollanders, D. A. and Ponds, E. H. M. (2012) Pension Funds' Asset Allocation and Participant Age: a Test of the Life-Cycle Model. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79: 595–618.Google Scholar
Bilias, Y., Georgarakos, D. and Haliassos, M. (2010) Portfolio inertia and stock market fluctuations. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(4): 715–742.Google Scholar
Brunnermeier, M. K. and Nagel, S. (2008) Do wealth fluctuations generate time-varying risk aversion? Micro-evidence on individuals. American Economic Review, 98(3): 713–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. Y. and Viceira, L. M. (2002) Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelletti, G. G. L. (2009) Do wealth fluctuations generate time-varying risk aversion? Italian micro-evidence on household asset allocation. Bank of Italy, mimeo.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, G. G. L. and Guazzarotti, G. (2010) Retirement savings in the survey on household income and wealth. Bank of Italy, Occasional papers, No. 77.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G. (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economics Studies, 47: 225–238.Google Scholar
Chiappori, P. A. and Paiella, M. (2008) Relative risk aversion is constant: evidence from panel data. Department of Economic Studies, University of Naples ‘Parthenope’, Discussion paper.Google Scholar
Choi, J. J., Laibson, D. and Madrian, B. (2006) Reducing the complexity costs of 401 (k) participation through quick enrollment. NBER working paper.Google Scholar
Feldstein, M. S. and Siebert, H. (2002) Social Security Pension Reform in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Franco, D. (2002) Italy: a never-ending pension reform. In Feldstein, M. and Siebert, H. (eds), Social Security Pension Reform in Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 211–262.Google Scholar
Franco, D. and Sartor, N. (2006) NDC in Italy: unsatisfactory present, uncertain future. In Holzmann, R. and Palmer, E. (eds), Pension Reform. Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 467–492.Google Scholar
Guiso, L., Haliassos, M. and Jappelli, T. (2003) Household stockholding in Europe: where do we stand and where do we go? Economic Policy, 18(36): 123–170.Google Scholar
Holzmann, R., Palmer, E. and Robalino, D. (eds) (2012) Nonfinancial Defined Contribution Pension Schemes in a Changing Pension World. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Huberman, G. and Jiang, W. (2006) Offering versus choice in 401 (K) plans: equity exposure and number of funds. Journal of Finance, 61(2): 763–801.Google Scholar
Jianakoplos, N. A. and Bernasek, A. (1998) Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 43(4):620–630.Google Scholar
Madrian, B. C. and Shea, D. F. (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401 (k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1149–1187.Google Scholar
Malmendier, U. and Nagel, S. (2011) Depression babies: do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126: 373–416.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, Andreu, Whinston, M. D. and Green, J. R. (1995) Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Economy and Finance (2012) Mid-Long term trends for the pension, health and long term care systems, Report No. 13, Rome.Google Scholar
Mitchell, O. S., Mottola, G. R., Utkus, S. P. and Yamaguchi, T. (2006) The inattentive participant: portfolio trading behavior in 401(K) plans. University of Michigan Retirement Center working paper.Google Scholar
Nickell, P., Perraudin, W. and Varotto, S. (2000) Stability of rating transitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24: 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odean, T. (1999) Do investors trade too much? American Economic Review, 89: 1279–1298.Google Scholar
OECD (2009) Private Pensions Outlook 2008. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Papke, L. E. (2004) Individual financial decisions in retirement saving plans: the role of participant-direction. Journal of Public Economics, 88(1–2): 39–61.Google Scholar
Poterba, J., Rauh, J., Venti, S. and Wise, D. (2007) Defined contribution plans, defined benefit plans, and the accumulation of retirement wealth. Journal of Public Economics, 91(10): 2062–2086.Google Scholar
Sahm, C. R. (2007) Stability of risk preference. Federal Reserve Board of Governors Working Papers.Google Scholar
Tapia, W. and Yermo, J. (2007) Implications of behavioural economics for mandatory individual account pension systems. OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions.Google Scholar
van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A. and Alessie, R (2011) Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2): 449–472.Google Scholar
Viceira, L. M. (2007) Life-cycle funds. Harvard Business School, mimeo.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Boston, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar