Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:04:26.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How much do respondents in the health and retirement study know about their contributions to tax-deferred contribution plans? A cross-cohort comparison*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2014

IRENA DUSHI  and
MARJORIE HONIG
IRENA DUSHI
Affiliation:
Social Security Administration, Office of Retirement and Disability Policy, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20254, USA (e-mail: Irena.Dushi@ssa.gov)
MARJORIE HONIG
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Hunter College and the Graduate School of CUNY, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We use information from Social Security earnings records to examine the accuracy of survey responses regarding participation in tax-deferred pension plans. As employer-provided defined benefit pensions are replaced by voluntary contribution plans, employees’ understanding of the link between their annual contributions and their post-retirement wealth is becoming increasingly important. We examine the extent to which wage-earners in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) correctly report their inclusion in tax-deferred contribution plans and, conditional on inclusion, their annual contributions. We use three samples representing different cohorts in three different periods: the original HRS cohort interviewed in 1992 at ages 51–56, the War Babies cohort interviewed in 1998 at ages 51–56, and the Early Baby Boomer cohort interviewed in 2004 at the same ages. Our findings indicate that while respondents interviewed in 1998 and 2004 were more likely to correctly report whether they were included in defined contribution plans, they were no more accurate when reporting whether they had contributed to their plans than respondents interviewed in 1992. Contributors in the three cohorts, moreover, overstated their annual contributions and thus would be likely to realize lower than expected account balances at retirement. The magnitude of this error is not negligible. In all three cohorts, the mean reporting error (the absolute difference between respondent-reported and Social Security earnings record contributions) was approximately 1.5 times larger than the mean contribution in the W-2 earnings record.

Keywords

J32H24D83J31DC planstax-deferred contributionsemployee knowledgeW-2 records
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 203 - 239
Creative Commons
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research reported herein was supported by a grant from the U.S. Social Security Administration through the Michigan Retirement Research Center. The opinions and conclusions are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Social Security Administration, any agency of the Federal Government, or the Michigan Retirement Research Center. We would like to thank Alan Gustman, Olivia Mitchell, Susan Grad, Paul Davies, and two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments.

References

Bricker, Jesse and Engelhardt, Gary V. (2008) Measurement error in earnings data in the health and retirement study. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 33: 39–61.Google Scholar
Buessing, Marric and Soto, Mauricio (2006) The State of Private Pensions: Current 5500 Data. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Issue Brief, February, Number 42.Google Scholar
Chan, Sewin and Stevens, Ann Huff (2003) What you don't know can't help you: knowledge and retirement decision making. NBER Working Paper 10185.Google Scholar
Choi, James, Laibson, David, Madrian, Brigitte C., and Metrick, Andrew (2002) Defined contribution pensions: plan rules, participant choices, and the path of least resistance. In Poterba, James M. (eds), Tax Policy and the Economy. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, volume 16, pp. 67–114.Google Scholar
Compson, Michael (2011) The 2006 earnings public-use microdata file: an introduction. Social Security Bulletin, 71(4): 33–59.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Christopher R. and Engelhardt, Gary V. (2002) Federal tax policy, employer matching, and 401(k) saving: evidence from HRS W-2 records. National Tax Journal, LV(3): 617–645.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, Gary V. (2001) Have 401(k)s Raised Household Saving? Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study. Syracuse University. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Peter and Huynh, Minh (2010) Are earnings inequality and mobility overstated? The impact of nonclassical measurement error. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92: 302–15.Google Scholar
Gustman, Alan L. and Steinmeier, Thomas L. (1989) An analysis of pension benefit formulas, pension wealth and incentives from pensions. Research in Labor Economics, 10: 53–106.Google Scholar
Gustman, Alan L. and Steinmeier, Thomas L. (2004) What people don't know about their pensions and social security. In Gale, William G., Shoven, John B. and Warshawsky, Mark J. (eds), Private Pensions and Public Policies. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution, pp. 57–119.Google Scholar
Gustman, Alan L. and Steinmeier, Thomas L. (2005) Imperfect knowledge of social security and pensions. Industrial Relations, 44(2): 373–397.Google Scholar
Haider, Steven J. and Gary, Solon (2000) Nonrandom selection in the HRS social security earnings sample. Working Paper No. 00–01, RAND Labor and Population Program.Google Scholar
Haines, Dawn E. and Greenberg, Brian (2005) Statistical uses of social security administrative data. Paper presented at American Statistical Association Joint Statistical Meetings, Minneapolis, MN. Available online at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/13/36237686.pdf Google Scholar
Honig, Marjorie and Dushi, Irena (2003) How demographic change will drive benefits design. In Mitchell, Olivia S., Blitzstein, David S., Gordon, Michael S. and Mazo, Judith F. (eds), Benefits for the Workplace of Tomorrow. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 58–88.Google Scholar
Ibbotson Associates (2010) Ibbotson Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation (SBBI) Classic Yearbook. Chicago, IL: Morningstar, Inc.Google Scholar
Kusko, Andrea L., Poterba, James M., and Wilcox, David W. (1998) Employee decisions with respect to 401(k) Plans. In Mitchell, Olivia S. and Schieber, Sylvester J. (eds), Living with Defined Contribution Pensions: Remaking Responsibility for Retirement, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Pension Research Council, the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 98–112.Google Scholar
Madrian, Brigitte C. and Shea, Dennis F. (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and saving behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1149–87.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Olivia S. (1988) Worker knowledge of pension provisions. Journal of Labor Economics, 6(1): 28–39.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Olivia S., Olson, Jan, and Steinmeier, Thomas L. (2000) Social security earnings and projected benefits. In Mitchell, Olivia S., Hammond, P. Brett, and Rappaport, Anna M. (eds), Forecasting Retirement Needs and Retirement Wealth. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 327–360.Google Scholar
Olson, Anya and Hudson, Russell (2009) Social security administration's master earnings file: background information. Social Security Bulletin, 69(3): 29–45.Google Scholar
Olson, Janice A. (1999) Linkages with data from social security administrative records in health and retirement study. Social Security Bulletin, 62(2): 73–85.Google Scholar
Pattison, David and Waldron, Hilary (2008). Trends in Elective Deferrals of Earnings from 1990–2001 in Social Security Administrative Data. Social Security Administration. ORDP Research and Statistics Notes, No. 2008–03.Google Scholar
Smith, Creston M. (1989) The social security administration's continuous work history sample. Social Security Bulletin, 52(10): 20–28.Google Scholar
Social Security Administration (2007) Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin. Available online at http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/supplement/2007/4b.pdf Google Scholar
Tamborini, Christopher R. and Iams, Howard M. (2011) Are generation X'ers different than late boomers? Family and earnings trends among recent cohort of women at young adulthood. Population Research and Policy Review, 30: 59–79.Google Scholar
Tamborini, Christopher R. and ChangHwan, Kim (2013) Are proxy interviews associated with biased earnings reports? Marital status and gender effects of proxy. Social Science Research, 42(2013): 499–512.Google Scholar
Turner, John, Muller, Leslie and Verma, Satyendra K. (2003) Defining participation in defined pension plans. Monthly Labor Review, 126(8): 36–43.Google Scholar
Utendorf, Kelvin R. (1999) Recent changes in earnings distributions in the United States: age and cohort effects. Social Security Bulletin, 62(2): 14–29.Google Scholar