Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:16:50.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cyclotron auto resonance maser and free electron laser devices: a unified point of view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2017

E. Di Palma ,
E. Sabia ,
G. Dattoli ,
S. Licciardi  and
I. Spassovsky
E. Di Palma*
Affiliation:
ENEA – Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044, Frascati, Rome, Italy
E. Sabia
Affiliation:
ENEA – Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044, Frascati, Rome, Italy
G. Dattoli
Affiliation:
ENEA – Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044, Frascati, Rome, Italy
S. Licciardi
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Department of Mathematics, Via Santa Sofia, 64, 95125 Catania, Italy
I. Spassovsky
Affiliation:
ENEA – Frascati Research Center, Via Enrico Fermi 45, 00044, Frascati, Rome, Italy
*
†Email address for correspondence: emanuele.dipalma@enea.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We take advantage of previous research in the field of cyclotron auto resonance maser (CARM) and undulator-based free electron laser (U-FEL) sources to establish a common formalism for the relevant description of the underlying physical mechanisms. This strategy is aimed at stressing the deep analogies between the two devices and at providing a practical tool for their study based on the use of well-tested scaling formulae developed independently for the two systems.

Keywords

plasma diagnosticsplasma heatingplasma interactions
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , 905830102
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Artioli, M., Dattoli, G., Ottaviani, P. L. & Pagnutti, S. Maggio-Giugno 2012 Virtual laboratory and computer aided design for free electron lasers outline and simulation. Energia Ambiente e Innovazione 3, 128–132.Google Scholar
Bratman, V. L., Ginzburg, N. S. & Petelin, M. I. 1979 Common properties of free electron lasers. Opt. Commun. 30 (3), 409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, V. L., Ginzburg, N. S., Nusinovich, G. S., Petelin, M. I. & Strklkov, P. S. 1981 Relativistic gyrotrons and cyclotron autoresonance maser. Int. J. Electron. 51 (4), 541–567.Google Scholar
Ceccuzzi, S., Dattoli, G., Di Palma, E., Doria, A., Sabia, E. & Spassovsky, I. 2015 The high gain integral equation for CARM-FEL devices. IEEE J. Quantum Electron 51 (7), 1–9.Google Scholar
Chen, C. & Wurtele, S. 1991 Linear and non linear theory of cyclotron autoresonance masers with multiple waveguide modes. Phys. Fluids B 3, 2133–2148.Google Scholar
Colson, W. B. 1990 Classical free electron laser theory. In Free Electron Laser Handbook (ed. Colson, W. B., Pellegrini, C. & Renieri, A.), pp. 115–194. North-Holland Physics, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dattoli, G., Ottaviani, P. L. & Pagnutti, S. 2007 Booklet for FEL Design: A Collection of Practical Formulae. Edizioni Scientifiche Frascati.Google Scholar
Dattoli, G., Pagnutti, S., Ottaviani, P. L. & Asgekar, V. 2012 Free electron laser oscillators with tapered undulators: inclusion of harmonic generation and pulse propagation. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 030708.Google Scholar
Dattoli, G., Renieri, A. & Torre, A. 1993 Lectures on the Free Electron Laser Theory and Related Topics. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliflet, A. W. 1986 Linear and non-linear theory of the Doppler-shifted cyclotron resonance maser based on TE and TM waveguide modes. Int. J. Electron. 61 (6), 1049–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M., Hammer, D. A., Manheimer, W. M. & Sprangle, P. 1973 Enhanced microwave emission due to the transverse energy of a relativistic electron beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (12), 752–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gapanov, A. V., Petelin, M. I. & Yulpatov, V. K. 1967 The induced radiation of excited classical oscillators and its use in high-frequency electronics. Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 10 (9), 794–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, N., Morton, P. & Rosenbluth, M. N. 1981 Free-electron lasers with variable parameter wigglers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 17, 1436–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchini, P. & Motz, H. 1990 Undulators and Free-Electron Lasers. Oxford University.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. 1985 Free Electron Lasers. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nusinovich, G. 2004 Introduction to The Physics of Gyrotrons. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nusinovich, G. S., Latham, P. E. & Li, H. 1994 Efficiency of frequency up-shifted gyrodevices: cyclotron harmonics versus CARM’s. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 22 (5), 796–803.Google Scholar
Saldin, E., Schneidmiller, E. V. & Yurkov, M. V. 2000 The Physics of Free Electron Lasers. Springer.Google Scholar