Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-jtjl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-15T16:34:08.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boundary conditions in the presence of Hall current of finite ion Larmor radius effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

R. J. Hosking  and
G. L. Kalra
R. J. Hosking
Affiliation:
University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
G. L. Kalra
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Studies in Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Boundary conditions appropriate to a model with finite ion mass corrections of ideal hydromagnetic theory are reviewed. It is shown that these boundary conditions have been correctly satisfied in earlier theory for the stability of an interface between two semi-infinite regions. This theory predicts instability due to Hall current.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , June 1972 , pp. 545 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Hosking, R. J. 1965 Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosking, R. J. 1968 J. Plasma Phys. 2, 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jukes, J. D. 1963 J. Fluid Mech. 16, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalra, G. L. 1967 Can. J. Phys. 45, 1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalra, G. L., Kathuria, S. N., Hosking, R. J. & Lister, G. G. 1970 J. Plasma Phys. 4, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klozenberg, J. P., McNamara, B. & Thonemann, P. C. 1965 J. Fluid Mech. 21, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, M. & Schwarzschild, M. 1954 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 223, 348.Google Scholar
Kruskal, M. & Tuck, J. L. 1958 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 245, 222.Google Scholar
McKenzie, J. F. 1971 J. Plasma Phys. 5, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayyar, N. K. & Trehan, S. K. 1966 Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayyar, N. K. & Trehan, S. K. 1970 J. Plasma Phys. 4, 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. & Chou, C. K. 1968 Can. J. Phys. 46, 2557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. & Tandon, J. N. 1969 J. Plasma Phys. 3, 633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stix, T. H. 1957 Phys. Rev. 106, 1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stix, T. H. 1962 The Theory of Plasma Waves. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Stratton, J. A. 1941 Electromagnetic Theory. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Talwar, S. P. & Kalra, G. L. 1967 J. Plasma Phys. 1, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, R. J. 1962 Nuclear Fusion Suppl. 3, 877.Google Scholar
Trehan, S. K., Malik, S. K. & Dikshit, M. S. 1965 Phys. Fluids, 8, 1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar