Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:34:45.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementation of Hamada principle in calculations of nested 3-D equilibria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2015

Leonid E. Zakharov*
Affiliation:
LiWFusion, PO Box 2391, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: lezprinceton@gmail.com

Abstract

Plasma confinement is based on the use of nested toroidal magnetic surfaces. In axisymmetric configurations the nestedness is provided by the existence of a flux function describing the magnetic surfaces explicitly. In the case of a three-dimensional magnetic field, the nested surfaces represent an exception. More typically, magnetic islands are formed on the resonant surfaces. The islands could degrade the plasma performance. The rigorous condition for the existence of nested surfaces without islands was formulated by Hamada (Nucl. Fusion, vol. 2, 1962, pp. 23–37) but was not implemented directly into numerical codes used, for example, for designing the stellarator configurations. This paper introduces a method of implementation of the Hamada principle in numerical algorithms. The proposed approach allows for simple linearized equilibrium equations (LEE) and potentially very efficient three-dimensional calculations of nested equilibria.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hamada, S. 1962 Hydromagnetic equilibria and their proper coordinates. Nucl. Fusion 2, 2337.Google Scholar
Helander, P. 2014 Theory of plasma confinement in non-axisymmetric magnetic fields. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 087001.Google Scholar
Hirshman, S. P. & Lee, D. K. 1986 MOMCON: a spectral code for obtaining three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic equilibria. Comput. Phys. Commun. 39, 161172.Google Scholar
Hirshman, S. P., van Rij, W. I. & Merkel, O. 1986 Three-dimensional free boundary calculations using a spectral Green’s function method. Comput. Phys. Commun. 43, 143155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, M. D. & Kulsrud, R. M. 1958 Equilibrium of a magnetically confined plasma in a toroid. Phys. Fluids 1, 265274.Google Scholar
Li, X. & Zakharov, L. E. 2013 Adaptive grids in simulations of toroidal plasma starting from MHD equilibrium. Plasma Sci. Technol. 17 (2), 97104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loizu, J., Hudson, S., Bhattacharjee, A. & Helander, P. 2015 Magnetic islands and singular currents at rational surfaces in three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic equilibria. Phys. Plasmas 22, 022501.Google Scholar
Pustovitov, V. D. & Shafranov, V. D. 1990 Equilibrium and stability of plasmas in stellarators. In Reviews of Plasma Physics (ed. Kadomtsev, B. B.), vol. 15, p. 163. Consultants Bureau.Google Scholar
Reiman, A. H. & Greenside, H. S. 1986 Calculations of three-dimensional MHD equlibria with islands and stochastic regions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 43, 157167.Google Scholar
Shafranov, V. D. & Yurchenko, E. I. 1969 Hydromagnetic stability of a plasma in stellarators. Nucl. Fusion 9, 285289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soloviev, L. S. & Shafranov, V. D. 1970 Plasma confinement in closed magnetic systems. In Reviews of Plasma Physics (ed. Leontovich, M. A.), vol. 5, pp. 1247. Consultants Bureau.Google Scholar
Zakharov, L. E. & Li, X. 2015 Tokamak magneto-hydrodynamics and reference magnetic coordinates for simulations of plasma disruptions. Phys. Plasmas 22, 062511.Google Scholar
Zakharov, L. E. & Pletzer, A. 1999 Theory of perturbed equilibria for solving the Grad–Shafranov equation. Phys. Plasmas 6, 46934704.Google Scholar
Zakharov, L. E. & Shafranov, V. D. 1986 Equilibrium of current-carrying plasmas in toroidal configurations. In Reviews of Plasma Physics (ed. Leontovich, M. A.), vol. 11, pp. 153302. Consultants Bureau.Google Scholar