Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:34:48.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic-energy release from a zero-net-current layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

J.-S. Kim ,
G. Van Hoven ,
D. D. Schnack  and
J. F. Drake
J.-S. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine, California 92717, U.S.A.
G. Van Hoven
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine, California 92717, U.S.A.
D. D. Schnack
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine, California 92717, U.S.A.
J. F. Drake
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine, California 92717, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The storage of magnetic energy in many natural systems is driven by localized convection. Since the initial state can often be described as a potential field, the stress arising from subsequent magnetic twisting is characterized by vanishing net-current flow. Such a layering scheme provides the lowest global energy excess for a given local field twist. In this paper we investigate the nonlinear release of this stored energy by the resistive magnetic-tearing instability. Our aim is to discover whether the evolution of this dynamic reconnection process is modified by the finite width and restoring force of the energizing field reversal. We use a force-free magnetic-field model with the sheared reversing component varying as tanh y sech Ky. We study the unstable nonlinear evolution by a 2·5-dimensional resistive magnetohydrodynamic simulation in a slab geometry. Almost all of the perpendicular (with respect to the ignorable coordinate) stored magnetic energy is released for some cases in this model. Although the magnetic reconnection is due to resistivity, the resulting closed flux surfaces evolve to a lower-energy state, i.e. to a nearly circular one, by mostly ideal MHD. Thus an elongated flux surface drives the plasma flow, and the flow speed is comparable to the Alfvén speed. The excess or stored magnetic energy is thereby released. In general, however, these processes take place only after reconnection occurs, and thus the release of energy is limited by the reconnection rate. The evolution of our new current/field system, which is more realistic as a model of a solar flare, exhibits an energy-release rate similar to that of more conventional field configurations. This rate can be increased, however, by the effects of an assumed anomalous resistivity enhancement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 71 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braginskii, S. I. 1965 Reviews of Plasma Physics, vol. 1 (ed. Lcontovich, M. A.), p. 217. Consultants Bureau.Google Scholar
Browning, P. K. & Hood, A. W. 1989 Solar Phys. 124, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, S. D. & de Boor, C. 1980 Elementary Numerical Analysis, p. 193. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Drake, J. F. 1985 Unstable Current Systems and Plasma Instabilities in Astrophysics (Proceedings of IAU Symposium 107, eds. Kundu, M. R. & Holman, G. D.), p. 61. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furth, H. P. 1985 Phys. Fluids, 28, 1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furth, H. P., Killeen, J. & Rosenbluth, M. N. 1963 Phys. Fluids, 6, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleva, R. G., Drake, J. F. & Denton, R. E. 1987 Phys. Fluids, 30, 2119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikić, Z., Barnes, D. C. & Schnack, D. D. 1988 Astrophys. J. 328, 830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikić, Z., Schnack, D. D. & Van Hoven, G. 1990 Astrophys. J. 361, 690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1972 Astrophys. J. 174, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, E. R. (ed.) 1981 Solar Flare Magnetohydrodynamics. Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Priest, E. R. 1982 Solar Magnetohydrodynamics, pp. 344–381. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, T. & Hayashi, T. 1979 Phys. Fluids, 22, 1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, L., Van Hoven, G. & Schnack, D. D. 1990 Astrophys. J. 353, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinolfson, R. S. & Van Hoven, G. 1983 Phys. Fluids, 26, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinolfson, R. S. & Van Hoven, G. 1984 Astrophys. J. 276, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svestka, Z. 1976 Solar Flares. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachi, T., Steinolfson, R. S. & Van Hoven, G. 1985 Solar Phys. 95, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hoven, G. 1976 Solar Phys. 49, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hoven, G. 1981 Solar Flare Magnetohydrodynamics (ed. Priest, E. R.), p. 217. Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Van Hoven, G., Sparks, L. & Tachi, T. 1986 Astrophys. J. 300, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar