Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:54:55.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonlinear theta-pinch equilibria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

B. Abraham-Shrauner
B. Abraham-Shrauner
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analytic solutions for cylindrical, rigid-drift equilibria were searched for by checking the invariance of the second-order, nonlinear differential equations of the line density and particle density under one-parameter Lie groups. No invariance was found for the cylindrical screw-pinch for the polytrope index γ ╪ 2 of the pressure equation of state. For the Z-pinch, the differential equation for the line density for arbitrary γ is invariant under one group and reduces by Euler's method to an intractable first-order, nonlinear differential equation. In the case of a θ-pinch, the nonlinear differential equations for the particle density and line density are invariant at least under the translation group. The particle density is found as an implicit function of the radial distance r, involving incomplete beta functions of the γth power of the particle density.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , December 1981 , pp. 419 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bateman, H. 1953 Higher Transcendental Functions (ed. Erdelyi, A.), vol. 1, p. 87. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bender, C. & Orszag, S. 1979 Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. H. 1934 Phys. Rev. 45, 890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluman, G. W. & Cole, J. D. 1975 Similarity Methods for Differential Equations. Springer.Google Scholar
Bodin, H. A. B., Green, T. S., Newton, A. A., Niblett, G. B. F. & Reynolds, J. A. 1966 Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Culham, vol. 1, p. 193. IAEA.Google Scholar
Byrd, P. & Friedman, M. D. 1971 Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. 1911 An Introduction to the Lie Theory of One-Parameter Groups. D. C. Heath, Boston.Google Scholar
Ekdakl, C., Bartsch, R. R., Commisso, R. J., Gribble, R. F., McKenna, K. F., Miller, G. & Siemon, R. E. 1980 Phys. Fluids, 23, 1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ince, E. L. 1956 Ordinary Differential Equations. Dover.Google Scholar
Kadish, A. 1976 Phys. Fluids, 19, 1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, L. 1960 Group Theory and Differential Equations (Lectures), Technical Report 4, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.Google Scholar
Morse, R. L. & Friedberg, J. P. 1970 Phys. Fluids, 13, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. 1968 Tables of the Incomplete Beta-Function. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. S. 1969 Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. S., Hanis, H. W., Jahoda, F. C., Sawyer, G. A. & Siemon, R. E. 1974 Phys. Fluids, 17, 1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, L. 1979 Phys. Fluids, 22, 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar