Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:18:07.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential bounds and estimation for the multiple water-bag plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Lim Chee-Seng
Lim Chee-Seng
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 0511, Republic of Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bounds are established for the permanent-state radiation-conditioned response to a vibrating charge in the MWB (‘multiple water-bag’) model of a warm Maxwellian plasma. Those bounds vary with the observation position beyond the charge and, along any radial direction, serve as boundary curves of potential bands containing the exact potential curves. They can therefore be employed for potential estimation. The bounds are actually Poisson potentials and are independent of (the degree of accuracy in) the MWB modelling when the charge frequency ω exceeds the electron plasma frequency ωp. In this case each potential band narrows to improve potential estimation as ω/ωp increases, and in fact a relative error in estimation can be uniformly predetermined to as small as one desires for all MWB models, charge distributions and observation points by setting ω beyond an appropriate level above ωp. The bounds are, however, model-dependent if ωp exceeds ω in magnitude, in which case, they are partially Poissonian; moreover, potential estimation based on them improves as ω/ωp decreases, and an error analysis is again performed. In either case, a sharper estimation is obtained by averaging the bounds to get an estimate; thus, for instance, the associated relative error cannot exceed 0·01, 0·02 and 0·05 when ω/ωp = (101)½, (51)½ and (21)½ respectively. Applications are described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 377 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berk, H. L. & Book, D. L. 1969 Phys. Fluids, 12, 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, H. L. & Roberts, K. V. 1967 Phys. Fluids, 10, 1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, H. L. & Roberts, K. V. 1970 Methods of Computational Physics, vol. 9, p. 87. Academic.Google Scholar
Bertrand, P., Doremus, J. P., Baumann, G. & Feix, M. R. 1972 Phys. Fluids, 15, 1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, P., Gros, M. & Baumann, G. 1976 Phys. Fluids, 19, 1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomberg, H. W. & Berk, H. L. 1973 J. Plasma Phys. 9, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzi, J. M. 1971 J. Physique, 32, Colloq. C5B, 102.Google Scholar
Buzzi, J. M. 1974 Phys. Fluids, 17, 716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasseriaux, J. M. & Odero, D. 1973 J. Plasma Phys. 10, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chee-Seng, L. 1971 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 323, 555.Google Scholar
Chee-Seng, L. 1989 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 421, 109.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1960 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 252, 397.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1965 J. Inst. Maths Applics, 1, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 27, 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourgues, G., Feix, M. R. & Fijalkow, E. 1977 Plasma Phys. 19, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourgues, G., Fijalkow, E. & Feix, M. R. 1980 Plasma Phys. 22, 367.Google Scholar
Navet, M. & Bertrand, P. 1971 Phys. Lett. 34A, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyer, M. L., Navet, M. & Feix, M. R. 1975 J. Plasma Phys. 13, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K. V. & Berk, H. L. 1967 Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, G. 1969 Phys. Lett. 30A, 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, N. 1978 Radio Sci. 13, 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotignon, J. G. & Feix, M. R. 1977 Radio Sci. 12, 1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar