Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:53:57.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compulsory Arbitration and the Australasian Model of State Development: Policy Transfer, Learning, and Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2017

Shaun Goldfinch  and
Philippa Mein Smith
Shaun Goldfinch
Affiliation:
University of Otago and University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Philippa Mein Smith
Affiliation:
University of Otago and University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Policymakers transfer knowledge about policies, ideas, and institutions between political systems, learning from one another in a process of policy learning; lesson drawing; diffusion; or policy transfer. As Dolowitz and Marsh observe: “While terminology and focus often vary … studies are concerned with the process by which knowledge about policies, administrative arrangements, institutions, and ideas in one political system (past or present) are used in the development of policies, administrative arrangements, institutions and ideas in another political system.” The literature on policy transfer has mainly addressed how policymakers glean potential lessons and use those experiences to devise reforms. It asks questions about why policy transfer occurs; who was involved; what was transferred; from where; the extent of the transfer; and how the process of transfer is “related to policy ‘success’ or ‘failure.’” Greener distinguishes this from policy learning, where policymakers make deliberate adjustments in response to experience or new information, and learning is evident when policy changes as a result of this process. Some scholars see policy transfer as a subset of policy learning, since these are often part of the same procedure. Oliver and Pemberton advance a model, for example, of how ideas are absorbed through learning, in which bureaucratic battles ensue to institutionalize a new policy, and reformers' success in securing support can be critical in determining the extent of policy learning and transfer.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , 2006 , pp. 419 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Heclo, Hugh, Modern Social Policy in Britain and Sweden (New Haven, 1974).Google Scholar

2. Rose, Richard, “What Is Lesson-Drawing?” Journal of Public Policy 11, no. 1 (1991): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Bennett, Robert, “The Relation Between Government and Business Associations in Britain: An Evaluation of Recent Developments,” Policy Studies 18, no. (1997): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Dolowitz, David and Marsh, David, “Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature,” Political Studies 44, no. 2 (1996): 343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Dolowitz, David and Marsh, David, “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making,” Governance 13:1 (2000): 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Lodge, M., “Institutional Choice and Policy Transfer: Reforming British and German Railway Regulation,” Governance 16, no. 2 (2003): 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Greener, I., “Understanding NHS Reform: The Policy-Transfer, Social Learning, and Path-Dependency Perspectives,” Governance 15, no. 2 (2002): 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Wolman, H. and Page, E., “Policy Transfer Among Local Governments: An Information-Theory Approach,” Governance 15, no. 4 (2002): 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Oliver, Michael J. and Pemberton, Hugh, “Learning and Change in Twentieth-Century British Economic Policy,” Governance 17, no. 3 (2004): 415–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Rodgers, Daniel T., Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Cambridge, Mass., 1998), 3.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., 55.

12. Olssen, Erik, Building the New World: Work, Politics, and Society in Caversham, 1880s-1920s (Auckland, 1995).Google Scholar

13. Coleman, P. J., “New Zealand Liberalism and the Origins of the American Welfare State,” Journal of American History 69, no. 2 (1982): 372–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Lloyd, Henry Demarest, Newest England: Notes of a Democratic Traveller in New Zealand, with Some Australian Comparisons (New York, 1900), 233 Google Scholar , and Lloyd, , A Country Without Strikes: A Visit to the Compulsory Arbitration Court of New Zealand (New York, 1900), 177 Google Scholar.

15. “Life in New Zealand,” New York Times, 19 March 1899, 14 Google Scholar , and “Topics of the Week,” New York Times, 10 February 1900, 1 Google Scholar.

16. Hirst, John, Australia's Democracy: A Short History (Sydney, 2002), 266 Google Scholar ; Denoon, Donald and Smith, Philippa Mein, with Wyndham, Marivic, A History of Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific: The Blackwell History of the World (Oxford and Maiden, Mass., 2000), 232 Google Scholar.

17. Beilharz, Peter, “The Antipodes: Another Civilization, Between Manhattan and the Rhine?” New Zealand Sociology 17, no. 2 (2002): 164–78.Google Scholar

18. Reeves, William Pember, “Lecture on Arbitration in New Zealand,” William Pember Reeves: MS-Papers-0129-21, Alexander Turnbull Library [hereafter ATL] (Wellington, n.d. [1912]).Google Scholar

19. On “progressive colonization,” see Belich, James, Paradise Reforged: A History of the New Zealanders from the 1880s to the Year 2000 (Auckland, 2001), 16–17 Google Scholar.

20. On “entrepreneurial states,” see Denoon, and Smith, Mein, A History of Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific, 192 Google Scholar ; Smith, Philippa Mein, A Concise History of New Zealand (Cambridge, 2005), 84–85 Google Scholar ; and Butlin, N. G., Investment in Australian Economic Development, 1861-1900 (Cambridge, 1964), 49 Google Scholar.

21. On this shared history, see Denoon and Mein Smith. Definitions of Australasia could include Fiji.

22. Bragg, W. H., “The Lessons of Radio-Activity,” Australasian Association for the Advancement of Science 12 (1909): 2.Google Scholar

23. Castles, Francis G., Australian Public Policy and Economic Vulnerability: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (Sydney, 1988), 91–93.Google Scholar

24. On the “settler contract,” see Smith, Mein, A Concise History of New Zealand, 98–102 Google Scholar.

25. Lloyd, , Newest England, 1.Google Scholar Other contemporary commentators include Earl of Onslow, , State Socialism and Labour Government in Antipodean Britain (London, 1893)Google Scholar ; Métin, Albert, Le Socialisme Sans Doctrines, 2d ed. (Paris, 1910)Google Scholar ; Rossignol, James E. and Stewart, William Downie, State Socialism in New Zealand (New York, 1910)Google Scholar ; Rankin, Mary T., Arbitration and Conciliation in Australasia: The Legal Wage in Victoria and New Zealand (London, 1916)Google Scholar.

26. Reeves, William Pember, State Experiments in Australia and New Zealand, 2 vols. (London, 1902, rpt. 1923).Google Scholar

27. Bennetts, Darrell, “Classical Modernity and Colonial Imagination: William Pember Reeves, Antipodean Intellectual,” Seminar to History Honours Class, Christchurch: University of Canterbury, August 2005.Google Scholar

28. Macintyre, Stuart, “Neither Capital nor Labour: The Politics of the Establishment of Arbitration,” in Foundations of Arbitration: The Origins and Effects of State Compulsory Arbitration, 1890-1914, ed. Macintyre, Stuart and Mitchell, Richard, 178-200 (Melbourne, 1989).Google Scholar See also Sawer, Marian, The Ethical State? Social Liberalism in Australia (Melbourne, 2003)Google Scholar , and Rowse, Tim, Australian Liberalism and National Character (Melbourne, 1978).Google Scholar National histories of Australia and New Zealand in 1930 recognized that the experiments were not socialist. Condliffe, J. B., New Zealand in the Making: A Survey of Economic and Social Development (London, 1930)Google Scholar , and Hancock, W., Australia (London, 1930)Google Scholar.

29. Macintyre, Stuart, A Colonial Liberalism: The Lost World of Three Victorian Visionaries (Oxford, 1991), 5, 12, 211.Google Scholar The Canadian counterpart of Reeves and Kingston was the new liberal intellectual W. L. Mackenzie King, author of Canada's Industrial Disputes Investigation Act 1907, which provided for “compulsory investigation without compulsory arbitration.” Craven, Paul, “An Impartial Umpire”: Industrial Relations and the Canadian State, 1900-1911 (Toronto, 1980), 4, 7-9, 12-14, 30–33 Google Scholar.

30. Webb, Sidney, “Impressions of New Zealand,” The Echo, 7 October 1898 Google Scholar , in Reeves, William Pember, “Scrapbooks of Newspaper Clippings.” In MS-1683-1685, ATL, Wellington, vol. 2 Google Scholar.

31. Hamer, David, The New Zealand Liberals: The Years of Power, 1891-1912 (Auckland, 1988).Google Scholar

32. Rickard, John, Class and Politics: New South Wales, Victoria, and the Early Commonwealth, 1890-1910 (Canberra, 1976)Google Scholar ; Connolly, C. N., “Review Article: Class and Politics in Australia,” New Zealand journal of History 15, no. 1 (1981): 68–75 Google Scholar.

33. Gollan, Robin, Radical and Worldng-Class Politics (Melbourne), 155.Google Scholar

34. Rickard, , Class and Politics, 8–9.Google Scholar

35. Ibid., 286.

36. Brown, Henry Phelps, The Origins of Trade Union Power (Oxford, 1983), 264.Google Scholar

37. Macintyre, Stuart, “Neither Capital nor Labour,” in Foundations of Arbitration, ed. Macintyre, and Mitchell, , 185.Google Scholar

38. Svensen, Stuart, “Motives and the Maritime Strike,” in The Maritime Strike: A Centennial Retrospective, ed. Hagan, Jim and Wells, Andrew (Wollongong, 1992), 13.Google Scholar

39. Pender, William C., “A Fair Decade's Work: The Origins of Compulsory Arbitration in Australia and New Zealand, 1890-1905” (Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, 1998), 127.Google Scholar

40. Isaac, Joe and Macintyre, Stuart, eds., The New Province for Law and Order: 100 Years of Australian Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration (Cambridge, 2004), 13.Google Scholar

41. Smith, Mein, Concise History of New Zealand, chap. 5.Google Scholar

42. Macintyre, Stuart and Mitchell, Richard, eds., Foundations of Arbitration: The Origins and Effects of State Compulsory Arbitration, 1890-1914 (Melbourne, 1989), 7.Google Scholar Wages boards were established under the Factories and Shops Acts of Victoria from 1896 to fix working conditions, hours, and minimum wages, in particular in trades such as baking, boots and shoes, and men's and boys' clothing. Boards included representatives of employers and employees, with an elected chairman.

43. Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act, NZ Parliament, 58 Viet, 1894, no. 14.Google Scholar

44. Holt, James, Compulsory Arbitration in New Zealand: The First Forty Years (Auckland, 1986), 106.Google Scholar Plowman, David, “Employers' Associations and Compulsory Arbitration,” in The New Province for Law and Order, ed. Isaac, and Macintyre, , 241–74Google Scholar.

45. Holt, , Compulsory Arbitration in New Zealand.Google Scholar

46. Mitchell, Richard and Stern, Esther, “The Compulsory Arbitration Model of Industrial Dispute Settlement: An Outline of Legal Developments,” in Foundations of Arbitration, ed. Macintyre, and Mitchell, , chap. 5.Google Scholar

47. Olssen, Erik, The Red Feds: Revolutionary Industrial Unionism and the New Zealand Federation of Labour, 1908-14 (Auckland, 1988).Google Scholar See also Bennett, James, “Rats and Revolutionaries”: The Labour Movement in Australia and New Zealand, 1890-1940 (Dunedin, 2004), chap. 4 Google Scholar.

48. Mitchell, Richard, “State Systems of Conciliation and Arbitration: The Legal Origins of the Australasian Model,” in Foundations of Arbitration, ed. Macintyre, and Mitchell, , chap. 4.Google Scholar

49. Macintyre, and Mitchell, , eds., Foundations of Arbitration, 18.Google Scholar

50. Macintyre, Stuart, The Labour Experiment (Melbourne, 1989), 24 Google Scholar ; Castles, Francis G., The Working Class and Welfare: Reflections on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand, 1890-1980 (Wellington, 1985), 13 Google Scholar.

51. Rickard, John, H. B. Higgins: The Rebel as Judge (Sydney, 1984), 288, 298.Google Scholar

52. Wells, A., “State Regulation for a Moral Economy: Peter Macarthy and the Meaning of the Harvester Judgement,” Journal of Industrial Relations 40 (1998): 371–82.Google Scholar Hancock recognized the judgment's significance in expressing what became “the popular refrain of Australian democracy” ; Hancock, , Australia, 83–84.Google Scholar For trends in real wages, see Hancock, Keith and Richardson, Sue, “Economic and Social Effects,” in The New Province for Law and Order, ed. Isaac, and Macintyre, , 139–206 Google Scholar.

53. Holt, , Compulsory Arbitration in New Zealand, 105.Google Scholar

54. Gollan, R., “Peter Macarthy and Labour History,” Journal of Industrial Relations 40 (1998): 359–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar A conservative New Zealand government had suspended compulsory arbitration in the depression.

55. Mitchell, , “State Systems of Conciliation and Arbitration.”Google Scholar

56. Salmond, J. D. and Crowley, D. W, New Zealand Labour's Pioneering Days: The History of the Labour Movement in New Zealand from 1840 to 1894 (Auckland, 1950), 73.Google Scholar Sweating Commission , Zealand, New, “Report of the Royal Commission Appointed to Inquire into Certain Relations between the Employers of Certain Kinds of Labour and the Persons Employed Therein,” Appendices to the Journals of the House of Representatives [AJHR], 1890, H-5, vi Google Scholar.

57. Holt, , Compulsory Arbitration in New Zealand, 16–17.Google Scholar On its first reading, Stewart's bill had the title “Strikes and Board of Arbitration Bill”; eight days later (10 July), its title was amended to “Strikes and Board of Conciliation Bill.” Gardner, W. J., “The Origins of State Compulsory Arbitration: Ulster and New Zealand, 1889-90,” unpublished paper, Christchurch, 1996.Google Scholar Stewart was content to advance a voluntary scheme, but he noted that the House could easily make it compulsory by substituting “shall” for “may” in the text. For speeches on the bill, see New Zealand Parliamentary Debates 68, 118-33.

58. Pender, , “A Fair Decade's Work,” chap. 1 Google Scholar ; Mitchell, , “State Systems of Conciliation and Arbitration,” 82–83.Google Scholar The French Conseiis des Prud'hommes , with origins in the twelfth century, could enforce, through criminal procedures, their findings on matters concerning existing contracts, and were seen as the antecedents of th e 1867 English Act by the New South Wales Royal Commission on Strikes in 1891. British Acts in the nineteenth century increasingly viewed arbitration as a private concern about terms of existing contracts, despite precursors going back to the seventeenth century that gave the state a central role in wage and dispute settlement.

59. Royal Commission on Strikes, “Report of the Royal Commission on Strikes (New South Wales)” (Sydney, 1891), 41.Google Scholar

60. Pender, , “A Fair Decade's Work,” chap. 2.Google Scholar

61. Lee, Henry and Mitchell, Glenn, “His Satanic Majesty's Request: The Genesis of State Conciliation and Arbitration in New South Wales, 1878-1896,” in The Maritime Strike, ed. Hagan, and Wells, .Google Scholar

62. Royal Commission on Strikes, “Report of the Royal Commission on Strikes (New South Wales): Minutes of Evidence” (Sydney, 1891), 10.Google Scholar

63. Ibid.

64. Ibid., 39.

65. Mitchell, , “State Systems of Conciliation and Arbitration,” 82.Google Scholar

66. Reeves, , State Experiments in Australia and New Zealand, 1:96–97.Google Scholar

67. Mitchell, , “State Systems of Conciliation and Arbitration,” 85-87, 93–95.Google Scholar T. A. Coghlan, the New South Wales Government Statistician, a contemporary of Reeves and Kingston, had judged in his four-volume history of labor and industry in Australia (in 1918) that Kingston's scheme of conciliation and arbitration was “the precursor of all Australasian legislation of that character.” Coghlan, T. A., Labour and Industry in Australia from the First Settlement in 1788 to the Establishment of the Commonwealth in 1901, reissue, 4 vols. (South Melbourne, 1918; 1969, 1917), vol. 4Google Scholar.

68. Glass, Margaret, Charles Cameron Kingston: Federation Father (Melbourne, 1997), 63.Google Scholar

69. Kingston, Charles C., “Memorandum Re Conciliation Bill,” PRG 1039/2, 24 October 1892 Google Scholar , State Library of South Australia, Adelaide.

70. Royal Commission on Strikes, “Report of the Royal Commission on Strikes (New South Wales),” Sydney, 1891.Google Scholar

71. Salmond, and Crowley, , New Zealand Labour's Pioneering Days.Google Scholar

72. See Royal Commission on Strikes, “Report of the Royal Commission on Strikes (New South Wales): Minutes of Evidence”; Kingston, C. C., 24 March 1891 Google Scholar ; and NZ Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1894, preamble.

73. Sinclair, Keith, William Pember Reeves: New Zealand Fabian (Oxford, 1965), 152.Google Scholar

74. Ibid., 208.

75. William Pember Reeves, “Reminiscences,” in William Pember Reeves, 1857-1932: Ms-Papers-0129-32, ATL, Wellington, n.d.

76. Holt, , Compulsory Arbitration in New Zealand, 24.Google Scholar

77. Reeves, , State Experiments in Australia and New Zealand, 1:100.Google Scholar

78. Labour Bills Committee, “Labour Bills Committee Minute Book,” August 1892 Google Scholar , Le 1/1892/7, August 1893, Le 1/1893/4, Archives NZ, Wellington.

79. Reeves, William Pember, The Long White Cloud Ao Tea Roa, 3d ed., Twickenham: Senate. Originally published by Allen, and Unwin, , 1898 [1924], 290.Google Scholar

80. Reeves, , “Reminiscences.”Google Scholar

81. Holt, , Compulsory Arbitration in New Zealand, 52.Google Scholar

82. Term from Lloyd, , Newest England, 237 Google Scholar.

83. Pender, , “A Fair Decade's Work,” 251 Google Scholar ; Mitchell, and Stern, , “The Compulsory Arbitration Model of Industrial Dispute Settlement,” in Foundations of Arbitration, ed. Macintyre, and Mitchell, , chap. 5 Google Scholar.

84. Gollan, , Radical and Worfcing-CIass Politics, 157.Google Scholar Lloyd, , Newest England, chap. X.Google Scholar

85. Reeves, William Pember, “Lecture on Arbitration in New Zealand,” in William Pember Reeves: MS-Papers-0129-21, ATL, Wellington, n.d. (1912).Google Scholar

86. Mitchell, and Stern, , “The Compulsory Arbitration Model of Industrial Dispute Settlement.”Google Scholar

87. Markey, R., “Trade Unions, the Labour Party, and the Introduction of Arbitration in New South Wales and the Commonwealth,” in Foundations of Arbitration, ed. Macintyre, and Mitchell, , chap. 7 Google Scholar ; Pender, , “A Fair Decade's Work,” chaps. 3 and 6 Google Scholar.

88. Backhouse, Alfred P., “Report of Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Working of Compulsory Conciliation and Arbitration Laws,” Sydney: NS W Legislative Assembly, 1901.Google Scholar

89. Ibid., 11, quoting the report of the New Zealand Department of Labour, 1900.

90. Ibid., 14.

91. Ibid., 26.

92. Industrial Arbitration Act 1901, NSW Parliament, 1 Edw. VII, no. 59.

93. Sawer, , The Ethical State? 53, 55.Google Scholar

94. Plowman, D., “Forced March: The Employers and Arbitration,” in Foundations of Arbitration, ed. Macintyre, and Mitchell, , chap. 6.Google Scholar

95. Pender, , “A Fair Decade's Work,” chap. 6.Google Scholar

96. Segal, Naomi, “Compulsory Arbitration and the Western Australian Gold-Mining Industry: A Re-Examination of the Inception of Compulsory Arbitration in Western Australia,” International Review of Social History 47 (2002): 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

97. Ibid., 59-100.

98. Svensen, Stuart, The Shearers' War: The Story of the 1891 Shearers' Strike (Brisbane, 1989).Google Scholar

99. Pender, , “A Fair Decade's Work,” chap. 8.Google Scholar In Tasmania, the smallest Australian state, radical newspapers also “strongly endorsed” the New Zealand experiment with arbitration. Bennett, , “Rats and Revolutionaries,” 60 Google Scholar.

100. Irving, Helen, ed., The Centenary Companion to Australian Federation (Melbourne, 1999) , appendix 3.Google Scholar

101. On this and earlier federation conferences and conventions, see the Australian Federation Full Text Database, SETIS, University of Sydney Library, http://setis. library.usyd.edu.au/fed.

102. Denoon, and Smith, Mein, with Wyndham, , A History of Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific, 233.Google Scholar

103. Glass, , Charles Cameron Kingston.Google Scholar

104. Pender, , “A Fair Decade's Work,” 292.Google Scholar

105. Mitchell, and Stern, , “The Compulsory Arbitration Model of Industrial Dispute Settlement.”Google Scholar

106. Plowman, D., “Forced March.”Google Scholar

107. Ramia, Gaby and Wailes, Nick, ”Knitting the Social Safety Net: Reassessing the Role of Federation in Shaping Social Protection, 1901-1914,” in Working the Nation: Working Life and Federation, 1890-1914, ed. Hearn, Mark and Patmore, Greg, 136–58 (Annandale NSW, 2001).Google Scholar

108. The concept of “reformist political leadership” is from Goldfinch, Shaun, and Hart, Paul 't, “Leadership and Institutional Reform: Engineering Macroeconomic Policy Change in Australia,” Governance 16, no. 2 (2003): 235–70.Google Scholar Higgins quoted in Macintyre, Stuart, “Arbitration in Action,” in The New Province for Law and Order, ed. Isaac, and Macintyre, , 62.Google Scholar Higgins published a book with this title in 1922.

109. Lodge, , “Institutional Choice and Policy Transfer,” 160.Google Scholar

110. Markey, , “Trade Unions, the Labour Party, and the Introduction of Arbitration in New South Wales and the Commonwealth,” 157–58.Google Scholar

111. Glass, , Charles Cameron Kingston.Google Scholar

112. James, Oliver and Lodge, Martin, “The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research,” Political Studies Review 1 (2003): 179–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

113. Reeves, , The Long White Cloud Ao Tea Roa, 282.Google Scholar

114. Walker, R., “The Americanization of British Welfare: A Case Study of Policy Transfer,” International Journal of Health Services 29, no. 4 (1999): 679–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

115. Webb, , quoted in Sinclair, William Pember Reeves, 210.Google Scholar

116. Hancock, , Australia, 83–85.Google Scholar For a useful summary, see Macintyre, , The Labour Experiment.Google Scholar

117. Dolowitz, and Marsh, , “Learning from Abroad,” 5–24.Google Scholar