Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:19:27.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Reformism to Resignation and Remedialism? Labour's Trajectory Through British Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Mark Wickham-Jones
Mark Wickham-Jones
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 9 April 1992, the British Labour party lost its fourth successive general election. The outcome, coming after prolonged economic difficulties, led many commentators to call into question altogether the viability of the reformist project in the United Kingdom. For Labour's leaders, the result was bitterly disappointing. To lose any general election is, of course, evidence of failure. But, given the extent of the radical transformation the party appeared to have undergone in the late 1980s and early 1990s, to lose in the propitious circumstances of 1992 was especially frustrating. Just over five years later, however, much of the period under a new leader, Tony Blair, and having undergone further dramatic adaptation, including a comprehensive rebranding as “New Labour,” the party not only took office at the general election of 1 May 1997 but won a landslide victory of 179 seats. A little over four years later it won a second landslide victory with a majority just 12 seats fewer at 167: it was an unparalleled achievement in the party's history.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 15 , Issue 1: Special Issue: The Future of the Democratic Left in Industrial Democracies , January 2003 , pp. 26 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. I am extremely grateful to Erwin Hargrove and Desmond King. All responsibility is mine.

2. Crewe, Ivor, “The Thatcher Legacy,” in Anthony King, Britain at the Polls 1992 (Chatham, N.J., 1992), 1–28, 25Google Scholar; Hay, Colin, The Political Economy of New Labour (Manchester, 1999), 58Google Scholar; Panitch, Leo and Leys, Colin, The End of Parliamentary Socialism (London, 1997), 4 and 259.Google Scholar

3. I take my title from Adam Przeworski: “I think I foresaw correctly their [social democrats'] ideological dynamic from revolution to reformism, to remedialism, to resignation,” European Consortium for Political Research News, 2001, 32. Revolution has never really been part of British Labour's ideological program: hence its absence here. In more recent work, Przeworski has developed this theme: “The long-term historical evolution of social democracy proceeded from revolution to reformism to remedialism. The question remains is whether it will end in resignation”; see “How Many Ways Can Be Third?” in Glyn, Andrew, ed., Social Democracy in Neoliberal Times (Oxford, 2001), 312–333, 316CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Note that Przeworski's periodization does not match mine precisely.

4. Butler, David and Kavanagh, Denis, The British General Election of 1992 (Basingstoke, 1992), 282–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, and Curtice, John, ed., Labour's Last Change (Aldershot, 1994), 275 and 280.Google Scholar

6. Jenkins, Peter, Anatomy of Decline (London, 1996), 236.Google Scholar

7. Crewe, Ivor, “Labour Force Changes, Working-Class Decline, and the Labour Vote in Postwar Britain,” in Frances Fox Piven, Labor Parties in Postindustrial Societies (Oxford, 1991), 20–46, 23.Google Scholar

8. Butler and Kavanagh, The British General Election of 1992, 275.

9. Ibid., 59.

10. See Przeworski, Adam, Capitalism and Social Democracy (Cambridge, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. I focus upon Przeworski's account because of its importance within that corpus and its relevance to the British case.

11. Przeworski, Adam, The State and the Economy Under Capitalism (New York, 1991), 92.Google Scholar

12. Anderson, Perry, “Introduction,” in P. Anderson and P. Camiller, Mapping the West European Left (London, 1994), 1–22, 14.Google Scholar

13. Moses, Jonathan, “Abdication from National Policy Autonomy: What's Left to Leave?” Politics and Society 22, no. 2 (06 1994): 125–148, at 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Perry Anderson noted “differences in work, income and security, age, gender, origin”; “Introduction,” 14.

15. Wickham-Jones, Mark, “How the Conservatives Lost the Economic Argument,” in Geddes, Andrew and Tonge, Jonathon, eds., Labour's Landslide (Manchester, 1997), 100–118.Google Scholar

16. Tony Blair, speech, CPU conference,Cape Town,South Africa,14 October 1996,6Google Scholar; and Tony Blair, speech, Corn Exchange, London, 7 April 1997.

17. Financial Times, 24 January 1997.

18. Wintour, P., The Observer, 26 01 1997.Google Scholar

19. Thompson, Paul, “Labour—The Natural Party of Opposition?” Renewal 1, no. 1 (1993): 1–10, at 3.Google Scholar

20. Tony Blair, speech, Singapore, January 1996.

21. Labour party, NEC report (1996 and 1997).

22. Denver, David, “The Results: How Britain Voted (or Didn't),” in Geddes, Andrew and Tonge, Jonathan, eds., Labour's Landslide, 2–21.Google Scholar

23. Tony Blair, speech, LSE, 12 March 2002.

24. Westlake, Martin, Neil Kinnock (London, 2001).Google Scholar

25. Wickham-Jones, Mark, “Exorcising Ghosts,” in Geddes, Andrew and Tonge, Jonathan, eds., Labour's Second Landslide (Manchester, 2001), 103–122.Google Scholar

26. Darling, Alistair, “We Make No Apologies for Our Tough Welfare Regime,” The Independent, 10 02 1999.Google Scholar

27. Blair, Tony, “It Really Is the End of the Something for Nothing Days,” The Daily Mail, 10 02 1999.Google Scholar

28. Denver, “The Results: How Britain Voted (or Didn't),” 9–24.

29. Tony Blair, speech, LSE, 12 March 2002.

30. Tony Blair, speech, London, 6 April 1997.

31. Tony Blair, speech, The Hague, 20 January 1998.

32. Tony Blair, speech, Paris, 24 March 1998.

33. Blair, Tony, The Third Way (London, 1998).Google Scholar

34. Giddens, Anthony, The Third Way (Oxford, 1998).Google Scholar

35. Blair, Tony and Schröder, Gerhard, “The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte,” reproduced in Bodo Hombach, The Politics of the New Centre (Oxford, 2000), 157–177.Google Scholar

36. Rentoul, John, Tony Blair, Prime Minister (London, 2002), 533.Google Scholar

37. He continued, “The public sector is still incredibly inflexible.” Interview, Observer, 5 September 1999.

38. Transcript, Observer, 13 May 2001.

39. Tony Blair, speech, LSE, 12 March 2002.

40. Tony Blair, speech, 16 October 2001.

41. The Guardian, 29 May 2001.

42. Transcript, The Guardian, 11 September 2001.

43. Tony Blair, draft speech, TUC, 11 September 2001.

44. Transcript, The Guardian, 11 September 2001.

45. Employment conditions were dropped for Prime Minister's Office of Public Services Reform, Reforming Our Public Services (London, 2002), 3.

46. BBC Newsnight, 12 March 2002. Hattersley praised Blair's use of the word “equality.”

47. A contrast with Przeworski, whose emphasis is on capital, domestic and international, rather than globalization.

48. Tony Blair, speech, 14 October 1996, 5; Tony Blair, speech, 22 May 1995.

49. Tony Blair, speech, Corn Exchange, London, 7 April 1997.

50. Brown, Gordon, “Responsibility in Public Finance,” 20 01 1997, 3.Google Scholar

51. Tony Blair, Speech, IPPR, January 1997.

52. Tony Blair, speech, Paris, 24 March 1998.

53. Blair and Schröder, “The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte,” 164.

54. Ibid., 167.

55. Brown, “Responsibility in Public Finance,” 9.

56. Transcript, The Guardian, 11 September 2001.

57. Ibid.

58. Tony Blair, speech, Corn Exchange, London, 7 April 1997.

59. Blair and Schröder, “The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte,” 166–67.

60. The Times, 17 September 1998.

61. Tony Blair, speech, Malmö, Sweden, June 1997, 3.

62. Anderson, Perry, “The Light of Europe,” in English Questions (London, 1991), 346.Google ScholarPubMed

63. Tony Blair, speech, CPU conference,Cape Town,South Africa,14 October 1996,9.Google Scholar

64. Tony Blair, speech, Aylesbury estate, Southwark, 2 June 1997, 1.

65. Time, 27 October 1997.

66. Tony Blair, speech, 20 December 1997, 4.

67. Tony Blair, speech, LSE, 12 March 2002.

68. Tony Blair, speech, Aylesbury estate, Southwark, 2 June 1997.

69. Gordon Brown, speech, 22 October 1996, 4.

70. Blair, “New Britain,” speech, 14 April 1998.

71. Transcript, The Guardian, 11 September 2001.

72. IFS, Green Budget report 2001 (London), 3.

73. Immervoll, H. et al. , “Budgeting for Fairness,” mimeo, Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge, 1999, 8.Google Scholar

74. The Guardian, 10 November 2000.

75. Hills, John, “How Labour Is Doing Good by Stealth for the Poor,” The Independent, 4 06 2000.Google Scholar

76. Anatole Kaletsky, The Times, 18 April 2002.

77. The Times, 18 April 2002.

78. The Guardian, 18 April 2002.

79. The Independent, 14 July 2001.

80. Przeworski, “How Many Ways Can Be Third?” 330.

81. Crewe, Ivor, “A New Political Hegemony,” in King, A., ed., Britain at the Polls, 2001 (London, 2002), 207–232Google Scholar

82. The Guardian, 29 May 2002.

83. The Guardian, 1 August 2001.