Article contents
Seclusion and restraint usage in seven English psychiatric intensive care units (PICUs)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2009
Abstract
Background: Psychiatric intensive care units (PICUs) provide care for patients who may demonstrate agitation and aggressive tendencies. Such behaviour has traditionally been managed using interventions such as seclusion and/or physical restraint. There is little published data about the use of these measures within different PICUs. This paper attempts to provide such evidence as a base for clinical governance.
Aims: To describe patterns of seclusion and restraint usage within the care of 332 patients admitted consecutively to seven English PICUs.
Method: Prospective, multi-centre patient case note analysis.
Results: Within the four units that utilised seclusion in the study period, it was used on 16% of patients who had been admitted. All seven units used control and restraint and 28% of admitted patients were formally restrained at some point during their admission. There was no significant difference in mean duration of restraint or proportion of patients who were restrained between the units that used seclusion and those that did not. Use of seclusion was significantly associated with patient violence and property damage in PICU. Restraint usage was also significantly associated with patient violence and property damage but also with higher two week BPRS scores and a younger patient age.
Conclusions: It appears that PICUs manage disturbed behaviour differently, either dependent upon facilities or local policies. In attempting to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint, a multi-faceted approach must be taken both locally and nationally. PICU clinicians and service users should be integral within this.
- Type
- Original Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © NAPICU 2009
References
- 9
- Cited by