Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:00:10.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effective and Ineffective Coping With Bullying Strategies as Assessed by Informed Professionals and Their Use by Victimised Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2012

Rosalind Murray-Harvey*
Affiliation:
Centre for Student Wellbeing and Prevention of Violence (SWAPv), Flinders University, Australia
Grace Skrzypiec
Affiliation:
Centre for Student Wellbeing and Prevention of Violence (SWAPv), Flinders University, Australia
Phillip T. Slee
Affiliation:
Centre for Student Wellbeing and Prevention of Violence (SWAPv), Flinders University, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Professor Rosalind Murray-Harvey, School of Education, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. Email: rosalind.murray-harvey@flinders.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

What strategies do students use to cope with bullying and how effective are they? Answers to such questions will not only help students understand how they can cope, but also inform school-wide policies and practices to reduce the incidence of bullying. To do this, schools need evidence on what strategies to focus on to most effectively target their intervention and prevention programs. Students across Years 8, 9 and 10 in three South Australian high schools (n = 1223) completed a Coping with Bullying questionnaire, indicating strategies they used, and 82 informed professionals (IPs) rated each strategy's effectiveness, along with its applicability to different bullying types. IPs generally agreed on which strategies were effective and ineffective and that the same strategies were appropriate for all types of bullying. Seriously bullied students reported under-using some effective strategies. No significant difference between males and females in strategy use was found. Awareness of effective and ineffective coping strategies provides schools with a workable framework for targeting prevention and/or intervention programs that align with extant knowledge on coping with bullying. Disseminating such research evidence is important as this study shows that seriously bullied students are evidently under-using many strategies that IPs in this study regarded as effective.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atlas, R.S., & Pepler, D.J. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. American Journal of Educational Research, 92 (2), 8699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Socio economic indexes for areas (Cat. no. 2033.0.55.001). Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2033.0.55.001/Google Scholar
Boulton, M.J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 7387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, D., Shaw, T., Hearn, L., Epstein, M., Monks, H., Lester, L., & Thomas, L. (2009). Australian Covert Bullying Prevalence Study (ACBPS). Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/NationalSafeSchools/Pages/research.aspxGoogle Scholar
Causey, D.L., & Dubow, E.F. (1992). Development of a self-report coping measure for elementary school children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 21 (1), 4759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, W.M., & Pepler, D. (1997). Observations of bullying and victimization in the school yard. Canadian Journal of School of Psychology, 13 (2), 4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elledge, C., Cavell, T.A., Ogle, N.T., Malcolm, K.T., Newgent, R.A., & Faith, M.A. (2010). History of peer victimization and children's response to school bullying. School Psychology Quarterly, 25 (2), 129141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, E.D., Furlong, M.J., & Austin, M.J. (2009). A cluster analytic investigation of school violence victimization among diverse students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 16731695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleiss, J.L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76 (5), 378382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydenberg, E. (2004). Coping competencies: What to teach and when. Theory Into Practice, 43 (1), 1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydenberg, E., Lewis, R., Bugalski, K., Cotta, A., McCarthy, C., Luscombe-Smith, N., & Poole, C. (2004). Prevention is better than cure: Coping skills training for adolescents at school. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20 (2), 117134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1993). The adolescent coping scale: Practitioners manual. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (2004). Adolescents least able to cope: How do they respond to their stresses? British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32 (1), 2537.Google Scholar
Grissom, R.J., & Kim, J.J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Halstead, M., Johnson, S.B., & Cunningham, W. (1993). Measuring coping in adolescents: An application of the Ways of Coping Checklist. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22 (3), 337344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, S.C., Mora-Merchan, J., & Ortega, R. (2004). The long-term effects of coping strategy use in victims of bullying. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 7 (1), 312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanetsuna, T., Smith, P.K., & Morita, Y. (2006). Coping with bullying at school: Children's recommended strategies and attitudes to school-based interventions in England and Japan. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 570580. doi:10.1002/ab.20156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Skinner, K. (2002). Children's coping strategies: Moderators of the effects of peer victimization? Developmental Psychology, 38 (2), 267278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Newcombe, R. G. (2006). Confidence intervals for an effect size measure based on the Mann–Whitney statistic. Part 1: General issues and tail-area-based methods. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 543557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (2000). Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 1724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, P., & Bussey, K. (2010). Peer victimization and psychological maladjustment: The mediating role of coping self-efficacy. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21 (2), 420433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, E.A., & Wellborn, J.G. (1994). Coping during childhood and adolescence: A motivational perspective. In Featherman, D.L., Lerner, R.M., & Perlmutter, M. (Eds.). Life-span development and behavior (pp. 91133). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Slee, P.T. (2001). The PEACE Pack: A programme for reducing bullying in our schools (3rd ed.). Adelaide, Australia: Flinders University.Google Scholar
Smith, P.K., & Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying: Findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action. Childhood, 7 (2), 193212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.K., Madsen, K.C., & Moody, J.C. (1999). What causes the age decline in reports of being bullied in school? Toward a developmental analysis of risks of being bullied. Educational Research, 41, 276285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swearer, S.M., Espelage, D.L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010). What can be done about school bullying? Linking research to educational practice. Educational Researcher, 39 (1), 3847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ttofi, M.M., & Farrington, D.P. (2009). What works in preventing bullying: Effective elements of anti-bullying programmes. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 1 (1), 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ttofi, M.M., Farrington, D.P., & Baldry, A. (2008). Effectivenesss of programmes to reduce school bullying: A systematic review (Report prepared for the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention; Brottsförebyggande rådet — Brå, Stockholm). Retrieved from www.bra.seGoogle Scholar
Visconti, K.J. & Troop-Gordon, W. (2010). Prospective relations between children's responses to peer victimization and their socioemotional adjustment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 261272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisz, J.R., McCabe, M., & Denning, M.D. (1994). Primary and secondary control among children undergoing medical procedures: Adjustment as a function of coping style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 324332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilton, M.M.M., & Craig, W.M. (2000). Emotional regulation and display in classroom victims of bullying: Characteristic expressions of affect, coping styles and relevant contextual factors. Social Development, 9 (2), 226245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar