Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:24:16.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Establishing the Psychometric Properties of an Interactive, Self-Regulation Assessment Battery for Young Offenders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2012

Annemaree Carroll ,
Francene Hemingway ,
Adrian Ashman  and
Julie Bower
Annemaree Carroll*
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Education, Australia
Francene Hemingway
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Education, Australia
Adrian Ashman
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Education, Australia
Julie Bower
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Education, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Associate Professor Annemaree Carroll, The University of Queensland, School of Education, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia. Email: a.carroll@uq.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

This research investigated the reliability and validity of the Mindfields Assessment Battery (MAB), measuring three components of self-regulation (forethought, performance control, self-reflection) of young offenders. Participants were 57 12- to 18-year-olds from youth justice service centres, alternative education schools, and a youth correctional facility (Nmales = 46; NIndigenous = 7). Psychometric properties of the battery were sound with adequate alpha levels for the scales. The factor structure and internal reliability of three measures were replicated and validated. Positive significant correlations found between these subscales indicated consistent relationships with young people's responses to challenging situations. Prodelinquency scores were significantly positively correlated with minor misdemeanours and negatively correlated with social competency. Significant positive correlations were found between social competence and goal commitment, and self-regulation and life satisfaction. The battery provides a reliable, valid way of assessing forethought, performance control, self-reflection, and treatment amenability within the conceptual framework of self-regulation.

Keywords

juvenile delinquencyantisocial behaviourself-regulationimpulsivitygoal setting
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , June 2012 , pp. 102 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, M., Briney, J., Hawkins, J., Abbott, R., Brook-Weiss, B., & Catalano, R. (2007). Measuring risk and protection in communities using the Communities that Care Youth Survey. Evaluating and Program Planning, 30, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, K.B., Neal, D.J., & Collins, S.E. (2004). A psychometric analysis of the self-regulation questionnaire. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, A., Ashman, A.F.A., Bower, J., & Hemingway, F. (2007). The Changing My Life Scale. Unpublished scale.Google Scholar
Carroll, A., Bower, J., Hemingway, F., & Ashman, A. (2007). Mindfields: A self-regulatory intervention for young people at risk who want to change their lives (pp. 59–64). In Bahr, N. & Pendergast, D. (Eds.), The millennial adolescent. Melbourne, Australia: ACER Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, A., Durkin, K., Hattie, J., & Houghton, S. (1997). Goal setting among adolescents: A comparison of delinquent, at-risk, and not-at-risk youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A., Durkin, K., Houghton, S., & Hattie, J. (1996). An adaptation of Mak's Self-reported Delinquency Scale for Western Australian adolescents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 48, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A., Gordon, K., Haynes, M., & Houghton, S. (2012). Adolescent goal setting and self-efficacy: Comparing delinquent, at-risk and not at-risk youths. Submitted to Journal of Youth and Adolescence.Google Scholar
Carroll, A., Hemingway, F., Bower, J., Ashman, A., Houghton, S., & Durkin, K. (2006). Impulsivity in juvenile offenders: Differences among early-onset, late-onset and non-offenders. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A., Houghton, S., Durkin, K., & Hattie, J. (2009). Adolescent reputations and risk: Developmental trajectories to delinquency. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, P.J., Glaser, B.A., Calhoun, G.B., Bradshaw, C.P., & Petrocelli, J.V. (2005). Examining readiness for change: A preliminary evaluation of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment with incarcerated adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 38, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, A. (2009). Offender emotion and self-regulation: Implications for offender rehabilitation programming. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 15, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, B., Teichner, G., Azrin, N., Weintraub, N., Crum, T.A., Murphy, L., & Silver, N.C. (2003). Initial reliability and validity of the life satisfaction scale for problem youth in a sample of drug abusing and conduct disordered youth. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12, 453–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I.K., Fabes, R.A., Reiser, M., Murphy, B.C., Holgren, R., . . . Losoya, S. (1997). The relation of regulation and emotionality to resiliency and competent social functioning in elementary school children. Child Development, 68, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, S.B., & McGurk, B.J. (1980). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness in a detention centre population. Psychological Reports, 47, 1299–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D.P. (1990). Implications of criminal career research for the prevention of offending. Journal of Adolescence, 13, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, T., Dishion, T., & Connell, A. (2008). Adolescent self-regulation as resilience: Resistance to antisocial behavior within the deviant peer context. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gideon, L. (2010). Drug offenders’ perception of motivation: The role of motivation in rehabilitation and reintegration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 597–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, R., Van Horn, M., Arthur, M., Hawkins, J., & Catalano, R. (2005). Measurement properties of the Communities that Care Youth Survey across demographic groups. Journal of Qualitative Criminology, 21, 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemphill, J.F., & Howell, A.J. (2000). Adolescent offenders and stages of change. Psychological Assessment, 12, 371–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemphill, S.A., Toumborou, J.W., Herrenkohl, T.I., McMorris, B.J., & Catalano, R.F. (2006). The effect of school suspensions and arrests on subsequent adolescent antisocial behavior in Australia and the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 736–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoge, R.D., & Andrews, D.A. (1994). The youth level of service/case management: Inventory and manual. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Psychology, Carleton University.Google Scholar
Hoge, R.D., & Andrews, D.A. (1996). Assessing the youthful offender: Issues and techniques. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperminc, G.P., Allen, J.P., & Arthur, M.W. (1996). Autonomy, relatedness, and male adolescent delinquency: Toward a multidimensional view of social competence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, P. (2007). Family and peer influences on the psychological adjustment of young people: Protective factors and developmental aspects (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) The University of Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B.J., Hellner, I., Allen, J.P., & Aber, J.L. (1989). Assessment of interpersonal negotiation strategies in youth engaged in problem behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 25, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Blanc, M. (2002). Review of clinical assessment strategies and instruments for adolescent offenders. In Corrado, R.R., Roesch, R., Hart, S.D. & Gierowski, J.K. (Eds.), Multi-problem violent youth: A foundation for comparative research on needs, interventions and outcomes (Vol. 324, pp. 171–190). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Logan, G.D., Schachar, R.J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science, 8, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magar, E.C.E., Phillips, L.H., & Hosie, J.A. (2008). Self-regulation and risk taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnaughy, E.A., DiClemente, C.C., Prochaska, J O., & Velicer, W.F. (1989). Stages of change in psychotherapy: A follow-up report. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 26, 494–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. (1996). Community-based interventions. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Melnick, G., De-Leon, G., Hawke, J., Jainchill, N., & Kressel, D. (1997). Motivation and readiness for therapeutic community treatment among adolescents and adult substance abusers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 485–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muirhead, J.E., & Rhodes, R. (1998). Literacy level of Canadian federal offenders. Journal of Correctional Education, 49, 59–60.Google Scholar
Neal, D.J., & Carey, K.B. (2005). A follow-up psychometric analysis of the self-regulation questionnaire. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 414–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, G.L., & Scalora, M.J. (2004). The utility of locus of control for assessing juvenile amenability to treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prochaska, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 19, 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, M.L., Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1989). Cognitive person variables in the delay of gratification of older children at risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 358–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, R.R., & Fabiano, E.A. (1985). Time to think: A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Sciences and Art.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. (2008). Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schunk, D., & Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Skeem, J.L., & Monahan, J. (2011). Current directions in violence risk assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slesnick, N., Bartle-Haring, S., Erdem, G., Budde, H., Letcher, A., Bantchevska, D., & Patton, R. (2009). Troubled parents, motivated adolescents: Predicting motivation to change substance use among runaways. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 675–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, A.P., & Pope, Z. (2005). Assessing juvenile offenders: Preliminary data for the Australian adaptation of the youth level of service/case management inventory. Australian Psychologist, 40, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L.L., Whitmore, E.A., Raymond, K.M., & Crowley, T.J. (2006). Measuring impulsivity in adolescents with serious substance and conduct problems. Assessment, 13, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, A.P., & Putnins, A.L. (2003). Risk-need assessment invenotires for juvenile offenders in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 10, 324–333.Google Scholar
Vitacco, M.J., Neumann, C.S., Robertson, A.A., & Durrant, S.L. (2002). Contributions of impulsivity and callousness in the assessment of adjudicated male adolescents: A prospective study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vohs, K.D., & Baumeister, R.F. (2004). Understanding self-regulation: An introduction. In Baumeister, R.F. & Vohs, K.D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 1–12). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
White, J.L., Moffitt, T.E., Caspi, A., Bartusch, D.J., Needles, D.J., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994). Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 192–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wulfert, E., Block, J.A., Ana, E.S., Rodriguez, M.L., & Colsman, M. (2002). Delay of gratification: Impulsive choices and problem behaviors in early and late adolescence. Journal of Personality, 70, 533–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), The Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar