Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:41:16.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parents and educators: Partners working together in an inclusive setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Sebastian (Nello) Raciti
Sebastian (Nello) Raciti*
Affiliation:
Tablelands School Support Centre
Get access

Extract

Parents have the right to participate in the educational planning for their child with a disability, however they often need assistance when interacting with professionals to ensure the best programs for their children. Professionals also require guidelines and opportunities to develop appropriate communication skills when interacting with other professionals and parents. This paper investigates the level of participatory decision-making which exists between parents and professionals, and professionals amongst themselves. The present thrust for including children with a disability in mainstream schools is used as the contextual setting for this investigation. Furthermore, the author presents an intervention plan based on the Collaborative Consultation Model to enhance the participatory decision-making skills of parents and professionals at the local school level.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 3 , November 1993 , pp. 33 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeson, A., & Weintraub, F. (1977). Understanding the Individual Educational Program. In Torris, S., (Ed.), A primer on individualized education for handicapped children. Va.: Foundation for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
Ball, D.W. (1979). Language as a means of social power: Theoretical-empirical explanations of language and language use embedded in a social matrix. In Rommetveit, R. & Blaker, R.M., (Eds), Studies of language, thought and verbal communication. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Beare, H. (1974). Community and parent involvement and participation in education. Educational Magazine, 41, 2.Google Scholar
Beattie, N. (1985). Professional parents. Lewes: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Factors affecting implementation and continuation. Volume 7. Santa Monica, California: Rand.Google Scholar
Blackburn, J. (1985). (Chairperson) Ministerial Review of Postcompulsory Schooling Report, Vol. 1. Melbourne: Ministerial review of postcompulsory schooling.Google Scholar
Blau, P.M., & Scott, W.R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Chandler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossard, M.D., & Gutkin, T.B. (1983). The relationship of consultant skill and school organisational characteristics with teacher use of school based consultation service. School Psychology Review, 12, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowd, A. (1986). Exceptional children in classes. North Melbourne: Hargreen Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Brown, J., Cahir, P., & Reeve, P. (1987). The educational rationale for parent participation. Unicorn, 13(4), 195–201.Google Scholar
Carlson, J. & Hillman, W. (1975). Facilitating parent-teacher conferences. School Counselor, 22(4), 243–249.Google Scholar
Chin, R., & Benne, K.O. (1976). General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In Bennis, W., The planning of change. 3rd Edition. New York,: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Cox, P.C. (1983). Complementary roles and successful change. Educational Leadership, 41, 3.Google Scholar
Derr, C.B. & Deal, T.E. (1979). Toward a contingency theory of change in education: Organisational structure, processes and symbolism. In King, E. (Ed.), Education of uncertainty. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Everets, J.F. (1987). Developing the high school's guidance network to cater for students with special needs. The Exceptional Child, 34(2), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, R.T. (1976). Poverty and education in Australia. Fifth Main Report, Commission of Enquiry into Poverty, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, R., Musgrave, P., & Pettit, P. (1976). Studies in community participation. Victorian Community Council.Google Scholar
Forester, J. (1980). Listening: The social policy of everyday life (critical theory and hermeneutics in practice). Social Praxis, 7, 219–232.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S., Strickland, B., Turnbull, A.P., & Curry, L. (1980). An observational analysis of the IEP Conference. Exceptional Children, 46(4), 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gow, L. (1986). Views on integration: Report to the Commonwealth School's Commission on Integration in Australia: Volume 2.Google Scholar
Gronn, P. (1983). Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, B. (1985). Democratic curriculum. Melbourne: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hard, S.M., Hauling, L.L., & Stiegelbauer, S.M. (1983). An analysis of interventions in school improvemen t efforts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, C. (1978). Towards a philosophy of administration. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. (1980). The curriculum and the community. Occasional Paper No. 5. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
Idol, L., Paolucci-Whitcombe, P., & Nevin, A. (1986). Collaborative consultation. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.P. (1962). Special education for the mentally retarded: A paradox. Exceptional Children, 29, 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmel, P.H. (1973). Schools in Australia: Report of the Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commission. Government Printer.Google Scholar
Keeves, J.P. (1982). Education and change in South Australia: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Education in South Australia. Adelaide: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kouzes, J.M., & Mico, P.R. (1976). The integration of services is a process, not a product. (Technical Report). San Jose: Joint Centre for Human Resources Development, San Jose State University.Google Scholar
Kroth, R. (1975). Communicating with parents of exceptional children: Improving parent-teacher relationships. Denver, Colo.: Love.Google Scholar
Licta, J.W. (1975). Is the principal an effective change agent?NASSP Bulletin, December, 75–81.Google Scholar
MacMillan, D.L., Jones, R.L., & Aloia, G.F. (1975). The mentally retarded label: A theoretical analysis and review of research. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 241–261.Google Scholar
Macpherson, R.J.S. (1989). Coursework papers: School organization and development. University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar
Maher, C.A. (1983). Development and implementation of effective educational programs (IEPs): Evaluation of two approaches. Journal of School Psychology, 21, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, C. (1988). Spotlight on school improvement. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Marsh, C.E., Price, B.J., & Smith, T.E.C. (1983). Teaching mildly handicapped children: Methods and materials. St Louis, Mo.: C.V. Mosby.Google Scholar
McAllen, I.M. (1978). The parent, teacher, and child as conference partners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 10(4), 103–105.Google Scholar
Meade, P. (1987). The Practising Administrator. 9(2), 36–39.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D. (1987). Special education in New Zealand: An historical perspective. In Mitchell, D., & Singh, N. (Eds), Exceptional children in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
Pettie, J. (1980). Strategies and educational change: The Victorian school debate. School and Community News, 4, 1–7.Google Scholar
Pettit, D. (1986). Community involvement and decision making in schools. Burwood State College Schools. Commission Report.Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G. (1973). Politics, language and time. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Price, M. & Goodman, L. (1980). Individualised Educational Programs: A cost study. Exceptional Children, 45(6), 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugach, M.C. (1982). Regular classroom teacher involvement in the development and utilisation of IEPs. Exceptional Children, 48(4), 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M. (1982). School effects on children's progress: Research findings and policy implications. Paper prepared for the National Institute of Education, US Department of Education, February.Google Scholar
Schon, D.A. (1971). Beyond the stable state. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schultz, L.R. (1982). Educating the special needs student in the regular classroom. Exceptional Children, 48(4), 366–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonnenschein, P. (1981). Parents and professionals: An uneasy relationship. Teaching Exceptional Children, 14(2), 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spier, M.S. (1973). Kurt Lewin's Force Field Analysis In Jones, J.E. & Pfeiffer, J.W., Annual handbook of group facilitators. San Diego: University Associate.Google Scholar
Walberg, J.H. (1983). Scientific and literacy and economic productivity in international perspective. Daedalus, Spring, 1–28.Google Scholar
Weintraub, F.B., Abeson, A., Ballard, J., & La Vor, M.L. (1976). Public policy and the education of exceptional children. Reston, Va.: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
Weick, K.E. (1982). Administering education in loosely coupled schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 63(10), 673–676.Google Scholar
Weick, K.E. (1976). Educational organisation in loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R., Wall, C., Martin, W., & Berchin, A. (1974). Effecting organizational renewal in schools: A social systems perspective. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Wynne, E.A. (1980). Looking at schools: Good, bad, and indifferent. Lexington, Mass.: Heath.Google Scholar
Zemke, S.R. (1988). Thirty things we know for sure about adult learning. Learning, 25(7), 58–61.Google Scholar