Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:12:23.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applied Social Research? The Use and Non-use of Empirical Social Inquiry by British and American Governmental Commissions.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Martin Bulmer
Martin Bulmer
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science and Administration, London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Governmental commissions are an established part of the British and American systems of government. To what extent are they a means by which social science can have an impact upon policy-making? To what extent do they use empirical research methods to gather evidence which influences the commissions' deliberations? What factors hinder the effective use of social science research by governmental commissions? Drawing on case studies of British Royal Commissions and Departmental Committees, and American Presidential Commissions, this article suggests that the potential effectiveness of social science is reduced by the political context in which commissions work, their preferred modes of taking evidence, the way in which commissions are staffed, and the internal dynamics of their workings.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , August 1981 , pp. 353 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acland, H. (1980) Research as stage-management: the case of the Plowden Committee. In Bulmer (1980b, 34–57).Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1966) Government by Commission, The Public Interest, 3 (Spring), 3–9.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (1980a) The Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income & Wealth. In Bulmer (1980b, 158–79).Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (ed.) (1980b) Social Research and Royal Commissions. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (1981) Charles S. Johnson, Robert E. Park and the research methods of the Chicago Commission on Race Relations, 1919–22, Ethnie & Racial Studies, 4, 289–306.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (forthcoming) The Uses of Social Research: Social Investigation in Public Policy–making. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Cartwright, T. J. (1975) Royal Commissions and Departmental Committees in Britain. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. A. (ed.) (1973) The Role of Commissions in Policy-Making. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. A. and Greenaway, J. (1980) The Dynamics of Administrative Reform. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Checkland, S. and Checkland, E. (1974) The Poor Law Report of 1834. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Chicago Commission on Race Relations (1922) The Negro in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cleveland, H. (1964) Inquiry into Presidential Inquiries. In Johnson, D. B. and Walker, J. L. (eds.), The Dynamics of the American Presidency. New York: Wiley, 291–4.Google Scholar
Clokie, H. M. and Robinson, J. W. (1937) Royal Commissions of Inquiry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coser, L. A. (1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Craven, E. (1978) Issues on representation. In Davies, R. and Hall, P. (eds.), Issues in Urban Society, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 242–67.Google Scholar
Cronin, T. E. and Greenberg, S. D. (eds.) (1969) The Presidential Advisory System. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Dean, A. L. (1969) Ad hoc Commissions for Policy Formulation? In Cronin and Greenberg (1969, 101–16).Google Scholar
Derthick, M. (1971) On Commissionship - Presidential Variety, Public Policy, 19, 623–38.Google Scholar
Dibelius, W. (1930) England. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Donnison, D. (1980) Committees and Committeemen. In Bulmer (1980b, 9–17).Google Scholar
Drew, E. (1968) On giving oneself a hotfoot: government by commission, The Atlantic, 221 (05), 45–9.Google Scholar
Farrell, C. (1980) The Royal Commission on the National Health Service, Policy and Politics, 8, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, A. D. J. (1980) A Commission and a Cost-Benefit Study. In Bulmer (1980b, 85–109).Google Scholar
Gosnell, H. F. (1934) British Royal Commissions of Inquiry, Political Science Quarterly, 49, 84–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. (1980) The Seebohm Committee and the under-use of research. In Bulmer (1980b, 67–84).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Lord George (1922) Parliamentary Reminiscences and Reflections 1886–1906. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Hanser, C. J. (1965) Guide to Decision: the Royal Commission. Totowa, NJ: The Bed-minster Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, A. P. (1961) Anything but Action?: a study of the uses and abuses of committees of inquiry. In Harris, R. (éd.), Radical Reaction. London: Hutchinson for IEA, 251–302.Google Scholar
Hood, R. (1974) Criminology and Penal change: a case study of the nature and impact of some recent advice to government. In Hood, R. (ed.), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy. London: Heinemann, 375–90.Google Scholar
Janowitz, M. (1970) Political Conflict. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
Janowitz, M. (1972) Sociological Models and Social Policy. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Karl, B. E. (1969) Presidential planning and social science research: Mr. Hoover's experts, Perspectives in American History, 3, 347–409.Google Scholar
Kerner Report (1968) Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Kilroy-Silk, R. (1973) The Donovan Royal Commission on Trade Unions. In Chapman (1973, 42–80).Google Scholar
Komarovsky, M. (ed.) (1975) Sociology and Public Policy: the Case of the Presidential Commissions. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kraft, J. (1969) The Washington Lawyers. In Cronin and Greenberg (1969, 150–5).Google Scholar
Larsen, O. N. (1975) The Commission on Obscenity and Pornography: form, function and failure. In Komarovsky (1975, 9–41).Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. and Olson, D. J. (1977) Commission Politics: the processing of racial crisis in America. Rutgers, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
McGregor, O. R. (1957) Social research and social policy in the nineteenth century, British Journal of Sociology, 8, 146–57.Google Scholar
McGregor, O. R. (1980) The Royal Commission on the Press, 1974–7: a note. In Bulmer (1980, 150–7).Google Scholar
Mansfield, H. C. (1968) Commissions, Government. In Sills, D. L. (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. III, 13–18.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1959) Capital. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House. (First published 1867.)Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1975) Social knowledge and public policy: sociological perspectives on four presidential commissions. In Komarovsky (1975, 153–77).Google Scholar
Ohlin, L. E. (1975) The President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice. In Komarovsky (1975, 93–115).Google Scholar
Pinker, R. A. (1971) Social Theory and Social Policy. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Platt, A. (ed.) (1971) The Politics of Riot Commissions 1917–1970. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Popper, F. (1970) The President's Commissions. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Prest, A. R. (1980) Royal Commission reporting. In Bulmer (1980b, 180–8).Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. (1975) Committees of Inquiry. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. (1980) The Younger Committee and Research. In Bulmer (1980, 110–21).Google Scholar
Robbins Committee (1963) Higher Education. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Lord (1978) Address to the British Academy, 29 June 1978. Unpublished MS. (Briefly reported in The Times, 30 June 1978.)Google Scholar
Sharpe, L. J. (1978) The social scientist and policy–making in Britain and America: a comparison. In Bulmer, M. (ed.), Social Policy Research. London: Macmillan, 302–12.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L. J. (1980) Research and the Redcliffe-Maud Commission. In Bulmer (1980b, 18–33).Google Scholar
Shonfield, A. (1980) In the course of investigation. In Bulmer (1980b, 58–66).Google Scholar
Short, J. F. Jr (1975) The National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence: the contributions of sociology and sociologists. In Komarovsky (1975, 61–91).Google Scholar
Short, J. F. Jr (ed.) (1978) Delinquency, Crime and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skolnick, J. H. (1970) Violence Commission violence, Transaction, 7 (October), 32–8.Google Scholar
Sulzner, G. T. (1971) The policy process and the uses of National Governmental Study Commissions, Western Political Quarterly, 24, 438–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, H. (ed.) (1959) The Establishment. London: Blond.Google Scholar
Tunstall, J. (1980) The Royal Commission on the Press, 1974–7. In Bulmer (1980, 122–49).Google Scholar
Violence Commission (1970) To Establish Justice, To Ensure Domestic Tranquility: The Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. Washington DC, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. V. and Mansergh, N. (eds.) (1940) Advisory Bodies. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Walker Report (1968) Rights in Conflict: a report to the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Waskow, A. I. (1967) From Race Riot to Sit-In: 1919 and the 1960's. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Webb, B. (1948) Our Partnership. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Webb, S. and Webb, B. (1932) Methods of Social Study. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Weiss, C. H. (1977) Introduction. In Weiss, C. H. (ed.), Using Social Research in Public Policy-Making. Farnborough: D. C. Heath, 1–22.Google Scholar
Westhoff, C. F. (1975) The Commission on Population Growth and the American Future: origins, operations and aftermath. In Komarovsky (1975, 43–59).Google Scholar
Wheare, K. C. (1955) Government by Committee. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. (1971) Violence, pornography and social science, The Public Interest, 22 (Winter), 45–61.Google Scholar
Wolanin, T. R. (1975) Presidential Advisory Commissions: Truman to Nixon. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar