Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:48:07.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business Associations and Public Policy: a Comparison of Organisational Development in Britain and Canada*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

William Coleman  and
Wyn Grant
William Coleman
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Wyn Grant
Affiliation:
Department of PoliticsUniversity of Warwick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The levels of organisational development of business interest associations in two industrial sectors – chemicals and food processing – in Canada and the United Kingdom are compared, with special reference to the capacity of the associations to undertake public policy functions and to engage in long-term strategic thinking about the problems facing their industries. There is a higher level of organisational development in British business interest associations than in their Canadian counterparts, especially in the chemicals sector. The British associations are better able to assume responsibility for public policy implementation as private governments. A number of explanations are reviewed, particular emphasis being placed on different company structures, the disintegrating effect of high levels of foreign ownership in Canada, bureaucratic competition in Canada, association involvement in collective bargaining, and the impact of European Community membership on the British associations.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , August 1984 , pp. 209 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, M. and Coleman, W. (1983) Corporatism and industrial policy, paper presented to the Sixth Colloquium of the European Group for Organizational Studies, Florence.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. and Grant, W. (1984) Regional differentiation of business interest associations: a comparison of Canada and the United Kingdom. Manuscript. Berlin.Google Scholar
Devlin Commission (1972) Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Industrial and Commercial Representation. London: Confederation of British Industry.Google Scholar
Dyson, K. (1983) Cultural, ideological and structural context. In Dyson, K. and Wilks, S. (eds.), Industrial Crisis. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Gillies, J. (1983) Where Business Fails. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Grant, W. (1981) The development of the government relations function in UK firms. Berlin: International Institute of Management labour market policy discussion paper.Google Scholar
Grant, W. (1983a) The organization of business interests in the UK chemical industry. Berlin: International Institute of Management labour market policy discussion paper.Google Scholar
Grant, W. (1983b) The organization of business interests in the UK food processing industry. Berlin: International Institute of Management labour market policy discussion paper.Google Scholar
Grant, W. (1984) Large firms and public policy in Britain, Journal of Public Policy, 4, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardman, R. (1981) The British chemical industry (typescript). London: Jordan & Sons.Google Scholar
Lang, R. (1974) The Politics of Drugs. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1979) Liberal corporatism and party government. In Schmitter, P. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds), Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1982) Neo-corporatism in comparative perspective. In Lehmbruch, G. and Schmitter, P. (eds.), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lindberg, L. (1983) Is it worse going up or coming down? Comparing models of the inflation-disinflation process. In Lindberg, and Maier, (eds.), The Politics of Inflation and Recession. Washington: Brookings.Google Scholar
Litvak, I. (1982) Government intervention and corporate government relations, Business Quarterly, Autumn 1981, 47–54.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1981) Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary Western Europe and North America. In Berger, S. (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1982) Reflections on where the theory of neo-corporatism has gone and where the praxis of neo-corporatism is going. In Lehmbruch, G. and Schmitter, P. (eds.), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. and Streeck, W. (1981) The organization of business interests. Berlin: International Institute of Management labour market policy discussion paper.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (1983a) Die Reform der beruflichen Bildung in der westdeutschen Bauwirtschaft 1969–1982. Berlin: International Institute of Management labour market policy discussion paper.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (1983b) Interessenverbände als Hindernisse und Vollzugsträger öffentlicher Politik. In Brockmann, M. and Scharpf, F. (eds), Institutionelle Bedingungen der Arbeilsmarkt- und Beschäftisgungs- Politik. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. (1984) Community, market, state – and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. Florence: European University Institute working paper 94.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. (1983) Political legitimacy and consensus: missing variables in the assessment of social policy. In Spiro, S. and Yuchtman-Yaar, E. (eds.), Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zysman, M. (1983) Governments, Markets and Growth. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar