Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:20:18.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporatism Without Labor? Industrial Policymaking in the American States1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Virginia Gray  and
David Lowery
Virginia Gray
Affiliation:
Political Science, University of Minnesota
David Lowery
Affiliation:
Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper extends previous analyses of industrial policy from a corporatist perspective. We advocate a mid-level measure of group influence; the measure is based upon analysis of newspaper stories. A preliminary exploration of NewsBank data is reported, and several interesting trends in economic development policy are isolated. Business and education are heavily involved in policymaking whereas labor and political parties are not at all involved. On the whole, a meso-corporatist model in which business, state government, and education are partners seems to fit better than a business capture model. Some speculations are offered about this new American form of corporatism and its resemblance to the Japanese case.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1991 , pp. 315 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ambrosius, Margery Marzahn and Welch, Susan (1988). ‘State Legislators' Perceptions of Business and Labor Interests,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly,13 (05): 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Michael M. and Coleman, William D. (1985). ‘Corporatism and Industrial Policy,’ in Cawson, Alan (ed.), Organized Interests and The State: Studies in Meso-Corporatism. London; Sage, pp.22–44.Google Scholar
Atlanta Journal, 09 26, 1988 (Located in NewsBank (Microform), BUS, 1988, 98:F6–7, fiche).Google Scholar
Best, Joel (ed.) (1989). Images of Issues. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bowman, Ann O'M. and Kearney, Richard C. (1986). The Resurgence of the States. Englewood Clifls, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bowman, Ann O'M. and Kearney, Richard C. (1988). ‘Dimensions of State Government Capability’, Western Political Quarterly, 41 (2): 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul (1988). ‘The Political Economy of Collective Action: The Case of the American States,’ Polity (Summer): 648–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawson, Alan (1985a). ‘Corporatism and Local Politics,’ in Grant, Wyn (ed.), The Political Economy of Corporatism. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 126–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cawson, Alan (1985b). ‘Varieties of Corporatism: The Importance of the Meso-level of Interest Intermediation,’ in Cawson, Alan (ed.), Organized Interests and the State: Studies in Meso-Corporatism. London: Sage Publications, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Dorff, Robert H. and Steiner, Jurg (1987). ‘Decision Cases in Western Democracies: A Data Bank,’ Comparative Political Studies, 20 (07): 160–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detroit Free Press, 04 15, 1985 (Located in NewsBank (Microform), BUS, 1985, 44:E4–5, fiche).Google Scholar
Dunwoody, Sharon and Shields, Steven (1986). ‘Accounting for Patterns of Selection of Topics in Statehouse Reporting,’ Journalism Quarterly, 63 (Autumn): 488–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisinger, Peter K. (1988). The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
George, Aurelia (1988). ‘Japanese Interest Group Behavior: An Institutional Approach’ in Stockwin, J. A. A. et al. , Dynamic and Immobilist Politics in Japan. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 106–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Robert C. (1987). ‘The Appeal of Corporatism in American Politics,’ paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
Grady, Robert C. (1990). ‘Corporatism and Liberal Principles.’ Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Grady, Dennis (1989a). ‘ Business Group Influence in State Development Policymaking,’ paperprepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association,Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
Grady, Dennis (1989b). ‘Economic Development and Administrative Power Theory: A Comparative Analysis of State Development Agencies,’ Policy Studies Review, 8 (Winter): 322–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia and Lowery, David (1988). ‘Interest Group Politics and Economic Growth in the U.S.’ American Political Science Review, 82 (03): 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia and Lowery, David (1990). ‘ The Corporatist Foundations of State Industrial Policy’, Social Science Quarterly, 71 (03): 3–24.Google Scholar
Halva-Neubauer, Glen (1989). ‘The Reversal of Roe: A View from the States,’ paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. (1989a). ‘Industrial Policy and Corporatism in the American States,’ Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 2 (04): 172–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. (1989b). ‘Targeting in Economic Development: Comparative State Perspectives,’ Publius, 19 (Spring, 1989): 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Bennett and Kanter, Sandra (1980). ‘The Political Economy of States’ Job-Creation Incentives,’ in Tipps, Dean and Webb, Lee, eds., State and Local Tax Revolt: New Directions for the 1980s. Washington, DC: Conference on Alternative State and Local Policies, pp. 277–288.Google Scholar
Hernes, Gudmund and Selvik, Arne (1981). ‘Local Corporatism,’ in Berger, Suzanne (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–122.Google Scholar
Hrebenar, Ronald (1989). ‘Interest Group Politics in Japan: Associational Politics in a Group Oriented Society.’ Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Hudson, William E., Hyde, Mark S., and Carroll, John J. (1987). ‘Corporatist Policy Making & State Economic Development,’ Polity, 9 (Spring): 402–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Mark S., Hudson, William E., and Carroll, John J. (1988). ‘Business and State Economic Development,’ Western Political Quarterly, 41 (03): 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985). Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, Judith K. and Wigand, Rolf T. (1987). ‘Industry-University Technology Transfer in Microelectronics,’ Policy Studies Review, 6 (#3): 584–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David and Gray, Virginia (1992). ‘Holding Back the Tide of Bad Economic Times: The Compensatory Impact of State Industrial Policy,’ Social Science Quarterly, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Milwaukee Journal, 08 7, 1985 (Located in NewsBank (Microform), BUS, 1985, 92:G11, fiche).Google Scholar
Morehouse, Sarah McCally (1980). State Politics, Parties, and Policy. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
National Journal, 05 27, 1989, pp. 1294–1297.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. and Tsunekawa, Keiichi (1979). ‘Corporatism without Labor? The Japanese Anomaly,’ in Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard (eds.), Trends Toward Corporalist Inter mediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 231–270.Google Scholar
Rothman, Stanley and Lichter, S. Robert (1984). ‘Media and Business Elites: Two Classes in Conflict?’ in Graber, Doris A. (ed.), Media Power in Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp.109–117.Google Scholar
Seattle Times, 02 7, 1985a (Located in NewsBank (Microform), BUS, 1985, I6:AI-4, fiche).Google Scholar
Shelley, Mack C. IIWoodman, William F., Reichel, Brian J., and Kinney, William J. (1990). ‘State Legislators and Economic Development: University–Industry Relationships and the Role of Government in Biotechnology,’ Policy Studies Review, 9 (Spring): 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Clarence N. and Sanders, Heywood T. (1987). ‘Reexamining a Classic Case of Development Politics: New Haven, Connecticut,’ in Stone, Clarence N. and Sanders, Heywood T., The Politics of Urban Development. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, pp. 159–181.Google Scholar
(Baltimore, MD) Sun, 09 14, 1988 (Located in NewsBank (Microform), BUS, 1988, fiche).Google Scholar
Tichenor, Phillip J., Donohue, George A., and Olien, Clarice N. (1980). Community Conflict and the Press. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Yanarella, Ernest and Green, William, eds. (1990). The Politics of Industrial Recruitment: Japanese Automobile Investment and Economic Development in the American States. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Harmon, Zeigler L. (1983). ‘Interest Groups in the States,’ in Gray, Virginia, Jacob, Herbert, and Vines, Kenneth N. (eds.), Politics in the American States, 4th ed.Boston: Little, Brown & Co.: 97–132.Google Scholar
Zeigler, Harmon (1988). Pluralism, Corporatism, and Confucianism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1988.Google Scholar